It is entirely normal that while one can agree piracy is, on the whole, wrong, and nonetheless engage in the activity.
Doubtless, pyromaniacs are aware they are wasting resources. Nonetheless...
Advertisement

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:22 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:22 pm

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:23 pm
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
There is a strong divide in the LGBT community over effeminate (sissy) + affected men. The ones who hate them, the ones who hate those hating them, the ones who are them, and the ones wholly indifferent or alienated from the controversy.
In Brazil the latter group is almost non-existent. Perhaps in cultures where gender roles are more liberated there isn't such a strong issue about it, and you both escaped. But I didn't saw people who didn't knew about it, before.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:24 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:I confused. Do you hate chess and go as well?

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:24 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
There is a strong divide in the LGBT community over effeminate (sissy) + affected men. The ones who hate them, the ones who hate those hating them, the ones who are them, and the ones wholly indifferent or alienated from the controversy.
In Brazil the latter group is almost non-existent. Perhaps in cultures where gender roles are more liberated there isn't such a strong issue about it, and you both escaped. But I didn't saw people who didn't knew about it, before.
So you presumed we were ignorant then tried to educate us with a source we can't read?

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:24 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
There is a strong divide in the LGBT community over effeminate (sissy) + affected men. The ones who hate them, the ones who hate those hating them, the ones who are them, and the ones wholly indifferent or alienated from the controversy.
In Brazil the latter group is almost non-existent. Perhaps in cultures where gender roles are more liberated there isn't such a strong issue about it, and you both escaped. But I didn't saw people who didn't knew about it, before.
So you presumed we were ignorant then tried to educate us with a source we can't read?

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:25 pm

by Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:27 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:27 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:28 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:So then you don't have a problem with "gay culture"?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:28 pm

Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.
by Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:30 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Jello Biafra wrote:So then you don't have a problem with "gay culture"?
I'm done following this train of questioning. You're fruitlessly trying to create a narrative where disliking flamboyance and associating flamboyance with gays means you hate gays and hate flamboyance for it's association with them.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:30 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:You've just said that you don't associate flamboyance with gays (or any other group of people).
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:31 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
I'm done following this train of questioning. You're fruitlessly trying to create a narrative where disliking flamboyance and associating flamboyance with gays means you hate gays and hate flamboyance for it's association with them.
You've just said that you don't associate flamboyance with gays (or any other group of people).
by Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:32 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:34 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
White culture isn't a subculture.
Missing the point.
Labeling a culture after a demographic when it isn't all-inclusive or even DESCRIPTIVE of that demographic, is discriminatory and perpetuates stereotypes.
Cut it out.
The point of that post was that renaming a culture to something more appropriate isn't someone "Taking" your culture from you, and it's childish to say otherwise.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Verbal Pararhea wrote:I was under the impression that the purpose of this forum was intellectual discussion.
In addition, I do not hate games as a whole. As I said, I hate when they become a distraction from intellectual progress.

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:36 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Missing the point.
Labeling a culture after a demographic when it isn't all-inclusive or even DESCRIPTIVE of that demographic, is discriminatory and perpetuates stereotypes.
Cut it out.
The point of that post was that renaming a culture to something more appropriate isn't someone "Taking" your culture from you, and it's childish to say otherwise.
Except it's not about queer pride, it's about being queer.
if you don't want to be a part of that, fine. You're not queer, you're just gay.
by Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:36 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:What I cannot fathom is why the Gay priders, the people who fulfill the gay stereotype, decided to go out and be all in everyones faces about it.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:36 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:Perhaps so, because if you don't have a problem with "gay culture" then we don't have a particular reason to be arguing.
Nice pun, by the way.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Concejos Unidos, Herador, Luziyca, Ryemarch, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Torisakia, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement