I hope calls happen to the Colts Sunday in Arizona.
Advertisement

by Qazox » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

by Saugeais » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:27 pm

by The Confederacy of Styx » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
Saugeais wrote:I'm now one of the many advocates that say Cutler should be franchise tagged, and the Bears should both re-sign McCown for another year while drafting a QB to develop. As far as said QB to draft, Aaron Murray seems to be the best fit if the Bears can nab him in the 2nd-3rd round. Durable, good arm and head on his shoulders, but will definitely be overlook with Teddy Bridgewater, Marcus Mariota, AJ McCarron, and Johnny Manziel coming out as well.

by Kentsland » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:19 pm

by Bralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:22 pm
Qazox wrote:Bralia wrote:In case you guys are wondering, the ball was thrown underneath. There was no way that the intended receiver could get to the ball even if he wasn't being hugged by the defensive player. The ball was fully uncatchable. Good call on the refs.
Anyway, WOOT! GO ANTI-PATRIOTS! Come back when you don't have a stick shoved up your ass, Aqib Talib!
Oh, cool, a gif is already available. Seriously guys, how could you possibly say Gronkowski could have gotten to where the ball was going from his position on the field?:
(Image)
Seriously guys, how could you possibly say Gronkowski could have gotten to where the ball was going from his position on the field? Go find different angles if that's not convincing enough for you. Gronk's own momentum was carrying him away from the ball. He tried to slow down. Let's say the defensive player wasn't hugging him. Do you guys really think Gronk could accelerate fast enough to come back and grab the ball? Without the hug, the d-player would have still been in his way. Gronk may be a miracle worker but he can't perform the impossible.
Maybe, just maybe if he wasn't being hugged and manhandled during the part of his route where he comes back to where the ball wound up, then he could have caught it.
I'm not even mad about the no-call. It's the fact that they threw a flag for either PI or (more likely) holding, then decided not to call it. Final play of the game, you either keep your hand in your pocket or you call the foul, not be a wishy-washy pussy.
. But then the referees joined up to take stock of the entire play and rectified the mistake. I don't see what's so "wishy-washy" about that. Even in the worst situations for my own preferred teams, I can objectively say that I want the refs to get their calls right.Kentsland wrote:The call is a judgement call, and is up to the Back Judge or any adjacent official to decide whether or not it's a penalty. If you don't throw the flag, then okay. That's the officials opinion, and should not be called. If the official throws the flag, you call it. No in between. The fact that the Official threw the flag in the first place-there should be a holding penalty against CAR. If they didn't throw the flag, that would be okay.

by Gaveo » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:19 pm
Saugeais wrote:I'm now one of the many advocates that say Cutler should be franchise tagged, and the Bears should both re-sign McCown for another year while drafting a QB to develop. As far as said QB to draft, Aaron Murray seems to be the best fit if the Bears can nab him in the 2nd-3rd round. Durable, good arm and head on his shoulders, but will definitely be overlook with Teddy Bridgewater, Marcus Mariota, AJ McCarron, and Johnny Manziel coming out as well.

by Starkiller101 » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:30 am

by Serrland » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:28 am

by Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:41 pm
Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.
http://www.footballasfootball.com/
by Osarius » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:22 pm
Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.
http://www.footballasfootball.com/

by Serrland » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:23 pm
Osarius wrote:Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.
http://www.footballasfootball.com/
Saw these earlier... Mixed bag. Some are really well done, others don't really look like footy crests to me.
Cool idea though. Pretty sure I saw the reverse somewhere else and thought the same thing.

by Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:19 pm

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:28 pm
Qazox wrote:Sports Science agree with me and Tom Brady: That was a bullshit no-call!
http://m.espn.go.com/general/video?vid=10004720&src=desktop

by Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:29 pm
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Qazox wrote:Sports Science agree with me and Tom Brady: That was a bullshit no-call!
http://m.espn.go.com/general/video?vid=10004720&src=desktop
He takes two whole chop steps to stop, and then he's supposed to be able to launch back towards the ball? Really?
Nope.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:33 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:42 pm
Qazox wrote:basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.

by Qazox » Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:57 pm

by Bralia » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:28 pm
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Qazox wrote:If he didn't have 235 lbs draped over him, he had a chance. But basically it proved that at worst defensive holding should have been called.
Except no. I still disagree with them that "even without the additional mass, Gronk would've had a play on the ball."
You can see him make one and a half chop steps before the brunt of the contact begins. ESPN also calling "hand on shoulder" the initiation of contact and, therefore, the initiation of added mass is entirely inaccurate, too, and even by that definition, "contact" happens after he's made one chop step.
I can see Gronk stopping from that stride in two and a half, three chop steps max. But that's just stopping - he then would have to launch himself back in the opposite direction towards the ball.
EDIT: And there's no such thing as "Defensive Holding" on a receiver when the ball is in the air towards that receiver. That call is made before the ball is in the air.

by Pope Joan » Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:41 am
Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.
http://www.footballasfootball.com/
by Jedoria » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:34 am

by Starkiller101 » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:43 am
Saints won done.

by Gaveo » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:49 am
Serrland wrote:For those of you who are fans of both American Football and Association Football, this is a pretty neat crossover - NFL team logos redesigned to be crests.
http://www.footballasfootball.com/

by Psycentric » Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:35 am

by The Confederacy of Styx » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:33 pm

by Psycentric » Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:27 pm
The Confederacy of Styx wrote:Rivalry games are always tight, but the Saints are just a goddamn juggernaut.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anti-Byzantine Empire, Berlin and Hanover, Dazchan, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, GCMG, Kashimura, Khardsland, Neu California, Paddy O Fernature, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Ambis, Thermodolia
Advertisement