*sigh*

Advertisement


by Mike the Progressive » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:52 pm
Ifreann wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:$15 per hour is too high for a fast food worker
$15 x 40 hours = $600 per week
$600 x 52 weeks = $31,200 per year
All people -- $31,200 = 39th percentile of income
Singles -- $31,200 = 69th percentile of income
And how exactly is that too high for a fast food worker?

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:53 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Find me a source saying that undergraduates in education never go into low-paid service work, such as fast food restaurants.
Because that's the opposite of my inference.
You did see the part where I said "make it to college, but get a liberal arts degree" right?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Ifreann » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:53 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:$15 per hour is too high for a fast food worker
$15 x 40 hours = $600 per week
$600 x 52 weeks = $31,200 per year
All people -- $31,200 = 39th percentile of income
Singles -- $31,200 = 69th percentile of income
I doubt they actually think they'll get $15. It's probably just a starting point.

by Vetalia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:59 pm

by Christian Democrats » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Ifreann wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:$15 per hour is too high for a fast food worker
$15 x 40 hours = $600 per week
$600 x 52 weeks = $31,200 per year
All people -- $31,200 = 39th percentile of income
Singles -- $31,200 = 69th percentile of income
And how exactly is that too high for a fast food worker?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.

by Ceannairceach » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:03 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Ifreann wrote:And how exactly is that too high for a fast food worker?
I don't think fast food work is more important than two-fifths of the jobs in America; and I do not see why a 20-something-year-old Mcworker, unmarried, would need to be making more than almost 70 percent of his or her peers.

by Vetalia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:03 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:If you read the thread at all, you'd understand that this is a starting demand to be whittled down in negotiations.

by Ceannairceach » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:04 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:06 pm
Genivaria wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Sadly, you're probably right. The current economic climate is against those without higher education; Sadly, this means that those with limited education will not get the greatest of jobs.
That, of course, doesn't mean that they don't deserve a fair shake.
I'm trying to join the Army right now to get out of my financial situation but because I was diagnosed as ADHD when I was little (me and every other kid) I have to get a cleared of needing medication.
My mother has been doing her best to stonewall my efforts though.

by Lemanrussland » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:06 pm

by Vetalia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:07 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Possibly, with benefits here and there to appease the masses. But its equally possible that they might get the small raise they likely want for real.

by Christian Democrats » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:08 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:I don't think fast food work is more important than two-fifths of the jobs in America; and I do not see why a 20-something-year-old Mcworker, unmarried, would need to be making more than almost 70 percent of his or her peers.
If you read the thread at all, you'd understand that this is a starting demand to be whittled down in negotiations.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.

by Genivaria » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:09 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Genivaria wrote:I'm trying to join the Army right now to get out of my financial situation but because I was diagnosed as ADHD when I was little (me and every other kid) I have to get a cleared of needing medication.
My mother has been doing her best to stonewall my efforts though.
Hey, I hear you.
Though I'm actually planning on joining the Air Guard when I'm done with graduate school. Or taking some time off, so I can join, do basic training, AIT, etc. Interestingly enough, my state's air guard has a cyber unit. Not sure if I want to go into IT. But it can't hurt if my plans in politics fizzles up.
I tried enlisting for combat duty when I turned 18. Got rejected because I was born with something called strabismus in my left eye, had surgery as a kid, but it actually made the visual acuity worse (20/200). Got it down to 20/60, but still. But some friendly advice? Don't mention anything medically wrong with you. Seriously. They say you can get in trouble, but you can't if you play stupid. If they find something wrong, just say you had no idea or you didn't understand. Don't tell them anything about your medical history. Tell them you've never taken drugs (except smoke and alcohol if you do/did either one). Don't tell them your primary doctor, or health insurance (most young guys don't have either one).
Because especially with mental health, they are more likely to reject you unless you have something great going (a perfect ASVAB score, a college degree, you have Good Will Hunting/Matt Damon like mathematical skills, etc.).
There's an article that tells you detail by detail about all of this. I'll have to find it.
And if you get in. Take advantage of the stuff the army offers. Go to college as soon as you can and if possible, see if you can apply for OCS. If you don't want to serve that long still join the reserves/national guard. It's an extra $300-500 bucks a month for only going out once a month, and two weeks a year.

by Mike the Progressive » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:13 pm
Genivaria wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Hey, I hear you.
Though I'm actually planning on joining the Air Guard when I'm done with graduate school. Or taking some time off, so I can join, do basic training, AIT, etc. Interestingly enough, my state's air guard has a cyber unit. Not sure if I want to go into IT. But it can't hurt if my plans in politics fizzles up.
I tried enlisting for combat duty when I turned 18. Got rejected because I was born with something called strabismus in my left eye, had surgery as a kid, but it actually made the visual acuity worse (20/200). Got it down to 20/60, but still. But some friendly advice? Don't mention anything medically wrong with you. Seriously. They say you can get in trouble, but you can't if you play stupid. If they find something wrong, just say you had no idea or you didn't understand. Don't tell them anything about your medical history. Tell them you've never taken drugs (except smoke and alcohol if you do/did either one). Don't tell them your primary doctor, or health insurance (most young guys don't have either one).
Because especially with mental health, they are more likely to reject you unless you have something great going (a perfect ASVAB score, a college degree, you have Good Will Hunting/Matt Damon like mathematical skills, etc.).
There's an article that tells you detail by detail about all of this. I'll have to find it.
And if you get in. Take advantage of the stuff the army offers. Go to college as soon as you can and if possible, see if you can apply for OCS. If you don't want to serve that long still join the reserves/national guard. It's an extra $300-500 bucks a month for only going out once a month, and two weeks a year.
Funny thing, my recruiter specifically laid out 'don't talk about it' as an option.
I don't know if I want to risk getting dishonorably discharged though, the stigma of that is not something I want.

by Vetalia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:16 pm
Lemanrussland wrote:I don't think asking for the company to practically double their labor expenses is really reasonable. I really dislike the collective bargaining model, as it exists in the US today. It's far too confrontational (the constant Union-busting attempts don't help either, for the record).
We would be better off moving to a model where employers' unions and worker unions work more closely with one another, like in Germany or the Nordic countries. There, the worker unions have representatives on the company boards, and thus can get a realistic picture of the financial state of the company. Union membership also needs to increase, right now I don't think they're really representative of most of the workers, seeing as only around 11 percent of workers in the US are unionized.

by Genivaria » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:17 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Genivaria wrote:Funny thing, my recruiter specifically laid out 'don't talk about it' as an option.
I don't know if I want to risk getting dishonorably discharged though, the stigma of that is not something I want.
So here's the thing.
Say you don't tell them anything. A few years down the road, you start having problems. You go see an army doctor (or whatever military doctor/doctor who accepts Tricare), he/she diagnoses you with ADHD. Um, you can't really help it if you got this while in the army *wink wink cough cough* If they ask you if you have a history of it, say you had a hard time focusing as a kid, but what kid hasn't? You never knew about it.
And they can't just access your private/pre-military medical history whenever they want.

by Salandriagado » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:17 pm
greed and death wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:"Meant for"? Who "meant" them to be that way? God? Was that decided on the 8th day, or the 9th?
I don't think the fast food industry cares; they only want a laborer and nothing more. So who's sense of moral outrage is being stoked by parents with children working fast food? Whose sense of moral proprienty determines which jobs are "meant for" teens, which jobs are "meant for" women, which jobs are "meant for" men, which jobs are "meant for" immigrants, and so forth?
Yours?
Look this is not hard to grasp not every job is designed to be a career, if you choose to attempt to make it a career you bear the risk of crappy wages.
It is a lower tier service industry gig, you use it to get experience and apply to better service industry jobs.
If you do not have the initiative to apply for better work or to get better work it is time to look for work in a different field.

by Aequalitia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:17 pm
Ifreann wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:$15 per hour is too high for a fast food worker
$15 x 40 hours = $600 per week
$600 x 52 weeks = $31,200 per year
All people -- $31,200 = 39th percentile of income
Singles -- $31,200 = 69th percentile of income
And how exactly is that too high for a fast food worker?

by Ifreann » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:19 pm
and I do not see why a 20-something-year-old Mcworker, unmarried, would need to be making more than almost 70 percent of his or her peers.

by Mike the Progressive » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:20 pm
Genivaria wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
So here's the thing.
Say you don't tell them anything. A few years down the road, you start having problems. You go see an army doctor (or whatever military doctor/doctor who accepts Tricare), he/she diagnoses you with ADHD. Um, you can't really help it if you got this while in the army *wink wink cough cough* If they ask you if you have a history of it, say you had a hard time focusing as a kid, but what kid hasn't? You never knew about it.
And they can't just access your private/pre-military medical history whenever they want.
Well the problem is that I don't want the 4 year Guard deal that my sister did.
I want full active duty and maybe make a career out of it, that's a long time to watch what I say.

by Genivaria » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:22 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Genivaria wrote:Well the problem is that I don't want the 4 year Guard deal that my sister did.
I want full active duty and maybe make a career out of it, that's a long time to watch what I say.
You've always got to watch what you say anyway. But if you want to make a career out of it, I think you can do it. You just have to be careful with how liberal you are with the truth...but that's always the case.

by Aequalitia » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:23 pm
Ifreann wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:I don't think fast food work is more important than two-fifths of the jobs in America;
Do you think Beyonce and Jay Z are more important than Obama? How much money one earns does not reflect how important one is.and I do not see why a 20-something-year-old Mcworker, unmarried, would need to be making more than almost 70 percent of his or her peers.
Need? No one needs more than the cost of a roof over your head and food on the table. Plenty of people get more than that, because that's how capitalism and employment work.


by Ifreann » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:24 pm
Aequalitia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Do you think Beyonce and Jay Z are more important than Obama? How much money one earns does not reflect how important one is.
Need? No one needs more than the cost of a roof over your head and food on the table. Plenty of people get more than that, because that's how capitalism and employment work.
Plenty of people get less then them already now, you known?
by Zottistan » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:27 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Dow Whilesseldfle, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fractalnavel, Gravlen, Greater Miami Shores 3, Gun Manufacturers, New Imperial Britannia, Rary, Senkaku, Shrillland, Snake Worship Football Club, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Umeria, Utquiagvik, Vassenor, Vistulange, Washington Resistance Army, Wrekstaat, Xind, Zerotaxia
Advertisement