NATION

PASSWORD

Things That Should Be Common Knowledge By Now

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:36 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:On the contrary, the fact that we can't obtain meaningful consent from animals is exactly why sex with them should be illegal and considered rape.



Because the animal has little to no understanding of what is going on, much like someone who has been drugged or isn't fully conscious.

People getting away with some forms of abuse doesn't make other forms of abuse acceptable, and holy fuck why did I have to say that to an adult person?

If a man is laying down, his hands at his sides, doing nothing, and a woman who is drunk walks over to him and hops on his dick for a spin, is it rape?

Since the man did not consent, any sex act performed on him is rape. Please tell me you're not turning into one of the "it's not rape unless you resist" people.
Last edited by Ifreann on Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:36 am

Conscentia wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:So he raped her by not doing anything?

Either he did nothing, thus taking advantage of the situation. (He rapes.)
Or he tries to stop her, and she doesn't allow him. (He is raped.)

No, I'm sorry. Him laying there doing nothing is not rape of the woman.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:36 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:imo if you're on the receiving end without training the animal to do it or forcing it to do it, the consent must be there. i.e. the animal chooses to put it's penis in your hidey hole, it cannot be rape.


What if the animal is raping the person? I would think that would be a more likely scenario than someone consenting to sex with an animal. So far as I'm aware, a dolphin ejaculating inside of a human female could be potentially lethal for her, because it shoots out at a much higher force.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:37 am

Conscentia wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:So he raped her by not doing anything?

Either he did nothing, thus taking advantage of the situation. (He rapes.)
Or he tries to stop her, and she doesn't allow him. (He is raped.)

loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

None is raped. Sex is delicious and fun. (Everybody wins.)
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:37 am

Ifreann wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:If a man is laying down, his hands at his sides, doing nothing, and a woman who is drunk walks over to him and hops on his dick for a spin, is it rape?

Since the man did not consent, then any sex act performed on him is rape. Please tell me you're not turning into one of the "it's not rape unless you resist" people.

I aM tAlKiNg AbOuT wHeThEr ThE wOmAn WaS rApEd.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix


User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:39 am

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Either he did nothing, thus taking advantage of the situation. (He rapes.)
Or he tries to stop her, and she doesn't allow him. (He is raped.)

loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
None is raped. Sex is delicious and fun. (Everybody wins.)

I hope you aren't being serious.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:40 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Either he did nothing, thus taking advantage of the situation. (He rapes.)
Or he tries to stop her, and she doesn't allow him. (He is raped.)

No, I'm sorry. Him laying there doing nothing is not rape of the woman.

Him laying and allowing her to do it is taking advantage of her in a state in which she cannot give valid consent.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:40 am

Conscentia wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:[...]at least not our rape, that is much more than just sex without consent.[...]

Er, "our rape" is exactly just sex without consent.

We incarcerate rapists for invading people and inflicting many sorts of pain on them. Not just giving them surprise ~action as normal as sleeping or eating~.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:41 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Either he did nothing, thus taking advantage of the situation. (He rapes.)
Or he tries to stop her, and she doesn't allow him. (He is raped.)

No, I'm sorry. Him laying there doing nothing is not rape of the woman.

Someone too drunk to consent is not going to be wandering around hopping on the dicks of inexplicably immobile men.


Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Since the man did not consent, then any sex act performed on him is rape. Please tell me you're not turning into one of the "it's not rape unless you resist" people.

I aM tAlKiNg AbOuT wHeThEr ThE wOmAn WaS rApEd.

No, you're talking about a hypothetical that isn't at all comparable to having sex with an animal as though it proves that it is okay to have sex with an animal.

User avatar
Qahadim
Diplomat
 
Posts: 554
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Qahadim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:41 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Since the man did not consent, then any sex act performed on him is rape. Please tell me you're not turning into one of the "it's not rape unless you resist" people.

I aM tAlKiNg AbOuT wHeThEr ThE wOmAn WaS rApEd.

She's hopping onto him, of her own free will? Regardless of get inebriation, she is freely choosing to "take him for a spin"?

Not rape of the woman.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:41 am

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Er, "our rape" is exactly just sex without consent.

We incarcerate rapists for invading people and inflicting many sorts of pain on them. Not just giving them surprise ~action as normal as sleeping or eating~.

:palm: Sex without consent is not just "surprise sex".

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:43 am

Conscentia wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
None is raped. Sex is delicious and fun. (Everybody wins.)

I hope you aren't being serious.

I don't have how to be raped in a multitude of ways having experience over all the different possible feels to give my say (but then, would I really be raped if I was looking for it?).
I don't even know how sex is.

But I wish I could know for then be serious.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:44 am

Qahadim wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:I aM tAlKiNg AbOuT wHeThEr ThE wOmAn WaS rApEd.

She's hopping onto him, of her own free will? Regardless of get inebriation, she is freely choosing to "take him for a spin"?

Not rape of the woman.

Her consent is not valid. She is intoxicated. The consent of the intoxicated is not valid.

It is acceptable for to validate her consent when she is not intoxicated, but until then, the consent is not present.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:45 am

Conscentia wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:We incarcerate rapists for invading people and inflicting many sorts of pain on them. Not just giving them surprise ~action as normal as sleeping or eating~.

:palm: Sex without consent is not just "surprise sex".

If someone started to put its dick inside you like they do in the African savannas of cable TV, and you didn't give a fuck even if you had no moral code and just did what your wishes command you to, it would be just a kind of surprise sex.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:45 am

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Conscentia wrote:I hope you aren't being serious.

I don't have how to be raped in a multitude of ways having experience over all the different possible feels to give my say (but then, would I really be raped if I was looking for it?).
I don't even know how sex is.

But I wish I could know for then be serious.

And in English?

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:46 am

Conscentia wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:No, I'm sorry. Him laying there doing nothing is not rape of the woman.

Him laying and allowing her to do it is taking advantage of her in a state in which she cannot give valid consent.

He is not coercing her, forcing her, or talking her into it. She may be drunk, but it does not mean he should be incarcerated for her actions upon him.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:46 am

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Conscentia wrote: :palm: Sex without consent is not just "surprise sex".

If someone started to put its dick inside you like they do in the African savannas of cable TV, and you didn't give a fuck even if you had no moral code and just did what your wishes command you to, it would be just a kind of surprise sex.

:eyebrow:

User avatar
Qahadim
Diplomat
 
Posts: 554
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Qahadim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:48 am

Conscentia wrote:
Qahadim wrote:She's hopping onto him, of her own free will? Regardless of get inebriation, she is freely choosing to "take him for a spin"?

Not rape of the woman.

Her consent is not valid. She is intoxicated. The consent of the intoxicated is not valid.

It is acceptable for to validate her consent when she is not intoxicated, but until then, the consent is not present.

I'm sorry no. "I was drunk" does not excuse that she willingly jumped on him and went to town. If she is not accountable because of her inebriation than neither is a person who shoots/stabs/bashes the head in of another human being while under similar influences. Sorry, that defense does NOT fly.
Last edited by Qahadim on Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:49 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Him laying and allowing her to do it is taking advantage of her in a state in which she cannot give valid consent.

He is not coercing her, forcing her, or talking her into it. She may be drunk, but it does not mean he should be incarcerated for her actions upon him.

But consent is not present. He is exploiting her.

He could avoid the legal consequences if:
a. he stops her, and waits until she is capable of giving valid consent.
b. she validates her consent when she becomes sober.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:49 am

Qahadim wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Her consent is not valid. She is intoxicated. The consent of the intoxicated is not valid.

It is acceptable for to validate her consent when she is not intoxicated, but until then, the consent is not present.

I'm sorry no. "I was drunk" does not excuse that agree willingly jumped on him and went to town. If she is not accountable because of her inebriation than neither is a person who shoots/stabs/bashes the head in of another human being while under similar influences. Sorry, that defense does NOT fly.

It's not a defence. You misinterpret my words, sir.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:50 am

Ifreann wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:No, I'm sorry. Him laying there doing nothing is not rape of the woman.

Someone too drunk to consent is not going to be wandering around hopping on the dicks of inexplicably immobile men.

I sure am.

Hell, even look at complete strangers in a restroom and if they react positively... or neutral or negatively... I will probably try.

That is why I am not going to be intoxicated, and why I never liked to go around naked with other men next to me. Dicks are magical and they attract me heavily since I'm 7. Can't explain it.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:51 am

Conscentia wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:He is not coercing her, forcing her, or talking her into it. She may be drunk, but it does not mean he should be incarcerated for her actions upon him.

But consent is not present. He is exploiting her.

He could avoid the legal consequences if:
a. he stops her, and waits until she is capable of giving valid consent.
b. she validates her consent when she becomes sober.

rape
noun
1. the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
2. any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person.
3. statutory rape.
4. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside.
5. Archaic. the act of seizing and carrying off by force.
verb (used with object)
6. to force to have sexual intercourse.
7. to plunder (a place); despoil.
8. to seize, take, or carry off by force.

He did not rape her.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:52 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Him laying and allowing her to do it is taking advantage of her in a state in which she cannot give valid consent.

He is not coercing her, forcing her, or talking her into it. She may be drunk, but it does not mean he should be incarcerated for her actions upon him.

They had sex. She did not consent. No amount of contrivances about some perfect level of drunkenness that leaves one incapable of consent but capable of climbing onto dicks makes this anything other than rape, and arguing otherwise looks really, really bad.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:53 am

Ifreann wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:He is not coercing her, forcing her, or talking her into it. She may be drunk, but it does not mean he should be incarcerated for her actions upon him.

They had sex. She did not consent. No amount of contrivances about some perfect level of drunkenness that leaves one incapable of consent but capable of climbing onto dicks makes this anything other than rape, and arguing otherwise looks really, really bad.

Except that no, a drunken person initiating sex does not mean that the person was raped.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Ayacachtli, Czechostan, Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, El Lazaro, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Grinning Dragon, Kohr, North Korea Choson, Northern Seleucia, Picairn, Raskana, Rhodevus, Ryemarch, Tarsonis, The Imperial State of Ateria, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, The North Polish Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Thermodolia, Uminaku, Valentine Z

Advertisement

Remove ads