Advertisement
by Pope Joan » Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:12 pm
by Narvelimrs » Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:22 pm
by Pope Joan » Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:37 pm
Narvelimrs wrote:Hello, I do find this interesting. My family are indeed Christians, but we're not and of types you listened in you poll. I hardy go to church due to my mother's job and I do read the Bible. I'm okay with everybody(atheist, Homosexuals, satanist to a degree etc.) Am I a terrible for this?
by Vazdania » Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:59 pm
Narvelimrs wrote:Hello, I do find this interesting. My family are indeed Christians, but we're not and of types you listened in you poll. I hardy go to church due to my mother's job and I do read the Bible. I'm okay with everybody(atheist, Homosexuals, satanist to a degree etc.) Am I a terrible for this?
by Bundesdeutschland » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:19 pm
Narvelimrs wrote:Hello, I do find this interesting. My family are indeed Christians, but we're not and of types you listened in you poll. I hardy go to church due to my mother's job and I do read the Bible. I'm okay with everybody(atheist, Homosexuals, satanist to a degree etc.) Am I a terrible for this?
by Neoconstantius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:27 pm
Pope Joan wrote:14. The premillennial Second Coming of Christ.
by The Holy Church of Arius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:28 pm
by Southern Arkansas » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:29 pm
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:35 pm
Southern Arkansas wrote:Neoconstantius wrote:Looks like they missed the boat on that one...
"Premillennialism in Christian eschatology is the belief that Jesus Christ will literally and physically return to the earth and take the righteous back to heaven with him. This return is referred to as the Rapture, and rather than Jesus descending to touch the Earth, the righteous will be raised to meet Him in the air."
Did I miss Jesus coming back already? Seems like I would have heard about it.
by Neoconstantius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:35 pm
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Tarsonis Survivors. You probably need things explained more in detail that the others. I understand.
Firstly, he called me first "misguided". You should read more carefully.
Secondly, when I meant "more brave in the face of the Truth", I (of cource) meant as a contrary to him. Didn't you get it? I have posted historical facts and common sense. Of cource I am assured as much as these facts and common sense allow me. You should read more carefully.
Third, I know he didn't say "undivided" or "indivisible". But he mentioned that, by saying that "the Church professes and has always professed the same belief as it did when it was founded on the day of Pentecost by Jesus Christ" and I very much doubted that for the historical reasons I posted above. You should read more carefully.
Forth, what has antagonism towards his church has anything to do with the fac that he is what he accuses me for. Arrogant. You should work on your clarity.
Fifth, It is not broken Greek. It's the "Dimotiki" (Δημοτική) dialect that is spoken today in Greece. You should read more carefully.
Sixth. I fail to understand why exactly do you rush so much to counterpost my posts on his part from the moment that (as you said yourself) I didn't refer to you anyway. Pretty wierd if you ask me.....
Shall we get back to the dialogue now? At last please?
by Neoconstantius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:36 pm
Southern Arkansas wrote:Neoconstantius wrote:Looks like they missed the boat on that one...
"Premillennialism in Christian eschatology is the belief that Jesus Christ will literally and physically return to the earth and take the righteous back to heaven with him. This return is referred to as the Rapture, and rather than Jesus descending to touch the Earth, the righteous will be raised to meet Him in the air."
Did I miss Jesus coming back already? Seems like I would have heard about it.
by The Holy Church of Arius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:43 pm
Neoconstantius wrote:The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Tarsonis Survivors. You probably need things explained more in detail that the others. I understand.
Firstly, he called me first "misguided". You should read more carefully.
Secondly, when I meant "more brave in the face of the Truth", I (of cource) meant as a contrary to him. Didn't you get it? I have posted historical facts and common sense. Of cource I am assured as much as these facts and common sense allow me. You should read more carefully.
Third, I know he didn't say "undivided" or "indivisible". But he mentioned that, by saying that "the Church professes and has always professed the same belief as it did when it was founded on the day of Pentecost by Jesus Christ" and I very much doubted that for the historical reasons I posted above. You should read more carefully.
Forth, what has antagonism towards his church has anything to do with the fac that he is what he accuses me for. Arrogant. You should work on your clarity.
Fifth, It is not broken Greek. It's the "Dimotiki" (Δημοτική) dialect that is spoken today in Greece. You should read more carefully.
Sixth. I fail to understand why exactly do you rush so much to counterpost my posts on his part from the moment that (as you said yourself) I didn't refer to you anyway. Pretty wierd if you ask me.....
Shall we get back to the dialogue now? At last please?
The fact that you keep accusing me of being arrogant only demonstrates your own arrogance, to be quite honest. End the ad hominems, please.
He probably felt it necessary to respond to your inflammatory post because you continue to peddle blatant falsehoods about me and my arguments as truth. I took up a firm but respectful stance against you, employed reason, logic, and Scripture to affirm my arguments, and instead you choose to misrepresent them, dance around the questions and points I pose to you, and self-righteously slander me and all the Christians here, deeming them heretics and liars and "conceited", I believe was the word. I don't care what you are, humility is a virtue, and regardless what you think of yourself, you are not more knowledgeable, morally upright, or praiseworthy than the least of us here.
I consider this matter closed, and I will have no further discourse with you in this regard.
by Neoconstantius » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:48 pm
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Neoconstantius wrote:The fact that you keep accusing me of being arrogant only demonstrates your own arrogance, to be quite honest. End the ad hominems, please.
He probably felt it necessary to respond to your inflammatory post because you continue to peddle blatant falsehoods about me and my arguments as truth. I took up a firm but respectful stance against you, employed reason, logic, and Scripture to affirm my arguments, and instead you choose to misrepresent them, dance around the questions and points I pose to you, and self-righteously slander me and all the Christians here, deeming them heretics and liars and "conceited", I believe was the word. I don't care what you are, humility is a virtue, and regardless what you think of yourself, you are not more knowledgeable, morally upright, or praiseworthy than the least of us here.
I consider this matter closed, and I will have no further discourse with you in this regard.
Suit yourself. "Verba volant, scripta manent". Everyone can see what you and I have wrote, and can make an opinion. However, you are basically the one who is leaving the table. Not me. Each and everyone of your posts prove your arrogance.
Have a nice day and God bless you.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:11 pm
DrakoLand wrote:@Tarsonis Survivor: Their Greek isn't broken.
by Narvelimrs » Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:12 pm
Bundesdeutschland wrote:Narvelimrs wrote:Hello, I do find this interesting. My family are indeed Christians, but we're not and of types you listened in you poll. I hardy go to church due to my mother's job and I do read the Bible. I'm okay with everybody(atheist, Homosexuals, satanist to a degree etc.) Am I a terrible for this?
Fine with me. Why should you be ashamed about that?
Pope Joan wrote:Narvelimrs wrote:Hello, I do find this interesting. My family are indeed Christians, but we're not and of types you listened in you poll. I hardy go to church due to my mother's job and I do read the Bible. I'm okay with everybody(atheist, Homosexuals, satanist to a degree etc.) Am I a terrible for this?
We may indeed need to be hardy to go to church.
So what do you and your family consider yourselves? Do you follow any sort of christian message in print or online or on the air?
by Bundesdeutschland » Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:58 pm
Narvelimrs wrote:Bundesdeutschland wrote:
Fine with me. Why should you be ashamed about that?
Reason being is because most of the I'm around are in a specific category where I'm not.Pope Joan wrote:
We may indeed need to be hardy to go to church.
So what do you and your family consider yourselves? Do you follow any sort of christian message in print or online or on the air?
We just consider ourselves, as plain as sounds, just plain old Christians who aren't in spefici categories. I try to my hardest to follow the 10 commands and I'm also trying to follow Jesus's way of treating others with proper rescept( sorry if I spell that wrong) and hating them for no good reason.
by Narvelimrs » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:31 pm
Bundesdeutschland wrote:Narvelimrs wrote:
Reason being is because most of the I'm around are in a specific category where I'm not.
We just consider ourselves, as plain as sounds, just plain old Christians who aren't in spefici categories. I try to my hardest to follow the 10 commands and I'm also trying to follow Jesus's way of treating others with proper rescept( sorry if I spell that wrong) and hating them for no good reason.
Basically...non-denominational then?
by Tarsonis Survivors » Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:59 am
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Tarsonis Survivors. You probably need things explained more in detail that the others. I understand.
Firstly, he called me first "misguided". You should read more carefully.
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Secondly, when I meant "more brave in the face of the Truth", I (of cource) meant as a contrary to him. Didn't you get it? I have posted historical facts and common sense. Of cource I am assured as much as these facts and common sense allow me. You should read more carefully.
Third, I know he didn't say "undivided" or "indivisible". But he mentioned that, by saying that "the Church professes and has always professed the same belief as it did when it was founded on the day of Pentecost by Jesus Christ" and I very much doubted that for the historical reasons I posted above. You should read more carefully.
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Forth, what has antagonism towards his church has anything to do with the fact that he is what he accuses me for. Arrogant. You should work on your clarity.
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Fifth, It is not broken Greek. It's the "Dimotiki" (Δημοτική) dialect that is spoken today in Greece. You should read more carefully.
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Sixth. I fail to understand why exactly do you rush so much to counterpost my posts on his part from the moment that (as you said yourself) I didn't refer to you anyway. Pretty wierd if you ask me.....
The Holy Church of Arius wrote:Shall we get back to the dialogue now? At last please?
by Tarsonis Survivors » Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:16 am
by Christmahanikwanzikah » Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:53 am
Southern Arkansas wrote:Neoconstantius wrote:Looks like they missed the boat on that one...
"Premillennialism in Christian eschatology is the belief that Jesus Christ will literally and physically return to the earth and take the righteous back to heaven with him. This return is referred to as the Rapture, and rather than Jesus descending to touch the Earth, the righteous will be raised to meet Him in the air."
Did I miss Jesus coming back already? Seems like I would have heard about it.
by Christmahanikwanzikah » Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:54 am
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Any way, what's the deal with Constantinople anyway. From what I gather, the Church still has a presence there.
by Bundesdeutschland » Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:44 am
by Benuty » Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:29 am
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Southern Arkansas wrote:
"Premillennialism in Christian eschatology is the belief that Jesus Christ will literally and physically return to the earth and take the righteous back to heaven with him. This return is referred to as the Rapture, and rather than Jesus descending to touch the Earth, the righteous will be raised to meet Him in the air."
Did I miss Jesus coming back already? Seems like I would have heard about it.
I didn't hear about flying horsemen, the deaths of some 2 billion people, or the moon turning red.
I'd say you're good.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:33 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Hidrandia, Ineva, Kainin, Keltionialang, Kostane, Maximum Imperium Rex, Neo-Hermitius, New Temecula, Northwesteros, Ors Might, Sarolandia, Southland, Statesburg, Tiami, Tricorniolis
Advertisement