NATION

PASSWORD

Should Animal Bloodsports be Legal?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What Bloodsports Should be Legal???

Dog Fighting
9
4%
Cockfighting
18
9%
Rat Baiting
13
6%
None
115
57%
Political Smearing
48
24%
 
Total votes : 203

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:01 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:Why?


Because it's a person killing an animal rather than two animals killing each other.

And that's somehow better because...?

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41251
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:02 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:Why?


Because it's a person killing an animal rather than two animals killing each other.


Hmmm... Not sure that is enough of a difference. After all, people are animals too.

User avatar
New Frenco Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7787
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Frenco Empire » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:03 pm

Geilinor wrote:
New Frenco Empire wrote:Animal bloodsports? No.

However, human bloodsports...

:rofl:

I'm actually somewhat serious. I'm weird. Best leave me to my own ramblings and extremism. :lol2:
NEW FRENCO EMPIRE

Transferring information from disorganized notes into presentable factbooks is way too time consuming for a procrastinator. Just ask if you have questions.
Plutocratic Evil Empire™ situated in a post-apocalyptic Decopunk North America. Extreme PMT, yet socially stuck in the interwar/immediate post-war era, with Jazz music and flapper culture alongside nanotechnology and Martian colonies. Tier I power of the Frencoverse.


Las Palmeras wrote:Roaring 20s but in the future and with mutants

Alyakia wrote:you are a modern poet
Top Hits of 2132! (Imperial Public Radio)
Coming at you from Fort Orwell! (Imperial Forces Network)



User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:04 pm

Vareiln wrote:And that's somehow better because...?


Because people kill animals. I don't see why doing it front of a bunch of cheering people is any different. Forcing two animals to fight is fucked up, forcing one animal to fight a person who enters the situation willingly is cool.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:05 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:Hmmm... Not sure that is enough of a difference. After all, people are animals too.


I like how people always bring that up in discussions about animal rights like it's something that we all didn't know.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
TaQud
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15959
Founded: Apr 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby TaQud » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:06 pm

political smearing
CENTRIST Economic Left/Right: 0.62 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.46
List Your Sexuality, nickname(s), NSG Family and Friends, your NS Boyfriend or Girlfriend, gender, favorite quotes and anything else that shows your ego here.
(Because I couldn't live without knowing who was part of NSG Family or what your nickname was. I was panicking for days! I couldn't eat, I couldn't sleep I was so worried that I'd would never know and have to live without knowing this! /sarcasm)
2013 Best signature Award

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:06 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vareiln wrote:And that's somehow better because...?


Because people kill animals. I don't see why doing it front of a bunch of cheering people is any different. Forcing two animals to fight is fucked up, forcing one animal to fight a person who enters the situation willingly is cool.

That's not better at all. There is still an animal being killed for amusement.

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:06 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Phocidaea wrote:Not for "higher animals".

If you want to set up duels between, say, insects, which might be semi-sentient at best, be my guest.

Insects would probably be the limit. Other animals are most definitely sentient. Of course chickens and dogs are conscious and can feel pain. Get one of those animals as pets and it will be pretty obvious.

Insects are just an example. If sentience is the problem, most invertebrates are fair game. The only invertebrates which most people would consider sentient are squid and octopuses, really.

And to someone else, I, for one, have no interest in fighting insects and am somewhat afraid of their entire phylum (except most crustaceans). And to someone else, I am not going to turn this into a fight over whether insects are sentient (most people would say "no", but you seem down to fight an uphill battle).
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:07 pm

Vareiln wrote:That's not better at all. There is still an animal being killed for amusement.


I don't have a problem with animals being killed for amusement. I have a problem with forcing animals to fight each other.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41251
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:07 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:Hmmm... Not sure that is enough of a difference. After all, people are animals too.


I like how people always bring that up in discussions about animal rights like it's something that we all didn't know.


Not an answer though, is it? ;)

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:08 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Not an answer though, is it? ;)

Wasn't really a question was it?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:09 pm

Vareiln wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Because people kill animals. I don't see why doing it front of a bunch of cheering people is any different. Forcing two animals to fight is fucked up, forcing one animal to fight a person who enters the situation willingly is cool.

That's not better at all. There is still an animal being killed for amusement.

There's no need to say this, but without consent. It's the same as the modern animal rights based argument against bestiality.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:10 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vareiln wrote:That's not better at all. There is still an animal being killed for amusement.


I don't have a problem with animals being killed for amusement. I have a problem with forcing animals to fight each other.

What the fuck. No seriously, what the fuck?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:11 pm

Phocidaea wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Insects would probably be the limit. Other animals are most definitely sentient. Of course chickens and dogs are conscious and can feel pain. Get one of those animals as pets and it will be pretty obvious.

Insects are just an example. If sentience is the problem, most invertebrates are fair game. The only invertebrates which most people would consider sentient are squid and octopuses, really.

And to someone else, I, for one, have no interest in fighting insects and am somewhat afraid of their entire phylum (except most crustaceans). And to someone else, I am not going to turn this into a fight over whether insects are sentient (most people would say "no", but you seem down to fight an uphill battle).

I don't know what would be so attractive about making insects fight anyway. You'd barely be able to see it and it would be over in a very short time.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:12 pm

Vareiln wrote:

What the fuck. No seriously, what the fuck?


Not a fan of hunting?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41251
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Not an answer though, is it? ;)

Wasn't really a question was it?


It kinda was. It wasn't explicit but it could be worked out fairly easily.

I guess if is spelled it out then I'd have to ask why would you be okay with people fighting to the death?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:12 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vareiln wrote:That's not better at all. There is still an animal being killed for amusement.


I don't have a problem with animals being killed for amusement. I have a problem with forcing animals to fight each other.

Why the difference? A sentient being that can feel pain is still being killed for no reason.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:13 pm

Phocidaea wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Insects would probably be the limit. Other animals are most definitely sentient. Of course chickens and dogs are conscious and can feel pain. Get one of those animals as pets and it will be pretty obvious.

Insects are just an example. If sentience is the problem, most invertebrates are fair game. The only invertebrates which most people would consider sentient are squid and octopuses, really.

And to someone else, I, for one, have no interest in fighting insects and am somewhat afraid of their entire phylum (except most crustaceans). And to someone else, I am not going to turn this into a fight over whether insects are sentient (most people would say "no", but you seem down to fight an uphill battle).

*DEATed*
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:14 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vareiln wrote:

What the fuck. No seriously, what the fuck?


Not a fan of hunting?

You kill things for amusement?
If you hunt for food, that's a somewhat different story, but for amusement?

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:14 pm

Certainly not.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:14 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
It kinda was. It wasn't explicit but it could be worked out fairly easily.

I guess if is spelled it out then I'd have to ask why would you be okay with people fighting to the death?


The person isn't supposed to be killed in a bullfight the bull is.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:15 pm

Yes, they should. However, well regulated.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:15 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Phocidaea wrote:Insects are just an example. If sentience is the problem, most invertebrates are fair game. The only invertebrates which most people would consider sentient are squid and octopuses, really.

And to someone else, I, for one, have no interest in fighting insects and am somewhat afraid of their entire phylum (except most crustaceans). And to someone else, I am not going to turn this into a fight over whether insects are sentient (most people would say "no", but you seem down to fight an uphill battle).

Invertebrate fish are actually sentient, by the way. http://fishcount.org.uk/fish-welfare-in-commercial-fishing/fish-sentience

Fish aren't invertebrates.
The only non-vertebrate animals referred to as fish colloquially are still chordates.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:15 pm

Vareiln wrote:You kill things for amusement?
If you hunt for food, that's a somewhat different story, but for amusement?


I don't for practical reasons but I would. People hunt recreationally, they do it often. You can turn on the television and watch people hunt and kill an animal and derive amusement from that.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:16 pm

Vareiln wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Not a fan of hunting?

You kill things for amusement?
If you hunt for food, that's a somewhat different story, but for amusement?

Some people love inflicting pain and suffering. Sentient animals do experience that.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Azin, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eragon Island, Fractalnavel, Google [Bot], Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, Nantoraka, Northern Seleucia, Ostroeuropa, Senkaku, The marxist plains, The North Polish Union, The Pacific Northwest, Xerographica, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads