NATION

PASSWORD

2014 NFL Thread Week 7 (At least your team isn't the Jags)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Some teams are in need of a QB. Who should they sign on the FA to help?

Tim Tebow
52
45%
Charlie Batch
7
6%
JaMarcus Russell
5
4%
Brett Farve
16
14%
Brady Quinn
10
9%
Matt Leinart
5
4%
Other
20
17%
 
Total votes : 115

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:
Qazox wrote:2nd time this season. The 1st was the BS one vs. the Jets


Both were perfectly correct calls.

I hope calls happen to the Colts Sunday in Arizona.
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Saugeais
Minister
 
Posts: 3387
Founded: Jul 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Saugeais » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:27 pm

I'm now one of the many advocates that say Cutler should be franchise tagged, and the Bears should both re-sign McCown for another year while drafting a QB to develop. As far as said QB to draft, Aaron Murray seems to be the best fit if the Bears can nab him in the 2nd-3rd round. Durable, good arm and head on his shoulders, but will definitely be overlook with Teddy Bridgewater, Marcus Mariota, AJ McCarron, and Johnny Manziel coming out as well.
The Republic of Saugeais : newswire
Founder of the AIBC
Co-host, World Cup 65
Co-host, World Cup 60 | Co-host, 47th Cup of Harmony | Co-host, Baptism of Fire 50
Hosted: 9th Winter Olympics, Copa Rushmori XV,
19th Rugby Union World Cup, Di Bradini Cup 27
Copa Rushmori VII, World Baseball Classic 21,
9th Rugby League World Cup, Market Cup 3
1st Place: Copa Rushmori 16, Cup of Harmony 58, NSCAA 4
2nd Place: World Baseball Classic 19 & 22, Gaelic Football WC 4,
Di Bradini Cup 23, CoH 54, T20 Cricket Championships 3, Rugby LWC 14
3rd Place: Copa Rushmori 5, 14, 15 & 17, Market Cup 3, RLWC 10
4th Place: DBC 15, WBC 24

User avatar
The Confederacy of Styx
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 480
Founded: Oct 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm

Saugeais wrote:I'm now one of the many advocates that say Cutler should be franchise tagged, and the Bears should both re-sign McCown for another year while drafting a QB to develop. As far as said QB to draft, Aaron Murray seems to be the best fit if the Bears can nab him in the 2nd-3rd round. Durable, good arm and head on his shoulders, but will definitely be overlook with Teddy Bridgewater, Marcus Mariota, AJ McCarron, and Johnny Manziel coming out as well.


One of those better fall to Pittsburgh. I love Big Ben as much as the next guy, but he needs an apprentice ASAP.
Formerly known as Confederated Southern States.
Libertarian Anarchist.
Pro: Gun rights, gay rights, legalization of marijuana, responsible capitalism, PS4, Pittsburgh Steelers.
Anti: Gun control, bigotry, authoritarianism, political correctness, Xbox One, Baltimore Ravens.
Conquer peace.

User avatar
Kentsland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1578
Founded: Jun 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kentsland » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:19 pm

Okay, I'll weigh in on the Pats Call last night in my opinion. To note, I am a Jets fan and hate the Pats.

The call is a judgement call, and is up to the Back Judge or any adjacent official to decide whether or not it's a penalty. If you don't throw the flag, then okay. That's the officials opinion, and should not be called. If the official throws the flag, you call it. No in between. The fact that the Official threw the flag in the first place-there should be a holding penalty against CAR. If they didn't throw the flag, that would be okay.

And to all you guys saying that the Pats fans keep getting jipped of calls, quit being damn butthurt. Every team has gotten close and bad calls in their favor and not. It just so happens to be that historically the Patriots have gotten calls in their favor (Tuck Rule, most popular, but also recently in New Orleans) and they happened to get two controversial calls against them this year (CAR & NYJ).

I shall also state this; Elite Teams don't leave the game to the officials or one call/play. They win on their own and battle through adversity.

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31245
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:22 pm

Qazox wrote:
Bralia wrote:In case you guys are wondering, the ball was thrown underneath. There was no way that the intended receiver could get to the ball even if he wasn't being hugged by the defensive player. The ball was fully uncatchable. Good call on the refs.

Anyway, WOOT! GO ANTI-PATRIOTS! Come back when you don't have a stick shoved up your ass, Aqib Talib!

Oh, cool, a gif is already available. Seriously guys, how could you possibly say Gronkowski could have gotten to where the ball was going from his position on the field?:

(Image)

Seriously guys, how could you possibly say Gronkowski could have gotten to where the ball was going from his position on the field? Go find different angles if that's not convincing enough for you. Gronk's own momentum was carrying him away from the ball. He tried to slow down. Let's say the defensive player wasn't hugging him. Do you guys really think Gronk could accelerate fast enough to come back and grab the ball? Without the hug, the d-player would have still been in his way. Gronk may be a miracle worker but he can't perform the impossible.


Maybe, just maybe if he wasn't being hugged and manhandled during the part of his route where he comes back to where the ball wound up, then he could have caught it.

I'm not even mad about the no-call. It's the fact that they threw a flag for either PI or (more likely) holding, then decided not to call it. Final play of the game, you either keep your hand in your pocket or you call the foul, not be a wishy-washy pussy.

Alright, then let's forget about the play being made and focus on that little bit of yellow. You do know the refs are allowed to correct mistakes they make on the field, right? The ref who threw the flag was probably focusing too much on the action between the two players and less on the trajectory of the ball. I don't blame him, the hug stands out. :p. But then the referees joined up to take stock of the entire play and rectified the mistake. I don't see what's so "wishy-washy" about that. Even in the worst situations for my own preferred teams, I can objectively say that I want the refs to get their calls right.

Kentsland wrote:The call is a judgement call, and is up to the Back Judge or any adjacent official to decide whether or not it's a penalty. If you don't throw the flag, then okay. That's the officials opinion, and should not be called. If the official throws the flag, you call it. No in between. The fact that the Official threw the flag in the first place-there should be a holding penalty against CAR. If they didn't throw the flag, that would be okay.

See above.
Last edited by Bralia on Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Gaveo
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32070
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaveo » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:19 pm

Saugeais wrote:I'm now one of the many advocates that say Cutler should be franchise tagged, and the Bears should both re-sign McCown for another year while drafting a QB to develop. As far as said QB to draft, Aaron Murray seems to be the best fit if the Bears can nab him in the 2nd-3rd round. Durable, good arm and head on his shoulders, but will definitely be overlook with Teddy Bridgewater, Marcus Mariota, AJ McCarron, and Johnny Manziel coming out as well.

Not Aaron Murray he is too inconsistent.

Did you see him in the First Half of the Auburn-Georgia game last week? Shesh.

Although then again, some players are better in the NFL than they were in college.
Bruh.

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:30 am

The panthers are really doing good this season.
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:28 am

For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:41 pm

Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/

Would be better once it's complete. Not bad though.
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Osarius
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Mar 21, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Osarius » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:22 pm

Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/

Saw these earlier... Mixed bag. Some are really well done, others don't really look like footy crests to me.
Cool idea though. Pretty sure I saw the reverse somewhere else and thought the same thing.
Monarch: Alexander III | First Minister: Mathieu Lupin | Population: ~125 million | Capital: Burningham, Mount Crown
Civilisation Index: 13.43 • Tier 7, Level 2, Type 5
Current Project(s): a discord scorination bot, and a football manager knock-off

Useful NSSports Stuff | RabaSport.net

||A Loyal Citizen of Wakanda||

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:23 pm

Osarius wrote:
Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/

Saw these earlier... Mixed bag. Some are really well done, others don't really look like footy crests to me.
Cool idea though. Pretty sure I saw the reverse somewhere else and thought the same thing.


The reverse would be interesting, especially to see what they do to clubs without mascots attached to them. Although maybe most if not all of the top clubs have mascots by now?

I get what you're saying with the first bit. Some do look a bit out there. Then again, this is a real soccer crest, so who knows...*

*actually, I think that's pretty wicked. Hereford cattle and all, I get it. Beats a shrimp or something like that for sure.

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:19 pm

Sports Science agree with me and Tom Brady: That was a bullshit no-call!

http://m.espn.go.com/general/video?vid=10004720&src=desktop
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:28 pm

Qazox wrote:Sports Science agree with me and Tom Brady: That was a bullshit no-call!

http://m.espn.go.com/general/video?vid=10004720&src=desktop


He takes two whole chop steps to stop, and then he's supposed to be able to launch back towards the ball? Really?

Nope.

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:29 pm

Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
Qazox wrote:Sports Science agree with me and Tom Brady: That was a bullshit no-call!

http://m.espn.go.com/general/video?vid=10004720&src=desktop


He takes two whole chop steps to stop, and then he's supposed to be able to launch back towards the ball? Really?

Nope.

If he didn't have 235 lbs draped over him, he had a chance. But basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Qazox wrote:
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
He takes two whole chop steps to stop, and then he's supposed to be able to launch back towards the ball? Really?

Nope.

If he didn't have 235 lbs draped over him, he had a chance. But basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.


Except no. I still disagree with them that "even without the additional mass, Gronk would've had a play on the ball."

You can see him make one and a half chop steps before the brunt of the contact begins. ESPN also calling "hand on shoulder" the initiation of contact and, therefore, the initiation of added mass is entirely inaccurate, too, and even by that definition, "contact" happens after he's made one chop step.

I can see Gronk stopping from that stride in two and a half, three chop steps max. But that's just stopping - he then would have to launch himself back in the opposite direction towards the ball.

EDIT: And there's no such thing as "Defensive Holding" on a receiver when the ball is in the air towards that receiver. That call is made before the ball is in the air.
Last edited by Christmahanikwanzikah on Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Franklin Delano Bluth
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Apr 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Franklin Delano Bluth » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:42 pm

Qazox wrote:basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.


Are you quite sure you know the rules?

Because this clause suggests heavily that you don't.

Once the ball's in the air, holding on the defense is out. It's PI or nothing.
The American Legion is a neo-fascist terrorist organization, bent on implementing Paulinist Sharia, and with a history of pogroms against organized labor and peace activists and of lynching those who dare resist or defend themselves against its aggression.

Pro: O'Reilly technical books, crew-length socks, Slide-O-Mix trombone lubricant, Reuben sandwiches
Anti: The eight-line signature limit, lift kits, cancelling Better Off Ted, Chicago Cubs

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:57 pm

Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:
Qazox wrote:basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.


Are you quite sure you know the rules?

Because this clause suggests heavily that you don't.

Once the ball's in the air, holding on the defense is out. It's PI or nothing.

Fine then Pass Interference should've been called.
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31245
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:28 pm

Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
Qazox wrote:If he didn't have 235 lbs draped over him, he had a chance. But basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.


Except no. I still disagree with them that "even without the additional mass, Gronk would've had a play on the ball."

You can see him make one and a half chop steps before the brunt of the contact begins. ESPN also calling "hand on shoulder" the initiation of contact and, therefore, the initiation of added mass is entirely inaccurate, too, and even by that definition, "contact" happens after he's made one chop step.

I can see Gronk stopping from that stride in two and a half, three chop steps max. But that's just stopping - he then would have to launch himself back in the opposite direction towards the ball.

EDIT: And there's no such thing as "Defensive Holding" on a receiver when the ball is in the air towards that receiver. That call is made before the ball is in the air.

That right there. That argument needs to be mentioned to all Patriots fans and the other decriers of the no-call.
Last edited by Bralia on Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:41 am

Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/


Woot! My Steelers have a black castle, which is also the center of my own clan crest! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... en.svg.png

I think Baltimore is well done, too, which yes smacks of trachery.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Jedoria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1306
Founded: Aug 23, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedoria » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:34 am

Thursday night, Saints vs Falcons.

Rivalry time.
“We were all of us cogs in a great machine which sometimes rolled forward, nobody knew where, sometimes backwards, nobody knew why.”
― Ernst Toller

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:43 am

Jedoria wrote:Thursday night, Saints vs Falcons.

Rivalry time.
Saints won done.
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Gaveo
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32070
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaveo » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:49 am

Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.

http://www.footballasfootball.com/

Yeah, I heard of that.

That is flipping awesome. :3
Bruh.

User avatar
Psycentric
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13739
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Psycentric » Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:35 am

Jedoria wrote:Thursday night, Saints vs Falcons.

Rivalry time.

The Saints should have this game won but it is the falcons. all the saints need to do it keep that defense great.
Hello everybody im so happy to be here on NS!!!!!!

User avatar
The Confederacy of Styx
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 480
Founded: Oct 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Confederacy of Styx » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:33 pm

Rivalry games are always tight, but the Saints are just a goddamn juggernaut.
Formerly known as Confederated Southern States.
Libertarian Anarchist.
Pro: Gun rights, gay rights, legalization of marijuana, responsible capitalism, PS4, Pittsburgh Steelers.
Anti: Gun control, bigotry, authoritarianism, political correctness, Xbox One, Baltimore Ravens.
Conquer peace.

User avatar
Psycentric
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13739
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Psycentric » Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:27 pm

The Confederacy of Styx wrote:Rivalry games are always tight, but the Saints are just a goddamn juggernaut.

Now with a good running game! #Unstoppable offensive
Hello everybody im so happy to be here on NS!!!!!!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anti-Byzantine Empire, Berlin and Hanover, Dazchan, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, GCMG, Kashimura, Khardsland, Neu California, Paddy O Fernature, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Ambis, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads