I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.
Advertisement

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

by Poopookakapeepeeshire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:31 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Yes, it absolutely is.
Because that erases my sexuality.
When heterosexuality is no longer considered the default, then you'll have a point. Not util then.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:32 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:I think that you're making a distinction is interesting.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:32 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Not in my town.
And you don't like displaying public affection with a girlfriend, either? This is peculiar.In the city, yes. Probably.
That's understandable--perfectly understandable. But don't fault those who have to the courage to be utterly and "inexcusably" gay for the world to see. Don't tell them to "tone it down" because you're scared of bigots.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:33 pm
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Those people are worse than libertarian. They are freaken conservative.
No wonder I lost mah temper.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:33 pm

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:34 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:34 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:35 pm
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:You are weird.
I would go naked in the street if it wasn't seen as a crime and reason to violence.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:35 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Those people are worse than libertarian. They are freaken conservative.
No wonder I lost mah temper.
You lost your temper because you're arguing about a subject you don't understand. You're also using political ideologies as slurs, because again you don't understand.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:
And you don't like displaying public affection with a girlfriend, either? This is peculiar.
That's understandable--perfectly understandable. But don't fault those who have to the courage to be utterly and "inexcusably" gay for the world to see. Don't tell them to "tone it down" because you're scared of bigots.
I don't like public affection with a girlfriend either really.
It's complicated. I have issues that i'm aware of. I wouldn't really consider myself a decent person to ask this line of questioning to, to be honest.
They can do it all they like. that's fine. But why do they insist on saying it's gay culture to do so?

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:36 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:37 pm

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:37 pm

by The Holy NeoSpanish Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I don't like public affection with a girlfriend either really.
It's complicated. I have issues that i'm aware of. I wouldn't really consider myself a decent person to ask this line of questioning to, to be honest.
They can do it all they like. that's fine. But why do they insist on saying it's gay culture to do so?
Because by now, it is. That's been the case for centuries. The problem is when folks see it as the entirety of gay culture, but I don't think that any flamboyant gay people are trying to say that, anyway. The way to address this may not be to say "That's not gay culture!", but, rather, to say "Yes, that's gay culture, but it's simply not part of it that I identify with."

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:38 pm
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:39 pm


by Forsakia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:40 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:As a straight man, perhaps I don't get it, but I'm not exactly sure why it's up to gay people to tone things down in case the hetero folk feel uncomfortable. I don't especially mind (and I've learned to deeply appreciate certain aspects of queer culture from my own perspective), and frankly, attempts to make everyone assimilate seem from this outsider's perspective just as fruitless as attempts to make everyone dress in drag would be. This culture and method of personal expression has developed in the face of oppression over the course of centuries. It's symbolized and signaled safety and acceptance to the oppressed and the marginalized. It's even been the source of entire code languages.
And now some gay people want to escape it because it makes them feel less "normal"? Fine. That's your business. It's going to be far easier for you to assimilate into heteronormative culture in the West than at any time in modern history, so have at it. But don't put down those who still find joy in the society that was built by those who came before, and only grew stronger in the face of police raids, gay-bashing, mockery, discrimination in employment and housing, and neared extinction in the face of neglect by the government once HIV hit. It's a wonderful, radiant, and--if you'll forgive the term--fabulous culture, and I celebrate those who celebrate it.

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:41 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I wouldn't care if you did.
I'd only care if you turned around and said it was something you and I have in common.
*HEAVY SIGH*
If someone claims that, omg ur queer/gay/lesbian/bi so omg u must b lyke da ppl in pride parAIDS,
then you clearly need to just tell them they are an ignorant fuck and not talk to them.
Because NO ONE IN THE LGBT MOVEMENT IS CLAIMING EVERY LGBT PERSON IS LIKE THE FLAMBOYANT ONES. So stop getting fucking mad at the LGBT movement for establishing a safety zone and culture of acceptance!

by Azrael » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:42 pm

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:42 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:*HEAVY SIGH*
If someone claims that, omg ur queer/gay/lesbian/bi so omg u must b lyke da ppl in pride parAIDS,
then you clearly need to just tell them they are an ignorant fuck and not talk to them.
Because NO ONE IN THE LGBT MOVEMENT IS CLAIMING EVERY LGBT PERSON IS LIKE THE FLAMBOYANT ONES. So stop getting fucking mad at the LGBT movement for establishing a safety zone and culture of acceptance!
Ignorance is fairly pervasive in society. If I disowned people every time they held an ignorant opinion, i'd be without friends. So would you.
Taking the time to educate people is better.
But the fact remains, I wouldn't have to educate them if they'd just stop calling it gay culture and call it what it is.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Christian Confederation, Dtn, Fartsniffage, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Northumbria and Scotland, Rusozak, Techocracy101010, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Selkie, Thermodolia, Vassenor, Yomet
Advertisement