Yeah. "It makes me uncomfortable that there might be a gay guy near me and I don't even know" is close to "But what if they make the children gay?" in terms of signs of homophobia.
Advertisement

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:08 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:08 pm
Bottle wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't have a share of the watermelon. I don't want a share of the watermelon. It's just not me; I refuse to be part of this watermelonnormative society.
You know, it's flamboyant anti-watermelonists like you who ruin this movement for the good anti-melonists. If you'd just tone it down and take a goddamn slice to fit in, instead of throwing your anti-melonism in everyone's face, then maybe we could make some progress.

Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Anti Communismm » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:08 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:09 pm
Bottle wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't have a share of the watermelon. I don't want a share of the watermelon. It's just not me; I refuse to be part of this watermelonnormative society.
You know, it's flamboyant anti-watermelonists like you who ruin this movement for the good anti-melonists. If you'd just tone it down and take a goddamn slice to fit in, instead of throwing your anti-melonism in everyone's face, then maybe we could make some progress.

by St George » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:09 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Dakini wrote:You don't pour it on something. You pour it inside something.
And fair point. You could go the skittles vodka route.
Ooh, yes, I remember the wodka in watermelon thing. Usually with some orange juice and straws. And then a huge group having to drink it bottoms up with the straws.
Great drinking game for a party with a tropical theme

Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

by The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:09 pm
It's the minority that are a problem.
With them, it's the perceived alien nature of homosexuality that is the problem.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:09 pm
Choronzon wrote:No, they don't.
If you're someone who was going to be pro gay rights until you say a gay pride parade, chances are you were never going to be pro gay rights.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Choronzon » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:10 pm
Anti Communismm wrote:St George wrote:To bigots like you, sure.
Pssst, you aren't the kind of person we're trying to reach with the Pride movement.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cCUqzN1Ky74/TDX3cetE7OI/AAAAAAAAADw/TBbFp334i2g/s1600/Pride+1.jpg
The image speaks for itself and you never will reach people like me .

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
So heteronormativity is gay culture.
No. YOU are part of gay culture. The fact that you are heteronormative is irrelevant. Take part in a parade, join a rights organization, or participate in some way in the community at large, and you're part of the culture. Neil Patrick Harris isn't effeminate, but he takes part in rallies and marches. Ellen DeGeneres is somewhat androgynous without being at all butch, but she's definitely part of the culture. You don't need to dress in drag, to lisp, to snap your fingers, or to shave yourself down, oil yourself up, and dance to club music in order to be part of the culture. You just have to accept the fact that it's there, and participate in your own way. Or you could also opt out, but then you forfeit your moral right to complain that you aren't being represented. Want people to see that gay people are diverse? Then be part of the diversity!

by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm


by Bottle » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Bottle wrote:You know, it's flamboyant anti-watermelonists like you who ruin this movement for the good anti-melonists. If you'd just tone it down and take a goddamn slice to fit in, instead of throwing your anti-melonism in everyone's face, then maybe we could make some progress.
We're there, we'd rather eat a pear, get used to it!

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Bottle wrote:You know, it's flamboyant anti-watermelonists like you who ruin this movement for the good anti-melonists. If you'd just tone it down and take a goddamn slice to fit in, instead of throwing your anti-melonism in everyone's face, then maybe we could make some progress.
We're here, we don't like melons, get used to it!

Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm

by St George » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:12 pm
As an expression of Pride? Sure. As a summation of the movement and our cause and our goals? Hell no.Anti Communismm wrote:St George wrote:To bigots like you, sure.
Pssst, you aren't the kind of person we're trying to reach with the Pride movement.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cCUqzN1Ky74/TDX3cetE7OI/AAAAAAAAADw/TBbFp334i2g/s1600/Pride+1.jpg
The image speaks for itself
We don't want to reach bigots like you.and you never will reach people like me .
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

by Anti Communismm » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:12 pm
Choronzon wrote:Anti Communismm wrote:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cCUqzN1Ky74/TDX3cetE7OI/AAAAAAAAADw/TBbFp334i2g/s1600/Pride+1.jpg
The image speaks for itself and you never will reach people like me .
You mean the gay rights group will never reach entrenched homophobes?
I assure you, this is not a revelation.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:12 pm
Choronzon wrote:the fuck does this even mean
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Katganistan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:13 pm

by Bottle » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:13 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Anti Communismm wrote:
Your Pride parades looks like a Freak Show with all honesty .
Most of those guys do more harm than good with all their actions during those parades .
Here's the fun thing: most straight people I know are absolutely cool with it. The ones who aren't cool with it (like you) aren't going to accept gay people in any way unless they're totally in the closet and self-hating, so there's no point in trying to get you to change your mind. Therefore, why should they care what you think?

by The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:13 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
No. YOU are part of gay culture. The fact that you are heteronormative is irrelevant. Take part in a parade, join a rights organization, or participate in some way in the community at large, and you're part of the culture. Neil Patrick Harris isn't effeminate, but he takes part in rallies and marches. Ellen DeGeneres is somewhat androgynous without being at all butch, but she's definitely part of the culture. You don't need to dress in drag, to lisp, to snap your fingers, or to shave yourself down, oil yourself up, and dance to club music in order to be part of the culture. You just have to accept the fact that it's there, and participate in your own way. Or you could also opt out, but then you forfeit your moral right to complain that you aren't being represented. Want people to see that gay people are diverse? Then be part of the diversity!
Why on earth would I want to spend time with the kinds of people who think their sexuality is worth making such a fuss over?
Literally the only reason I can think of is the reason you point out. That if I don't go, i wont be represented. And as such, people will get the impression that gays are just like that.
So in essence, because you people refuse to rename the culture, i'm being forced to either participate, or to face misinformation that you are propogating.
Why can't you just rename it, and then I can not participate in peace.

by The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:14 pm
Anti Communismm wrote:St George wrote:To bigots like you, sure.
Pssst, you aren't the kind of person we're trying to reach with the Pride movement.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cCUqzN1Ky74/TDX3cetE7OI/AAAAAAAAADw/TBbFp334i2g/s1600/Pride+1.jpg
The image speaks for itself and you never will reach people like me .

by St George » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:14 pm
Katganistan wrote:Can we at least agree that there are a spectrum of personality types under the umbrella of gay and that is sucks to try to exclude types you don't agree with as either "too gay" or "not gay enough"?
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Concejos Unidos, Diarcesia, Herador, Luziyca, Ryemarch, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Torisakia, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement