NATION

PASSWORD

Homosexuality a trend?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Homosexuality A Trend?

Yes
119
21%
No
437
79%
 
Total votes : 556

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm

Sorry for my absurdly delayed response. My internet connection likes driving me insane now and then.

Rawrckia wrote:1. Ever read Shakespeare? People married pretty damn young back then. It wasn't uncommon for a twenty-something man to marry a twelve-fourteen year old girl through consent in both parties.

Irrelevant. We don't live in the 16th century anymore, and that something was common in the past doesn't make it valid.

Valcouria wrote:Nonsense...homosexuality IS a trend...just like in the next decade or two, polygamy, incest, zoophilia, and pederasty will all be trends as well, since eventually these deviants will come out of hiding and press their claims to be able to marry. And all of these will be trends as well, since all of a sudden everyone will, for some odd reason, accept them all as normal individuals, when they clearly are not.

Also, regarding consent laws...as most should be aware, laws like that are subject to change...who knows, maybe tomorrow the law of consent will drop to 10 because enough people want it to be there; when everything is subjective, then everything can happen.

Your entire post is not only one giant fallacious falsehood...it's also utterly irrelevant. You have not proven homosexuality to be a trend. You just farted the typical 'slippery slope' bullshit on our faces and pretended it was some sort of 'argument'.

Valcouria wrote:Explain to me then the purpose of having TWO existent genders, then...if homosexuality were natural, as you claim, then there would only be a single gender.

Every time you post this sort of arrogant nonsense, a Biology teacher kills herself.

So, what sort of asinine bullshit am I to refute now?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm

Riiser-Larsen wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:I'M SO SCARY! LOOK! LIPSTICK LESBIANISM! TERRIFYING.


People have some weird fears.

Personally I'm afraid of cashiers and restaurant staff.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm

What the fuck is this bullshit? You don't choose to be homosexual. I am a homosexual, and I don't think homosexuality is "cool", its just who I am. It ain't a trend, mkay?
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Too much fabulousness scares him.

I'M SO SCARY! LOOK! LIPSTICK LESBIANISM! TERRIFYING.

D:
NOT LIPSTICK!
BE MERCIFUL TO HIM.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43467
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby New haven america » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm

New Libertarian States wrote:
New haven america wrote:He also said it was a perversion in nature.

:eyebrow:
Has he never observed nature?

He also said, that Mantis's eating their mates head after mating was a perversion too.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Riiser-Larsen wrote:
People have some weird fears.

Personally I'm afraid of cashiers and restaurant staff.

Also slugs. Slugs are creepy.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:What the fuck is this bullshit? You don't choose to be homosexual. I am a homosexual, and I don't think homosexuality is "cool", its just who I am. It ain't a trend, mkay?


Summertime hipsters think everything is a trend.

User avatar
Riiser-Larsen
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1117
Founded: Jun 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riiser-Larsen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Personally, I view it to be an extension of the civil rights movement to see how far people can go to get what they want from the government. As I said before, I suspect in a few decades or so we'll be having a similar debate regarding the merits of polygamy, zoophilia, incest, and pederasty.
So you are going for the global conspiracy involving millions then rather than you being wrong?


Supposedly there are three steps of thinking about someone with a opposing argument
-Ignorance-They don't have all the information
-Stupidity- They have all the information, but they can't put it together
-Evil- They have the information and they can put it together, but they're refusing to acknowledge what is "obvious" because they have some ulterior motive hidden.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/home
Fun Quotes:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I'm pretty tired of discussing serious issues in a serious manner with people who are so divorced from reality that the marriage was not only annulled, any historical records or witnesses to the original marriage were drawn, quartered, burnt, and then boiled in acid and served to hogs.

Thafoo wrote:So I guess leaving a negative environmental footprint now makes you a killer?

This just in: all cows are Hitlers. McDonald's releases the Heilburger.

User avatar
Valcouria
Minister
 
Posts: 3012
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Valcouria » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Not violently...because of ethics. As I said, perhaps science will one day be able to decipher this perversion in the DNA, and then root it out entirely. In one generation...it would no longer be a problem.


Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.
Pro: Social Conservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, National Conservatism, Theo-democracy, Pro-Life, Capital Punishment
Anti: Social Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, LGBT/Gay Marriage, Pro-Choice, Secularism, Atheism

"In matters of style, swim with the current: in matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed."-Edmund Burke

User avatar
Pacifornia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1255
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pacifornia » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Bullshit, I never chose my sexual orientation, and neither did anyone else. Why do you think everyone is claiming they didn't choose their orientation? Which seems more likely to you? Millions of people pretending they never chose their sexual orientation as a part of some global conspiracy we somehow telepathically comunicated with one another to make others believe sexuality isn't a choice, or that you are wrong and that millions of people as well as mental health experts are correct?

Personally, I view it to be an extension of the civil rights movement to see how far people can go to get what they want from the government. As I said before, I suspect in a few decades or so we'll be having a similar debate regarding the merits of polygamy, zoophilia, incest, and pederasty.


I'm guessing you're opposed to rights for all humans, regardless of race, sexuality or class? Seems legit. A fascist totalitarian regime where you get beat up for acting like a normal, non-sadistic, person sounds like a loads of fun >:(
Check out our nation's website! http://bam2011.wix.com/pacifornia
IRL: Male, straight, atheist, socialist, Californian, Honduran-American, third year college student

"I know a lot of people think L.A. and they see a picture in their head, but those people obviously don't know me, because I sit on a couch every day. That's my idea of a good time - just being in a sweat suit."-Hayley Williams, Paramore
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Flames? Take a number and have a seat. Have a nice day :)

User avatar
The Merchant Republics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8503
Founded: Oct 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Merchant Republics » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Valcouria wrote:You can tell me that until you're blue in the face, but I refuse to believe it. I steadfastly remain with my opinion that homosexuality is a perversion of the natural order, and that accepting it is harming society in the long run (which also happens to answer your second point).

How does me getting married to a woman affect you in any way?


I've said it before and I'll say it again.

Because it saps and spoils my precious and vital bodily fluids.

That is Plan "R" for Romeo, Plan "R" for Romeo, over and out
Your Resident Gentleman and Libertarian; presently living in the People's Republic of China, which is if anyone from the Party asks "The Best and Also Only China".
Christian Libertarian Autarchist: like an Anarchist but with more "Aut".
Social: Authoritarian/Libertarian (-8.55)
Economic: Left/Right (7.55)
We are the premiere of civilization, the beacon of liberty, the font of prosperity and the ever illuminating light of culture in this hellish universe.
In short: Elitist Wicked Cultured Free Market Anarchists living in a Diesel-Deco World.

Now Fearing: Mandarin Lessons from Cantonese teachers.
Factbook (FT)|Art Gallery|Embassy Program

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:16 pm

New Libertarian States wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:I'M SO SCARY! LOOK! LIPSTICK LESBIANISM! TERRIFYING.

D:
NOT LIPSTICK!
BE MERCIFUL TO HIM.

YEAH, LOOK AT MY ENDLESS STEREOTYPICAL FEMININTY AND UNABASHED LOVE FOR PUSSY
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm

Rawrckia wrote:Not to mention, you again treat the line between "minor" and "adult" like it's sacred and never should be touched. But in reality the number is just nonsense. You can be tried as an adult in criminal court at age 11 or even younger. You can drive a car (where I'm at at least) at 16. You can consent to sex at 16 here, and isn't that what this "marrying younger women" argument is all about? And you cannot consume alcohol until age 21? These numbers are fairly meaningless and you're taking them like they were carved on a mountain by God.

So what you're saying is, you don't have a shred of evidence to back up your claim that 10 year olds can consent.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm

New haven america wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote: :eyebrow:
Has he never observed nature?

He also said, that Mantis's eating their mates head after mating was a perversion too.

How...I mean...WHAT.
I'm completely lost in what he's saying.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.

Then choose to do it RIGHT NOW.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.

So choose to be gay.
Prove that you are correct.
Prove that people choose to be killed for their sexuality because of people like of mind to you.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.


I am so sick and tired of your constant lies. It's not a choice, it's been proven. But people like you can't accept simple facts.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:D:
NOT LIPSTICK!
BE MERCIFUL TO HIM.

YEAH, LOOK AT MY ENDLESS STEREOTYPICAL FEMININTY AND UNABASHED LOVE FOR PUSSY

KNEEL BEFORE FABULOUS ZOD!
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Cadaver breadsticks
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1158
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cadaver breadsticks » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.

You have been provided with explicit evidence that it is not a choice. Why are you continuously ignoring that?
do not meddle in the affairs of dragons
subtract 24,817 from my post count
another lgbt autistic teenager
pro: melodic hardcore, japanese things
anti: everything

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.


If DNA is involved then it is not a choice.

And saying that gays have "weaker" DNA sounds nazi-like.
Last edited by Pandeeria on Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Libraria and Ausitoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7099
Founded: May 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Libraria and Ausitoria » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Riiser-Larsen wrote:
People have some weird fears.

Personally I'm afraid of cashiers and restaurant staff.

Well, I'm afraid of the dark. That's unfashionably old fashioned, I believe.
The Aestorian Commonwealth - Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere - (Factbook)

Disclaimer: Notwithstanding any mention of their nations, Ausitoria and its canon does not exist nor impact the canon of many IFC & SACTO & closed-region nations; and it is harassment to presume it does. However in accordance with my open-door policy the converse does not apply: they still impact Ausitoria's canon.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○
(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]

User avatar
Ranmaverse
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ranmaverse » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

The same amount of Homosexuals have always existed, they were just too scared to admit it before, even today in some countries you can still be killed for it. Now, people are just more comfortable admitting it.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:What the fuck is this bullshit? You don't choose to be homosexual. I am a homosexual, and I don't think homosexuality is "cool", its just who I am. It ain't a trend, mkay?


Summertime hipsters think everything is a trend.

Sadly, yes. These people piss me off.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Homosexuals isn't a problem. Also you said it was a choice, now you're saying its in DNA, don't contradict yourself it makes you look stupid.

It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.

Then choose to be gay.
Right now.
"Weaker DNA"
What?
Last edited by New Libertarian States on Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:19 pm

Cadaver breadsticks wrote:
Valcouria wrote:It is a choice, but I also think that perhaps some people may be more inclined to make that choice, and I suspect DNA is involved with that. As I said, I could choose to be gay, but I do not. Other people choose and follow through, and I suspect that they have...weaker DNA...than the others.

You have been provided with explicit evidence that it is not a choice. Why are you continuously ignoring that?


He just wants to lay in his puddle of self ignorance I guess :meh:
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Minal

Advertisement

Remove ads