Gonna draw considerable ire from many, many, people with this I expect, but I personally think he has done no better or worse than Bush, I am drawing on an outsiders perspective, where we get to see (slightly, if we dig enough) less politically fuelled idiocy. Bush may have been an arse, a warmonger and many other things, but you know what? he didn't do -that- badly as an actual administrator (he saved your automotive industry for starters, which proved a rather useful thing to have once Japans started to have their brakes fell off when you used them)
Obama... His heart is definitely in the right place, at another time he probably would have made an excellent politician. At the moment? his policies abroad seem even more erratic than Bush's (which is REALLY saying something), his domestic policies seem to fail, or in some cases seem to be a little out of touch with what Americans want (I can't remember a specific example, but lets face it, he had a key hand in the espionage behind the recent Snowden scandal, regardless of what people think of said scandal, and his drug war policies has caused him heaps of trouble)
As stated, that's a foreign (British) view. Ironically, I'm running off of mostly anti-Bush propaganda because most of my friends in America hate the Republicans; so logic actually would dictate Bush was probably slightly better (except, applying logic to politics is like hammering a nail into your forehead, it's not smart, and it's going to hurt like hell.)
