UK - porn block plan to stop "childhood corrosion"

[The Land of Truth]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

"All people with less than 5 generations of English/British ancestors should not be allowed by law to have more than one child."

I love how this perceives that English and British are synonymous.

Considering the site seems to be populated by nothing but right-wing idiots, you shouldn't be surprised.

[Helvereos]

"All people with less than 5 generations of English/British ancestors should not be allowed by law to have more than one child."

I love how this perceives that English and British are synonymous.

Considering the site seems to be populated by nothing but right-wing idiots, you shouldn't be surprised.

I thought this site is primarily left-wing.

[Cadaver breadsticks]

Considering the site seems to be populated by nothing but right-wing idiots, you shouldn't be surprised.

I thought this site is primarily left-wing.

britishfreedom, not nationstates.

[The Land of Truth]

"All people with less than 5 generations of English/British ancestors should not be allowed by law to have more than one child."

I love how this perceives that English and British are synonymous.

Wait till you get to the bit where they mention the holocaust...

Edit: We're in luck

From Wikipedia:

"The party was de-registered by the Electoral Commission in December 2012[3] after failing to return the annual registration form and £25 fee by the due date of 31 October 2012."

Thank Christ.

Eh, I, personally, like the part about "Nobody from Islamic countries should be allowed to enter..." lol so stuped (yes, I spelled that wrong on purpose).

[Draakonite]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is a link to http://www.holotruth.org.uk/
I have only overlocked it,but it seems to be a holocaust revisionist site.

[Planeia]

(1)Children under 12 should definitely not be watching pornography.

(2)For instance, porn makes it seem like it's easy to get laid. (3)Children are not mature enough to know that's not true. (4)Porn also encourages promiscuity and what not. (5)While I'm not arguing any religious bullshit, why should we encourage irresponsibility, I understand tolerate, but why encourage? (6)We have enough underage pregnancies and kids catching STDs as is.

(7)Around that age they probably haven't had proper sex education either, and so they'll go out and imitate what they saw, and since most pornstars don't use contraception on film, they'll do it without protection.

(8)Overall, they're just too young for that stuff.

1) I agree, but it's an opinion, so I don't quite care.
2) Only if you don't understand how sex works (which your parents should explain to you, anyway). And if they go on and do it behind their backs?
3) Again, an opinion. http://www.hhs.gov/opa/familylife/tech_assistance/etraining/adolescent_brain/Development/prefrontal_cortex/
4) Bullshit. Banging five chicks at a time and going on to do the same the next scene.
5) No one's "encouraging" anything. Ever heard of monkey see monkey do?
6) Their fault. Gotta agree with you there, irresponsibility
7) The fuck are you talking about?
8. Another fucking opinion.

[Arglorand]

"All people with less than 5 generations of English/British ancestors should not be allowed by law to have more than one child."

I love how this perceives that English and British are synonymous.

Wait till you get to the bit where they mention the holocaust...

Edit: We're in luck

From Wikipedia:

"The party was de-registered by the Electoral Commission in December 2012[3] after failing to return the annual registration form and £25 fee by the due date of 31 October 2012."

Thank Christ.

No pun intended, but... freeeeeeedom, and thank God.

[The Land of Truth]

I thought this site is primarily left-wing.

britishfreedom, not nationstates.

Yep. NationSates appears to be filled with left-wing..."somethings".

[The Sivent Isles]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

A good chuckle was had.

[Imperializt Russia]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

[Democratic Koyro]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

The crap?

[The Land of Truth]

1) I agree, but it's an opinion, so I don't quite care.
2) Only if you don't understand how sex works (which your parents should explain to you, anyway). And if they go on and do it behind their backs?
3) Again, an opinion. http://www.hhs.gov/opa/familylife/tech_assistance/etraining/adolescent_brain/Development/prefrontal_cortex/
4) Bullshit. Banging five chicks at a time and going on to do the same the next scene.
5) No one's "encouraging" anything. Ever heard of monkey see monkey do?
6) Their fault. Gotta agree with you there, irresponsibility
7) The fuck are you talking about?
8. Another fucking opinion.

2) Then, it's their parents fault for not paying fucking attention to their kids.
3) And? What does that have to do with what I said?
4) That doesn't automatically promote promiscuity, like you presume it does.
5) That's not encouraging.
7) Ah, the facepalm, the last-ditch defense of someone who can't defend their assertions. Gotta love it.

[Arglorand]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

... what party is this

[The Land of Truth]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

The fuck is wrong with those people?

[Grand Britannia]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

I'll have whatever substance they're having.

[The Land of Truth]

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

I'll have whatever substance they're having.

^Now in the awesome quotes thread.

[Imperializt Russia]

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

... what party is this

Afraid I can't recall the name.

If I dredge it up and find their website, I'll let you know.

[DesAnges]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

The internalised EU immigration policy was good.

I didn't personally agree with it, but it was very sensible for someone producing those other policies.

[Planeia]

2) Then, it's their parents fault for not paying fucking attention to their kids.
3) And? What does that have to do with what I said?
4) That doesn't automatically promote promiscuity, like you presume it does.
5) That's not encouraging.
7) Ah, the facepalm, the last-ditch defense of someone who can't defend their assertions. Gotta love it.

2) Which is why parental controls would be useful for them.
3) This is needed again: notice the word "Maturation" in the title.
4) Too much of it can.
5) ^
7) No you just weren't able to comprehend what I said and so I gave up. I'll try again: Since they have no sex education they'll think what they see in porn is the right thing to do, and so if they watch hardcore stuff they'll go and do that. Add in the fact that contraception is rarely used in porn, and the kids never had sex ed to tell them pregnancies and STDs are not something you want, they'll do it without protection.

[Hurdegaryp]

There is something worse.

There's an Australian party that wants to introduce segregation, threaten US cities with clandestine EMP tactics and hidden nukes (not delivered by ICBM, that's too risky and predictable) and replace all their army officers with Russian Army Officers and turn the force into one huge Russia trope.

... what party is this

Indeed. We need a source, and we need it now.

[Densaner]

Well done Dave. Keep flying those kites.

[The Land of Truth]

2) Then, it's their parents fault for not paying fucking attention to their kids.
3) And? What does that have to do with what I said?
4) That doesn't automatically promote promiscuity, like you presume it does.
5) That's not encouraging.
7) Ah, the facepalm, the last-ditch defense of someone who can't defend their assertions. Gotta love it.

2) Which is why parental controls would be useful for them.
3) This is needed again: notice the word "Maturation" in the title.
4) Too much of it can.
5) ^
7) No you just weren't able to comprehend what I said and so I gave up. I'll try again: Since they have no sex education they'll think what they see in porn is the right thing to do, and so if they watch hardcore stuff they'll go and do that. Add in the fact that contraception is rarely used in porn, and the kids never had sex ed to tell them pregnancies and STDs are not something you want, they'll do it without protection.

2) So use parental controls. Why the hell do they need the government to do it for them?
3) To even present this, you have to presume that all kids reach "maturity" as the same age, which they don't.
4) So, don't watch too much.
5) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (I can do that, too, but it's still not an argument.)
7) Wow, it's very convenient that I just couldn't "comprehend" it. You're using a slippery slope argument and presuming that all children think alike (thus creating a false equivocation), please keep your logical fallacies out of my logic.

And even if any of that was true, in what way does if affect your life?

[Ayreonia]

http://britishfreedom.org/

Anyone who wants a good chuckle. Its truely dreadful. The website is nearly as bad and as infantile as the policies. Seriously looks like something i came up with in Year 8 when i was goofing off in IT class. The one about the Knights Templar getting Israel seems to have gone. Granted, there are is some, though very little good stuff in there, but mostly because its populist nonsense.

Vox Populi?

*cocks China Broom*

Got a solution to that right here.

[The Blue Wolf Federation]

Fine -shrugs-

Since you went and provided your father's full name and professional affiliation, I think I'm going to take the liberty of letting him know that he needs to have a chat with his child about the appropriateness of giving away identifying information on the internet.


Seriously, kid. How have your parents not discussed this with you already? Do you think that "don't give your name out to strangers" really just means your name? Because you know, it's probably not a huge leap to figure that out based on the information you've given us.

Ah rite. About that. The only information you've received is that which he has published in his CVs. As for me being his kid, there is no way to determine his private information or mine. All the information presented is already public. That he has kids is also known. Which kid or whether this is even a legitimate claim is subject to beleif.

[Democratic Koyro]

Since you went and provided your father's full name and professional affiliation, I think I'm going to take the liberty of letting him know that he needs to have a chat with his child about the appropriateness of giving away identifying information on the internet.


Seriously, kid. How have your parents not discussed this with you already? Do you think that "don't give your name out to strangers" really just means your name? Because you know, it's probably not a huge leap to figure that out based on the information you've given us.

Ah rite. About that. The only information you've received is that which he has published in his CVs. As for me being his kid, there is no way to determine his private information or mine. All the information presented is already public. That he has kids is also known. Which kid or whether this is even a legitimate claim is subject to beleif.

Link.