NATION

PASSWORD

What do you think of same-sex church wedding ceremonies?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37330
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:36 pm

Polkopia wrote:
Liriena wrote:What if a church wants to marry a same-sex couple? You're going to legally prohibit it? What happened to religious liberty?


If a Church wants to marry them, then fine, go ahead, but I don't want the Church to be forced to marry same-sex couples.

No one is forcing them to.
:palm:
Last edited by Benuty on Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Verbal Pararhea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 362
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Verbal Pararhea » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:38 pm

Benuty wrote:No one is forcing them to :roll:.


Actually, I am. I, along with the rest of the Freemason society, use our power to force churches to marry and accept gay people and to plant fake evidence for the Holocaust.

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Williamson wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:I know that, but it seemed like that's what he was suggesting.

what made you think that

Mostly misreading your post. :blush:
Not my night, I think I'm just gonna lurk.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:40 pm

Liriena wrote:
Polkopia wrote:
If a Church wants to marry them, then fine, go ahead, but I don't want the Church to be forced to marry same-sex couples.

So far, no one has proposed forcing any temple of any religion to marry same-sex couples, and since even the most radical left-wingers do appreciate religious liberty and the separation of Church and State, I doubt you'll ever actually see a movement to do such a thing.


This, if for no other reason than we realize that doing so would give anti-SSM people a legitimate reason to oppose SSM.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:43 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Williamson wrote:its 10:13 est this thread has offical been derailed.

"Nurse, I'm calling time of Derail. Notify the OP and family... Hopefully we can get them to consider donating the ideas to needy topics."


Getting AQ'd.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6738
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:00 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Williamson wrote:why?


Indeed. There is NO logical, rational reason to go around arresting people of the same sex who want to get married. Its a fucking stupid idea. Its about as rational as solving world hunger by taking pieces of the moon and feeding it to the hungry.

But it's funny!
Libremas wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
1. I wan to have a civil discussion.
2. Why is marriage between just a man and a woman? And please give a secular reason.
3. How is two gay men getting married a crime worthy of arresting people. It harms nobody.


1. Okay let us have one.

2. It justifies without tying in with religion. People are not born gay. We are all born straight. Please don't laugh at that. I will provide more evidence in a few minutes. You choose to be gay. You may think you're different when you're young, (Like that idiot Macklemore has stated) but honestly it isn't the case. Yes I was born straight, I never decided to be straight. so what sense does it make that I say people were never born gay? What I mean is I've always been straight and never chose it as I already was, so a gay person cannot per say choose their sexual orientation.

Please add quote marks.
But look at history. Let's go back to the ages where we were just starting out, were we just started communicating. were there any gays? no ,

[citation needed]
it was vital to breed with the same opposite sex as we needed to grow it felt good.

Corrected.
this whole idea of homosexuality dates back to who knows when.

I think the phrase you are looking for is 'time immemorial'.
however in modern years, and by modern i mean around 1950-2013 it seems there are more and more gays. now while marriage has always been between man and woman.

Incorrect. Although it has predominately been between a man and at least one woman, there have been isolated cases of gay marriage.
if a state wanted to legalize it then let them do it with a vote and see whether or not they'd actually create that type of unionship.

"if a state wants to ban dick flashing then let them do it with a vote and see whether or not they'd actually ban that type of crime."
3. It is a crime in iran, and other countries. soooo...?

WRONG AGAIN! It's buttsex that's prohibited!
Lithosano wrote:
Libremas wrote:
if a country doesn't want those people yes.


So Germany was justified in committing the Holocaust?

Godwin's l-

*gets brick thrown at him*
Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Libremas wrote:
False. I could cite you on that. That's like saying ww2 never happened, or the cuban war, or even the african war. Wars happened, hitler was real, but no jews were killed in camps. they were arrested or deported, never killed or gased. how dumb is that to kill people because of their religion or sexual orientation??? -.-

Then Auschwitz was...what then? A friggen preschool?

Obviously wanted to execute capital felons like California, but wholesale.

Duh.
Williamson wrote:its 10:13 est this thread has offical been derailed.

Now back on topic: The holocaust was faked so that 'pointless' discrimination would become unpopular, thus leading to faggots marrying in churches!

MASTER LOGIC

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:27 pm

If the church in question has no objection to it what business of it is mine ?
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Blahbania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 568
Founded: Apr 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Blahbania » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:30 pm

The Holy Michigan Empire wrote:
Fasternia wrote:
Oh god no, not the internet atheists... Here too?


No, they are secretly apart of the occult of liberal communist satanists whom plan to resurrect the dark warlock FDR with the help of marxist magic.

Pfft, atheists, do they even exist?


:lol2:
☻/ This is Bob, copy & paste him in
/▌ your sig so Bob can take over the
/ \ world.


Blahbanian airport and companies:
Borispil International Airport | Akijan cruises | Konstantinovsk shipyards
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature



/------\======[] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =+
/------------\
(OOOOOOOO)

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:32 am

Vazdania wrote:
Lithosano wrote:
It happens. Usually when a priest/pastor wants to marry a gay couple but their denomination/the law won't let them. For instance, Indiana has criminalized the solemnization of same-sex unions.

Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)


No, it includes church weddings. Those have nothing to do with the institution of marriage, which is and always has been a legal construct.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
The Aztec Allience
Attaché
 
Posts: 96
Founded: Sep 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Aztec Allience » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:37 am

I'm a pretty devout Lutheran myself, and I go to church every Sunday, and I see no reason why same sex marriages shouldn't be allowed in church (probably biased, being gay myself). A few outdated passages in the Old Testament is not enough of a reason to say that people like me shouldn't be allowed to marry who we love in a religious manner. Gays can be faithful, and I imagine lesbians can to. We spend our entire lives being faithful to God and we deserve the right to marry like anybody else would. I don't give a shit about Leviticus 18:22, or about any other mildly anti gay passage in the Bible. Love is love, regardless of gender.

User avatar
Belauer
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 47
Founded: Apr 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Belauer » Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:29 am

Oh boy, the bible defines marriage as a man and a women. Sorry to correct you sir, but the bible also defines marriage as:

1. 2 men (David and Jonathan, making David the son-in-law of Saul twice)*
2. 1 man several women (Saul had many wives as did many other figures in the bible)
and those are all from the old testament :p

*David married Jonathan and one of Saul's daughters.

User avatar
Blekksprutia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5957
Founded: Mar 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Blekksprutia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:40 am

Vazdania wrote:
Lithosano wrote:
It happens. Usually when a priest/pastor wants to marry a gay couple but their denomination/the law won't let them. For instance, Indiana has criminalized the solemnization of same-sex unions.

Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)

There's marriage and then there's Marriage.
marriage is when two people who love each other get married so they can grow old together.'
Marriage is when a man and a woman who don't love each other get married to share their wealth and prove a point to teh ebul gheyz trying to invade the Holy Institution of Marriage.
KILLUGON and BERNIE SANDERS and my moirail, ERIDEL.
Founder of Kotturheim, home to my GAY POLECATS, who are TOO FABULOUS FOR YOU.
Arg: Blekk does that. The topics of same sex marriage and the human race's fight against idiocy motivate him to write some truly impressive and glorious rants that deserve to be remembered and sigged.
Zott: I see our Blekky has discovered the joys of amphetamines.
Horus: blekky you are blekky i am horus
Rio: Blekky you are the best person on this website. Figuratively, kiss me.
Blekky is like a bunny. He looks adorable, yet he might bite you till it hurts.
Veccy: you're the worst blekky
The Balkens: Blekk does that, he has been taught by NSG's greatest practitioners of Snark to Snark combat.
Napki: Marry me, Blekk
Aeq: Blekk, you are Jesus!!!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Aug 22, 2013 7:51 am

Vazdania wrote:
Lithosano wrote:
It happens. Usually when a priest/pastor wants to marry a gay couple but their denomination/the law won't let them. For instance, Indiana has criminalized the solemnization of same-sex unions.

Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)

Marriage is not a "religious church ceremony". It is a secular institution that provides numerous legal benefits.
A wedding can be a religious church ceremony, assuming the people getting married choose to have a religious wedding. This, however, is not required for you to have a valid marriage.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:59 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Basically, State and Federal Law can fuck itself when it comes to RELIGIOUS Church Ceremonies (of which includes Marriage)

Marriage is not a "religious church ceremony". It is a secular institution that provides numerous legal benefits.
A wedding can be a religious church ceremony, assuming the people getting married choose to have a religious wedding. This, however, is not required for you to have a valid marriage.

From a legal standpoint yes. its an agreement that provides legal benefits.
Yes.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:38 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Marriage is not a "religious church ceremony". It is a secular institution that provides numerous legal benefits.
A wedding can be a religious church ceremony, assuming the people getting married choose to have a religious wedding. This, however, is not required for you to have a valid marriage.

From a legal standpoint yes. its an agreement that provides legal benefits.
Yes.


Then if you acknowledge those points, why did you post what you did? Some sort of paranoia that your church is going to be forced to conduct same-sex marriages? If so, then your fears are completely unfounded, as nobody anywhere on this fucking planet is even considering forcing churches to marry ANYBODY. You're literally complaining about shit that doesn't happen, hasn't happened, and will never happen.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:40 pm

I think its immoral and wrong
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Caecuser
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6896
Founded: Jul 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Caecuser » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:42 pm

Starkiller101 wrote:I think its immoral and wrong


Why? / How?

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:45 pm

Caecuser wrote:
Starkiller101 wrote:I think its immoral and wrong


Why? / How?
IBecause its my beliefs that same sex marrige is wrong.
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Lupelia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Jun 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lupelia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:48 pm

Starkiller101 wrote:
Caecuser wrote:
Why? / How?
IBecause its my beliefs that same sex marrige is wrong.

And those beliefs are?

United Empire of Lupelia

User avatar
Caecuser
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6896
Founded: Jul 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Caecuser » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:48 pm

Starkiller101 wrote:
Caecuser wrote:
Why? / How?
IBecause its my beliefs that same sex marrige is wrong.


Why is it that those are your beliefs though?
Last edited by Caecuser on Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tenebriso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 143
Founded: Aug 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tenebriso » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:50 pm

Fasternia wrote:I personally believe that:

- The Christian definition marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though.
- I have nothing against homosexuals.

And let me guess: Now you call me a homophobic. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? I think it's illogical.

Fixed to make more sense.


The Episcopalians and other denominations would disagree with your first point.

Second point is ok.

Third Point: The what is the point of the topic? :eyebrow:
American: Ron Paul Supporter. European: David Farage/UKIP Supporter.


NatSov proponent in the WA except in (most) cases of Civil and Human Rights.

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:58 pm

Lupelia wrote:
Starkiller101 wrote:IBecause its my beliefs that same sex marrige is wrong.

And those beliefs are?
that gay marriage is a abomination and sex marriage should not be allowed
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Williamson
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Williamson » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:58 pm

Starkiller101 wrote:
Lupelia wrote:And those beliefs are?
that gay marriage is a abomination and sex marriage should not be allowed

because?

User avatar
Lupelia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Jun 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lupelia » Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:03 pm

Starkiller101 wrote:
Lupelia wrote:And those beliefs are?
that gay marriage is a abomination and sex marriage should not be allowed

Care to elaborate on those points?

United Empire of Lupelia

User avatar
Tenebriso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 143
Founded: Aug 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Re: What do you think of same-sex church wedding ceremonies?

Postby Tenebriso » Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:08 pm

Sex marriage should not be allowed? By Jove, we must forcibly divorce any person who had sex before their marriage.
American: Ron Paul Supporter. European: David Farage/UKIP Supporter.


NatSov proponent in the WA except in (most) cases of Civil and Human Rights.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, Keltionialang, Pale Dawn, Tarsonis, The H Corporation

Advertisement

Remove ads