NATION

PASSWORD

Escaping the 'Gay Culture'

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:31 pm

Huh. I'm fed up with you two.

Have your goddamn ignorance and insult us of silly feminazis as much as you want. We will not concede. Period.
Last edited by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro on Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Verbal Pararhea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 362
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

Bottle wrote:I bet you also think "homophobia" refers to being scared of gays, don't you?


No more than does hydrophobia in molecules refer to actual fear of water. Phobos is used in more than one way. Misogyny, on the other hand, pretty much means woman-hating. That's the direct meaning of the Greek roots.

I still fail to see how not liking every single possible personality type which may be associated with a feminine stereotype somewhere is misogyny.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Bottle wrote:I bet you also think "homophobia" refers to being scared of gays, don't you?


Gays are like bogeymen, hiding in the closet, waiting until little Blaat is almost asleep and scares them :(

Now I'm picturing the Sassy Gay Friend guy leaping out of a closet with a butcher knife in one hand and a fistful of glitter confetti in the other, screaming "BOO, YOU STUPID BITCH!"
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Jello Biafra
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6401
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Jello Biafra wrote:Disliking someone for being like a woman (however the person doing the disliking defines it) is also misogyny.


Gender roles are not inherently good. Disliking a trait because you think it's a bad thing is not sexist regardless of where your personal definition of gender roles lies.

It is when you dislike those traits because of their association with women.
Last edited by Jello Biafra on Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

Verbal Pararhea wrote:
Bottle wrote:I bet you also think "homophobia" refers to being scared of gays, don't you?


No more than does hydrophobia in molecules refer to actual fear of water. Phobos is used in more than one way. Misogyny, on the other hand, pretty much means woman-hating. That's the direct meaning of the Greek roots.

I still fail to see how not liking every single possible personality type which may be associated with a feminine stereotype somewhere is misogyny.

Ah, so we do understand that "hatred of women" is only the very most over-simplified definition of the term "misogyny," then. Excellent.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Huh. I'm fed up with you two.

Have your goddamn ignorance and insult us of silly feminazis as much as you want. We will not concede. Period.


"I won't change my opinion regardless of how patently wrong it is."

You said Bye several posts ago. After that good conduct dictates you stop posting.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Verbal Pararhea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 362
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:34 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Huh. I'm fed up with you two.

Have your goddamn ignorance and insult us of silly feminazis as much as you want. We will not concede. Period.


I never used the term "feminazi" nor did I imply any insult toward feminism. I simply pointed out that your particular definition of misogyny was so broad that it's essentially meaningless.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:34 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Huh. I'm fed up with you two.

Have your goddamn ignorance and insult us of silly feminazis as much as you want. We will not concede. Period.

It's kind of what the Pedantry Patrol People do.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:34 pm

Jello Biafra wrote:It is when you dislike those traits because of their association with women.


Nobodies arguing otherwise. You're saying that because the traits are associated with women hating them immediately constitutes misogyny.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 158977
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:35 pm

Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Patriote wrote:I've said it before, I'm a person with disability, We too are being marginalized and suffer from solitude. But we don't make a festival out of it now do we?


http://www.specialolympics.org/

Team 2003 up in this motherfucker!

User avatar
Jello Biafra
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6401
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:35 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Jello Biafra wrote:Disliking someone for being like a woman (however the person doing the disliking defines it) is also misogyny.


Not if you deny the behaviour is related to womanhood.

(Whether or not there is such a person who denies that the behavior is related to womanhood), it doesn't appear as though the OP is one of them.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57844
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:36 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Are there any gay behaviours we should know about, beside the obvious.
See, it comes across like you saying eating chicken is a Black person behaviour.
It sounds incredibly racist.
I readily concede that if you dislike someone for childbirth, you are probably a sexist.
But what feminine traits are related to being female?
How are they related, other than by people continually insisting they are?


Hunting on a certain stereotype means generally that you think they hold true and are a reason of mockery to that group.

Not the specific act of the stereotype itself but the kind of person that will have such absurd take of lifestyle, worldviews, taste or whatever.

You are making an enormous and disgusting strawman, and my patience with you already ended. Stop asking things if you are not sufficiently educated or is a huge hipster skeptic conservative to know better why [not].


I also dislike gangsta's.
Doesn't mean I dislike black people, because i'm mature enough to know that black people aren't all, or even mostly, gangsta's.
It isn't a strawman to point out that your objections don't answer my questions.
If anything, it's pointing out you are strawmanning.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Verbal Pararhea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 362
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:37 pm

Bottle wrote:Ah, so we do understand that "hatred of women" is only the very most over-simplified definition of the term "misogyny," then. Excellent.


So will anyone actually explain the connection here? What makes disliking a particular personality trait which is sometimes associated with female stereotypes misogyny? Which traits of personality is one "permitted" to dislike without being automatically misogynistic? It's such a vague conception of misogyny that it could be used against pretty much anyone.

User avatar
Jello Biafra
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6401
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:38 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Jello Biafra wrote:It is when you dislike those traits because of their association with women.


Nobodies arguing otherwise. You're saying that because the traits are associated with women hating them immediately constitutes misogyny.

When the person hates them because of that association, it is.
Last edited by Jello Biafra on Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Orangi
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6406
Founded: Jan 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Orangi » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:39 pm

It can't be forced. In time it'll occur, the stereotype being dumbed down.

But we still have commercials and TV shows full of "Sassy strong black women who don't need no man™" everywhere.

Media portrayal of gays as, "FAAAABULOOOOOUUUUUS!" will exist for a long time. Not much anyone can do to force the social realization of, "Oh, so gays ARE human and not archetypes after all!", honestly.
The Sovereign Republic of Orangi: World Assembly Member

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57844
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:39 pm

Verbal Pararhea wrote:
Bottle wrote:Ah, so we do understand that "hatred of women" is only the very most over-simplified definition of the term "misogyny," then. Excellent.


So will anyone actually explain the connection here? What makes disliking a particular personality trait which is sometimes associated with female stereotypes misogyny? Which traits of personality is one "permitted" to dislike without being automatically misogynistic? It's such a vague conception of misogyny that it could be used against pretty much anyone.


I keep asking for the connection.
Nobody's answered satisfactorily except Jello, who now agrees with us.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57844
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:39 pm

Jello Biafra wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Nobodies arguing otherwise. You're saying that because the traits are associated with women hating them immediately constitutes misogyny.

When the person hates them because of that association, it is.


Sure.
But noone has argued that that isn't sexist.
We've argued that merely hating them isn't.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Verbal Pararhea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 362
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Verbal Pararhea » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:40 pm

Jello Biafra wrote:When the person hates them because of that association, it is.


A because B.

B because A.

Do you really not understand the difference between these two propositions? Is this really that hard?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:40 pm

Jello Biafra wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Nobodies arguing otherwise. You're saying that because the traits are associated with women hating them immediately constitutes misogyny.

When the person hates them because of that association, it is.



"Nobodies arguing otherwise. You're saying that because the traits are associated with women hating them immediately constitutes misogyny."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Faolinn
Minister
 
Posts: 2055
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Faolinn » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:41 pm

Well this argument went just about as I expected it. The sad truth is that some people live up to stereotypes and those people get all the attention and some times that's reinforced by societal stigma. Society regarded gays as "unmanly" so they hit them with the stereotype which a number thereof probably internalized or adopted in an attempt to in a grand twist of irony claim for their own and forge an identity separate from the community that exiled them. I'd reckon that a fair number also decided to fight the stereotype by being anything but. Apparently the op seems to be coming from this second camp of thought.
"And the Gods said down with tyrants and it was good."-Me
One of the religious left.
Research supports cynicism
My ideology.

I support: Deism, Evolution, Pro Choice, Feminism, Environmentalism, Communal Anarchism, Cosmopolitanism, Transcendentalism, Occultism, Anarcho Syndicalism, Mutualism, Legalizing Illegal substances, Sexual Freedom, LGBT Rights, Freedom of Speech

I oppose: Fascism, Objectivism, Determinism, Nihlism, Evangelism, Anarcho Capitalism, Atheism (militant), Conservatism, Monarchy, Totalitarianism,Might = Right, Timocracy, Plutocracy, Oligarchy, Materialism, Creationism, Transhumanism, Legalism, Nationalism, Imperialsm, Racism

I disagree with but have some respect for: Secular Humanism, Agnosticism

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:41 pm

Ostroeuropa, I don't care about your questions. You are only one whining. As I said, I won't bother with people who can't see an inch beyond them. If you can't see how hating feminity in males is thinking people supposed to be men are in a higher standard than people supposed to be women is a very clear form of sexism, no one in this world is going to make you see the fucking obvious.

The internet is neither your schoolteacher nor your babysitter.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Jello Biafra
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6401
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Jello Biafra » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:42 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Jello Biafra wrote:When the person hates them because of that association, it is.


Sure.
But noone has argued that that isn't sexist.
We've argued that merely hating them isn't.

Very well. If it isn't sexism that motivates your hatred of flamboyance and over-excitedness, then what is it?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:42 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Ostroeuropa, I don't care about your questions. You are only one whining. As I said, I won't bother with people who can't see an inch beyond them. If you can't see how hating feminity in males is thinking people supposed to be men are in a higher standard than people supposed to be women is a very clear form of sexism, no one in this world is going to make you see the fucking obvious.

The internet is neither your schoolteacher nor your babysitter.


If you won't bother stop bothering.

You said you were leaving.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57844
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:42 pm

Faolinn wrote:Well this argument went just about as I expected it. The sad truth is that some people live up to stereotypes and those people get all the attention and some times that's reinforced by societal stigma. Society regarded gays as "unmanly" so they hit them with the stereotype which a number thereof probably internalized or adopted in an attempt to in a grand twist of irony claim for their own and forge an identity separate from the community that exiled them. I'd reckon that a fair number also decided to fight the stereotype by being anything but. Apparently the op seems to be coming from this second camp of thought.


It's a majority, almost certainly.
10% of the population are gay remember.
1/10 people you see on the street.
Now how many times have you met an honest to god Prider?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:42 pm

Anyone who hates gays because they don't like camp gays, is homophobic regardless. Catering to them is bullshit, it's letting them have power over you just like they want, and accepting the position of lessor is not going to make them all-of-a-sudden not homophobic. A lot of equality is about not having to fucking conform to what bigoted shitheads want.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Ceilikkell, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Giovanniland, Incelastan, Kenmoria, The Huskar Social Union, Valyxias, Warvick

Advertisement

Remove ads