Mine are not especially bouncy....
Advertisement

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:57 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:59 pm
" 
by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:59 pm


by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:43 pm
Dakini wrote:How do you figure that?
She's playing games spanning decades and isn't focusing just on major titles. What makes you think that all the games she wanted to discuss are featured on someone's youtube channel? What makes you think that they're featured on someone's youtube channel without extra commentary and intact cut scenes? What makes you think that it's okay to steal video clips from other people's youtube videos (and what makes you think they'll be reasonable quality)?
I imagine that she'd have had to (in some cases) acquire older platforms (?; a bit out of my depth here with the lingo) because, from personal experience, some games just won't play on newer stuff (i.e. MTW and Windows Vista).

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:50 pm
From my experience their characterizations are much more interesting than thàt of male ones. If anything the male characters need work, the old macho routine is cheesy.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:57 pm
Forsher wrote:Dakini wrote:I don't generally like multiquoting. I mean, you do it well because you don't reply to 20 posts at once (and I'm not sure if I've noticed you doing this when breaking down a really large post). Someone on here gets several screens worth of replies to other people in one go and whenever I'm among those I just kinda give up.
I usually feel bad because the poster who does it is generally thoughtful, but I just don't want to sort through that shit.
Heaps of people post this way. I hope. As I pointed out in a certain thread where I took a lot of flak for doing so, I do it a lot.
But, I kind of did notice that I wasn't getting replied to much so I've got a new model. Which I've been trying to use here. I post when the scroll bar gets to a point where I think it's too small.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:00 pm
Ifreann wrote:Dakini wrote:Which has nothing to do with the fact that you don't take women seriously in any shape or form.
You know. Women. The real people your preferred characters represent in the most shallow ways possible.
Yes, because "I have an H-cup and no bra, look at me bounce! This doesn't hurt my back at all! *tee hee* Look at my hilariously inadequate armour! Oh, my hair got messed up when I did that, how terrible!" isn't cheesy. Not at all.
I imagine the pain in one's face from running about with H cup boobs and no H cup bra to keep them in would show up first.
Hmm, I wonder which would hurt more in that case, your face or your boob...*deep thought*

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:36 pm

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:37 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Ifreann wrote:Possibly amusing mechanic for a game: Female characters can be put in ridiculous outfits that provide neither support nor modesty nor protection, but they'll limit their movements to compensate. Absolute cleavage without a bra? Sorry, your character's hands are now busy keep her boobs from flailing about painfully or popping out. Equip the mini-skirt item, no more high kicks or jumping around. An enemy spies you wearing Leather "Armour" of I Just Came From A Fetish Club and your character will run rather than fight.
I would totally support this if the character is also made to comment on it, so that when you equip the mini-skirt she says, "Really? I'm trying to fight zombies here, not go clubbing," and when the enemy attacks she says, "Dammit, I told you not to make me wear heels! How am I supposed to run now, dumbass?" Or, if you object to fourth-wall-breaking, "I don't know what the hell I was thinking when I put on this outfit to go slay dragons in. Apparently I'm some sort of moron! Ow, my completely unprotected spleen!"

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:41 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:Which has nothing to do with the fact that you don't take women seriously in any shape or form.
You know. Women. The real people your preferred characters represent in the most shallow ways possible.
Yes, because "I have an H-cup and no bra, look at me bounce! This doesn't hurt my back at all! *tee hee* Look at my hilariously inadequate armour! Oh, my hair got messed up when I did that, how terrible!" isn't cheesy. Not at all.
How don't I take women seriously? Just because I don't pander to the few that bitch every waking moment about how everything in the universe is sexist, raping them, or oppressing them?

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:25 pm
Xeng He wrote:Dakini wrote:Which has nothing to do with the fact that you don't take women seriously in any shape or form.
You know. Women. The real people your preferred characters represent in the most shallow ways possible.
You know, you don't have a damn clue who his characters are or even how they look, so I find it odd you say that.
Yes, because "I have an H-cup and no bra, look at me bounce! This doesn't hurt my back at all! *tee hee* Look at my hilariously inadequate armour! Oh, my hair got messed up when I did that, how terrible!" isn't cheesy. Not at all.
"Because clearly, my physical appearance is the sole relevant aspect of my character, hee hee!"
Seriously, for someone opposed to objectification, you objectify a lot.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:29 pm
Microsol wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
The social and political equality of the genders.
(Also, I'm not sure why not wanting to be oppressed is crap. Seems like a pretty reasonable goal to me.)
Such equality is pretty impossible while maintaining a country that's still a pleasure to live in. Look how "well" it went in Sweden, that place looksawfulfucking amazing now.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:42 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:Xeng He";p="15614266" wrote:Because clearly, my physical appearance is the sole relevant aspect of my character, hee hee!"
Oh no, never the case for film or video games....

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:50 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Dakini wrote:I also like how the puppets defending Alaje are somehow oblivious to the fact that he mistook women with female video game characters and acting as though these are one and the same. Or perhaps they don't consider this part of his fucking problem when it very clearly is.
This is especially ironic because earlier in the thread he was doing one of those "men in video games are typecast and unrealistic and not at all like most men" things. Yet for some reason, he thinks that video games accurately depict women (or at least this is suggested by the fact that he somehow can't tell women apart from video game "women").
Explain that again but more clearly.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:57 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:I also like how the puppets defending Alaje are somehow oblivious to the fact that he mistook women with female video game characters and acting as though these are one and the same. Or perhaps they don't consider this part of his fucking problem when it very clearly is.
This is especially ironic because earlier in the thread he was doing one of those "men in video games are typecast and unrealistic and not at all like most men" things. Yet for some reason, he thinks that video games accurately depict women (or at least this is suggested by the fact that he somehow can't tell women apart from video game "women").
I don't see how it would seem I think game females and real females are the same, when I've been saying "they're just games, calm you're tits" the whole time.
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:Silly would be expecting Alaje to take women seriously in any way shape or form.
Uh, right. FYI, I play almost exclusively with females characters in games I play. From my experience their characterizations are much more interesting than thàt of male ones. If anything the male characters need work, the old macho routine is cheesy.
Zweite Alaje wrote:How don't I take women seriously? Just because I don't pander to the few that bitch every waking moment about how everything in the universe is sexist, raping them, or oppressing them?
I was pointing out that sure some things about game characters annoy me too, but I don't scream "SEKSIZM SEKSIZM!!!!". Same goes for female characters, some of there designs are weird and gaudy, but its a game I can take it with a grain of salt. I'm not gonna die because a game.


by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:58 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:I stated that Alaje did not respect women and their opinions. He countered that this wasn't true because he played female characters in his video games.
My statement about Alaje not respecting women had nothing to do with him not respecting female video game characters (and this should have been obvious from the context), yet somehow he conflated the two. Somehow, to him, female video game characters count as real women when they're really not.
Wow, I don't even...wth.
Not even what I was trying to convey. I don't know how you came to that conclusion.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:14 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:Because you responded to my statement about your attitude toward women (you know, the people) with how you choose your fucking video game characters.
Seriously.
The fucking thread is about how games related to the real world.
Oh, btw, you still haven't explained how I'm a supposed woman hater. I asked you like three pages ago.

by Dakini » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:31 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Dakini wrote:Yes I did. Just now even. You lumped it in with a bunch of shit and said that it was invented.
I mean, you also clearly hate women because of how you act in the abortion threads. It's pretty fucking blatant that we're only good for one thing according to you.
Hate abortion =/= hate women.
You have no idea what the hell you're talking about, if I really hated women I'd want to kill them all no exceptions and I'd want to have all female children aborted. That hating women. When I hate, I'm very unforgiving. I don't even hate liberals, I just have an incredible disliking of their views.

by Dakini » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:01 am
Nazis in Space wrote:Just looking at page 84 here.
Are (Some) folks here saying that female characters choosing to be sexy, rather than obeying certain self-declared male feminists' standards of decency for the other sex like good, devout little 19th century girls is sexist?
lel

by Dakini » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:01 am
Helvereos wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?

by Dakini » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:09 am
Falcania wrote:Nazis in Space wrote:Just looking at page 84 here.
Are (Some) folks here saying that female characters choosing to be sexy, rather than obeying certain self-declared male feminists' standards of decency for the other sex like good, devout little 19th century girls is sexist?
lel
Characters having sexual agency is not sexist. The creators of the game that decide to include heavily sexualised female characters as the premise of the game are being sexist.

by Dalmacie » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:22 pm

by Dalmacie » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:12 am
Ikigain wrote:
1-You can categorize kratos from god of war being objectified for being shown in little clothes while having giant muscles and commander shepherd for wearing a military uniform.
2-And even when these things are pointed out, most anti-sexists say "Well, these are marketed to men, not women. So these can't be sexist for objectifying men."
3-Even than, as a male, I don't give a fuck if I'm being objectified or sexualized. I don't feel like I'm being objectified when I'm playing a male architype. Y'know why? Because that's the actual ideal male. Just like housewife characters(none exist, BTW) are the ideal female architype.
4-If you play a video game with no story and the male is just a masculine macho man, I don't give a fuck. I'd play it. I already play video games like that. You don't see me throwing a bitch fit and starting a social movement.
5-And just because you play a video game with female characters that are sexually appealing and have no personality, it doens't mean you view real women like that. That's like saying you'll believe all men are dreamy millionaires because you watched the young and the restless.
6-Oh wait, no one gawks at this. No one stares at these for fun. they have actual porn to do that with.

by Dalmacie » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:32 am
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Choronzon wrote:Of course. But we can't have any discussion around here on how X is really harmful to women without the MRA Brigade coming in and yelling "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ MENZ MENZ!"
I'm just glad the King of the NSG MRAs hasn't shown up yet to explain how Ivy from Soul Calibur is guilty of "boob fraud" for not jumping off the screen and fucking him or something.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Dumb Ideologies, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, La Cocina del Bodhi, Teckopian, The Jamesian Republic, The Selkie
Advertisement