I like how he tried claiming he was well-informed on the subject and thought that anyone believed him before he posted a statement that two seconds on google could disprove.
Well, in case anyone was gullible before..
Advertisement

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:23 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:25 pm
Novislavia wrote:
I do have a feeling something is morally wrong with requesting money for "research" when all she's really doing is buying video games. Research my ass. She could go on YouTube and do just as much research with those "let's play" thingies.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:26 pm
Choronzon wrote:Dakini wrote:Nope. If you can't read the thread or be bothered to look around and see things that are right in front of your face then I'm not going to waste more of my time on you.
The fact that he hasn't made everyone else's ignore list is actually quite astonishing. I mean, perhaps to some its amusing or cute, but I got sick of his shit some time ago.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:30 pm
Novislavia wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
It's "morally wrong" to say, explicitly, "Your support will go towards production costs, equipment, games and downloadable content," and then spend the money she receives on production costs, equipment, games, and downloadable content?
You have a rather unique definition of "morally wrong."
Morality is relative, but still there's something icky about what she's doing. Again, she could get just as much information on these games from YouTube by watching, literally, hundreds of other people play rather than enjoying the games herself.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:32 pm
Neo Art wrote:Choronzon wrote:The fact that he hasn't made everyone else's ignore list is actually quite astonishing. I mean, perhaps to some its amusing or cute, but I got sick of his shit some time ago.
TJ was, for the longest time, the only person on my ignore list, because no matter how bad, how idiotic, how utterly bereft of integrity, honesty, and basic human dignity people appeared to be, I always believed that somehow, someday, they'd all have SOMETHING useful to say.
TJ was, in my entire history of NSG, the only person who I was utterly, completely convinced would never, ever, ever have anything useful to contribute. I don't like blocking people because I like to believe that someday they might say something worthwhile. It takes a lot, a LOT, to convince me that you're someone who is completely and totally useless in a conversation, beyond any redemption.
But some people like to push that belief.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:37 pm
Novislavia wrote:Dakini wrote:She's a media critic. Her job involves consuming media and critically analyzing it. She decided to release these for free online so everyone could have access to it and instead of finding a company to pay her, she asked the internet if they'd be interested (and they are). Also, she's got, like, an actual studio so you're not staring at her nose hair while she mumbles incoherently into a camera.
Eh. Fair enough. Still, I hold my opinion. Morality is relative. Blah blah blah.
Dakini wrote:I mean, it's a sweet gig, but considering how much people are willing to pay professional athletes for playing games this is pretty negligible.
Oh, I agree with you. It's terrible, but different.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:38 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Gauntleted Fist wrote:You know, for some reason, the idea that someone who is going through hundreds of video games to identify sexism in video games and why it's wrong and explain how it's wrong and to document where, when, and how it happens is only doing it because they just want to get someone else to pay for their video game habit is pretty hilarious.
...
*quietly makes a new youtube account*

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:44 pm
Sommorragh wrote:Gauntleted Fist wrote:Obviously a thread about sexism in video games should have nothing to do with actual sexism in video games.
For fuck's sake. Oh my fucking god did you not read any of my post?
I have literally thousands of hours of playtime and multiple max level characters on different servers. Holy fucking shit I play the FUCK out of Internet Lightsabers and Blasters. What in the ever-loving hell makes you think I'm too sensitive to handle it?
I give up.
Look, at the end of the day, my question will remain this: is it really worth talking about a trend that is disappearing anyway?

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:58 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:01 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:06 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:39 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Yet Aurora comes in and claims that "hurt feelings" aren't real harm.
They aren't, and if you think they are, you really need to grow up. If something makes you feel offended, that's not a real harm. You need to learn how to deal with things that you personally might not like. That's how, you know, mature adults live.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:48 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Me, for one? I certainly know people who have.
The dozens of rape victims I know who've been triggered if someone tells that fucking 'is it theft or rape hurr durr' "joke". The abuse victims, who hear people laughing about domestic abuse.
I means seriously, it's quite common. I don't think I've had a full blown PTSD attack because someone has said a joke, but it's not out of the realms of possibility for me alone and I'm pretty fucking lucky in terms of my flashbacks and episodes.
Then those people should take measures to not hear those kinds of jokes, either by avoiding certain places/situations, or informing people beforehand that they really don't enjoy such things, as it sets them off.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:50 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Depression isn't hurt feelings. It's a chemical imbalance causing irrational thought patterns, with a tendency toward catastrophizing problems, accentuating negative information, and dismissing positive information.
ahahahahaha.
Right. Of course. Bullying and emotional abuse in no way contributes to depression.
How could I forget.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:58 pm

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:00 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Dakini wrote:Did you try reading the fucking links about PTSD someone posted?
No?
Just like you didn't bother reading the links about the bullying and harassment that Anita S. experienced which you dismissed as something like "people got annoyed, so she cried and got money"?
I second (or third, or fourth) Neo Art's sentiment regarding your posts.
Which links? Things are moving pretty fast.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:03 pm


by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:04 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Dakini wrote:Did you try reading the fucking links about PTSD someone posted?
No?
Just like you didn't bother reading the links about the bullying and harassment that Anita S. experienced which you dismissed as something like "people got annoyed, so she cried and got money"? Because it conflicts with your precious preconceived notions about how things work?
I second (or third, or fourth) Neo Art's sentiment regarding your posts.
And it's really a reflection of the level of ignorance those arguing there is no sexism have. They do not consider personal examples to exist. They do not consider expert opinions to exist. They consider, as the only shred of evidence, their assertion that there is simply no evidence while finding increasingly pathetic reasons to dismiss the opposing evidence.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:08 pm
Angel investors? People who do have talent helping you (or vice-versa)? The Internet?
There a certainly accessible ways.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:09 pm
Neo Art wrote:Shaggai wrote:It isn't all the fault of the mods. Really, it's more the fault of the world. People tend to think that anyone who disagrees with them is deluded/lying/evil. It's the new trend in politics.
Yeah, really, it is. They're the ones who set the tone and temperament. They're the ones who decide the level of discourse allowed. They're the ones who set the bar.
This is where they've set it.
This shit show is entirely on them.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:10 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Neo Art wrote:
Yeah, really, it is. They're the ones who set the tone and temperament. They're the ones who decide the level of discourse allowed. They're the ones who set the bar.
This is where they've set it.
This shit show is entirely on them.
You mean with half of us arguing, and you standing there on the sidelines insulting people and acting superior?
Why are you even here?
Just leave. You apparently hate it so much. Maybe you just enjoy insulting people. That's kind of sad.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:11 pm
Neo Art wrote:Dakini wrote:Maybe there aren't enough of them.
I mean, really, if they had to deal with everyone on here who should be banned, I don't think they'd ever sleep (let alone do their jobs that actually pay them).
I used to think that. I really did. I used to think it was just a matter of staffing.
And then "trollnaming" happened.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:17 pm
Sommorragh wrote:Dakini wrote:That totally tales care of the time, resources, connections and talent part doesn't it?
Also, considering how much sexist assholes complained when a woman tried raising $6000 to create a series commenting on sexism in video games, I can't imagine what would happen if anyone tried raising enough to actually create non-sexist video games (if that was their expressed intent).
If by "accessible" you mean "to a select few".
How about you quote my whole comment?
How about that you consider that I never rallied against the women you speak off.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:19 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Dakini wrote:Maybe there aren't enough of them.
I mean, really, if they had to deal with everyone on here who should be banned, I don't think they'd ever sleep (let alone do their jobs that actually pay them).
Personally, I think that other forums got it right when a lot of them encouraged BYOM. They not only broadcasted using the ignore function but also told players to encourage others to do the same. Instead, we got a rule against suggesting that someone use their ignore function to avoid conflict.

by Dakini » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:20 pm
Susurruses wrote:Dakini wrote:That totally tales care of the time, resources, connections and talent part doesn't it?
Also, considering how much sexist assholes complained when a woman tried raising $6000 to create a series commenting on sexism in video games, I can't imagine what would happen if anyone tried raising enough to actually create non-sexist video games (if that was their expressed intent).
See, bringing up Feminist Frequency is a bit of a double-edged sword.
On the one hand, the sheer backlash was insane.
The amount of misogynistic bullshit that got spewed and the rape and death threats...
It's sickening and symptomatic of serious issues in the culture.
On the other hand, a lot of her "criticisms" are complete bullshit and rely on incomplete information or twisting of facts.
I don't really consider her credible, but I share contempt of the assholes that (instead of raising opposition in a rational way and countering her arguments) resort to violence.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Bradfordville, Dimetrodon Empire, Equai, Eternal Algerstonia, Foehn Paramilitary Regions, Khamento, Kubra, Neu California, Norse Inuit Union, Peatiktist, Senscaria, The Rio Grande River Basin, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx
Advertisement