NATION

PASSWORD

Homosexuality a trend?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Homosexuality A Trend?

Yes
119
21%
No
437
79%
 
Total votes : 556

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:18 pm

Agymnum wrote:Homosexuality is a trend in the same way heterosexuality is a trend, asexuality is a trend, pansexuality is a trend, bisexuality is a trend, etc.

Put simply, it isn't.

Pansexuality and the polysexualities are just different kinds of bisexuality for the sexual orientation spectrum purpose.

Taking the gender identity spectrum instead of the biological sexes makes things hell complex.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Rawrckia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 450
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rawrckia » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:20 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:And, no, 10 year old children cannot give informed consent. Are you fucking kidding me? Read up on brain function, child development, child psychology...hell, just SPEND SOME TIME AROUND CHILDREN, and you'll see that.


As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children how electricity works, how magnetism works, how vacuum pumps work, how motors work. And many of them understood it, despite me having to kneel down to engage them face to face.

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.
Last edited by Rawrckia on Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18
"Build a man a fire and you'll keep him warm through the night. Set a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life."
PRO: Hugs
ANTI: Loud noises

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:21 pm

Rawrckia wrote:As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.

So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:23 pm

Rawrckia wrote:As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.


But we cannot immediately assume that all children are capable of consent, and due to the fact that many children can be manipulated by adults due to the power authority tends to hold over people, we need to set a legal precedent for acceptable relationships. Having an age precedent for relationships is a practical solution where having every child who wants to get into a relationship with an adult psychologically evaluated is not.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:23 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.

So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.

He's credible. I mean, he's a teen and so he knows how teen brains work.

What more example do you want? Take a look at how popular Justin Bieber is among teens. That's the epitome of maturity.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Rawrckia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 450
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rawrckia » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:24 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.

So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.


You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?
Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18
"Build a man a fire and you'll keep him warm through the night. Set a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life."
PRO: Hugs
ANTI: Loud noises

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:24 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.

So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.

This, again^
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:25 pm

Rawrckia wrote:You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?


He's pointing out that anecdotal evidence offers nothing to the discussion. Come back with statistics that we can properly debate.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:25 pm

Rawrckia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.


You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

So you don't have evidence that 10 year olds can consent. Got it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:25 pm

Norstal wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.

He's credible. I mean, he's a teen and so he knows how teen brains work.

What more example do you want? Take a look at how popular Justin Bieber is among teens. That's the epitome of maturity.

Justin Beiber and 1D are a fuck up of biology.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:26 pm

Rawrckia wrote:You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

What the fuck.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:26 pm

New haven america wrote:
Norstal wrote:He's credible. I mean, he's a teen and so he knows how teen brains work.

What more example do you want? Take a look at how popular Justin Bieber is among teens. That's the epitome of maturity.

Justin Beiber and 1D are a fuck up of biology.


Technically, a fuck-up of anthropology, but I agree.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Rawrckia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 450
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rawrckia » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:27 pm

Norstal wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.

He's credible. I mean, he's a teen and so he knows how teen brains work.

What more example do you want? Take a look at how popular Justin Bieber is among teens. That's the epitome of maturity.


Wow, so I'm a teen now?

I guess the last 5 years of my life since the school volunteer program have been fake! And you must really be NSA'ing it up, how else would you have found my birth certificate?

"Justin Bieber is popular among teens"

The Twilight books are popular among women in their twenties, as is Fifty Shades of Grey.

And we all know how intelligently written and morally fine those are, right?
Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18
"Build a man a fire and you'll keep him warm through the night. Set a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life."
PRO: Hugs
ANTI: Loud noises

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:27 pm

Rawrckia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So let me get this straight. You not only STILL refuse to give ANY credible evidence that 10 year olds can consent, but now you pretend that ANECDOTES are a substitute for them?

Holy fucking shit.


You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

When did that happen? :eyebrow:
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:28 pm

Rawrckia wrote:And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

This reasoning is why I support a relative social tolerance of interspecies sexual relationships (even if, despite having some zoophilic feelings - significant sexual attraction in the context of some emotional bonds, very little interest when not the case -, I would rather not practice for individual moral reasons), at least while we see meat-eating as perfectly acceptable in our society in spite of the generally damaging side consequences (I expect to become a vegan until January 2023), and the recognition of zoosexuality as something sexual orientation-like, but even this is a very very very very very minority view and some (especially non-Brazilians) get very shocked when I tell them about this. :?
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:28 pm

New haven america wrote:
Valcouria wrote:If I chose to live that way, no. I wouldn't. However, I choose to live as nature intended, with my attraction to the opposite sex.

God, I hate extremists. :palm: :palm:

Well I'm offended....
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:28 pm

Rawrckia wrote:
Wow, so I'm a teen now?


Rawrckia wrote:As a teen,

I know you're trying to confuse us to oblivion, but this isn't working.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:28 pm

New haven america wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:
You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

When did that happen? :eyebrow:

In FantasyLand.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:28 pm

Rawrckia wrote:Wow, so I'm a teen now?

I guess the last 5 years of my life since the school volunteer program have been fake! And you must really be NSA'ing it up, how else would you have found my birth certificate?


The last five years are anecdotal and not empirical evidence. Try again.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
German-Spanish Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 865
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby German-Spanish Empire » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:29 pm

Norstal wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

What the fuck.


"What the fuck" quote of the year :clap:

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:30 pm

Vazdania wrote:
New haven america wrote:God, I hate extremists. :palm: :palm:

Well I'm offended....

*Shrugs*
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:30 pm

Rawrckia wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:And, no, 10 year old children cannot give informed consent. Are you fucking kidding me? Read up on brain function, child development, child psychology...hell, just SPEND SOME TIME AROUND CHILDREN, and you'll see that.


As a teen, I volunteered to work with the "talented and gifted" group of elementary and middle schoolers. There are some very mature and intelligent minds (more developed than some of the teachers at the school I'd add, some of them were a pain in the ass to volunteers).

I volunteered to work at a kind of "hands-on" science museum, to show young children how electricity works, how magnetism works, how vacuum pumps work, how motors work. And many of them understood it, despite me having to kneel down to engage them face to face.

And children can not be mature at all, until they hit 18? And adults with a sub-50 IQ or no sense of right or wrong can get married and have sexual relations when they clearly cannot behave responsibly?

Really? I mean if we're going to set the standard to allow the mentally disabled to remain married and have a position as adults, there are THOUSANDS of children who more than qualify. They can act responsibly. They have ethics.

And I've talked with them, I've worked with them, I've watched them grow. Just because someone's 10 doesn't mean they're immediately an idiot.


Interesting.

I was a gifted child.

My friends were gifted children.

NONE of us had the capacity to make informed decisions, as intelligent as we were. At age 10, the brain is not fully developed. It continues developing until age 25 or so. Frankly, it would almost make more sense to not allow people to enter formal contracts until then, but the social upheaval required would be immense, and I suspect that there would be social unrest if such a thing were to ever be seriously proposed.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:30 pm

Every morning I wake up and flip a coin heads for guys and tails for girls, I only don't like men because it only falls on tails. :roll:

NO it's not a choice, its not a trend, its not a fad its none of those things. What it is is a perfectly natural and normal sexual attraction and its no more common today than it was before; the only thing that has changed is people have become more accepting of it and so now those who are homosexual feel more free to come out about their feelings.
Last edited by SaintB on Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:30 pm

Vazdania wrote:
New haven america wrote:God, I hate extremists. :palm: :palm:

Well I'm offended....


You have a right to be offended. We also have a right, due to free speech, to say what we please and not give a fuck about your offense.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Rawrckia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 450
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rawrckia » Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:31 pm

New haven america wrote:
Rawrckia wrote:
You're trying to prove that life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe again aren't you?

When did that happen? :eyebrow:


Most of your posts in this thread have been 1 liners parroting someone else's post or saying "no ur wrong".

I would not consider you mentally or cognitively developed yet to be allowed to offer consent as you seem to be too timid to offer your own opinions.

This doesn't mean no 14 year old is mentally developed enough to make their own decisions.
Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18
"Build a man a fire and you'll keep him warm through the night. Set a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life."
PRO: Hugs
ANTI: Loud noises

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Breizh-Veur, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Galloism, Hurdergaryp, Ostroeuropa, Page, Reich of the New World Order, Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads