NATION

PASSWORD

What do you think of same-sex church wedding ceremonies?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nationalist State of Knox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10293
Founded: Feb 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationalist State of Knox » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:09 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Mkuki wrote:I'll give you two.

1. God does not exist.
2. If God did exist, and he disapproved of gay sex, he would clearly have the power to prevent people from having gay sex. The fact that people have gay sex is proof enough of two things. Either God does not exist or God doesn't disapprove of either homosexuality or gay sex.


God does not exist, huh. Shitty athiest. Keep on denying God. He will punish you, if not in this life, but the afterlife. Just wait and see.

Provide one shred of evidence for his existence.
Last edited by Gilgamesh on Mon Aru 17, 2467 BC 10:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Knox.
Biblical Authorship
God is Malevolent.
Bible Inaccuracies
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
Impeach Enlil, legalise dreaming, mortality is theft. GILGAMESH 2474 BC

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53445
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Liriena » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Condunum wrote:
Aquafireland wrote:
Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.

Because it's only backed up by a religious text.

A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.
The Fabulous Pope of NS


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Phocidaea » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?

Also, no, same-sex "sexual reactions" are not "absolutely horrid".
Last edited by Phocidaea on Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
Aquafireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5905
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aquafireland » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Benomia wrote:
One logical reason, one good, acceptable reason. Not a fallacious, bad, silly, logicless reason.


Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.


Your so sad that the only comebacks you have are about cactus'. Please, leave it for those who care.
abc|xyz

“Some people say you are going the wrong way, when it’s simply a way of your own.”
-Angelina Jolie

User avatar
Rhodesi
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesi » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Condunum wrote:
Aquafireland wrote:
Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.

Because it's only backed up by a religious text. You have to show how that is correct.


Why is a religious text not a good or acceptable reason.
NSG Senate: Classical Monarchist Party
"Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists" - Joseph De Maistre

"It is one of man's curious idiosyncrasies to create difficulties for the pleasure of resolving them" - Joseph De Maistre

"The United Nations is useless...and also harmful. It is a land that flowers demagoguery with a bunch of newborn countries, devoid of any tradition." - Antonio de Oliveira Salazar

"If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nation’s mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nation’s needs" - Jan Christiaan Smuts

"So, it's possible to be a democracy without gay-pride parades, hmm?" - Lyttenburgh - July 2013

Political Compass: Economic Right: 7.12, Social Authoritarian: 5.54

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Phocidaea wrote:Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?

Yes. You start with a small reaction and end big.

User avatar
Benomia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Benomia » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:10 am

Phocidaea wrote:Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?


www.en.wikipedia.org/orgasm
Last edited by Benomia on Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Remembering games, and daisy chains, and laughs...Got to keep the loonies on the path.
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
(-9.8, -10.0)
Map of Benomia
NS's Resident Floydian
Left 4 Dead RP
Want me to explain life to you?

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Phocidaea » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Divair wrote:
Phocidaea wrote:Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?

Yes. You start with a small reaction and end big.

Critical orgy mass?
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Liriena wrote:
Condunum wrote:Because it's only backed up by a religious text.

A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.

And also, as I will point out again, condones mind-control, slavery, war, personal sacrifice, honor killings, murder, rape, forced marriage, executions, etc.
password scrambled

User avatar
Aquafireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5905
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aquafireland » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Liriena wrote:
Condunum wrote:Because it's only backed up by a religious text.

A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.


You said give me a reason. As long as the word 'reason' was in there, I can say the shit I want.
abc|xyz

“Some people say you are going the wrong way, when it’s simply a way of your own.”
-Angelina Jolie

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126919
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Condunum wrote:
Liriena wrote:Well, aren't you a cute and mature little thing? I want to pinch your cheeks and ruffle your hair for that asinine 'response' of yours.

Sorry, sweetie, but I have every right to call you out on your baseless bullshit. Besides, calling me 'gaylord' is a really lousy insult. I'm not a 'gaylord'. I'm a faggot.

Go shag your lousy posts with a cactus, my love. :roll:

If anyone is the gay lord in this relationship, it's me.

Condunum of House Bumsex, first of his name, King of the Homosexuals, the Queers, and the Gay Men, Lord of the Manlove Kingdoms, and Protector of the Realm.
Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Banter For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Snark That Are Themselves The Mere Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Sarcasm.
He/Him
What do we have that they should want?
We have a wall to work upon!
We have work and they have none
And our work is never done
My children, my children
And the war is never won

The enemy is poverty
And the wall keeps out the enemy
And we build the wall to keep us free
That's why we build the wall
We build the wall to keep us free
We build the wall to keep us free

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26630
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Condunum wrote:Because it's only backed up by a religious text. You have to show how that is correct.


Why is a religious text not a good or acceptable reason.

Because it doesn't apply to me or anyone who refuses to follow that specific interpretation of the religious text in question.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Salandriagado
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17577
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:11 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Benomia wrote:
One logical reason, one good, acceptable reason. Not a fallacious, bad, silly, logicless reason.


Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.


Debates 101: you may take something as axiomatic iff everybody involved the debate agrees that it is true.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126919
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:12 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Liriena wrote:A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.


You said give me a reason. As long as the word 'reason' was in there, I can say the shit I want.

He said "logical reason", sweetie.
Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Banter For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Snark That Are Themselves The Mere Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Sarcasm.
He/Him
What do we have that they should want?
We have a wall to work upon!
We have work and they have none
And our work is never done
My children, my children
And the war is never won

The enemy is poverty
And the wall keeps out the enemy
And we build the wall to keep us free
That's why we build the wall
We build the wall to keep us free
We build the wall to keep us free

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:12 am

Phocidaea wrote:Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?


I get it now. The homophobes are trying to protect us from the explosive nature of gay sex. I feel so foolish now. They really are pro-life.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Furious Grandmothers
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Furious Grandmothers » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:12 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Aquafireland wrote:
Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.


Your so sad that the only comebacks you have are about cactus'. Please, leave it for those who care.

Fuck your god, because your reason only applies to same-sex couples from the Abrahamic religions. Do you have a reason applicable also to same-sex couples who are Hindu, Pagan, Buddhist etc.?
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 
Code: Select all
 

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:12 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Condunum wrote:Because it's only backed up by a religious text. You have to show how that is correct.


Why is a religious text not a good or acceptable reason.

Because it's a text. It provides no reason behind it's moral standing other than just because. That's why I didn't even attempt to read into the texts I get at the temple as a moral teaching. Morals must be determined by something more than 'just because'.
password scrambled

User avatar
Nationalist State of Knox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10293
Founded: Feb 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationalist State of Knox » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:12 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Condunum wrote:Because it's only backed up by a religious text. You have to show how that is correct.


Why is a religious text not a good or acceptable reason.

Because 1. There's no evidence to suggest that it's truthful with regards to spirituality 2. Belief in a certain text is subjective, and shouldn't apply to everybody on an objective basis.
Last edited by Gilgamesh on Mon Aru 17, 2467 BC 10:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Knox.
Biblical Authorship
God is Malevolent.
Bible Inaccuracies
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
Impeach Enlil, legalise dreaming, mortality is theft. GILGAMESH 2474 BC

User avatar
Caecuser
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6896
Founded: Jul 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Caecuser » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:13 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Liriena wrote:A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.


You said give me a reason. As long as the word 'reason' was in there, I can say the shit I want.


We're not in a theocracy.

User avatar
Aquafireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5905
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aquafireland » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:13 am

Ifreann wrote:
Condunum wrote:If anyone is the gay lord in this relationship, it's me.

Condunum of House Bumsex, first of his name, King of the Homosexuals, the Queers, and the Gay Men, Lord of the Manlove Kingdoms, and Protector of the Realm.


Wow. You are unbelievably gay.
abc|xyz

“Some people say you are going the wrong way, when it’s simply a way of your own.”
-Angelina Jolie

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:13 am

Benomia wrote:
Phocidaea wrote:Aquafireland's "sexual reactions" concept is cracking me up. Are "sexual reactions" like "nuclear reactions"?


http://www.en.wikipedia.org/orgasm

I had a nuclear orgasm once. It was horrible.
password scrambled

User avatar
Nationalist State of Knox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10293
Founded: Feb 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationalist State of Knox » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:13 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Liriena wrote:A religious text that contradicts scientific realities at that.


You said give me a reason. As long as the word 'reason' was in there, I can say the shit I want.

And "shit" is exactly what you've been saying.

Next please.
Last edited by Gilgamesh on Mon Aru 17, 2467 BC 10:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Knox.
Biblical Authorship
God is Malevolent.
Bible Inaccuracies
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
Impeach Enlil, legalise dreaming, mortality is theft. GILGAMESH 2474 BC

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26630
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:14 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Condunum of House Bumsex, first of his name, King of the Homosexuals, the Queers, and the Gay Men, Lord of the Manlove Kingdoms, and Protector of the Realm.


Wow. You are unbelievably gay.

That's a pretty sweet compliment. I wouldn't pull that out to the second date.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Aquafireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5905
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aquafireland » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:14 am

Nationalist State of Knox wrote:
Rhodesi wrote:
Why is a religious text not a good or acceptable reason.

Because 1. There's no evidence to suggest that it's truthful with regards to spirituality 2. Belief in a certain text is subjective, and shouldn't apply to everybody on an objective basis.


I still gave you a reason, didn't I? So shut your hole.
abc|xyz

“Some people say you are going the wrong way, when it’s simply a way of your own.”
-Angelina Jolie

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53445
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Liriena » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:14 am

Aquafireland wrote:
Aquafireland wrote:
Tell me why its not a logical, good, acceptable reason.


Your so sad that the only comebacks you have are about cactus'. Please, leave it for those who care.

We have already explained it to you. Look to the previous page.

Your 'argument' claims that homosexuality is wrong because 'man is designed to have sexual intercourse with a woman'. If that were the case, homosexual intercourse would not be naturally possible. And yet, not only is homosexual intercourse naturally possible, but it's also extremely common in the animal kingdom, without any human intervention.

If your deity existed, and believed homosexuality to be dangerous, immoral or whatnot, it would not exist in the natural world.

Homosexuality exists, homosexual intercourse is possible and often pleasurable, and nothing is directly hindered by them. Your argument was, thus, not only fallacious (since it was an appeal to nature), but it was also false and based on an unproven claim on your part ('god exists and he is against homosexuality').
The Fabulous Pope of NS


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crysuko, Darussalam, Exabot [Bot], Maineiacs, Minachia, New Yeeia, Radical Republic, Uiiop, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads