I'm pretty sure he isn't actually a fascist, but he's extremely authoritarian and traditionalist.
Advertisement

by Liriena » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:51 am
Grainne Ni Malley wrote:Harmed? By gay marriage?! Are you serious?!?!
Why, every day when I wake up and stumble into the kitchen to grab my bowl of cereal I am assaulted by gay men wanting my fruit loops to decorate their sequined tutus for their impending ceremonies. I can't even use the bathroom without worrying that a glory hole might appear in place of my toilet paper roll. In fact, when I'm peeping... er, uh... gazing through my telescope and accidentally focus on the neighbors' bedrooms, gay sex distracts me from my own relationship so thoroughly that I have migraines. If they were to get married my relationship might be in complete ruins!!
I cannot allow this in the name of- oh my god, there's a gay man standing behind me with a wand threatening to turn me into Liza Minnelli if I post this! How do I delete?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:52 am
Quintium wrote:Liriena wrote:The divorce rates are meaningless, as is the number of partners. Marriage has not lost its social and cultural value as of yet, and even in current conditions it serves its purpose: providing a modicum of stability to couples and their children.
If it's a social and cultural institution, why should it have anything to do with the state? I'm not against marriage, but I am against the state recognising marriage and giving any form of privilige to those who are married.Liriena wrote:Hospital visitation as in being allowed to visit your family at the hospital. A married person's spouse counts as family and, therefor, is allowed to visit you. Anybody else, however, is not.
You really do live in a primitive country if that's the rule.
Again, that's not actually the case here, so clearly it's not a necessity.Liriena wrote:People often are not legally literate enough to draw up a comprehensive final will, or they can't afford a lawyer for it.
Good thing they don't need a lawyer for that, then, and anything that can be read easily is sufficient.
All concerns so far have to do with whatever awful country you're from that has all these archaic rules.Liriena wrote:When I speak of custody of children, I don't only mean biological children of a couple. I also mean adopted children.
And? You can register as a co-custodian here. It takes about half an hour of your time.

| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:53 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:The families that are shamed because Adam and Steve decided to make their perversions public.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Agritum » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:57 am
Liriena wrote:Quintium wrote:
If it's a social and cultural institution, why should it have anything to do with the state? I'm not against marriage, but I am against the state recognising marriage and giving any form of privilige to those who are married.
You really do live in a primitive country if that's the rule.
Again, that's not actually the case here, so clearly it's not a necessity.
Good thing they don't need a lawyer for that, then, and anything that can be read easily is sufficient.
All concerns so far have to do with whatever awful country you're from that has all these archaic rules.
And? You can register as a co-custodian here. It takes about half an hour of your time.
What country do you live in?

by Chishimotata » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:57 am

by Chishimotata » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:59 am
Luveria wrote:Chishimotata wrote:Not you Liriena, but if you're spending your time wondering whether the people your kid wants to fuck are of the same gender or not, you really need to get a hobby.
I know you meant 'of the same sex or not', but they seem equally hostile to same-gender relations also.

by Papal England » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:01 am

by Nationalist State of Knox » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:02 am
Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Mkuki » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:05 am
Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.

John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Chishimotata » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:05 am
Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.

by Liriena » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:09 am
Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Nationalist State of Knox » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:10 am
Chishimotata wrote:Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.
Acts 15:7-11, Leviticus and Deuteronomy doesn't apply.
Mistranslations abound in Romans and others in which Paul didn't use the established Greek word for homosexuality but a totally different word -- presumed to mean "temple prostitute".
So you're wrong.
Catechism 2357 wrote:Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Liriena » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:10 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Mkuki » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:11 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Nationalist State of Knox » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:11 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Mkuki » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:12 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by The Scientific States » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:12 am
Papal England wrote:Yes, society and Catholic beliefs are harmed by gay marriage. The scriptures make it very clear about the position that all Catholics must take on the war against gay marriage.

by Chishimotata » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:12 am
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:Chishimotata wrote:Acts 15:7-11, Leviticus and Deuteronomy doesn't apply.
Mistranslations abound in Romans and others in which Paul didn't use the established Greek word for homosexuality but a totally different word -- presumed to mean "temple prostitute".
So you're wrong.
Actually, you're wrong.Catechism 2357 wrote:Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... s2c2a6.htm

by Nationalist State of Knox » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:12 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Nationalist State of Knox » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:13 am
Chishimotata wrote:Nationalist State of Knox wrote:Actually, you're wrong.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... s2c2a6.htm
When was this issued?
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Mkuki » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:14 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Chishimotata » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bhang Bhang Duc, Continental Free States, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Hirota, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Soviet Haaregrad, The Astral Mandate
Advertisement