Advertisement

by New Bierstaat » Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:42 am
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

by New West Guiana » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:12 am
Trollgaard wrote:Is their defensive coordinator outdated? If so, why? If not, why are people saying that?
Maurepas wrote:I think Green Bay's problems emanate from the QB position and a lack of Aaron Rogers. Nothing more, nothing less. When he gets back, turnaround should commence.

by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:13 am
New West Guiana wrote:Trollgaard wrote:Is their defensive coordinator outdated? If so, why? If not, why are people saying that?
The chants are getting louder Dom Capers has got to go!Maurepas wrote:I think Green Bay's problems emanate from the QB position and a lack of Aaron Rogers. Nothing more, nothing less. When he gets back, turnaround should commence.
Wrong! Our DC sucks.
Never mind.
by New Bierstaat » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:21 am
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

by Serrland » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:01 pm

by Serrland » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:02 pm
New West Guiana wrote:Trollgaard wrote:Is their defensive coordinator outdated? If so, why? If not, why are people saying that?
The chants are getting louder Dom Capers has got to go!Maurepas wrote:I think Green Bay's problems emanate from the QB position and a lack of Aaron Rogers. Nothing more, nothing less. When he gets back, turnaround should commence.
Wrong! Our DC sucks.

by The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:53 pm

by New Bierstaat » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:57 pm
The Confederacy of Styx wrote:On the topic of Chicago, the Bears really just got bit by the injury bug.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

by The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:00 pm

by New Bierstaat » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:24 pm
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

by Serrland » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:26 pm
New Bierstaat wrote:The Confederacy of Styx wrote:
Ah, open the revolving door for coaching again, eh? Seems logical.
No, we don't need to do that, just open the playbook op a bit. We should not be running that same stupid right run play for Michael Bush every time we're near the goal line. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out it's coming anytime we're inside the 3 or so and we send in Michael Bush.

by Trollgaard » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:43 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:02 pm
Trollgaard wrote:Qazox wrote:And Gronkowski as well.
RE: Trollgaard- So basically you think the single-wing offense of the 1930s can work in today's NFL?
Probably not game after game as the only thing. But maybe for a drive or two here in there. Or a few plays from time to time. It would be pretty neat to see, too; especially if it worked!

by Qazox » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:21 pm
Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq5dvOn1Wlc&t=0m2s
Aaron caught it.
Aaron fucking caught it.
Eighteen years later, and I still remember, clear as day: Aaron caught the goddamn ball.

by Qazox » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:23 pm

by New West Guiana » Tue Nov 26, 2013 4:08 pm

by Trollgaard » Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:36 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:53 pm
or even older...pre-single wing? What was that called?

by Trollgaard » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:Trollgaard wrote:
Hmm...well that is certainly something similar. I'm thinking a little bit more old school than that, though. Like the single wing
Which is basically what the Wildcat was.or even older...pre-single wing? What was that called?
T-formation was pretty much dominant before then.

by The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:32 pm
Trollgaard wrote:A thought, this goes out to errybody: I know people have mixed feeling about Tim Tebow, but from my (limited) knowledge of him, he seems like he could be a decent QB for that style of offense. What do all you scrupples think?

by Trollgaard » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:34 pm
The Confederacy of Styx wrote:Trollgaard wrote:A thought, this goes out to errybody: I know people have mixed feeling about Tim Tebow, but from my (limited) knowledge of him, he seems like he could be a decent QB for that style of offense. What do all you scrupples think?
Fuck Tim Tebow. I never want to hear about his bible-thumping ass ever again.

by Tiami » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:41 pm
Trollgaard wrote:The Confederacy of Styx wrote:
Fuck Tim Tebow. I never want to hear about his bible-thumping ass ever again.
What the fuck? What has he done?
Anyways, the question wasn't whether you liked him. It was whether or not he could play that style of offense better than how most offenses are played now.


by The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:43 pm
Tiami wrote:Trollgaard wrote:
What the fuck? What has he done?
Anyways, the question wasn't whether you liked him. It was whether or not he could play that style of offense better than how most offenses are played now.
Remember what Tebow did to the Steelers in the playoffs? That is why CS doesn't like him.

by Trollgaard » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:49 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bendary, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Past beans, The Huskar Social Union, Yasuragi
Advertisement