O5vx wrote:You see, I'm using your own argument to destroy your claims.
♪ HE
IS
THE ARGUMENT KILLAR.
THIS
IS
THE ARGUMENT KILLAR ♪
Advertisement
by The Rich Port » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:00 pm
O5vx wrote:You see, I'm using your own argument to destroy your claims.
by Tlaceceyaya » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:00 pm
Prusseusss wrote:Terran Faction wrote:I don't like to tell my religious beliefs but I am an evolutionary creationist.
Do I believe in a god? Yes, but a "creator or heavenly engineer" would be the correct term. Do I know this god exists? I don't know, there is no evidence of that. It's a theory. Why do I choose to believe in this god? Because I am convinced by the idea of intelligent design and evolution does play a role in it.
Evolution is such a fascinating process or perfecting a species. Modern Humans or H.Sapiens are much more evolved and well-built than our previous ancestors. Our species was put to the test to survive which is why I believed the Dinosaurs could have evolved into intelligent reptilians but never got the chance because of their extinction. The mammals were better off as rulers of the Earth, but our genus Homo is the ultimate successor on our own planet.
But we are only on Earth, so far. So what about other possible worlds with life? It is possible the universe is occupied by multiple heavenly creators and that Earth has been engineered by one of them. The way the universe works is so mathematical, it's the reason why I choose to believe that there is superior intelligence out there. I am advocating worship and storytelling. It's why I left Christianity, but that doesn't mean I will refuse the idea of a god.
So basically, Evolution is an experimental process of creating life by whatever creator may or may not be occupying the very universe. Where did this creator come from? We don't know and our three-dimensional minds will not be able to comprehend what was before the Big Bang or the existence of a god. It goes both ways in the end.
I think I will follow this idea. It makes a lot of wonderful sense. It is plausible, and very well thought out.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:00 pm
O5vx wrote:You see, I'm using your own argument to destroy your claims.
by Dyakovo » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:00 pm
O5vx wrote:You see, I'm using your own argument to destroy your claims.
by Neo Rome Republic » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:01 pm
by O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:05 pm
by The Rich Port » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:06 pm
O5vx wrote:Philosophically, my evidence is sufficient enough to back up my claim. Trying to measure something that isn't physical with science is rubbish.
by Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:07 pm
O5vx wrote:Philosophically, my evidence is sufficient enough to back up my claim.
O5vx wrote:Trying to measure something that isn't physical with science is rubbish.
by New Acardia » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:13 pm
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:14 pm
O5vx wrote:Philosophically, my evidence is sufficient enough to back up my claim. Trying to measure something that isn't physical with science is rubbish.
by Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:16 pm
The Silence of Night wrote:You do understand that air is a physical thing, right? and that wind is pretty much just the movement of atmospheric pressures? (If I understand Wind correctly, and I believe I do)
by Neo Rome Republic » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:24 pm
by Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:26 pm
O5vx wrote:Philosophically, my evidence is sufficient enough to back up my claim. Trying to measure something that isn't physical with science is rubbish.
by Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:27 pm
by O5vx » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:28 pm
by Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:29 pm
O5vx wrote:I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically
by Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:29 pm
by Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:30 pm
O5vx wrote:Okay let me give you another example. If I were to tell you to close your eyes and imagine that you are building the most wonderful car in the word, the cost of building this car is not limited. Later I now ask you to seat down with an artist to describe to her what you saw, would you be able to do that? I'm sure many of you will be able to describe that car so perfectly. In this argument, I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically is at work here because you did not see any image that your brain can then process to give the artist the picture that you just vividly described.
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:31 pm
O5vx wrote:I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically
by Mkuki » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:33 pm
O5vx wrote:Okay let me give you another example. If I were to tell you to close your eyes and imagine that you are building the most wonderful car in the word, the cost of building this car is not limited. Later I now ask you to seat down with an artist to describe to her what you saw, would you be able to do that? I'm sure many of you will be able to describe that car so perfectly. In this argument, I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically is at work here because you did not see any image that your brain can then process to give the artist the picture that you just vividly described.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
by Ermiopa » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:34 pm
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Mkuki wrote:O5vx wrote:Okay let me give you another example. If I were to tell you to close your eyes and imagine that you are building the most wonderful car in the word, the cost of building this car is not limited. Later I now ask you to seat down with an artist to describe to her what you saw, would you be able to do that? I'm sure many of you will be able to describe that car so perfectly. In this argument, I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically is at work here because you did not see any image that your brain can then process to give the artist the picture that you just vividly described.
You're just going to ignore my wind evidence?
by Mavorpen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Ermiopa wrote:Mavorpen wrote:What you THINK is wind is just God farting, obviously.
Also: Rain is God peeing, asteroids are the poop, hurricanes are the water going down God's toilet bowl, thunder is God bowling, lightning is his electrical problems, and the sun is his light which he switches off at night. Now, if we assume this, we can extrapolate that the Earth which we live in is actually essentially a giant sewer where all God's waste products go, and we are little rats.
Now it all makes sense!
by Neo Rome Republic » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Mkuki wrote:O5vx wrote:Okay let me give you another example. If I were to tell you to close your eyes and imagine that you are building the most wonderful car in the word, the cost of building this car is not limited. Later I now ask you to seat down with an artist to describe to her what you saw, would you be able to do that? I'm sure many of you will be able to describe that car so perfectly. In this argument, I can now say that the mind, which does not exist scientifically is at work here because you did not see any image that your brain can then process to give the artist the picture that you just vividly described.
You're just going to ignore my wind evidence?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Barinive, Big Eyed Animation, Elwher, Kostane, Kreushia, Paddy O Fernature, Talibanada, The Vooperian Union, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement