Aquafireland wrote:It says so in numerous religious books in the world.
The sections pertaining to such are not to be taken literally.
Advertisement
by West Angola » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:08 am
Aquafireland wrote:It says so in numerous religious books in the world.
by Slafstopia » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:08 am
by Nationalist State of Knox » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
by Neo Rome Republic » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
by Genivaria » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
Releign wrote:Why do we bother attempting to find out where we came from?
Unless you invent a time machine and follow EVERY POSSIBLE SPECIES that could have made us we will never know! So, again, it is pointless to debate.
For all we know we sprung out of a hole in the ground or just grew from a corn plant, I don't know.
[/thread]
by Aquafireland » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
by The Scientific States » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
by Britcan » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:09 am
by State of the Church » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:10 am
NEO Rome Republic wrote:State of the Church wrote:
That's all theory. Just as Creationism.
It's not a matter of reason, it's a matter of personal tendence.
Scholasticism is not the only way to reach the truth.
Creationism is not a Scientific theory. Please learn the difference between a layman's definition of theory and a Scientific one. http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-i ... heory.html
by Neoconstantius » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:10 am
Des-Bal wrote:Neoconstantius wrote:That's not the "scientific consensus" I encountered in any of my biology/evolution/microbiology/anatomy/physiology/rheumatology/ courses. Who are you to speak definitively on scientific consensus? Are you in the field? The reality is there is no consensus as there is no evidence one way or another, there can be no scientific opinion on the matter.
Yes there is. "There is no evidence to suggest this is necessary" is a consensus.
by Bentrada » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:10 am
Aquafireland wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Numerous contradictory religious books. If it's just the bulk of books that matters and not any actual evidence then you just proved elves, dragons, fairies, and interdimensional travel all exist.
You are atheist, I believe. Well, you and I believe different thongs, apparently. Are you saying that you are denying the words of Allah?
by Aquafireland » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:10 am
by Des-Bal » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:10 am
Aquafireland wrote:You think God is an as whole? Please, enlighten me with all the other things He does that have negative effect.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Genivaria » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Aquafireland wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Numerous contradictory religious books. If it's just the bulk of books that matters and not any actual evidence then you just proved elves, dragons, fairies, and interdimensional travel all exist.
You are atheist, I believe. Well, you and I believe different thongs, apparently. Are you saying that you are denying the words of Allah?
by State of the Church » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Evolution is a theory in the scientific sense, much like gravity. Not accepting evolution is as ridiculous as not accepting gravity.
by Furious Grandmothers » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
by The Holy Therns » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Conscentia » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Aquafireland wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Numerous contradictory religious books. If it's just the bulk of books that matters and not any actual evidence then you just proved elves, dragons, fairies, and interdimensional travel all exist.
You are atheist, I believe. Well, you and I believe different thongs, apparently. Are you saying that you are denying the words of Allah?
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Neo Rome Republic » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
by Ethan Foley » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
by Neoconstantius » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Aquafireland wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Numerous contradictory religious books. If it's just the bulk of books that matters and not any actual evidence then you just proved elves, dragons, fairies, and interdimensional travel all exist.
You are atheist, I believe. Well, you and I believe different thongs, apparently. Are you saying that you are denying the words of Allah?
by Aquafireland » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
by Genivaria » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
State of the Church wrote:Evolution is a theory in the scientific sense, much like gravity. Not accepting evolution is as ridiculous as not accepting gravity.
No, gravity is proved by experience. Evolution can't be proved through experience.
by Nationalist State of Knox » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:11 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
by The Scientific States » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:12 am
State of the Church wrote:Evolution is a theory in the scientific sense, much like gravity. Not accepting evolution is as ridiculous as not accepting gravity.
No, gravity is proved by experience. Evolution can't be proved through experience.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Gartohol, Shrillland, The Black Forrest, Tiami
Advertisement