NATION

PASSWORD

License To Parent?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Devilz Advocate
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Sep 30, 2006
Ex-Nation

License To Parent?

Postby The Devilz Advocate » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:33 pm

In the United States, and perhaps in most countries, there is a process that prospective parents need to go through in order to adopt a child. The adoptive parents need to actively prove that they have the ability to parent the child they seek to adopt. Biological childrearing, on the other hand, does not require this; a parent is assumed to be fit until proven otherwise.
Should this be the case? Are biological children less important than adoptive children? I say no. All parents should have to actively demonstrate that they have the ability to parent. Fertility is not a sufficient qualification.

Edit: In case the above is confusing, I'm saying that simply supplying the biological beginnings of children does not equate to the ability to raise children, and biologically-related parents should be put under the same constraints as potential adoptive parents.
Last edited by The Devilz Advocate on Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia
Anti: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:34 pm

Ban pregnancy.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Tyriece
Minister
 
Posts: 2033
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyriece » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:36 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:In the United States, and perhaps in most countries, there is a process that prospective parents need to go through in order to adopt a child. The adoptive parents need to actively prove that they have the ability to parent the child they seek to adopt. Biological childrearing, on the other hand, does not require this; a parent is assumed to be fit until proven otherwise.
Should this be the case? Are biological children less important than adoptive children? I say no. All parents should have to actively demonstrate that they have the ability to parent. Fertility is not a sufficient qualification.


Agreed
Pro: Education, Democracy, Buddhism, Civil Rights, Liberalism, Philosophy, Idealism, Logic, Pacifism, Happiness, Compassion, Environment, Love, Rationalism, Liberty, Exploration, Tolerance, Diplomacy

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163903
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:37 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:In the United States, and perhaps in most countries, there is a process that prospective parents need to go through in order to adopt a child. The adoptive parents need to actively prove that they have the ability to parent the child they seek to adopt. Biological childrearing, on the other hand, does not require this; a parent is assumed to be fit until proven otherwise.
Should this be the case? Are biological children less important than adoptive children? I say no. All parents should have to actively demonstrate that they have the ability to parent. Fertility is not a sufficient qualification.

Whose are you, then?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Devilz Advocate
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Sep 30, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The Devilz Advocate » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:38 pm

Frisivisia wrote:Ban pregnancy.

Forcibly sterilizing people, or just women at birth and then undoing the sterilization once they acquire their parenting license would work, but would be awfully invasive.
Pro: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia
Anti: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:39 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Ban pregnancy.

Forcibly sterilizing people, or just women at birth and then undoing the sterilization once they acquire their parenting license would work, but would be awfully invasive.

But think of the children, or rather, don't.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Qahadim
Diplomat
 
Posts: 554
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Qahadim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:40 pm

So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:42 pm

1984 was not an instruction manual.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Devilz Advocate
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Sep 30, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The Devilz Advocate » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:42 pm

Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.
Pro: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia
Anti: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia

User avatar
Zilam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zilam » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:42 pm

Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.


Amen brother/sister! :)
I'm not who I was.

User avatar
Tyriece
Minister
 
Posts: 2033
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyriece » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:42 pm

Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.


And if you so happen to be a crackhead with zero money or jobs that makes a living by killing people and harvesting there organs, tough luck for the kid, right?
Pro: Education, Democracy, Buddhism, Civil Rights, Liberalism, Philosophy, Idealism, Logic, Pacifism, Happiness, Compassion, Environment, Love, Rationalism, Liberty, Exploration, Tolerance, Diplomacy

User avatar
Zilam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zilam » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:44 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.



And how do you go about getting a license? How do you prove what a 'good' parent is? My parents did some shitty things while I was growing up, but they always loved me, and I've turned out right, to be a mostly productive member of society. I am afraid that you would rip children away from loving parents who have made a few bad mistakes.
I'm not who I was.

User avatar
Lancov
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1966
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lancov » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:44 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.

Where do you propose on housing all the confiscated children? In already understaffed orpahanges?
Демократска Република Лaнкoв | RP population: 60 million | rewriting canon as of 2023. previous posts may no longer be accurate | Currency: Haid (1 LVH = 0.41 USD)

| WA Mission | Factbook |
Everyone wrote:Who?

User avatar
Zilam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zilam » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:44 pm

Tyriece wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.


And if you so happen to be a crackhead with zero money or jobs that makes a living by killing people and harvesting there organs, tough luck for the kid, right?



The state already intervenes in cases like this. Child protective services, and what not.
I'm not who I was.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:45 pm

Tyriece wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.


And if you so happen to be a crackhead with zero money or jobs that makes a living by killing people and harvesting there organs, tough luck for the kid, right?

Isn't this exactly why there is a child welfare system?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:45 pm

Not into the mass breeders of the world. Also not really into what is basically just a euthanasia programme. Ho hum.

User avatar
Zonolia
Senator
 
Posts: 4170
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zonolia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:45 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.

You can't determine how good a person will be at parenting if they're having their first child...therefore it is unlicensable.
Hell hath no fury like a mod scorned.
Kim Berloni-
President of Zonolia.
Population (Homeland+Colonies-As of 03/14/2014): 19,874,000,000
Current Year: 2014
Territories:
(Jikilo Brothers Incorporated)
S Islands Archipelago
Commonwealths:
Cubanonoa
The Island of Gu
Proud Progressive!
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49

All Hail Emperor Palpatine, Savior of the Republic and Valiant Destroyer of the Anti-Establishment Jedi Order!

User avatar
Partybus
Minister
 
Posts: 2289
Founded: Oct 20, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Partybus » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:45 pm

I have to say no, while at the same time believing that there are many people on this planet, That. Just. Shouldn't. Breed!!

User avatar
Zilam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zilam » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:46 pm

Lancov wrote:
The Devilz Advocate wrote:This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.

Where do you propose on housing all the confiscated children? In already understaffed orpahanges?



This is also a very good point. With so many children already in the system, without parents to care for them, how can we put more children in said system? It would probably create more issues than solve.
I'm not who I was.

User avatar
Qahadim
Diplomat
 
Posts: 554
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Qahadim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:46 pm

The Devilz Advocate wrote:
Qahadim wrote:So anybody and everybody that wants to have children through natural biological processes have too go to some government official who will be given authority to say yay, or nay? No. It's impractical, impossible to enforce, and violates the bodily sovereignty of both men and women.

It's my body, and I'll reproduce with it if I want too. You, your best friend, or even the government has zero right to tell me differently.

This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.

Children are a privilege!

No. I have a right to bear children. No amount of licensing changes what is my natural right.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:46 pm

Partybus wrote:I have to say no, while at the same time believing that there are many people on this planet, That. Just. Shouldn't. Breed!!

Like people who think others shouldn't breed.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Partybus
Minister
 
Posts: 2289
Founded: Oct 20, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Partybus » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:48 pm

Zilam wrote:
The Devilz Advocate wrote:This is why I don't support the sterilization method. I think you should be able to reproduce as much as you like. You just wouldn't be allowed to keep any of the children unless you're licensed.



And how do you go about getting a license? How do you prove what a 'good' parent is? My parents did some shitty things while I was growing up, but they always loved me, and I've turned out right, to be a mostly productive member of society. I am afraid that you would rip children away from loving parents who have made a few bad mistakes.


But if they had to take a test, they wouldn't be allowed to breed in the first place, so, no problem.

User avatar
The Devilz Advocate
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Sep 30, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The Devilz Advocate » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:49 pm

Zilam wrote:And how do you go about getting a license? How do you prove what a 'good' parent is? My parents did some shitty things while I was growing up, but they always loved me, and I've turned out right, to be a mostly productive member of society. I am afraid that you would rip children away from loving parents who have made a few bad mistakes.

Presumably the same way that adoption agencies determine fitness. Home visits, income checks; etc.
Pro: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia
Anti: Abortion rights, LGBT rights, men's rights. feminism, Black Lives Matter, veganism, reparations for slavery, gun control, pornography, free speech, xenophobia

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:49 pm

Awesome idea.

I think Brazil should have an artificial way of leveling birth rate for different groups, regions and social strata.

Or rather the entire world.

Poor people would get it way better without their average 5-6 children in Africa.

Bonus, we wouldn't have all those Stormfront copypasta trolls because their basic arguments would then be void.

*nods*
Last edited by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro on Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Partybus
Minister
 
Posts: 2289
Founded: Oct 20, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Partybus » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:49 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Partybus wrote:I have to say no, while at the same time believing that there are many people on this planet, That. Just. Shouldn't. Breed!!

Like people who think others shouldn't breed.


Hurrr.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Caffeinated, Google [Bot], New Temecula, Smoya, Socialist Lop, Soul Reapers, Spirit of Hope, The Xenopolis Confederation, Trump Almighty

Advertisement

Remove ads