Abortion and Capital Punishment

[ALMF]

Fetus =/= baby, just like child =/= adult. You gain rights as you go from fetus to adult.

Yes, based on the idea of consent, a foetus is incapable of consenting to an abortion.

Because a featous is not an individual and as such has no intrest to wave (waver of interest is the essence of consent).

[Blasveck]

Fetus =/= baby, just like child =/= adult. You gain rights as you go from fetus to adult.

Yes, based on the idea of consent, a foetus is incapable of consenting to an abortion.

A fetus isn't a legal person.

End. Of. Story.

[The Norgan Alliance]

Nope,
Human=human
1=1
Maths fail=maths fail

Fetus=clump of cells in your body. It's no more a legal person than an appendix.

My appendix thinks, moves on it's own, has a unique DNA, and is already human/will eventually become one?

[The ivain isles]

Nope,
Human=human
1=1
Maths fail=maths fail

PHD in it
featous=appendix=/= human therefor featous=/=human. basic math and stuff.

Lol, and nobody with a phd in maths has ever made a mistake

a foetus is a human, composed of its own genetic identity, therefore, human=human and 1 =/= 100

[Solarys]

It is.

Then consent to having your house burned down is consent to not have a reply by the fire department.

Only it is not. Consent to leave the stove burning is consent to having your house burned down. Try again.

[Geilinor]

Fetus=clump of cells in your body. It's no more a legal person than an appendix.

moves on it's own

Fetuses do not move on their own.

[Solarys]

Yes, based on the idea of consent, a foetus is incapable of consenting to an abortion.

A fetus isn't a legal person.

End. Of. Story.

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

[ALMF]

Fetus=clump of cells in your body. It's no more a legal person than an appendix.

My appendix thinks, moves on it's own, has a unique DNA, and is already human/will eventually become one?

And "those child sacrificing Jues" deni the divinity the divinity of Crist. Your point?

[Solarys]

So the idea is that lack of consent shouldn't be considered "yes".

It isn't considered a yes.

Then it is a tie.

[Mavorpen]

Then consent to having your house burned down is consent to not have a reply by the fire department.

Only it is not. Consent to leave the stove burning is consent to having your house burned down. Try again.

Cool, then consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy.

[Sociobiology]

PHD in it
featous=appendix=/= human therefor featous=/=human. basic math and stuff.

Lol, and nobody with a phd in maths has ever made a mistake

a foetus is a human, composed of its own genetic identity, therefore, human=human and 1 =/= 100

a tumor has its own genetic identity, therefor according to you human with same rights as you.

[Geilinor]

Lol, and nobody with a phd in maths has ever made a mistake

a foetus is a human, composed of its own genetic identity, therefore, human=human and 1 =/= 100

a tumor has its own genetic identity, therefor according to you human with same rights as you.

Anthrax has it's own genetic identity as well.

[The Norgan Alliance]

moves on it's own

Fetuses do not move on their own.

Have you never seen a baby kick in the womb?

[Mavorpen]

A fetus isn't a legal person.

End. Of. Story.

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

Of course you would. Slaves by definition are property. Therefore the solution is to free them and THEN they could be persons.

[Solarys]

Only it is not. Consent to leave the stove burning is consent to having your house burned down. Try again.

Cool, then consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy.

Ok, something is wrong with you. I am not going to do this dance.

[ALMF]

PHD in it
featous=appendix=/= human therefor featous=/=human. basic math and stuff.

Lol, and nobody with a phd in maths has ever made a mistake

a foetus is a human, composed of its own genetic identity, therefore, human=human and 1 =/= 100

Restating the new Blood Liable dosen't make it true.

[Mavorpen]

Cool, then consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy.

Ok, something is wrong with you. I am not going to do this dance.

It's not my fault you can't remain consistent.

[Sociobiology]

A fetus isn't a legal person.

End. Of. Story.

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

if the slaves had the mental development of a tadpole, yes.

[Mavorpen]

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

if the slaves had the mental development of a tadpole, yes.

That's rather insulting to tadpoles.

[The Norgan Alliance]

A fetus isn't a legal person.

End. Of. Story.

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

According to Hitler Jews aren't people, can I go around killing Jews?

[Geilinor]

if the slaves had the mental development of a tadpole, yes.

That's rather insulting to tadpoles.

[Geilinor]

Cool, then consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy.

Ok, something is wrong with you. I am not going to do this dance.

[The Norgan Alliance]

My appendix thinks, moves on it's own, has a unique DNA, and is already human/will eventually become one?

And "those child sacrificing Jues" deni the divinity the divinity of Crist. Your point?

You did relate your answer in any way to my post therefore your argument is invalid. Try again.

[The ivain isles]

Lol, and nobody with a phd in maths has ever made a mistake

a foetus is a human, composed of its own genetic identity, therefore, human=human and 1 =/= 100

a tumor has its own genetic identity, therefor according to you human with same rights as you.

Yep, and your the lucky father.

[Solarys]

So if slaves are not considered legally persons, would you agree ?

if the slaves had the mental development of a tadpole, yes.

Even if they don't remain that way for more than 10 months ?

And if your reply is that when that happens, they can be considered persons, then the only problem is that until then they could be legally murdered thus rendered unable to even get to that point in life.