NATION

PASSWORD

Explain Your Religious Views or Lack Thereof

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:35 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:
Mkuki wrote:You're just going to ignore my wind evidence?

I don't know if you've noticed, but ignoring evidence is kinda what he does.

And he doesn't fucking understand Plato.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:37 pm

Ermiopa wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:What you THINK is wind is just God farting, obviously.

Also: Rain is God peeing, asteroids are the poop, hurricanes are the water going down God's toilet bowl, thunder is God bowling, lightning is his electrical problems, and the sun is his light which he switches off at night. Now, if we assume this, we can extrapolate that the Earth which we live in is actually essentially a giant sewer where all God's waste products go, and we are little rats.
Now it all makes sense!

He should really get a better electrician. :?
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Humdan
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Aug 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Humdan » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:40 pm

Lack thereof.
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE
CHANGE FOR THE COINSTAR
-Shaggai
Wellerbania and I are the same person.

Dalek is the most popular TV drama in Dalekland. It airs every Wednesday at 5:30 on Dalek-TV. It follows the lives of George the Dalek, his wife Trish the Dalek, and their son Wally the Dalek as they try to rebuild after their house was EXTERMINATED by some thugs.
-Dalekland

A Brilliant Podcast:http://mikeomearashow.com/

User avatar
O5vx
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: Jun 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:48 pm

When you refer to your body you say, "this is my body". Which suggest that your body is completely different from who you are. We use the same logic to compare something like a hat, a cat, a dog and many other possessive non. So to suggest that a body exist without soul, is to suggest quite the contrary to your argument.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:50 pm

O5vx wrote:When you refer to your body you say, "this is my body". Which suggest that your body is completely different from who you are.

No it doesn't. How else would you structure the language in such a way as to show possession?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:51 pm

O5vx wrote:When you refer to your body you say, "this is my body". Which suggest that your body is completely different from who you are. We use the same logic to compare something like a hat, a cat, a dog and many other possessive non. So to suggest that a body exist without soul, is to suggest quite the contrary to your argument.

Is that seriously your argument? A bit of word play? Really? :eyebrow:
There is no evidence to suggest the existence of a 'soul'. There is however good evidence that the brain is what determines the personality, memory, and 'who they are'. Things that are normally associated with the 'soul'.

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:51 pm

O5vx wrote:When you refer to your body you say, "this is my body". Which suggest that your body is completely different from who you are. We use the same logic to compare something like a hat, a cat, a dog and many other possessive non. So to suggest that a body exist without soul, is to suggest quite the contrary to your argument.

First off, the way people say things does in no way, shape or form, define is scientifically or factually.
Secondly, Most religious people use the possessive on their "souls" (Which have not yet been proven to exist) So by that logic, should are souls exist, they are not us either.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
O5vx
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: Jun 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:54 pm

My last and final argument. And there is actually more than one reason that we have this intuitive sense of the transcendent nature of our identity as humans. We also understand this based on the fact that we do NOT lose our identity over time. Let’s do another exercise together. Imagine that you own a beautiful 1972 Volkswagen Bug (just like mine). It is in mint condition and perfect in every way. No dings, no damage; a true collector’s item. Now imagine that your next door neighbor also owns a 1972 VW Bug. What a coincidence. The only difference between the two is that his Bug is a mess. Old and damaged, it doesn’t run and looks like a complete piece of junk. One day as you look out your window, you notice that the front quarter panel on YOUR Bug looks just like the old front quarter panel that used to be on your neighbors Bug! And sure enough, his Bug now has a quarter panel that looks just like yours! It appears as though the panels have been exchanged, one for the other! Now suspend logic a little bit here and imagine that over the next years, each and every day, more and more of your Bug was seen on your neighbor’s Bug, cleanly exchanged for parts from YOUR vehicle! In fact, at the end of the year, the Bug sitting on YOUR driveway looks suspiciously like your NEIGHBOR’S Bug. All the parts have been exchanged.

OK, now let me ask you a question: that Bug that is now sitting in your driveway. Whose Bug is it? Is it yours? Or is it your neighbor’s? I think we would agree that the Bug sitting in your driveway, even though it is on your property, is actually the Bug that used to belong to your neighbor! So, what’s the point of all this? Simply this: physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity. When the parts get exchanged, their identity changes as well. At some point, that Bug was no longer your Bug. Even when only ONE part had been replaced, you would not have been happy about it. You would have to admit that a pristine 1974 Bug with one crummy quarter panel was NOT your Bug!

But while physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity, Souls are NOT. Look at yourself in the mirror. Do you have the same body today that you had ten years ago? No. Each and every cell in your body has been renewed and replaced. Some would argue that brain cells are NOT renewed, but that ignores what is happening at the cellular level WITHIN each cell. The replacement process is taking place at that level, until whatever brain cells you were born with have nothing in common with what you now have. So let’s be very strict about this. While you have a very different body than you had years ago, YOU are still YOU! So clearly YOU cannot be described as something that is purely physical, because physical things that have different PARTS have a different identity.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:55 pm

O5vx wrote:Philosophically, my evidence is sufficient enough to back up my claim.


Ah, philosophically?

Sure!

That's where I got confused - I thought you were arguing that the soul was REAL.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:55 pm

Genivaria wrote:
O5vx wrote:When you refer to your body you say, "this is my body". Which suggest that your body is completely different from who you are. We use the same logic to compare something like a hat, a cat, a dog and many other possessive non. So to suggest that a body exist without soul, is to suggest quite the contrary to your argument.

Is that seriously your argument? A bit of word play? Really? :eyebrow:
There is no evidence to suggest the existence of a 'soul'. There is however good evidence that the brain is what determines the personality, memory, and 'who they are'. Things that are normally associated with the 'soul'.

If anything your brain functions are your soul. In the figurative sense.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:57 pm

O5vx wrote:The replacement process is taking place at that level, until whatever brain cells you were born with have nothing in common with what you now have.

Have you heard of DNA? :roll:
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:58 pm

O5vx wrote:My last and final argument. And there is actually more than one reason that we have this intuitive sense of the transcendent nature of our identity as humans. We also understand this based on the fact that we do NOT lose our identity over time. Let’s do another exercise together. Imagine that you own a beautiful 1972 Volkswagen Bug (just like mine). It is in mint condition and perfect in every way. No dings, no damage; a true collector’s item. Now imagine that your next door neighbor also owns a 1972 VW Bug. What a coincidence. The only difference between the two is that his Bug is a mess. Old and damaged, it doesn’t run and looks like a complete piece of junk. One day as you look out your window, you notice that the front quarter panel on YOUR Bug looks just like the old front quarter panel that used to be on your neighbors Bug! And sure enough, his Bug now has a quarter panel that looks just like yours! It appears as though the panels have been exchanged, one for the other! Now suspend logic a little bit here and imagine that over the next years, each and every day, more and more of your Bug was seen on your neighbor’s Bug, cleanly exchanged for parts from YOUR vehicle! In fact, at the end of the year, the Bug sitting on YOUR driveway looks suspiciously like your NEIGHBOR’S Bug. All the parts have been exchanged.

OK, now let me ask you a question: that Bug that is now sitting in your driveway. Whose Bug is it? Is it yours? Or is it your neighbor’s? I think we would agree that the Bug sitting in your driveway, even though it is on your property, is actually the Bug that used to belong to your neighbor! So, what’s the point of all this? Simply this: physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity. When the parts get exchanged, their identity changes as well. At some point, that Bug was no longer your Bug. Even when only ONE part had been replaced, you would not have been happy about it. You would have to admit that a pristine 1974 Bug with one crummy quarter panel was NOT your Bug!

But while physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity, Souls are NOT. Look at yourself in the mirror. Do you have the same body today that you had ten years ago? No. Each and every cell in your body has been renewed and replaced. Some would argue that brain cells are NOT renewed, but that ignores what is happening at the cellular level WITHIN each cell. The replacement process is taking place at that level, until whatever brain cells you were born with have nothing in common with what you now have. So let’s be very strict about this. While you have a very different body than you had years ago, YOU are still YOU! So clearly YOU cannot be described as something that is purely physical, because physical things that have different PARTS have a different identity.


What you're describing is actually an artifact of memory:

http://human-memory.net/

You are you because you remember being you before.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:58 pm

O5vx wrote:My last and final argument. And there is actually more than one reason that we have this intuitive sense of the transcendent nature of our identity as humans. We also understand this based on the fact that we do NOT lose our identity over time. Let’s do another exercise together. Imagine that you own a beautiful 1972 Volkswagen Bug (just like mine). It is in mint condition and perfect in every way. No dings, no damage; a true collector’s item. Now imagine that your next door neighbor also owns a 1972 VW Bug. What a coincidence. The only difference between the two is that his Bug is a mess. Old and damaged, it doesn’t run and looks like a complete piece of junk. One day as you look out your window, you notice that the front quarter panel on YOUR Bug looks just like the old front quarter panel that used to be on your neighbors Bug! And sure enough, his Bug now has a quarter panel that looks just like yours! It appears as though the panels have been exchanged, one for the other! Now suspend logic a little bit here and imagine that over the next years, each and every day, more and more of your Bug was seen on your neighbor’s Bug, cleanly exchanged for parts from YOUR vehicle! In fact, at the end of the year, the Bug sitting on YOUR driveway looks suspiciously like your NEIGHBOR’S Bug. All the parts have been exchanged.

OK, now let me ask you a question: that Bug that is now sitting in your driveway. Whose Bug is it? Is it yours? Or is it your neighbor’s? I think we would agree that the Bug sitting in your driveway, even though it is on your property, is actually the Bug that used to belong to your neighbor! So, what’s the point of all this? Simply this: physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity. When the parts get exchanged, their identity changes as well. At some point, that Bug was no longer your Bug. Even when only ONE part had been replaced, you would not have been happy about it. You would have to admit that a pristine 1974 Bug with one crummy quarter panel was NOT your Bug!

But while physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity, Souls are NOT. Look at yourself in the mirror. Do you have the same body today that you had ten years ago? No. Each and every cell in your body has been renewed and replaced. Some would argue that brain cells are NOT renewed, but that ignores what is happening at the cellular level WITHIN each cell. The replacement process is taking place at that level, until whatever brain cells you were born with have nothing in common with what you now have. So let’s be very strict about this. While you have a very different body than you had years ago, YOU are still YOU! So clearly YOU cannot be described as something that is purely physical, because physical things that have different PARTS have a different identity.

Really? The boat thing? The Thought experiment that was originally set up as a fun little paradox? I can tell you that your argument is false, seeing as peoples temperaments and such change almost yearly, since I guarantee that my thought processes are completely different now than a year ago.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:00 pm

O5vx wrote:My last and final argument. And there is actually more than one reason that we have this intuitive sense of the transcendent nature of our identity as humans. We also understand this based on the fact that we do NOT lose our identity over time. Let’s do another exercise together. Imagine that you own a beautiful 1972 Volkswagen Bug (just like mine). It is in mint condition and perfect in every way. No dings, no damage; a true collector’s item. Now imagine that your next door neighbor also owns a 1972 VW Bug. What a coincidence. The only difference between the two is that his Bug is a mess. Old and damaged, it doesn’t run and looks like a complete piece of junk. One day as you look out your window, you notice that the front quarter panel on YOUR Bug looks just like the old front quarter panel that used to be on your neighbors Bug! And sure enough, his Bug now has a quarter panel that looks just like yours! It appears as though the panels have been exchanged, one for the other! Now suspend logic a little bit here and imagine that over the next years, each and every day, more and more of your Bug was seen on your neighbor’s Bug, cleanly exchanged for parts from YOUR vehicle! In fact, at the end of the year, the Bug sitting on YOUR driveway looks suspiciously like your NEIGHBOR’S Bug. All the parts have been exchanged.

OK, now let me ask you a question: that Bug that is now sitting in your driveway. Whose Bug is it? Is it yours? Or is it your neighbor’s? I think we would agree that the Bug sitting in your driveway, even though it is on your property, is actually the Bug that used to belong to your neighbor! So, what’s the point of all this? Simply this: physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity. When the parts get exchanged, their identity changes as well. At some point, that Bug was no longer your Bug. Even when only ONE part had been replaced, you would not have been happy about it. You would have to admit that a pristine 1974 Bug with one crummy quarter panel was NOT your Bug!

But while physical things are dependent on their parts for their identity, Souls are NOT. Look at yourself in the mirror. Do you have the same body today that you had ten years ago? No. Each and every cell in your body has been renewed and replaced. Some would argue that brain cells are NOT renewed, but that ignores what is happening at the cellular level WITHIN each cell. The replacement process is taking place at that level, until whatever brain cells you were born with have nothing in common with what you now have. So let’s be very strict about this. While you have a very different body than you had years ago, YOU are still YOU! So clearly YOU cannot be described as something that is purely physical, because physical things that have different PARTS have a different identity.

"You" are the relationship between the brain cells, not the cells themselves.
Similar to how you can put a file onto another computer without having to replace the other computer's hard drive with the first's.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.

Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:00 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:Really? The boat thing? The Thought experiment that was originally set up as a fun little paradox? I can tell you that your argument is false, seeing as peoples temperaments and such change almost yearly, since I guarantee that my thought processes are completely different now than a year ago.

The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:02 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:Really? The boat thing? The Thought experiment that was originally set up as a fun little paradox? I can tell you that your argument is false, seeing as peoples temperaments and such change almost yearly, since I guarantee that my thought processes are completely different now than a year ago.

The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.

Who needs DNA when you have YAWEH, amirite?
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:03 pm

What's happening in this little thread? :eyebrow:
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:04 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:I'm an atheist because there is no rational evidence for the existence for a deity.

This.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
O5vx
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: Jun 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:04 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:Really? The boat thing? The Thought experiment that was originally set up as a fun little paradox? I can tell you that your argument is false, seeing as peoples temperaments and such change almost yearly, since I guarantee that my thought processes are completely different now than a year ago.

The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.


DNA do not change over time.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:05 pm

O5vx wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.


DNA do not change over time.

Yes. Which means you were...say it with us...wrong.

Unless you want to argue that the DNA being the same isn't a common trait among brain cells you were born with and those now.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:06 pm

O5vx wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.


DNA do not change over time.

So, DNA=Your soul?
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:07 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:
O5vx wrote:
DNA do not change over time.

So, DNA=Your soul?


No, not really. There is no such thing as a soul.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
O5vx
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: Jun 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:08 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:The very fact that he makes the claim that your brain cells aren't in any shape or form similar to what they were years ago is enough to call bullshit on his post. Seriously, he's evidently never heard of DNA.

Who needs DNA when you have YAWEH, amirite?


Can you measure your thoughts, your emotions, your feelings?

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:09 pm

O5vx wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:Who needs DNA when you have YAWEH, amirite?


Can you measure your thoughts, your emotions, your feelings?


Yes.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:09 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:So, DNA=Your soul?


No, not really. There is no such thing as a soul.

I know that, I'm trying to make a point on the silliness of his argument.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, Ineva, Keltionialang, Pale Dawn, Tarsonis, The H Corporation

Advertisement

Remove ads