Homosexual Marriage Clears House Of Lords

by **Menassa** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:04 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Menassa wrote:As long as you have your Christ.

Val's gay for Jesus.

Him and Paul.

by **San Leggera** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:10 pm

Grenartia wrote:
New Dorset wrote:Well that's a shame.

Gallup wrote:Damn. England also?

Boohoo. Another country has taken a step towards basic human decency and equality. How will the bigots survive?

In their decommissioned bomb shelters with "marriage is one man plus one woman" painted on its walls in blood, maybe?

by **Grenartia** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:10 pm

Menassa wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Val's gay for Jesus.

Him and Paul.

Must be why they're so homophobic. They don't want anybody getting in on the action.

by **Grenartia** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:12 pm

San Leggera wrote:
Grenartia wrote:

Boohoo. Another country has taken a step towards basic human decency and equality. How will the bigots survive?

In their decommissioned bomb shelters with "marriage is one man plus one woman" painted on its walls in blood, maybe?

Where'd the blood come from?

by **Menassa** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:12 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Menassa wrote:Him and Paul.

Must be why they're so homophobic. They don't want anybody getting in on the action.

Paul, being short and bald, probably wasn't a hit in the Judean dating pool.

by **San Benedict e San Francesco** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:13 pm

Well, this is pretty well tragic.

by **Menassa** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:14 pm

San Benedict e San Francesco wrote:Well, this is pretty well tragic.

Once secularism-in-government exists properly everywhere, what the hell am I going to have to complain about?

Acceptance of Homosexuals is no sign of secularism.

by **San Leggera** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:15 pm

Grenartia wrote:
San Leggera wrote:In their decommissioned bomb shelters with "marriage is one man plus one woman" painted on its walls in blood, maybe?

Where'd the blood come from?

That's a question we'd best leave unanswered.

by **GrandKirche** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:16 pm

Menassa wrote:
San Benedict e San Francesco wrote:Well, this is pretty well tragic.

Once secularism-in-government exists properly everywhere, what the hell am I going to have to complain about?

Acceptance of Homosexuals is no sign of secularism.

Secularism?!

This is Britain. Bishops sit in the House of Lords, the Queen is anointed by God, We have a State Church...and it all in practice has no importance, whilst retaining symbolic significance which allows us to have pretty national ceremonies. Why would we want secularism? It's just what we have now with no pretty bits.

by **San Benedict e San Francesco** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:18 pm

Menassa wrote:
San Benedict e San Francesco wrote:Well, this is pretty well tragic.

Once secularism-in-government exists properly everywhere, what the hell am I going to have to complain about?

Acceptance of Homosexuals is no sign of secularism.

Sure it is. No properly secular state could fail to ensure human rights regardless of sexuality. There is no non-religious argument to be made against homosexuality.

by **Menassa** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:20 pm

San Benedict e San Francesco wrote:
Menassa wrote:Acceptance of Homosexuals is no sign of secularism.

Sure it is. No properly secular state could fail to ensure human rights regardless of sexuality. There is no non-religious argument to be made against homosexuality.

As well as there is a very little religious one to be made against homosexuality.

GrandKirche wrote:
Menassa wrote:Acceptance of Homosexuals is no sign of secularism.

Secularism?!

This is Britain. Bishops sit in the House of Lords, the Queen is anointed by God, We have a State Church...and it all in practice has no importance, whilst retaining symbolic significance which allows us to have pretty national ceremonies. Why would we want secularism? It's just what we have now with no pretty bits.

Don't get your knickers in a twist.

What I'm saying has nothing to do with the British government.

by **Fetahar** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:42 pm

Progress has been made! Excellent! (Now if only America would get its butt in gear and do the same...)

by **Saracenia** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:14 pm

Yay freedom hurrah open ur shirt we r so gay now like I really care etc etc.

by **The Tiger Kingdom** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:52 pm

Saracenia wrote:Yay freedom hurrah open ur shirt we r so gay now like I really care etc etc.

Then why exactly did you bother to post?
Is your time so worthless you go out of your way to comment on things you don't care about?

by **Saracenia** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:46 pm

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
Saracenia wrote:Yay freedom hurrah open ur shirt we r so gay now like I really care etc etc.

Then why exactly did you bother to post?
Is your time so worthless you go out of your way to comment on things you don't care about?

Yes, probably? Is it forbidden to say that I don't care? Is it take too much time to post?

by **The Tiger Kingdom** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:48 pm

Saracenia wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:Then why exactly did you bother to post?
Is your time so worthless you go out of your way to comment on things you don't care about?

Yes, probably? Is it forbidden to say that I don't care? Is it take too much time to post?

Well, posting at all kind of confirms you care on some level.
People who don't care don't comment.

by **Dalmacie** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:15 pm

Good for Britain.

When they first started with this project I thought they were going to beat France to it, due to the whole "Manif pour tous" bullshit, but we still finished first. Good.

Now, continue on Britain, join the rest of us. Join us. Join us.

by **Saracenia** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:22 pm

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
Saracenia wrote:Yes, probably? Is it forbidden to say that I don't care? Is it take too much time to post?

Well, posting at all kind of confirms you care on some level.
People who don't care don't comment.

Unfortunately I don't see 'posting' at that big deal, actually. Beside, I thought it'd be boring if all answers are positive, I come with apathetic reply.

Why do you mind with me posting 'meh i don't care'?

by **Verbal Pararhea** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:34 pm

Yay, another country I can marry my imaginary boyfriend.

by **Greed and Death** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:56 pm

Divair wrote:
Geilinor wrote:I am, but I haven't seen greed and death doing it. Usually, he has sources. At least in the Zimmerman thread.

If he hasn't posted a source, it's his attempt at a bad joke.

I take offense at that, I find the jokes funny.

by **The Truth and Light** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:59 pm

Verbal Pararhea wrote:Yay, another country I can marry my imaginary boyfriend.

Follow for more relatable posts! *throws sparkles*

by **Cadaver breadsticks** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:34 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Verbal Pararhea wrote:Yay, another country I can marry my imaginary boyfriend.

Follow for more relatable posts! *throws sparkles*

*whispers* this isn't tumblr

by **Stedicules** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:00 pm

Thafoo wrote:I'm sure my opinion on this is clear...

SQUEEEE! NEXT STOP MURICA (hopefully)

Probably not.

by **Liriena** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:30 pm

Risottia wrote:
Liriena wrote:1) I fail to see what is so disgusting about this sort of stuff:

Well, it's manga. Yuuck. Manga are disgusting!

Impeach manga, outlaw anime, PONY DICTATORSHIP ON CARTOONS!

You are dead to me.

by **Tsuntion** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:10 am

Individuality-ness wrote:Are there additional protections for trans* people? Explain.

The Lords amended the bill to allow that people who legally change sex will be able to remain married to their partner afterwards. In some places, IIRC, even when gay marriage is legal transitioning people are forced to divorce and remarry. The Commons happily approved the amendments.

Homosexual Marriage Clears House Of Lords

Who is online