NATION

PASSWORD

Escaping the 'Gay Culture'

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
I honestly think Ostro just wants all of us to blend in. to keep our gayness to the bedroom. to not challenge popular society at all in any way shape or form in our actions.


How terrible it is to blend in. To be thought of as a person instead of a gay person.

I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Poopookakapeepeeshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jun 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Poopookakapeepeeshire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

Blekksprutia wrote:
Poopookakapeepeeshire wrote:that and one of their leaders is a lesbian

Your name is real mature. Real mature...

and?

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

Those people are worse than libertarian. They are freaken conservative.

No wonder I lost mah temper.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32121
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Yes, it absolutely is.

Because that erases my sexuality.

When heterosexuality is no longer considered the default, then you'll have a point. Not util then.


No it doesn't. I don't take anybody who wants to be thought of as different or special seriously.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32121
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:32 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.


I don't. That's exactly what steel magnolia wants, for people to be thought of as GAY people rather than just PEOPLE.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:32 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Not in my town.


And you don't like displaying public affection with a girlfriend, either? This is peculiar.

In the city, yes. Probably.

That's understandable--perfectly understandable. But don't fault those who have to the courage to be utterly and "inexcusably" gay for the world to see. Don't tell them to "tone it down" because you're scared of bigots.


I don't like public affection with a girlfriend either really.
It's complicated. I have issues that i'm aware of. I wouldn't really consider myself a decent person to ask this line of questioning to, to be honest.
They can do it all they like. that's fine. But why do they insist on saying it's gay culture to do so?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32121
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:33 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Those people are worse than libertarian. They are freaken conservative.

No wonder I lost mah temper.


You lost your temper because you're arguing about a subject you don't understand. You're also using political ideologies as slurs, because again you don't understand.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:33 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.


I don't. That's exactly what steel magnolia wants, for people to be thought of as GAY people rather than just PEOPLE.


I am not a bisexual person.
I am a person who happens to be bisexual.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:34 pm

You are weird.

I would go naked in the street if it wasn't seen as a crime and reason to violence.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:34 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Yes, it absolutely is.

Because that erases my sexuality.

When heterosexuality is no longer considered the default, then you'll have a point. Not util then.


No it doesn't. I don't take anybody who wants to be thought of as different or special seriously.

Stop faulting people who don't act just how you want them to, for trying "to be thought of as different or special".
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:35 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:You are weird.

I would go naked in the street if it wasn't seen as a crime and reason to violence.


I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:35 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Those people are worse than libertarian. They are freaken conservative.

No wonder I lost mah temper.

You lost your temper because you're arguing about a subject you don't understand. You're also using political ideologies as slurs, because again you don't understand.


Shaddap.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:You are weird.

I would go naked in the street if it wasn't seen as a crime and reason to violence.


I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.


Our maleness or our biness? I concede mine is very different.

My views on personal freedom, also.
Last edited by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro on Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:
And you don't like displaying public affection with a girlfriend, either? This is peculiar.


That's understandable--perfectly understandable. But don't fault those who have to the courage to be utterly and "inexcusably" gay for the world to see. Don't tell them to "tone it down" because you're scared of bigots.


I don't like public affection with a girlfriend either really.
It's complicated. I have issues that i'm aware of. I wouldn't really consider myself a decent person to ask this line of questioning to, to be honest.
They can do it all they like. that's fine. But why do they insist on saying it's gay culture to do so?


Because by now, it is. That's been the case for centuries. The problem is when folks see it as the entirety of gay culture, but I don't think that any flamboyant gay people are trying to say that, anyway. The way to address this may not be to say "That's not gay culture!", but, rather, to say "Yes, that's gay culture, but it's simply not part of it that I identify with."

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.


I don't. That's exactly what steel magnolia wants, for people to be thought of as GAY people rather than just PEOPLE.

She wants being gay and expressing it, not to be thought of as abnormal. Expressing gayness as an aspect of oneself is not any worse than expressing any other aspect, even if folks like you want to make it shameful.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:37 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.


Our maleness or our biness?


If you're running around in the street and saying it's part of bisexuality to do so, i'd be pissed.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:37 pm

I am a homosexual and don't really do any of the stereotypical stuff. Not in public, at least.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
The Holy NeoSpanish Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 787
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Holy NeoSpanish Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm

its the posession of the demon¡¡ and MUST be banned¡¡¡¡

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I don't like public affection with a girlfriend either really.
It's complicated. I have issues that i'm aware of. I wouldn't really consider myself a decent person to ask this line of questioning to, to be honest.
They can do it all they like. that's fine. But why do they insist on saying it's gay culture to do so?


Because by now, it is. That's been the case for centuries. The problem is when folks see it as the entirety of gay culture, but I don't think that any flamboyant gay people are trying to say that, anyway. The way to address this may not be to say "That's not gay culture!", but, rather, to say "Yes, that's gay culture, but it's simply not part of it that I identify with."


Can you explain to me why it's gay culture, and not just a subculture that contains gay people.
I don't see the point in labeling social groups and cultures around demographics. It's divisive, almost always misleading, and in most cases unjustifiable.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:You are weird.

I would go naked in the street if it wasn't seen as a crime and reason to violence.


I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.

*HEAVY SIGH*
If someone claims that, omg ur queer/gay/lesbian/bi so omg u must b lyke da ppl in pride parAIDS,
then you clearly need to just tell them they are an ignorant fuck and not talk to them.
Because NO ONE IN THE LGBT MOVEMENT IS CLAIMING EVERY LGBT PERSON IS LIKE THE FLAMBOYANT ONES. So stop getting fucking mad at the LGBT movement for establishing a safety zone and culture of acceptance!
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:39 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Our maleness or our biness?


If you're running around in the street and saying it's part of bisexuality to do so, i'd be pissed.


It would be fabulous Brazilianness.

Bisexuality is part of fabulous Brazilianness but in other ways. :)
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Forsakia
Minister
 
Posts: 3076
Founded: Nov 14, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Forsakia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:40 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:As a straight man, perhaps I don't get it, but I'm not exactly sure why it's up to gay people to tone things down in case the hetero folk feel uncomfortable. I don't especially mind (and I've learned to deeply appreciate certain aspects of queer culture from my own perspective), and frankly, attempts to make everyone assimilate seem from this outsider's perspective just as fruitless as attempts to make everyone dress in drag would be. This culture and method of personal expression has developed in the face of oppression over the course of centuries. It's symbolized and signaled safety and acceptance to the oppressed and the marginalized. It's even been the source of entire code languages.

And now some gay people want to escape it because it makes them feel less "normal"? Fine. That's your business. It's going to be far easier for you to assimilate into heteronormative culture in the West than at any time in modern history, so have at it. But don't put down those who still find joy in the society that was built by those who came before, and only grew stronger in the face of police raids, gay-bashing, mockery, discrimination in employment and housing, and neared extinction in the face of neglect by the government once HIV hit. It's a wonderful, radiant, and--if you'll forgive the term--fabulous culture, and I celebrate those who celebrate it.



On the one hand this, while also opposing stereotypes of gay people, and reinforcing those stereotypes by referring to "acting straight" which is offensive in itself.

But this thread is mostly people talking past each other.
Member of Arch's fan club.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:41 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.

*HEAVY SIGH*
If someone claims that, omg ur queer/gay/lesbian/bi so omg u must b lyke da ppl in pride parAIDS,
then you clearly need to just tell them they are an ignorant fuck and not talk to them.
Because NO ONE IN THE LGBT MOVEMENT IS CLAIMING EVERY LGBT PERSON IS LIKE THE FLAMBOYANT ONES. So stop getting fucking mad at the LGBT movement for establishing a safety zone and culture of acceptance!


Ignorance is fairly pervasive in society. If I disowned people every time they held an ignorant opinion, i'd be without friends. So would you.
Taking the time to educate people is better.
But the fact remains, I wouldn't have to educate them if they'd just stop calling it gay culture and call it what it is.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Azrael
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7884
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Azrael » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:42 pm

Usually I'd be like, "yeah, the oversaturation of flamboyancy of gay men in the media is rather annoying" but it seems you're just flaunting some idealistic sense of male machismo rather than trying to convey actual humanity.

In other words, "awwww yeah muscles, working out, protein shakes, macho!!" isn't any better than "FABULOUS"
They're both contrived senses of gender identity rather than actual personality.
Last edited by Azrael on Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If nothing exists, where did this anger come from?

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:42 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:*HEAVY SIGH*
If someone claims that, omg ur queer/gay/lesbian/bi so omg u must b lyke da ppl in pride parAIDS,
then you clearly need to just tell them they are an ignorant fuck and not talk to them.
Because NO ONE IN THE LGBT MOVEMENT IS CLAIMING EVERY LGBT PERSON IS LIKE THE FLAMBOYANT ONES. So stop getting fucking mad at the LGBT movement for establishing a safety zone and culture of acceptance!


Ignorance is fairly pervasive in society. If I disowned people every time they held an ignorant opinion, i'd be without friends. So would you.
Taking the time to educate people is better.
But the fact remains, I wouldn't have to educate them if they'd just stop calling it gay culture and call it what it is.

"Call it what it is"
Yes, we shall call it, "All those terrible, awful homos who aren't normal like me and think they have a right to an identity of their own that doesn't involve MY heteronormative standards!"
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christian Confederation, Dtn, Fartsniffage, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Northumbria and Scotland, Rusozak, Techocracy101010, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Selkie, Thermodolia, Vassenor, Yomet

Advertisement

Remove ads