Advertisement

by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:58 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Blaatschapen » Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:58 am
Chinese Regions wrote:Sassinia wrote:Nope. Although you can group them according to their scripts:
Devanagari
Bengali-Assamese
Punjabi
That Arabic-like script (I'm not Pakistani so i don't know the name)
Scripts are a bad way to group.
Japanese is an isolate but shares characters with Chinese.
Viatnamease uses the Latin Alphabet but is of a totally different family to French (though it does have a lot of French loanwords).

by Chinese Regions » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:00 am
HorusLand wrote:Nationalist State of Knox wrote:If most professionals consider it a language isolate, I'm inclined to believe it's a language isolate. A few people who disagree don't really make a difference.
It's like saying the few scientists who disagree with global warming's existence disprove the existence of global warming, despite the overwhelming majority accepting its existence.
Okay.
But isn't East Asian good? All languages from East Asia?
What else can be done to put them into 10 options?

by Nationalist State of Knox » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:00 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Chinese Regions » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:00 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Chinese Regions wrote:Scripts are a bad way to group.
Japanese is an isolate but shares characters with Chinese.
Viatnamease uses the Latin Alphabet but is of a totally different family to French (though it does have a lot of French loanwords).
Not to mention, Afrikaans, a Germanic language, is sometimes written in Arabic.

by Camelza » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:00 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Chinese Regions wrote:Scripts are a bad way to group.
Japanese is an isolate but shares characters with Chinese.
Viatnamease uses the Latin Alphabet but is of a totally different family to French (though it does have a lot of French loanwords).
Not to mention, Afrikaans, a Germanic language, is sometimes written in Arabic.

by Jukraina » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:00 am

by Horusland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:01 am

by Chinese Regions » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:01 am

by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:01 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Nationalist State of Knox » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:01 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
by Souseiseki » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:02 am

by Horusland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:02 am


by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:03 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Archregimancy » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:03 am
Camelza wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
I can state with some confidence that Basque has no linguistic relationship to Carthaginian (more accurately Punic).
Basque is a language isolate; even those unsuccessful attempts to link Basque to other family trees that have taken place have never, to the best of my knowledge, attempted to make a link to Semitic languages, or any other branch of the Afro-Asiatic family, but have rather focused on potential links to languages in the Caucasus mountains (several candidates, but any link with Kartvelian languages such as Georgian now wholly discredited), or now-extinct languages spoken in Spain.
Basque grammar and vocabulary bear absolutely no resemblance to Semitic languages. The clearest indication of the lack of any relationship between Basque and Semitic languages is the total lack of Semitic consonantal roots in Basque, such as the s-l-m root that indicates peace/submission in shalom/salaam/Islam/Muslim, and which have been a feature of Semitic languages since Akkadian - in other words, since the advent of writing.
That's why I said it's not certain ...so, is it some godforsaken language that survived since Iberia was invaded by Indo-Europeans?

by Nationalist State of Knox » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:03 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Horusland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:04 am



by Camelza » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:05 am
Immoren wrote:Chinese Regions wrote:dafuq is Indo-Uralic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Uralic_languages
I forgot it's superior to Indo-European.
Should've said "Uralic "

by Risottia » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:07 am

by The Blaatschapen » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:08 am

by Sassinia » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:08 am
HorusLand wrote:Camelza wrote:Split the languages by region.
And then you have people complaining and trying to reorder them, and then one (Camelza) succeeds at making a list, which has only one problem, so they all decide to split the languages by region.
Now, if you read the sentence I just wrote over and over again, it makes a logical loop.
Of course, I won't accept that. I needz correct groupings.

by Horusland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:09 am
Risottia wrote:Er, OP: Farsi isn't Semitic, it's Indoeuropean!

by Camelza » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:09 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Camelza wrote:That's why I said it's not certain ...so, is it some godforsaken language that survived since Iberia was invaded by Indo-Europeans?
It's not so much 'not certain' as 'demonstrably false to anyone with even a passing knowledge of historical linguistics'. That perhaps sounds a little abrupt; it's not meant to be, so apologies if it sounds that way.
I'm not sure the Basques would describe their language as 'godforsaken'. Given the lack of definite evidence, the best that can be said about the origin of Basque is that it was spoken along the shores of the Bay of Biscay and the nearby mountains before the Romans arrived; anything beyond that it speculation.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: New Raffica, The Holy Therns
Advertisement