General Girl Advice

[Torcularis Septentrionalis]

No, they're more valuable. Because they're people.

Precisely. That is why.

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

[The Land of Truth]

No, they're more valuable. Because they're people.

Precisely. That is why.

Why? They're people, so why should they receive treatment that is different from that of any other person?

[The French Revolutionaries]

So women aren't as valuable as all the gold, land, etc. in the world in your opinion?

As a general proposition, no, no more than any other human being is. And don't you give me the eyebrow, youngling.

Yes, but in my opinion not desiring to protect them sounds like your are sub-humanizing them.

[Torcularis Septentrionalis]

Comparing us to objects, then saying we aren't objects? Wow.

Actually, I never said women were objects.

You compared us to objects.

[Stern des Meeres]

Basically, yes.

Do you believe it created the universe as well?

Ah, yes. Actually, I think he created the universe and started the ball rolling, which eventually led to the creation of our solar system. Immediately after creation, I think the laws of nature and physics took control.

[The French Revolutionaries]

Actually, I never said women were objects.

You compared us to objects.

When?

[Pasovo-nacoBo]

Why do you keep pushing this bullshit when all the women here don't like it? Is that part of being chivalrous?

No, it's called being a modern guy who gets all the ladies.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

Precisely. That is why.

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

So I can't buy you for a camel?
...How about two camels?

[Torcularis Septentrionalis]

As a general proposition, no, no more than any other human being is. And don't you give me the eyebrow, youngling.

Yes, but in my opinion not desiring to protect them sounds like your are sub-humanizing them.

No, saying we are incapable of doing as good a job at protecting ourselves as men is dehumanizing.

[The Land of Truth]

As a general proposition, no, no more than any other human being is. And don't you give me the eyebrow, youngling.

Yes, but in my opinion not desiring to protect them sounds like your are sub-humanizing them.

Is it sub-humanizing other men when you don't desire to defend them?

[Farnhamia]

Basically, yes.

Do you believe it created the universe as well?

Deism was created by Enlightenment intellectuals in the 17th and 18th centuries, people who couldn't tear themselves away from their Christian upbringing.

[Torcularis Septentrionalis]

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

So I can't buy you for a camel?
...How about two camels?

One male, one female, and a field of corn, and the pussy is open for business.

[The Land of Truth]

Why do you keep pushing this bullshit when all the women here don't like it? Is that part of being chivalrous?

No, it's called being a modern guy who gets all the ladies.

Dafuq?

[Vitaphone Racing]

Comparing us to objects, then saying we aren't objects? Wow.

Actually, I never said women were objects.

Except you're advocating treating them like objects.

And now I've figured out why you're single. It's because you want a girlfriend for the girlfriend experience, not because you actually are in love with a girl. When you stop treating women like items in your inventory, you might have more luck.

[Pasovo-nacoBo]

Stop hating on this guy!

He is in trouble with "a lady friend" looking for help, not bait for supertrolls.

yes, there are trolls, then there are supertrolls.

I'm a supertroll?

Do I get a costume?

Here, put this on:
http://stickerish.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/TrollFaceFemaleBlackSS.png

[Ostroeuropa]

Precisely. That is why.

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

Frankly if I saw someone in need of help I wouldn't feel the need to check if they had tits before offering assistance.
I'm not going to see someone being mugged and approach then say "Oh, i'm sorry chap you look like a girl from behind. carry on with your business dear muggers." either.

But this attitude you are espousing is contrary to that (slightly) in that its implying that we simply shouldn't help women if we see them in danger.
It's kind of implying that we should check if they have tits and if they do, THEN walk away. Women don't need help after all.

The phrasing should be more
I may need you, as might anyone, to jump in and help if i'm being mugged.
What I don't need from you is to walk me home when you would think it completely absurd to offer the same thing to a man on the grounds of "Danger."

[Torcularis Septentrionalis]

Why do you keep pushing this bullshit when all the women here don't like it? Is that part of being chivalrous?

No, it's called being a modern guy who gets all the ladies.

hahahahaha
no

[Nightkill the Emperor]

So I can't buy you for a camel?
...How about two camels?

One male, one female, and a field of corn, and the pussy is open for business.

Capitalism does work.

[Farnhamia]

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

So I can't buy you for a camel?
...How about two camels?

Cheapskate. How about a whole carton?

[The French Revolutionaries]

Yes, but in my opinion not desiring to protect them sounds like your are sub-humanizing them.

Is it sub-humanizing other men when you don't desire to defend them?

No, according to Chivalry, an abled bodied man must protect himself. It is his honourable duty.

[The Land of Truth]

Do you believe it created the universe as well?

Deism was created by Enlightenment intellectuals in the 17th and 18th centuries, people who couldn't tear themselves away from their Christian upbringing.

Also, they didn't have all the scientific theories and information we have today, so "goddidit" was still considered a valid argument.

[Shaggai]

Each person is different. But in most cases, there's a pretty simple rule to follow.

Wheaton's Law.

There, now you have it all down, except for the subtleties. They include: talk about mutual interests, actually give a crap about your appearance, be confident but not arrogant, and a plethora of things that vary from person to person.

Oh, and be human. It's rather hard to get in a relationship with human girls if you're a crocodile, say, or a hippopotamus. I mean, you can be a unicorn or something, maybe, depending on who you're interested in, but being human generally helps.

You can be a unicorn...
trust me.
http://static4.fjcdn.com/comments/+_d58 ... 244d02.jpg

Image link is broken for me. But anyway, that's why I said unicorn. Plenty of people like unicorns.

Also, if you're the sort of thing (elf, some unicorns, some dragons, some faeries, most shapeshifters) that looks (or can look) human, or something close, you don't have to be human necessarily.

[The Parkus Empire]

Do you believe it created the universe as well?

Ah, yes. Actually, I think he created the universe and started the ball rolling, which eventually led to the creation of our solar system. Immediately after creation, I think the laws of nature and physics took control.

Do you consider god a hypothetical fact or as an entity?

[Hathradic States]

Do you believe it created the universe as well?

Ah, yes. Actually, I think he created the universe and started the ball rolling, which eventually led to the creation of our solar system. Immediately after creation, I think the laws of nature and physics took control.

Sounds a lot like my beliefs, actually.

[Pasovo-nacoBo]

And we are capable of surviving without your bullshit, thank you. We don't need inherent "protecting." We are not YOURS, and do not compare us to objects.

So I can't buy you for a camel?
...How about two camels?

lol.