Is anyone actually harmed by gay marriage?

[Blueton]

Harmed? By gay marriage?! Are you serious?!?!

Why, every day when I wake up and stumble into the kitchen to grab my bowl of cereal I am assaulted by gay men wanting my fruit loops to decorate their sequined tutus for their impending ceremonies. I can't even use the bathroom without worrying that a glory hole might appear in place of my toilet paper roll. In fact, when I'm peeping... er, uh... gazing through my telescope and accidentally focus on the neighbors' bedrooms, gay sex distracts me from my own relationship so thoroughly that I have migraines. If they were to get married my relationship might be in complete ruins!!

I cannot allow this in the name of- oh my god, there's a gay man standing behind me with a wand threatening to turn me into Liza Minnelli if I post this! How do I delete?

-Evil laugh-

[Kingsley Bedford]

I am deeply disturbed that you are anti-China and anti-Iran, but not anti-Russia... according to your signature.

I'm anti Putin. Not entirely anti Russia. I'm not putting it on there to please you, so deal with it.

The irony is that Putin has just implemented homophobic laws in Russia. so maybe you agree on something.

[Timsvill]

Well, lately around where I live, there's been an awful lot of discussion about gay rights (sure is a pity I'm not there right now, because everything would be very fun if I was), largely due to a pride parade that happened a couple of days ago, which is a relatively rare event around here. So, NSG, allow me to bring the liberal communazi gay agenda to you and ask this - is anyone actually harmed by gay marriage?

I have heard all the "marriage is an ancient union of a man and a woman PILLARS OF SOCIETY and so on" arguments, but none of them seem to answer the key question - how does gay marriage harm anyone? Because to me and to presumably many, it does not harm anyone at all. And if it harms no one, I see no reason for it to be illegal.

Just so we're clear - I'm not asking you people why gay marriage should be illegal. I'm asking you if it, in any way, harms anyone. In any capacity.

It couldn't harm any one! But if there has to be a balance between the gay's and straights. A balance for reporducing!

[Immoren]

Well, lately around where I live, there's been an awful lot of discussion about gay rights (sure is a pity I'm not there right now, because everything would be very fun if I was), largely due to a pride parade that happened a couple of days ago, which is a relatively rare event around here. So, NSG, allow me to bring the liberal communazi gay agenda to you and ask this - is anyone actually harmed by gay marriage?

I have heard all the "marriage is an ancient union of a man and a woman PILLARS OF SOCIETY and so on" arguments, but none of them seem to answer the key question - how does gay marriage harm anyone? Because to me and to presumably many, it does not harm anyone at all. And if it harms no one, I see no reason for it to be illegal.

Just so we're clear - I'm not asking you people why gay marriage should be illegal. I'm asking you if it, in any way, harms anyone. In any capacity.

It couldn't harm any one! But if there has to be a balance between the gay's and straights. A balance for reporducing!

It's already.
And gays aren't necessarily infertile...

[Freiheit Reich]

The families that are shamed because Adam and Steve decided to make their perversions public.

[The Whispers]

I dunno, I'd say there's a pretty tight correlation between extreme weather events caused by 'Global warming' and the increase in the number of states legalising gay marriage, and just now we've had a series of deadly public transport accidents in Europe after the Pope said 'yeah whatever, gays are just a thing'.

Coincidence?

[DrakoBlaria]

The children, obviously

[Regnum Dominae]

The families that are shamed because Adam and Steve decided to make their perversions public.

What?

[Surfistan]

Fashion industry, because the gheys love fashion.

Kidding, no not really, offended yes, but hey you shouldn't live to please the Jesuslanders.

[Heleventia]

Well, lately around where I live, there's been an awful lot of discussion about gay rights (sure is a pity I'm not there right now, because everything would be very fun if I was), largely due to a pride parade that happened a couple of days ago, which is a relatively rare event around here. So, NSG, allow me to bring the liberal communazi gay agenda to you and ask this - is anyone actually harmed by gay marriage?

I have heard all the "marriage is an ancient union of a man and a woman PILLARS OF SOCIETY and so on" arguments, but none of them seem to answer the key question - how does gay marriage harm anyone? Because to me and to presumably many, it does not harm anyone at all. And if it harms no one, I see no reason for it to be illegal.

Just so we're clear - I'm not asking you people why gay marriage should be illegal. I'm asking you if it, in any way, harms anyone. In any capacity.

It harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, ungodly and against my principles. To see a man and a woman holding hands is a much pleasanter sight than to see two men holding hands (ugh!). I feel like puking. On a broader sense, it harms the country where population is on decline. Unstabilised population can have devastating consequences ranging from ruining economy to workforce decline. Above all, its simply ungodly and displeases him.

[Surfistan]

I dunno, I'd say there's a pretty tight correlation between extreme weather events caused by 'Global warming' and the increase in the number of states legalising gay marriage, and just now we've had a series of deadly public transport accidents in Europe after the Pope said 'yeah whatever, gays are just a thing'.

Coincidence?

But, GLUUBAL WURMENG IS A LIEEEE by the Libruls trying to take away our manly SUV's and handlebar moustaches.

[Aquafireland]

I have no idea. Just no idea.

[Norstal]

The families that are shamed because Adam and Steve decided to make their perversions public.

What a retarded logic.

"Well maybe you wouldn't get bullied in school if you're so smart! STOP BEING SMART!"

[Condunum]

The families that are shamed because Adam and Steve decided to make their perversions public.

What?

Don't bother. Freiheit Reich is Alaje before he stopped being a fascist. Only worse.

[Agritum]

What?

Don't bother. Freiheit Reich is Alaje before he stopped being a fascist. Only worse.

And he also pretends to be a Libertarian, may I add.

[Condunum]

Don't bother. Freiheit Reich is Alaje before he stopped being a fascist. Only worse.

And he also pretends to be a Libertarian, may I add.

Well that's a fucking joke. Libertarians don't think there should be state laws banning personal relationships.

[Condunum]

I dunno, I'd say there's a pretty tight correlation between extreme weather events caused by 'Global warming' and the increase in the number of states legalising gay marriage, and just now we've had a series of deadly public transport accidents in Europe after the Pope said 'yeah whatever, gays are just a thing'.

Coincidence?

I THINK NOT!3

[Utceforp]

Well, lately around where I live, there's been an awful lot of discussion about gay rights (sure is a pity I'm not there right now, because everything would be very fun if I was), largely due to a pride parade that happened a couple of days ago, which is a relatively rare event around here. So, NSG, allow me to bring the liberal communazi gay agenda to you and ask this - is anyone actually harmed by gay marriage?

I have heard all the "marriage is an ancient union of a man and a woman PILLARS OF SOCIETY and so on" arguments, but none of them seem to answer the key question - how does gay marriage harm anyone? Because to me and to presumably many, it does not harm anyone at all. And if it harms no one, I see no reason for it to be illegal.

Just so we're clear - I'm not asking you people why gay marriage should be illegal. I'm asking you if it, in any way, harms anyone. In any capacity.

It harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, ungodly and against my principles. To see a man and a woman holding hands is a much pleasanter sight than to see two men holding hands (ugh!). I feel like puking. On a broader sense, it harms the country where population is on decline. Unstabilised population can have devastating consequences ranging from ruining economy to workforce decline. Above all, its simply ungodly and displeases him.

Your worshipping of this "God" harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, unmarduky and against my principles. The ancient Sumerian pantheon is the one true religion, and anyone who doesn't agree with my opinion is a Tiamatist.

Getting away from the jokes, "population decline" is not a bad thing. China and India are ridiculously overpopulated, and both (especially India) are still growing very quickly, and the world simply can't sustain a population larger than the one currently. World overpopulation is actually a genuine problem. If more people were gay (And thus either didn't have children or adopted children, either way not increasing the population) the world would be a better place.

[Condunum]

It harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, ungodly and against my principles. To see a man and a woman holding hands is a much pleasanter sight than to see two men holding hands (ugh!). I feel like puking. On a broader sense, it harms the country where population is on decline. Unstabilised population can have devastating consequences ranging from ruining economy to workforce decline. Above all, its simply ungodly and displeases him.

Your worshipping of this "God" harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, unmarduky and against my principles. The ancient Sumerian pantheon is the one true religion, and anyone who doesn't agree with my opinion is a Tiamatist.

Getting away from the jokes, "population decline" is not a bad thing. China and India are ridiculously overpopulated, and both (especially India) are still growing very quickly, and the world simply can't sustain a population larger than the one currently. World overpopulation is actually a genuine problem. If more people were gay (And thus either didn't have children or adopted children, either way not increasing the population) the world would be a better place.

As much as I'm all for gay marriage, population control is a shit reason to support it. The reason we can't support a larger population at this time is distribution.

[Utceforp]

Your worshipping of this "God" harms everyone. Me first of all. Its ugly, unmarduky and against my principles. The ancient Sumerian pantheon is the one true religion, and anyone who doesn't agree with my opinion is a Tiamatist.

Getting away from the jokes, "population decline" is not a bad thing. China and India are ridiculously overpopulated, and both (especially India) are still growing very quickly, and the world simply can't sustain a population larger than the one currently. World overpopulation is actually a genuine problem. If more people were gay (And thus either didn't have children or adopted children, either way not increasing the population) the world would be a better place.

As much as I'm all for gay marriage, population control is a shit reason to support it. The reason we can't support a larger population at this time is distribution.

There's also the whole equality/freedom/separation of church and state stuff, which I definitely think is the best reason for supporting gay marriage, but if you need a more "practical" reason to support it, there's that.

[Luveria]

Don't bother. Freiheit Reich is Alaje before he stopped being a fascist. Only worse.

And he also pretends to be a Libertarian, may I add.

A Fascist Libertarian. He'd fit in with the Tea Party.

[Soviet Russia Republic]

No harm done.

[Mkuki]

And he also pretends to be a Libertarian, may I add.

A Fascist Libertarian. He'd fit in with the Tea Party.

Fascist libertarian? Have ideologies lost their meaning? Political ideology fusion has gone too far these days.

[Condunum]

As much as I'm all for gay marriage, population control is a shit reason to support it. The reason we can't support a larger population at this time is distribution.

There's also the whole equality/freedom/separation of church and state stuff, which I definitely think is the best reason for supporting gay marriage, but if you need a more "practical" reason to support it, there's that.

If you need a more practical reason, use rights & responsibilities. Y'know, the couple hundred or so that come with marriage? That's as good a reason as any.

[Luveria]

A Fascist Libertarian. He'd fit in with the Tea Party.

Fascist libertarian? Have ideologies lost their meaning? Political ideology fusion has gone too far these days.

When I see an obvious fascist calling themselves a libertarian I'll call them out on what they are.