NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Culture and the rules

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Observe and Report

I have broken rules, gotten away with it, and let others get away with it.
83
22%
I have broken rules, gotten away with it, but don't let others get away with it.
30
8%
I have broken rules, but not gotten away with it, I let others get away with it.
36
9%
I have broken rules, but not gotten away with it, I don't let others get away with it.
48
13%
I have not broken rules, and I don't let others get away with it.
81
21%
I have not broken rules, But I let others get away with it.
105
27%
 
Total votes : 383

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:30 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Choronzon wrote:How is it not admission when you say "Man, I should go to places where child prostitution is legal. They roll out the red carpet for people like me."


Possibly a controversial opinion, but has the guy broken any laws having sex with young girls in countries where that's legal?

Vile? Yes. But illegal?


Yes.

Many countries make it an offence for one of their citizens to engage in child sex tourism.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:30 pm

Esternial wrote:
Divair wrote:Then maybe we need a new group of staff to deal with this type of shit.

Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.


So maybe we should have an unofficial neighbourhood watch organization and forum.
Compile files on people and stuff.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:30 pm

Electroconvulsive Glee wrote:
Choronzon wrote:The mods protected a child rapist. Any mod who was an active part in that decision is a criminal. Period. This is both my stance on the issue, and is it a stance I am sure legal authorities would agree with.

Any mod involved in the decision to allow a child rapist to post on a 13+ forum should no longer be a mod. Period.

And all the bootlicks pretending like the MODS JUST DIDN'T KNOW are lying to themselves and everyone else.

Um. Pull back the reins.

Criticism, even unfair criticism, of Moderations decisions, policies, etc.

Calling a group of Mods criminals if beyond the pale. Based on limited information, I am outraged by what appeared to have happened. But even the worst interpretation of the worst allegations I have seen does not amount to criminal activity.

It is not surprising that any group of humans will make mistakes. Even huge, horrifying, seemingly incomprehensible errors. It is not realistic or reasonable to expect that not to happen. Overreacting and demanding harsh punishment upon members of Moderation will not help and will only discourage anyone with any sense from wanting to be a Mod.

The circling of wagons, refusal to admit mistakes, refusal to correct errors, and absurd excuses are a whole different and very real problem. Threatening to tar and feather Mods will make that problem worse and give them every reason to write off criticism as hysterical rants.

This is not up for debate. Under US federal law, there are abundant criminal implications for Zeonic States' use of this forum to discuss not just his illegal activity, but also advocate for and aid others to commit similar acts. Having been informed of this, refusing to act and to continue to allow him the use of this forum and not take reasonable efforts to prevent and report constitutes aiding and abetting.

This is not something to joke about. In all likelihood, nothing would have come of it. But let's be frank: there was a potentially criminal level of negligence going on, and it is not beyond the pale to suggest it.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:30 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
As an international site, I've often wondered. NS is governed by the laws of the country where the servers are hosted?



The usual litmus test of moderation is "If it's illegal in the US you can't talk about it". Even if it's legal in parts of the US (such as marijuana) they still refuse to allow discussion. So there's no excuse beyond incompetence.

or tax evasion, which is ok, because they're not the IRS!
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:31 pm

1. Pretty sure I broke the rules once when I kinda went calm furry ape shit on someone accusing me of racism simply because I pointed out that race isn't real in a biological context (anyone who wants to dispute that, create a new thread). Didn't get a warning or anything though, so maybe it was still kosher.

2. As for the whole mods thingy. I...do get frustrated at times with rulings or lack thereof, but nothing is perfect. However, the Zeonic States fiasco is simply and utterly inexcusable. The mods who were made aware of that crap and didn't act accordingly need to be removed from the mod staff. It is possibly the blackest spot on the mods record (or at least since I've been here). It is revolting that Zeonic was allowed to be here after it was brought to their attention.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:31 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
As an international site, I've often wondered. NS is governed by the laws of the country where the servers are hosted?



The usual litmus test of moderation is "If it's illegal in the US you can't talk about it". Even if it's legal in parts of the US (such as marijuana) they still refuse to allow discussion. So there's no excuse beyond incompetence.


Talking about a joint? LOL BAN

Talking about going to another country and raping kids? Totally legitimate opinion we must all debate.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:31 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Khadgar wrote:

The usual litmus test of moderation is "If it's illegal in the US you can't talk about it". Even if it's legal in parts of the US (such as marijuana) they still refuse to allow discussion. So there's no excuse beyond incompetence.

or tax evasion, which is ok, because they're not the IRS!

But they are, apparently, the DEA.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:31 pm

Esternial wrote:
Divair wrote:Then maybe we need a new group of staff to deal with this type of shit.

Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.

Because it shouldn't take six months to deal with this shit. And what if you approached a mod after six months and, again, they told you (politely) to fuck off? And if this was missed for so long, imagine all the other stuff that has been missed.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:31 pm

Esternial wrote:
Divair wrote:Then maybe we need a new group of staff to deal with this type of shit.

Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.


Here's the problem. It was reported when it happened and it was ignored. People had to go back and do the legwork for the mods who were too inept to check the first time someone said something. The defense is "you only reported it once".

That's their defense.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:32 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
As an international site, I've often wondered. NS is governed by the laws of the country where the servers are hosted?



The usual litmus test of moderation is "If it's illegal in the US you can't talk about it". Even if it's legal in parts of the US (such as marijuana) they still refuse to allow discussion. So there's no excuse beyond incompetence.


Yes, this was a display of incompetence. I was just curious as to whether the site needs to abide by the laws of the server hosting country or how that would proceed.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:32 pm

Divair wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Possibly a controversial opinion, but has the guy broken any laws having sex with young girls in countries where that's legal?

Vile? Yes. But illegal?

Yes. Sex tourism is illegal.


Fair enough. I stand corrected and apologise.

Just replying to the first post that told me I'm a cretin, not the rest. :p

User avatar
Gauntleted Fist
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10061
Founded: Aug 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauntleted Fist » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:32 pm

Esternial wrote:
Divair wrote:Then maybe we need a new group of staff to deal with this type of shit.

Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.

Ah, you do know that the account system has a warning history on your account, right? As in they can see every warning or ban you've ever received.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:33 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Choronzon wrote:How is it not admission when you say "Man, I should go to places where child prostitution is legal. They roll out the red carpet for people like me."


Possibly a controversial opinion, but has the guy broken any laws having sex with young girls in countries where that's legal?

Vile? Yes. But illegal?

In at least some jurisdictions. Won't claim to know the specifics of that particular case.

Note to self, do not walk away from computer and then post anyway in this thread.
Last edited by Ifreann on Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:33 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Esternial wrote:Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.


So maybe we should have an unofficial neighbourhood watch organization and forum.
Compile files on people and stuff.

Many NS'ers already have a network of connection. No need to go even that far.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:34 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Khadgar wrote:

The usual litmus test of moderation is "If it's illegal in the US you can't talk about it". Even if it's legal in parts of the US (such as marijuana) they still refuse to allow discussion. So there's no excuse beyond incompetence.


Yes, this was a display of incompetence. I was just curious as to whether the site needs to abide by the laws of the server hosting country or how that would proceed.


In a case like this, where there's a potential for aiding/abetting charges. I would guess they have to suffer the laws of wherever the servers are yes.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:35 pm

Esternial wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
So maybe we should have an unofficial neighbourhood watch organization and forum.
Compile files on people and stuff.

Many NS'ers already have a network of connection. No need to go even that far.


Plus Ostro's idea is a bit much.

Report rule breaking like in the case of ZS, consistently. Would that make a difference? I surely hope so.

Address incompetence. We are all responsible for our judgement.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:36 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes, this was a display of incompetence. I was just curious as to whether the site needs to abide by the laws of the server hosting country or how that would proceed.


In a case like this, where there's a potential for aiding/abetting charges. I would guess they have to suffer the laws of wherever the servers are yes.

Look, I don't actually think any mod should be charged with a crime or anything like that. And I don't think every mod is culpable. As you said, the mods shouldn't have to babysit their fellow mods, especially when the fucking SENIOR GAME MOD says he handled an issue.

But the mods that allowed this to go on should have their mod powers revoked and be run out on a rail.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:37 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Khadgar wrote:
In a case like this, where there's a potential for aiding/abetting charges. I would guess they have to suffer the laws of wherever the servers are yes.

Look, I don't actually think any mod should be charged with a crime or anything like that. And I don't think every mod is culpable. As you said, the mods shouldn't have to babysit their fellow mods, especially when the fucking SENIOR GAME MOD says he handled an issue.

But the mods that allowed this to go on should have their mod powers revoked and be run out on a rail.


That was concerning the DOS poster, actually. Not the mods.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:37 pm

Gauntleted Fist wrote:
Esternial wrote:Why? Players who are desperate to prove they're right roam these wild lands. Why appoint new staff if you got those around?

Some of you thoroughly proved it by gathering up all that info. Present your findings to the Mods and they'll act on it. Seems to work fine if you ask me, since ZS got his just desserts. It's actually a better system than having staff dig it up and make the ruling. Two separate groups rather than one.

If they're presented with all the proof, they'll see sense. It's just because reports are spread over a period of time that the Mods can't be expected to remember every single infraction. It's not like we have a database on this forum.

Ah, you do know that the account system has a warning history on your account, right? As in they can see every warning or ban you've ever received.

I repeat: It's not like we have a database on this forum.

Sometimes people get warned without using the warn tags, which isn't registered in your 'history'. A single post that's suggestive but not really crossing the line may be ignored, and the Mods don't store this into some CMR in their heads that reminds them the next time they see one of those posts, and the next, and the next. On many occasions, only when all are put together and viewed at the same time do they notice "holy shit, this dude is dangerous"

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:38 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Khadgar wrote:
In a case like this, where there's a potential for aiding/abetting charges. I would guess they have to suffer the laws of wherever the servers are yes.

Look, I don't actually think any mod should be charged with a crime or anything like that. And I don't think every mod is culpable. As you said, the mods shouldn't have to babysit their fellow mods, especially when the fucking SENIOR GAME MOD says he handled an issue.

But the mods that allowed this to go on should have their mod powers revoked and be run out on a rail.


Like I said, DOS the both of 'em. I don't want the hammer coming down on anyone but the perv. I am however extremely pissed about the whole thing.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:39 pm

Is the Zeon debacle being investigated, addressed etc?
Has anyone actually gone to the mods and said "We want some kind of action taken."
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:40 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:Is the Zeon debacle being investigated, addressed etc?
Has anyone actually gone to the mods and said "We want some kind of action taken."


Yes there's an ongoing investigation. No they won't comment on it.

User avatar
DesAnges
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31807
Founded: Nov 02, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby DesAnges » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:40 pm

There are 452422 registered nations on the forum "Members" page.

Now, granted, I'd say that probably 75%-80% of these are either DEAT or timed out. So that gives us about what, about 90k active posters?

Probably less than that. Let's go for 50k.

There are 25 moderators and admins that operate on the forums. Twenty-five. That's just patently not enough.
My name is Kim-Jong Ayatollah, and I'm a big boy. I'm ten and three-quarters. I have high levels of respect for this man. <3<32 NSG, two pages into a debate
@Iseabbv Don't @ me

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:40 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Esternial wrote:Many NS'ers already have a network of connection. No need to go even that far.


Plus Ostro's idea is a bit much.

Report rule breaking like in the case of ZS, consistently. Would that make a difference? I surely hope so.

Address incompetence. We are all responsible for our judgement.

I agree, the admin staff should be held accountable for their actions if they make mistakes or fall short.

We can't accept someone going "whoops my bad" a dozen of times and just go along with it.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:40 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Is the Zeon debacle being investigated, addressed etc?
Has anyone actually gone to the mods and said "We want some kind of action taken."


Yes there's an ongoing investigation. No they won't comment on it.


In that case, shouldn't we wait for the result of the investigation before commenting ourselves?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belschaft, Lativs, Skelleftella, Vyahrapura, World Anarchic Union

Advertisement

Remove ads