Seperates wrote:It would be as incorrect as saying that Zeus and Odin are 'similar'. Now, Jupiter and Zeus is a better comparison... because as we all know... when Rome conquered Greece... Greece conquered Rome.
Don't tell the Romans that.
Advertisement
by Avenio » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:32 pm
Seperates wrote:It would be as incorrect as saying that Zeus and Odin are 'similar'. Now, Jupiter and Zeus is a better comparison... because as we all know... when Rome conquered Greece... Greece conquered Rome.
by Seitonjin » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:32 pm
Seperates wrote:Seitonjin wrote:It certainly does not work in most cases as per exact calculations. And afterlife already? I hate talking about that. And remembber Buddhism as with other Dharmic faiths believe in being reborn?
Step outside the western thought of the afterlife.
Yes, assume I know nothing of all Eastern theology. How condescending.
Prove rebirth balances karma.
by Riiser-Larsen » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:33 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I'm pretty tired of discussing serious issues in a serious manner with people who are so divorced from reality that the marriage was not only annulled, any historical records or witnesses to the original marriage were drawn, quartered, burnt, and then boiled in acid and served to hogs.
Thafoo wrote:So I guess leaving a negative environmental footprint now makes you a killer?
This just in: all cows are Hitlers. McDonald's releases the Heilburger.
by Shaggai » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:33 pm
Vareiln wrote:Shaggai wrote:The Norse pantheon are just as three-dimensional. And besides, when Prometheus steals fire, Zeus just ties him to a rock and has an eagle eat his liver. When Loki killed Baldur, he got tied to a rock by his sons entrails and had a snake wrapped around the roots of the World-Tree dripping poison in his eyes for all eternity. Which is a more imaginative punishment?
Besides, Norse mythology has cooler monsters and creatures.
by The Grey Wolf » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:33 pm
Seperates wrote:The Grey Wolf wrote:
I just scream obscenities into the air.
A friend of mine was raped and got an abortion. It was in no way "good" for her. She suffered from stress, paranoia, and had nightmares.
Whomever says rape is good in any context needs to go and *CENSORED FOR EXPLICT CONTENT*
At least we can agree on that.
by Melungea » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:33 pm
by The Grey Wolf » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:34 pm
by Southeastern Xiatao » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:35 pm
by Seitonjin » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:36 pm
Seperates wrote:Seitonjin wrote:That's an interesting way to look at it.
I never denied their differences, to say something is is similar is to accept that there are differences.
It is to turn the phrase around. They share so few similarities it is astonishing that we even bother on focusing on them, other than as a theological masturbation of "Oh you believe in a singular all-powerful deity, well so do I, right oh, lets show those other wankers what for." Again, the schools of thought are what should be important when talking about the differences in religion, and these schools are radically different, even when they are all the liberal groups of their respective religions.
It would be as incorrect as saying that Zeus and Odin are 'similar'. Now, Jupiter and Zeus is a better comparison... because as we all know... when Rome conquered Greece... Greece conquered Rome.
by The Rich Port » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:39 pm
Southeastern Xiatao wrote:-bullshit snip-
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:40 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:The Silence of Night wrote:Less Gods and more a Race of people.
Meh, I think that the Book of Invasions euhemerized the gods, or gave things an entirely different meaning. They're more like elves in some text.
But my ancestors beat the crap out of motherfucking elves. Suck on that Tolkien.
by Shaggai » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:42 pm
by The Grey Wolf » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:42 pm
The Silence of Night wrote:The Grey Wolf wrote:
Meh, I think that the Book of Invasions euhemerized the gods, or gave things an entirely different meaning. They're more like elves in some text.
But my ancestors beat the crap out of motherfucking elves. Suck on that Tolkien.
Yeah, the Tuatha De Danann are my favorite "mythical" people. My only complaint was forcing out Nauda because of his arm.
by The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:46 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:The Silence of Night wrote:Yeah, the Tuatha De Danann are my favorite "mythical" people. My only complaint was forcing out Nauda because of his arm.
I think the reason was that the king reflects the land. With Nuada maimed, the land would be too. Read that somewhere, but who knows? He beats Bres hands down (no pun intended.)
by Southeastern Xiatao » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:50 pm
by Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:50 pm
Seitonjin wrote:Seperates wrote:Yes, assume I know nothing of all Eastern theology. How condescending.
Prove rebirth balances karma.
When did that assumption appear... Wait. Oh okay nevermind.
Anyways. I like to look at rebirt this way, assume people are free from any predestination as per Abrahamic religions as well as Hinduism (I may be incorrect about Hinduism though). Now by the constant rebirth we make flub ups and other such mistakes or bad deeds which in turn should (key word) affect us the next instance. But it doesn't. It affects us later along the cycle of rebirth.
However, as you already know that due to this sense of freedom from being destined to do such and such the only way (presumably) things happen is because it either a) previous deeds b) you did it yourself c) tough luck. So instead of thinking karma is linear and absolute, it is a bit random and caused by own personal actions. The best way to hypothesize what will happen is by doing said action the could, well asuming this happens on a day to day basis, lead you to that reaction.
In all intents and purposes, waddling around and figuring how it works is a bit pointless. After all, a better way to look at things is by figuring out why one thing happens without divine intervention. Because even then, karma can be interpreted as divine intervention in action.
by The Grey Wolf » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:51 pm
The Silence of Night wrote:The Grey Wolf wrote:
I think the reason was that the king reflects the land. With Nuada maimed, the land would be too. Read that somewhere, but who knows? He beats Bres hands down (no pun intended.)
Well, Bres had a shaky claim to the throne, didn't he? Of course Nuada, the rightful king would have to restore himself. He just had to make a silver arm to do it. Nuada is just a badass. Almost as cool as Lugh.
by Seperates » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:51 pm
by Southeastern Xiatao » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:51 pm
Southeastern Xiatao wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
You just fucking said rape can be okay sometimes.
Nobody's gonna give a shit what the fuck you think about fucking ghosts.
If you read my thing about correctly about a person who was born from a raped person, that is good dammit since he/she is now living in the world. The person who raped the victim and is the father is a bitch and a bad thing. You guys need to understand what I said in my point of view.
by Seitonjin » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:52 pm
Seperates wrote:Seitonjin wrote:When did that assumption appear... Wait. Oh okay nevermind.
Anyways. I like to look at rebirt this way, assume people are free from any predestination as per Abrahamic religions as well as Hinduism (I may be incorrect about Hinduism though). Now by the constant rebirth we make flub ups and other such mistakes or bad deeds which in turn should (key word) affect us the next instance. But it doesn't. It affects us later along the cycle of rebirth.
However, as you already know that due to this sense of freedom from being destined to do such and such the only way (presumably) things happen is because it either a) previous deeds b) you did it yourself c) tough luck. So instead of thinking karma is linear and absolute, it is a bit random and caused by own personal actions. The best way to hypothesize what will happen is by doing said action the could, well asuming this happens on a day to day basis, lead you to that reaction.
In all intents and purposes, waddling around and figuring how it works is a bit pointless. After all, a better way to look at things is by figuring out why one thing happens without divine intervention. Because even then, karma can be interpreted as divine intervention in action.
Or it would be simpler to assume it doesn't happen...
by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:52 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Elejamie, Floppa Lovers, Google [Bot], Hurdergaryp, Juristonia, Pale Dawn, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Statesburg, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, Zurkerx
Advertisement