Daft States wrote:Whats the name of that other puppet...that always bothers Ahmed the Dead Terrorist...wanna say Spudnik but thats just stupid
Walter.
Advertisement
by Galloism » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:15 pm
Daft States wrote:Whats the name of that other puppet...that always bothers Ahmed the Dead Terrorist...wanna say Spudnik but thats just stupid
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:16 pm
Daft States wrote:Whats the name of that other puppet...that always bothers Ahmed the Dead Terrorist...wanna say Spudnik but thats just stupid
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:16 pm
Ashmoria wrote:UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:I don't believe in god or anything supernatural, but I chose other because I don't think that the label of atheism has much meaning. Why should I define myself by something that I lack? There's no word for non-astrologers, or for people who don't collect stamps, why should people who lack belief in the gods have a label? Instead, I define myself as a naturalist and an empiricist, because these are both positive statements of belief. Empiricists do not accept any proposition that lacks evidence. Naturalists do not believe that there is nothing supernatural. I believe that if there are gods, or there is esp, or ghosts, then such things possess a naturalistic explanation, and so don't qualify as supernatural, if they exist. Now, I don't believe in any of those things because they lack evidence, but I'm explaining just what I mean by naturalism.
I am a naturalist empiricist.
im an aphilatelist
by Ashmoria » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:18 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Ashmoria wrote:UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:I don't believe in god or anything supernatural, but I chose other because I don't think that the label of atheism has much meaning. Why should I define myself by something that I lack? There's no word for non-astrologers, or for people who don't collect stamps, why should people who lack belief in the gods have a label? Instead, I define myself as a naturalist and an empiricist, because these are both positive statements of belief. Empiricists do not accept any proposition that lacks evidence. Naturalists do not believe that there is nothing supernatural. I believe that if there are gods, or there is esp, or ghosts, then such things possess a naturalistic explanation, and so don't qualify as supernatural, if they exist. Now, I don't believe in any of those things because they lack evidence, but I'm explaining just what I mean by naturalism.
I am a naturalist empiricist.
im an aphilatelist
wassat?
by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:20 pm
Ashmoria wrote:my religion involves not collecting stamps.
by Ashmoria » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:22 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Ashmoria wrote:my religion involves not collecting stamps.
My hobby is not being a pokemon trainer, and I derive great philosophical meaning by not knowing the title of every episode of DBZ.
by Hebalobia » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:28 pm
by New Heliopolis » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:31 pm
JJ Place wrote: just because an organization tells you that them taking money from you isn't theft because they have more rights than any other organization is one of the lamest arguments a person can utilize in a debate; saying that the government can do what it likes because it writes it's own law is intellectually dishonest, and flies in the face of all reality.
Lucantis wrote:If a fat man puts you in a bag at night, don't worry I told Santa I wanted you for Christmas.
by Dakini » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:42 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Poll fail.
"Agnostic" shouldn't be an option.
by Secruss » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:43 pm
by Poliwanacraca » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:44 pm
by Hayteria » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:45 pm
Dakini wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Poll fail.
"Agnostic" shouldn't be an option.
Nor should "atheist" really. It's not exactly a religion. "None" would be a more appropriate option.
by South Lorenya » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:50 pm
by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:50 pm
Ashmoria wrote:lol
i liked your point.
by Enadail » Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:07 pm
by New Manvir » Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:49 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Galloism wrote:This poll is suspiciously missing the "heathen" option.
You aren't a heathen. You're an infidel!
by Maurepas » Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:50 pm
by Tmutarakhan » Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:00 pm
Enadail wrote:I'm culturally Jain, but I have to point out its not Jainist, no more then its Muslimist or Christianist.
The religion is Jainism, the followers are Jains
Tmutarakhan wrote:I am curious. Digambar or Svetambar? Were you raised in India, and are you still living there? Were you under family/social pressure to marry within the faith and keep it going, or is it accepted that some will go off their own way?
by Jahca » Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:22 pm
by Grave_n_idle » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:44 pm
Jahca wrote:Christianity isn't a religion, its a relationship with Jesus.
by Vojvodina-Nihon » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:51 pm
by Peisandros » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:53 pm
by Enadail » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:56 pm
Tmutarakhan wrote:I am curious. Digambar or Svetambar? Were you raised in India, and are you still living there? Were you under family/social pressure to marry within the faith and keep it going, or is it accepted that some will go off their own way?
by Sapphista » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:00 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom, Shamhnan Insir, The Grene Knyght, Tungstan
Advertisement