Why? Because it's artificial, like civil marriage?
Advertisement

by Geilinor » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:00 pm

by Blasveck » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:00 pm
Scholencia wrote:Geilinor wrote:It means 1,138 rights. http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/an-overview-of-federal-rights-and-protections-granted-to-married-couples
It says that marriages are right of a man and woman, not a man and man. Even, hetero people donr see marriages as something necessary.

by Lithosano » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:01 pm

by Agorya » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:01 pm


by Geilinor » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:01 pm

by Vazdania » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:01 pm


by Liriena » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Scholencia » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm

by Cadaver breadsticks » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm

by Vazdania » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm
Blasveck wrote:Scholencia wrote:It says that marriages are right of a man and woman, not a man and man. Even, hetero people donr see marriages as something necessary.
For one, DOMA was struck down, so marriage is not just a man and woman. And yes, marriage is not necessary, if you don't want tax breaks.

by Bundesdeutschland » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm

by Lupelia » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm
United Empire of Lupelia

by Liriena » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Tlik » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm
Genivaria wrote:Bundesdeutschland wrote:
Okay, maybe things like that are a little extreme. But I don't support LGBT "rights" nonetheless. But I'm guessing this will pass because Armageddon is approaching so I think I'd best let things be...and let others do the work.
Oh please, fanatics have been claiming it was the end times since the beginning times.

by Geilinor » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:02 pm

by Menassa » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:03 pm
Australasia wrote: [...]
Hillary's speech in particular left Arab and African delegates stony faced, but received thunderous applause from the delegates of all developed countries.
[...]

by Industries (Ancient) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:03 pm

by Divair » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:03 pm
Lupelia wrote:What I don't understand is how these militant Christians don't see God as a malevolent being for condemning homosexuality. Sexual/romantic attraction, whether heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual, is a natural and beautiful thing. If God is against something as natural as sex and love, then he's not good by any means.

by Geilinor » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage
Advertisement