No one is forcing them to.
Advertisement
by Benuty » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:36 pm
by Verbal Pararhea » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:38 pm
Benuty wrote:No one is forcing them to .
by The Silence of Night » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:39 pm
by Grenartia » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:40 pm
Liriena wrote:Polkopia wrote:
If a Church wants to marry them, then fine, go ahead, but I don't want the Church to be forced to marry same-sex couples.
So far, no one has proposed forcing any temple of any religion to marry same-sex couples, and since even the most radical left-wingers do appreciate religious liberty and the separation of Church and State, I doubt you'll ever actually see a movement to do such a thing.
by Grenartia » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:43 pm
by Blakk Metal » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:00 pm
Libremas wrote:Blasveck wrote:
1. I wan to have a civil discussion.
2. Why is marriage between just a man and a woman? And please give a secular reason.
3. How is two gay men getting married a crime worthy of arresting people. It harms nobody.
1. Okay let us have one.
2. It justifies without tying in with religion. People are not born gay. We are all born straight. Please don't laugh at that. I will provide more evidence in a few minutes. You choose to be gay. You may think you're different when you're young, (Like that idiot Macklemore has stated) but honestly it isn't the case. Yes I was born straight, I never decided to be straight. so what sense does it make that I say people were never born gay? What I mean is I've always been straight and never chose it as I already was, so a gay person cannot per say choose their sexual orientation.
But look at history. Let's go back to the ages where we were just starting out, were we just started communicating. were there any gays? no ,
it was vital to breed with thesameopposite sex aswe needed to growit felt good.
this whole idea of homosexuality dates back to who knows when.
however in modern years, and by modern i mean around 1950-2013 it seems there are more and more gays. now while marriage has always been between man and woman.
if a state wanted to legalize it then let them do it with a vote and see whether or not they'd actually create that type of unionship.
3. It is a crime in iran, and other countries. soooo...?
Gaelic Celtia wrote:Libremas wrote:
False. I could cite you on that. That's like saying ww2 never happened, or the cuban war, or even the african war. Wars happened, hitler was real, but no jews were killed in camps. they were arrested or deported, never killed or gased. how dumb is that to kill people because of their religion or sexual orientation??? -.-
Then Auschwitz was...what then? A friggen preschool?
Williamson wrote:its 10:13 est this thread has offical been derailed.
by Greed and Death » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:27 pm
by Blahbania » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:30 pm
☻/ This is Bob, copy & paste him in
/▌ your sig so Bob can take over the
/ \ world.
by Salandriagado » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:32 am
Vazdania wrote:
Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)
by The Aztec Allience » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:37 am
by Belauer » Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:29 am
by Blekksprutia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:40 am
Vazdania wrote:
Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)
by Dyakovo » Thu Aug 22, 2013 7:51 am
Vazdania wrote:
Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)
by Vazdania » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:59 am
Dyakovo wrote:Vazdania wrote:Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)
Marriage is not a "religious church ceremony". It is a secular institution that provides numerous legal benefits.
A wedding can be a religious church ceremony, assuming the people getting married choose to have a religious wedding. This, however, is not required for you to have a valid marriage.
by Grenartia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:38 pm
Vazdania wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Marriage is not a "religious church ceremony". It is a secular institution that provides numerous legal benefits.
A wedding can be a religious church ceremony, assuming the people getting married choose to have a religious wedding. This, however, is not required for you to have a valid marriage.
From a legal standpoint yes. its an agreement that provides legal benefits.
Yes.
by Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:40 pm
by Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:45 pm
IBecause its my beliefs that same sex marrige is wrong.
by Tenebriso » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:50 pm
Fasternia wrote:I personally believe that:
- The Christian definition marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though.
- I have nothing against homosexuals.
And let me guess: Now you call me a homophobic. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? I think it's illogical.
Fixed to make more sense.
by Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:58 pm
that gay marriage is a abomination and sex marriage should not be allowed
by Williamson » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:58 pm
by Tenebriso » Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:08 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, Keltionialang, Pale Dawn, Tarsonis, The H Corporation
Advertisement