NATION

PASSWORD

UK - porn block plan to stop "childhood corrosion"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:50 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Have you ever had sex?

No, I haven't, and I won't til I'm in a relationship long enough. What does that have to do with anything?

If you'd ever been laid you would not say that it's more of a waste of time than going to the movies or playing video games.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:51 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:There are plenty of people who think about sex fucking all the time and don't get any, and there are plenty of people who think about it every once in a while but get some multiple times a day.

That doesn't even make sense, how can you not think about sex if you have more of it. You'd have to be thinking about sex during the act. :eyebrow:


*ahem*

Dakini wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:There are plenty of people who think about sex fucking all the time and don't get any, and there are plenty of people who think about it every once in a while but get some multiple times a day.

I think about sex much less when I'm having it regularly.

It's almost like actually doing it means I have done it and don't have to think about it anymore for a while or something. A bit like how I don't think about food right after I've eaten.


It's not like a person has sex more than once an hour. :roll:

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:53 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:
Somehow this is relevant.
Image


Seriously, though. How about doing something with, y'know, actual people instead of just fapping to hentai and hating on everyone else like some misanthropic super villain?

Har har, "doesn't wanna be a whore, must not have friends, must be jelly" hur dur.

No, you're just talking out your ass.

Ayreonia wrote:Nothing wrong with that. I first had sex after being in a relationship for a year (granted, we would have wanted to do it sooner, but that's not my point).

Just please don't act as an authority on sexuality if you're a virgin. I don't tell my boss how to do his job, and neither does he.


I don't see how me being a virgin has anything to do with my opinion of how often people should think about sex or when they should have it. I'd still think the same way whether I were or not.

Yeah, and when I was 12 I thought that I would wait until I got married.


....and that totally happened....


:rofl:

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:55 am

New haven america wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Har har, "doesn't wanna be a whore, must not have friends" hur dur.

I have a rather large clique of friends, that I hang out with multiple times every week. Try again.

I don't see how me being a virgin has anything to do with my opinion of how often people should think about sex or when they should have it. I'd still think the same way whether I were or not.

Cause you've never had it(Like me), since you've never experienced it you shouldn't judge people about why, when, or how they have sex.

It's almost like a person can avoid being an asshole despite having different life experiences or something. Who would have thought? :P

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:55 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
New haven america wrote:Cause you've never had it(Like me), since you've never experienced it you shouldn't judge people about why, when, or how they have sex.

That's ridiculous. It's like saying, " because I haven't smoked cocaine, I shouldn't have a say if, when, or how you can smoke cocaine".

That's ridiculous. You don't smoke cocaine.

(You smoke crack.)
Last edited by Dakini on Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:02 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:But your flag is a sexualized image, mofo. Also: that attitude is incredibly perverse.

I don't have issue with a level of sexualization (I'm not asexual like some here think I am), I don't like excessive emphasis on sex, however. Nor do I approve of promiscuousity.

What is "perverse" about sex negativity?

Dude, your flag is like 1/4 tits and the rest is a woman in an Escher Girl pose. Yet that's not very sexualized. If a woman consents to be pictured in a similar pose (that one is physically impossible) and is paid for it, then she's "basically a prostitute" though. But you don't have a problem with women. Not at all.

And clearly, everyone who has sex (even if they're married) has too much of it and is a whore (except the men, the men are "studs").
Last edited by Dakini on Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:06 am

Morrdh wrote:Couple of things I find ironic about the block.

1. Its suppose to 'protect' children, yet the government wants to teach children computer programming skills from age 5.

2. It was the Daily Fail who campaigned for the block, which is ironic since they often have smut both in their newspaper and on their website.

Clearly they want to monopolize the smut so they can sell more rags.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:15 am

Dakini wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:I don't have issue with a level of sexualization (I'm not asexual like some here think I am), I don't like excessive emphasis on sex, however. Nor do I approve of promiscuousity.

What is "perverse" about sex negativity?

Dude, your flag is like 1/4 tits and the rest is a woman in an Escher Girl pose. Yet that's not very sexualized. If a woman consents to be pictured in a similar pose (that one is physically impossible) and is paid for it, then she's "basically a prostitute" though. But you don't have a problem with women. Not at all.

And clearly, everyone who has sex (even if they're married) has too much of it and is a whore (except the men, the men are "studs").


Those are supposed to be tits? I mean, I know I have limited experience, but tits don't look like that. Well, I suppose the overdone silicone enhanced ones sometimes can but it's really unappealing.

User avatar
Malfyria
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Malfyria » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:29 am

Apart from the moralistic overtones I see nothing wrong with this.

User avatar
Gallup
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6162
Founded: Jan 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallup » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:30 am

I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.
Economic Left/Right: 6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.92
NSG's Official Hero of Kvatch and Prophet of NSG
Have you seen Evita? Best musical ever.
╔═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╗
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Repost this if ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ you are a beautiful strong Argonian maid ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ who don’t need no Nord ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
╚═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╝

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:32 am

Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.

Morality is subjective.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:32 am

Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.


Oh do tell, how so?

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:48 am

Khadgar wrote:
Dakini wrote:Dude, your flag is like 1/4 tits and the rest is a woman in an Escher Girl pose. Yet that's not very sexualized. If a woman consents to be pictured in a similar pose (that one is physically impossible) and is paid for it, then she's "basically a prostitute" though. But you don't have a problem with women. Not at all.

And clearly, everyone who has sex (even if they're married) has too much of it and is a whore (except the men, the men are "studs").


Those are supposed to be tits? I mean, I know I have limited experience, but tits don't look like that. Well, I suppose the overdone silicone enhanced ones sometimes can but it's really unappealing.

I'm not going to claim that they're drawn very well or that they actually appear to be attached to her torso in a way that makes sense (they don't). The artist who drew that was clearly not very good and definitely seemed to care more about saying "TITS! OVER HERE!" than they did about drawing a woman in a way that makes sense (because women are clearly just a collection of body parts that exist for men to oggle).

Granted, probably more disturbing is that she appears to be composed of two different people: one standing up and the other laying down.
Last edited by Dakini on Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159047
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:51 am

Ayreonia wrote:
Ifreann wrote::O And now you're making porn! David Cameron would be disappointed.



We do. We understand that trying to be funny when suggesting that society dictate what women wear doesn't make it funny. Do you understand this?

"Ooh, look at how politically correct I am. I am, in fact, so politically correct that I'll get offended by a comment that wasn't aimed at me, made by a person who agrees with me, whose said comment was making fun of people who think rape is okay."

ffs

"Someone didn't like a joke that I liked? Better blame political correctness so people know how edgy I am"


The Land of Truth wrote:
Ifreann wrote:It wasn't funny because suggesting that women be forced to dress a certain way isn't funny, and that was pretty much the whole joke.

Nah, I'm good.

And I wasn't suggesting that. As a matter of fact, I wasn't suggesting anything, that's the whole fucking point of a joke (be it funny or not).

Well, no. The point of a joke is to be funny. Not to make empty statements.
You're just mad because I said something you didn't like and you wanna make sure I can't ever say anything else you don't like.

I could just as easily say that you're just mad because you can't handle people criticising your jokes.


Dakini wrote:
Ifreann wrote::O And now you're making porn! David Cameron would be disappointed.

Nah, porn is the stuff I make for him that I won't send via gmail and have to transfer in person.

...scarves?


Zweite Alaje wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:That flag is pretty fucking sexualized.

It's a biological function. Being sex-negative is comparable to being anal retentive or putting someone down if they take too many shits.

And? It's a fucking anime character, who gives a shit?

>doesn't like excessive emphasis on sex
>sets flag to woman with massive tits front and centre
Ergo, you do like excessive emphasis on sex, as long as its the right kind.


Souseiseki wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Il7fctr.jpg

in a victory for the daily mail

e: alaje incase its not clear to half the people in the thread you look like that right now

Bingo.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:56 am

Ifreann wrote:
Dakini wrote:Nah, porn is the stuff I make for him that I won't send via gmail and have to transfer in person.

...scarves?

I feel like a scarf made of 1s and 0s is not very warm. Well, except this one.


...yes, I knew of a binary scarf pattern before I made this post...

User avatar
Gabralia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Jul 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gabralia » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:57 am

Oh no it won't.... I'm assuming "childhood corrosion" equals child abuse, and blocking porn isn't going to stop that..

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159047
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:01 am

Dakini wrote:
Ifreann wrote:...scarves?

I feel like a scarf made of 1s and 0s is not very warm. Well, except this one.


...yes, I knew of a binary scarf pattern before I made this post...

Awesome.

User avatar
Horsefish
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7402
Founded: Jun 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Horsefish » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:04 am

Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.


Block it and don't watch it then.

Other people will watch it if they want to.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.

Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.

Georgism wrote:
Geniasis wrote:Maybe if you showered every now and then...

That's what the Nazis said, we're not falling for that one again.

The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

What's wrong with a little destruction?

User avatar
DesAnges
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31807
Founded: Nov 02, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby DesAnges » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:10 am

Horsefish wrote:
Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.


Block it and don't watch it then.

Other people will watch it if they want to.

The number of first class degrees might go through the roof if they banned the porn.
My name is Kim-Jong Ayatollah, and I'm a big boy. I'm ten and three-quarters. I have high levels of respect for this man. <3<32 NSG, two pages into a debate
@Iseabbv Don't @ me

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:10 am

DesAnges wrote:
Horsefish wrote:
Block it and don't watch it then.

Other people will watch it if they want to.

The number of first class degrees might go through the roof if they banned the porn.

Doubt it.

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:19 am

Dakini wrote:That's ridiculous. You don't smoke cocaine.

(You smoke crack.)

Well, yeah. Crack cocaine.

Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.

i don't even have a response to this. maybe i'll just write a sentence i consider roughly equivalent:

"gosh i hope they don't give anyone access to water with FLUORIDE, did you know it's used for etching glass??? i hear it causes autisms"
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:54 am

Tubbsalot wrote:
Dakini wrote:That's ridiculous. You don't smoke cocaine.

(You smoke crack.)

Well, yeah. Crack cocaine.

Gallup wrote:I really hope it is banned. Porn is immoral.

i don't even have a response to this. maybe i'll just write a sentence i consider roughly equivalent:

"gosh i hope they don't give anyone access to water with FLUORIDE, did you know it's used for etching glass??? i hear it causes autisms"
Hmm... seems to fly by reactionary asshat logic.

Ban Flouride then. And Cars, because they kill people too y'know.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:25 am

The Whispers wrote:
DesAnges wrote:The number of first class degrees might go through the roof if they banned the porn.

Doubt it.

I dunno.
I can report firsthand that porn addiction is not conducive to your studies.
Unless you're doing a degree on porn addiction.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159047
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:34 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Whispers wrote:Doubt it.

I dunno.
I can report firsthand that porn addiction is not conducive to your studies.
Unless you're doing a degree on porn addiction.

Your personal experience cannot be generalised to all other third level students.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:35 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Whispers wrote:Doubt it.

I dunno.
I can report firsthand that porn addiction is not conducive to your studies.
Unless you're doing a degree on porn addiction.

Pft. If we're going to ban things that have a negative impact on one's studies, why not ban abusive relationships, working part-time jobs more than 10 hours/week and message boards?
Last edited by Dakini on Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ascovo, Bradfordville, Ellese, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Fartsniffage, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Haganham, Hauthamatra, Ifreann, Jilia, Kubra, Mtwara, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Rary, The Jamesian Republic, The Snazzylands, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads