So your subjective opinion counts as evidence of narcissism now?
Advertisement
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:54 pm
by The Scientific States » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:55 pm
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:58 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Abatael wrote:
And where would that evidence be?
Just look at the thread itself. Congress wants to make sure the NSA can do what they want and infringe on people's privacy.
Regarding greed congress always votes against increased welfare and healthcare, and lobbying plays a major influence in congress.
by The Scientific States » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:59 pm
Abatael wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Just look at the thread itself. Congress wants to make sure the NSA can do what they want and infringe on people's privacy.
Regarding greed congress always votes against increased welfare and healthcare, and lobbying plays a major influence in congress.
First of all, that's loaded with bias.
Second of all, even if that were true, it would not be evidence of narcissism. But it's not true.
And if they are always voting against healthcare, how is it that Obamacare passed and if I recall correctly, over twenty attempts to get it repealed failed? (However, this would be off-topic; so I won't be discussing this anymore.)
by New haven america » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:00 pm
Komi Rus wrote:I'm pretty sure CONGRESS stands for Collection Of Narcissists Greedily Ruling (by) Endorsing Surveillance (and) Suppression.
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:00 pm
by Komi Rus » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:03 pm
Abatael wrote:Komi Rus wrote:They shoot down bills supporting the constitution and support their own raises
What have they shot down that would support the Constitution? And as to them increasing there own pay, that may be considered a fault with the system, but it is what it is. (I realize that's a poor response to it, but it would be off-topic.)Everia wrote:Everywhere.
So nowhere.
by Everia » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:03 pm
Abatael wrote:Komi Rus wrote:They shoot down bills supporting the constitution and support their own raises
What have they shot down that would support the Constitution? And as to them increasing there own pay, that may be considered a fault with the system, but it is what it is. (I realize that's a poor response to it, but it would be off-topic.)
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:03 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Abatael wrote:
First of all, that's loaded with bias.
Second of all, even if that were true, it would not be evidence of narcissism. But it's not true.
And if they are always voting against healthcare, how is it that Obamacare passed and if I recall correctly, over twenty attempts to get it repealed failed? (However, this would be off-topic; so I won't be discussing this anymore.)
Obamacare took a long, long time to pass.
Also what I said is not bias, it's fact.
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:05 pm
Komi Rus wrote:Abatael wrote:
What have they shot down that would support the Constitution? And as to them increasing there own pay, that may be considered a fault with the system, but it is what it is. (I realize that's a poor response to it, but it would be off-topic.)
So nowhere.
Amash, Right to privacy unless a warrant is given is the fourth amendment
by Yes Im Biop » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:06 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Komi Rus » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:06 pm
Abatael wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Obamacare took a long, long time to pass.
Also what I said is not bias, it's fact.
". . . wants to make sure the NSA can do what they want and infringe on people's privacy." That's biased and warped.
They never once did that. The NSA requires proper warrants and only looks at the caller, the one being called, the frequency of calls and the duration of calls. It is looking at what could be considered private, but it is not infringing it, where "to infringe" means to disobey or disregard something, such as the law or one's rights.
by Blasveck » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:08 pm
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:10 pm
Komi Rus wrote:Abatael wrote:
". . . wants to make sure the NSA can do what they want and infringe on people's privacy." That's biased and warped.
They never once did that. The NSA requires proper warrants and only looks at the caller, the one being called, the frequency of calls and the duration of calls. It is looking at what could be considered private, but it is not infringing it, where "to infringe" means to disobey or disregard something, such as the law or one's rights.
they are disobeying/disregarding the bill of rights
by Abatael » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:10 pm
Blasveck wrote:Fuck all this. Just fuck everything. If I can't even live in my own country without being spied on, I might as well leave. It's to stop "Counterterrorism"?
"Those who value security over freedom deserve neither."
-Benjamin Franklin
by Komi Rus » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:11 pm
Blasveck wrote:Fuck all this. Just fuck everything. If I can't even live in my own country without being spied on, I might as well leave. It's to stop "Counterterrorism"?
"Those who value security over freedom deserve neither."
-Benjamin Franklin
by The blood ravens » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:11 pm
Blasveck wrote:Fuck all this. Just fuck everything. If I can't even live in my own country without being spied on, I might as well leave. It's to stop "Counterterrorism"?
"Those who value security over freedom deserve neither."
-Benjamin Franklin
by Luziyca » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:12 pm
Maurepas wrote:I had high hopes for it, but I'm not surprised it didn't pass. The US Government has clearly demonstrated it doesn't give a shit about its people or their rights.
by Blasveck » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:13 pm
Abatael wrote:Blasveck wrote:Fuck all this. Just fuck everything. If I can't even live in my own country without being spied on, I might as well leave. It's to stop "Counterterrorism"?
"Those who value security over freedom deserve neither."
-Benjamin Franklin
Then leave. No one is going to stop you. Or even try to stop you.
by Everia » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:14 pm
Luziyca wrote:Day by day, I am quite thankful I was born in Canada and not south of it. At this point, if the Republicans win a majority in the 2014 election for the House of "Representatives", I strongly wish the last person to leave the United States would turn off the lights, for a shitload of reasons. This is one of them.
To quote Maurepas on this matter...Maurepas wrote:I had high hopes for it, but I'm not surprised it didn't pass. The US Government has clearly demonstrated it doesn't give a shit about its people or their rights.
by Seperates » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:15 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, DutchFormosa, Eahland, Europa Undivided, Kerwa, Khalasa, Turenia, Unmet Player
Advertisement