You realize that I was being sarcastic, right, sweetheart?
Advertisement

by Frisivisia » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:01 am

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:01 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Well, to say that they will watch it even if they don't like it implies that there's nothing else to watch, which just isn't true.
There is. I don't guess many people look for "non degrading porn" tho, they just look for "porn".I have seen just about everything there is to see, and there is a lot of (imo boring) vanilla porn. Pretty much everything in the "amateur" section is vanilla, as is a pretty big chunk of production quality pornography.
I dunno why anything not vanilla has to be misogynist (I'm very kinky myself), nor do I understand how vanilla can't be done in a misogynist way.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:02 am

by New Britannia of America » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:02 am
Economic Left/Right: -6.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.36
by IshCong » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:03 am
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Well, to say that they will watch it even if they don't like it implies that there's nothing else to watch, which just isn't true. I have seen just about everything there is to see, and there is a lot of (imo boring) vanilla porn. Pretty much everything in the "amateur" section is vanilla, as is a pretty big chunk of production quality pornography.
Straight anal sex is never vanilla.
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:It is always big, rude assholes treating women like whores or engaging in 'raep' with their submissive girlfriends, often with friends.
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:(even more, in threeways guys never look at or are minimally affective/sexual with each other, as if someone calling other guy to bed would never be minimally bisexual. But I don't even complain about it, since average straight guys mostly focuse on females and "faind 'faggetreh' tiscustin'!11!11!")
I never fucked, but I know that straight sex doesn't happen that way.

by Frisivisia » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:03 am
New Britannia of America wrote:I'm tired of these threads.

by Regnum Dominae » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:04 am
New Britannia of America wrote:I'm tired of these threads.

by Nua Corda » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:04 am

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:04 am
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Well, to say that they will watch it even if they don't like it implies that there's nothing else to watch, which just isn't true. I have seen just about everything there is to see, and there is a lot of (imo boring) vanilla porn. Pretty much everything in the "amateur" section is vanilla, as is a pretty big chunk of production quality pornography.
Straight anal sex is never vanilla.
It is always big, rude assholes treating women like whores or engaging in 'raep' with their submissive girlfriends, often with friends.
(even more, in threeways guys never look at or are minimally affective/sexual with each other, as if someone calling other guy to bed would never be minimally bisexual. But I don't even complain about it, since average straight guys mostly focuse on females and "faind 'faggetreh' tiscustin'!11!11!")
I never fucked, but I know that straight sex doesn't happen that way.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:05 am
New Britannia of America wrote:I'm tired of these threads.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Frisivisia » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:05 am
Nua Corda wrote:The title of this thread tricked me!
I came here looking for juicy tits, not summer.
How do I refund?

by IshCong » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:06 am
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:IshCong wrote:
This is just going to reek of subjectivity if implemented. And even if implemented it wouldn't apply to what you seem to have a problem with. By virtue of being 'average' the average isn't the 'extreme' and wouldn't be labelled as such.
I believe they can target the average consumer and you apparently believe they're capable of targeting whichever sex acts the bulk of eighty percent of the male population most desires. That is not a climate in which a small minority can predominate and have most of the porn produced solely for their niche interests. If 80% of a populace is viewing porn, porn that is attractive to the most people among that 80% will be the most produced and tend towards becoming the 'average'.
It's not like 80% of people are both lonely and employed in any event.
hue, personal experiencesI meant that if only (yes, it is only, I freaked out 2 weeks without when I was 15 or 16, my first time in my 9th birthday was strong and like all of those years before were my body waiting for that moment, your entire live then seems like a very scary thing) 95% of guys fap, a good percent of them fap at porn too.
It doesn't mean they buy porn, or that they buy porn always, or that they even are sufficient to change the statistics of sites such as x...mster where most people already are there for a good time, looking at the comments and how everyone seems to like porn much more than me, and I am the most wanking person I ever knww personally.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:06 am
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:IshCong wrote:
I wonder if it wouldn't actually decrease harm in much the same way that legalizing porn lowers incidences of rape in general.
Pedophiles in general are not bad people. Pedophilia does not mean that the person will go out and abuse a child - in fact, for the most part, people who secretly or openly identify as pedophiles would be disgusted at the idea of harming a child.
But they need outlets just like everyone else, and for some, imagination won't cut it. Where I live, even drawings that depict someone who looks like they might be underage is illegal, which is ridiculous. 3D models, drawings, and stories should be freely available without reprimand. It will certainly reduce the need for people to find real child pornography that depicts real children really being abused.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:06 am
Aurora Novus wrote:So...what, people just made porn on a whim then, and magically bred people to like it? Nonsense.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:08 am
IshCong wrote:If the vast majority of men view porn, as you claim, then there are more than enough of them to change what the industry will produce. Even if they aren't spending money on it the industry will almost certainly track hits on online videos/sites, run interest polls, etc and they will actively pursue producing whatever sort of porn most people (ie, the average) like in order to make more money. There is simply no way a minority group can dominate a market the vast majority of the population participates in like that.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:08 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:So...what, people just made porn on a whim then, and magically bred people to like it? Nonsense.
Again you conflate porn itself with misogynist porn.
I'm talking about what the industry tends to produce. That shit ain't a common man's fantasy.
You don't think watching something over and over can make you desensitized to it, or maybe even like it?
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Liriena » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:08 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by IshCong » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:09 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:So...what, people just made porn on a whim then, and magically bred people to like it? Nonsense.
Again you conflate porn itself with misogynist porn.
I'm talking about what the industry tends to produce. That shit ain't a common man's fantasy.
You don't think watching something over and over can make you desensitized to it, or maybe even like it?

by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:10 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:IshCong wrote:If the vast majority of men view porn, as you claim, then there are more than enough of them to change what the industry will produce. Even if they aren't spending money on it the industry will almost certainly track hits on online videos/sites, run interest polls, etc and they will actively pursue producing whatever sort of porn most people (ie, the average) like in order to make more money. There is simply no way a minority group can dominate a market the vast majority of the population participates in like that.
Producers dominate it.

by IshCong » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:10 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:IshCong wrote:If the vast majority of men view porn, as you claim, then there are more than enough of them to change what the industry will produce. Even if they aren't spending money on it the industry will almost certainly track hits on online videos/sites, run interest polls, etc and they will actively pursue producing whatever sort of porn most people (ie, the average) like in order to make more money. There is simply no way a minority group can dominate a market the vast majority of the population participates in like that.
Producers dominate it.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:11 am
IshCong wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
hue, personal experiencesI meant that if only (yes, it is only, I freaked out 2 weeks without when I was 15 or 16, my first time in my 9th birthday was strong and like all of those years before were my body waiting for that moment, your entire live then seems like a very scary thing) 95% of guys fap, a good percent of them fap at porn too.
It doesn't mean they buy porn, or that they buy porn always, or that they even are sufficient to change the statistics of sites such as x...mster where most people already are there for a good time, looking at the comments and how everyone seems to like porn much more than me, and I am the most wanking person I ever knww personally.
If the vast majority of men view porn, as you claim, then there are more than enough of them to change what the industry will produce. Even if they aren't spending money on it the industry will almost certainly track hits on online videos/sites, run interest polls, etc and they will actively pursue producing whatever sort of porn most people (ie, the average) like in order to make more money. There is simply no way a minority group can dominate a market the vast majority of the population participates in like that.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:11 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Again you conflate porn itself with misogynist porn.
I'm talking about what the industry tends to produce. That shit ain't a common man's fantasy.
You don't think watching something over and over can make you desensitized to it, or maybe even like it?
I have watched men getting a blowjob many times and I haven't become desensitized to it nor I would like it.
In other words, I am living proof your statement is bullshit.
Research shows that initial exposure to violence in the media produces a number of aversive responses such as increased heart rate, fear, discomfort, perspiration and disgust. However, studies conducted show that prolonged and repeated exposure to violence in the media reduces or habituates the initial psychological impact until violent images do not elicit these negative responses. Eventually the observer becomes emotionally and cognitively desensitized to media violence. In an experiment to determine the effects on violent video games causing physiological desensitization to real-life violence, participants played either a violent or non-violent video game for 20 minutes. After that, they watched a 10 minute video containing real-life violence while their heart rate and galvanic skin responses were being monitored. The participants who played violent video games previously to watching the video showed lower heart rate and galvanic skin response readings compared to those who had not played violent video games displaying a physiological desensitization to violence.[10]

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:11 am
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:12 am
IshCong wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Again you conflate porn itself with misogynist porn.
I'm talking about what the industry tends to produce. That shit ain't a common man's fantasy.
You don't think watching something over and over can make you desensitized to it, or maybe even like it?
If you don't like it, why are you viewing it over and over again? It's not like there's any other point than to watch it and like it and it's not like there aren't plenty of alternatives.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:12 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Again you conflate porn itself with misogynist porn.
I'm talking about what the industry tends to produce. That shit ain't a common man's fantasy.
You don't think watching something over and over can make you desensitized to it, or maybe even like it?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, American Legionaries, Atras Raland, Belarusball, Elejamie, Fahran, Fractalnavel, Grand matrix of Dues ex machina, Gravlen, Grinning Dragon, Hurdergaryp, Kandorith, Kasase, Kerwa, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Qwuazaria, RIBBON EELS, Ryemarch, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, Torrocca, Uiiop, Warvick
Advertisement