NATION

PASSWORD

Homosexuals and Marriage: A Constant Battle

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:53 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:No. In which ALL are gay.
All with the honourable exception of me, of course.

My male, agender and pangender three halves are all bi, silly.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
The Count of Monte Cristo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:55 am

Fiancée, eh ? Don´t worry. Means you´re bisexual. No offense meant.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:56 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Fiancée, eh ? Don´t worry. Means you´re bisexual. No offense meant.

But how am I bisexual if I:
1. Don't like men
2. Have not dated men
3. Will not date men

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:57 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Fiancée, eh ? Don´t worry. Means you´re bisexual. No offense meant.

BIsexual is not exactly gay.

Queer, sure. Not gay.
Divair wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Fiancée, eh ? Don´t worry. Means you´re bisexual. No offense meant.

But how am I bisexual if I:
1. Don't like men
2. Have not dated men
3. Will not date men
Not to say how half this forum is asexual.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
The Count of Monte Cristo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:59 am

I´ve read somewhere that you have to be a little gay to be pro-gay.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:00 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:I´ve read somewhere that you have to be a little gay to be pro-gay.

Where? Infowars? Freerepublic? Some other bullshit site?

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:00 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Fiancée, eh ? Don´t worry. Means you´re bisexual. No offense meant.

BIsexual is not exactly gay.

Queer, sure. Not gay.
Divair wrote:But how am I bisexual if I:
1. Don't like men
2. Have not dated men
3. Will not date men
Not to say how half this forum is asexual.

It isn't.

User avatar
The Count of Monte Cristo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:06 am

Divair wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:I´ve read somewhere that you have to be a little gay to be pro-gay.

Where? Infowars? Freerepublic? Some other bullshit site?


I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:07 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Divair wrote:Where? Infowars? Freerepublic? Some other bullshit site?


I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

So it's simply delusion. How boring.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72184
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:08 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Divair wrote:Where? Infowars? Freerepublic? Some other bullshit site?


I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

This just in:

People who want to give black people voting rights must be a little bit black.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:09 am

Galloism wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

This just in:

People who want to give black people voting rights must be a little bit black.

People who want to give free education to kids must be a little childish.
People who want to give rights to women must be a little female.
People who want to give rights to transsexuals must be a little transsexual.

Marvelous.

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:09 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Divair wrote:Where? Infowars? Freerepublic? Some other bullshit site?


I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

I support Women's Rights. Does that make me a woman?
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72184
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:10 am

Divair wrote:
Galloism wrote:This just in:

People who want to give black people voting rights must be a little bit black.

People who want to give free education to kids must be a little childish.
People who want to give rights to women must be a little female.
People who want to give rights to transsexuals must be a little transsexual.

Marvelous.

Once again proving that liberals are all things to all people.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:10 am

Regnum Dominae wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

I support Women's Rights. Does that make me a woman?

I support unemployment insurance. Does that make me a little unemployed?

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:11 am

Regnum Dominae wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:I can´t believe there isn´t a sign of gayness is pro-gay stances, no matter how slight.

I support Women's Rights. Does that make me a woman?

Welcome to the transgender team, Regnum. We have sunflower + apple + strawberry + passionfruit cake. *nods*
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
The Count of Monte Cristo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:12 am

Depends not on the rights, but rather on who they were designed for.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:13 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Depends not on the rights, but rather on who they were designed for.

So if I support women's rights, I must be a little female?

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:14 am

Divair wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Depends not on the rights, but rather on who they were designed for.

So if I support women's rights, I must be a little female?

Who never had a little period.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
The Count of Monte Cristo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:15 am

Divair wrote:
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Depends not on the rights, but rather on who they were designed for.

So if I support women's rights, I must be a little female?


Why not ? I believe nobody is 100% male or female. That somehow one half must contain part of the other.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:16 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Divair wrote:So if I support women's rights, I must be a little female?


Why not ? I believe nobody is 100% male or female. That somehow one half must contain part of the other.

And if I support black's rights, I must be a little black?

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:17 am

The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Why not ? I believe nobody is 100% male or female. That somehow one half must contain part of the other.

If nobody is 100% male or female, isn't it "a bit" arbitrary to be against [now so-called] homosexuals?
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Seaxeland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Jan 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Seaxeland » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:17 am

It's wrong. It's sinful. It's unnatural.

My 2¢ for you.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126487
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:18 am

the grave diggers union would like to have a word.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:18 am

Seaxeland wrote:It's wrong. It's sinful. It's unnatural.

My 2¢ for you.

Fake money.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:19 am

Seaxeland wrote:It's wrong.

Why?
It's sinful.

Incorrect and irrelevant.
It's unnatural.

Incorrect.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alris, Ard alAkhua, Bienenhalde, Bovad, Celritannia, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Giovanniland, Greater Miami Shores 3, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Rusozak, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, United kigndoms of goumef, Washington Resistance Army, Western Theram

Advertisement

Remove ads