Advertisement
by Furious Grandmothers » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:22 pm
by Meryuma » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:25 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Anachronous Rex » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:25 pm
by Imperial Nilfgaard » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:28 pm
by Dyakovo » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:30 pm
by Imperial Nilfgaard » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:33 pm
by Dyakovo » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:36 pm
by Anachronous Rex » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:41 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:
Indeed. But male and female are not because thats human anatomy.
You realize that you are now arguing against what you just said, yes?
Gender is a social construct that has nothing to do with what genitalia you possess.
Sex is biological, and is based on your genetic make-up.
Neither necessarily have any connection to what genitalia you possess.
by Dyakovo » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:42 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:Dyakovo wrote:You realize that you are now arguing against what you just said, yes?
Gender is a social construct that has nothing to do with what genitalia you possess.
Sex is biological, and is based on your genetic make-up.
Neither necessarily have any connection to what genitalia you possess.
Alternatively: Sex is gonadal and does not necessarily have any connection to your genetic make up.
Two ways of saying the same thing, really.
by Susurruses » Wed Jul 24, 2013 4:46 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote: [Lots of things that didn't answer questions]
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 4:55 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:
Indeed. But male and female are not because thats human anatomy.
You realize that you are now arguing against what you just said, yes?
Gender is a social construct that has nothing to do with what genitalia you possess.
Sex is biological, and is based on your genetic make-up.
Neither necessarily have any connection to what genitalia you possess.
by Pagan Hungary » Wed Jul 24, 2013 5:53 pm
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 5:58 pm
Pagan Hungary wrote:In a ever growing liberal world it feels like there is going to be a massive amount of new genders due to the fact that people can do what they want; I personally only recognize the genders of male & female and whatever it's called if you're a hermaphrodite. I realize that not all people of the same sex feel the same; and that these new genders have been made to make them fit in. I just think having 3 genders in my beliefs suites me; not everyone of the same sex is neuro-typical with each other. Some will always feel like they're someone else, and that they don't identify with their current gender and / or sex; it's just difficult to be able to draw the line to what people can claim what is a completely different gender.
by Pagan Hungary » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:01 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Pagan Hungary wrote:In a ever growing liberal world it feels like there is going to be a massive amount of new genders due to the fact that people can do what they want; I personally only recognize the genders of male & female and whatever it's called if you're a hermaphrodite. I realize that not all people of the same sex feel the same; and that these new genders have been made to make them fit in. I just think having 3 genders in my beliefs suites me; not everyone of the same sex is neuro-typical with each other. Some will always feel like they're someone else, and that they don't identify with their current gender and / or sex; it's just difficult to be able to draw the line to what people can claim what is a completely different gender.
Gender and sex are not the same thing.
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:15 pm
Pagan Hungary wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Gender and sex are not the same thing.
Never said that, I spent a while trying to make sure it wouldn't come out like that, but I guess it's difficult to write an opinion going against the flow. I am just saying that the traditional one gender to one sex doesn't make everyone comfortable it's just a issue to be able to define a new unique gender.
by Trollgaard » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:16 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Pagan Hungary wrote:
Never said that, I spent a while trying to make sure it wouldn't come out like that, but I guess it's difficult to write an opinion going against the flow. I am just saying that the traditional one gender to one sex doesn't make everyone comfortable it's just a issue to be able to define a new unique gender.
Why is it an issue? Gender is solely how one thinks of oneself. So I, who do not think of myself as a man, woman, or any other gender, am genderless.
by Bottle » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:18 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Pagan Hungary wrote:
Never said that, I spent a while trying to make sure it wouldn't come out like that, but I guess it's difficult to write an opinion going against the flow. I am just saying that the traditional one gender to one sex doesn't make everyone comfortable it's just a issue to be able to define a new unique gender.
Why is it an issue? Gender is solely how one thinks of oneself. So I, who do not think of myself as a man, woman, or any other gender, am genderless.
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:18 pm
by Trollgaard » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:20 pm
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:20 pm
Bottle wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Why is it an issue? Gender is solely how one thinks of oneself. So I, who do not think of myself as a man, woman, or any other gender, am genderless.
Most people determine how they will treat you in large part based on your gender, and are profoundly uncomfortable if they aren't given gender cues to tell them where you rank in the social hierarchy.
by Neutraligon » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:21 pm
Trollgaard wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
How so? I don't see myself as a man or a woman or as any other third gender. I don't have a gender and therefor am considered genderless (in the same way an asexual is a sexual orientation).
I simply don't see how you actually think that.
Wouldn't you just be a really androgynous man/woman, and not genderless?
by Trollgaard » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:22 pm
by Bottle » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:25 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Bottle wrote:Most people determine how they will treat you in large part based on your gender, and are profoundly uncomfortable if they aren't given gender cues to tell them where you rank in the social hierarchy.
I haven't faced that issue, but then my gender expression tends to be female (at least in how I dress) so I guess they place me that way. On most forums I go to thoguh, I am always mistaken for a man and people are often shocked when I tell them technically I am a female(sex).
by Pagan Hungary » Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:27 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Europa Undivided, Ineva, Juansonia, Keltionialang, Kostane, Rusrunia
Advertisement