NATION

PASSWORD

What do you think of same-sex church wedding ceremonies?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:26 am

The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Crap, I'm gay?

Time to have an awkward talk with the wife.

I already heard. >:(


Sweetie, I didn't mean to. I just watched that "Milk" movie, and thought that it made some sense, and by the time that I was crying at the candlelight vigil at the end, it turned out that one of my hands had found its way down the cutoff shorts of a young blonde boy....

User avatar
Drackmaria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 122
Founded: Aug 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Drackmaria » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:27 am

Well maybe just maybe people call it a right is because it is. :eyebrow:
It is discrimination plain and simple.
You claim to have the right to deny gay couples the right to get married because of what you believe.
If I recall not so long ago in America a lot of people felt they had the right to deny black people the vote because of what they believed.
So my question is how is this any different.

Your religion should not tell other people what they can and can't do.

Oh and don't play the "oh no, atheists and secularists are going to bash me cause I hold outdated and discriminatory views, please feel sorry for me" card
Cause it carry no weight.
Its like the KKK claiming everyone bullies them because they aren't allowed to hang black people anymore.
Stop complaining and end discrimination.
Hail to the legions
Hail to the Direktor
Long Live Drackmaria

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:27 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:I already heard. >:(


Sweetie, I didn't mean to. I just watched that "Milk" movie, and thought that it made some sense, and by the time that I was crying at the candlelight vigil at the end, it turned out that one of my hands had found its way down the cutoff shorts of a young blonde boy....

I've known since the Book of Mormon!
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:28 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Myrensis wrote:
Obviously only the gays think gays ought to have rights.


Crap, I'm gay?

Time to have an awkward talk with the wife.

Same here... I guess we could hook up and our wives could as well...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:30 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Crap, I'm gay?

Time to have an awkward talk with the wife.

Same here... I guess we could hook up and our wives could as well...


Yeah, but...

Hmm.

Let me talk this over with my therapist first....

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:31 am

Drackmaria wrote:Well maybe just maybe people call it a right is because it is. :eyebrow:
It is discrimination plain and simple.
You claim to have the right to deny gay couples the right to get married because of what you believe.
If I recall not so long ago in America a lot of people felt they had the right to deny black people the vote because of what they believed.
So my question is how is this any different.

Your religion should not tell other people what they can and can't do.

Oh and don't play the "oh no, atheists and secularists are going to bash me cause I hold outdated and discriminatory views, please feel sorry for me" card
Cause it carry no weight.
Its like the KKK claiming everyone bullies them because they aren't allowed to hang black people anymore.
Stop complaining and end discrimination.


If you're a guy, and if I were gay? I would totally hook up with you for that.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:32 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Same here... I guess we could hook up and our wives could as well...


Yeah, but...

Hmm.

Let me talk this over with my therapist first....

One night with me will cure you of your homosexuality.
*nods*
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:32 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Northern Dantika wrote:Being that you're gay, aren't you the fairy?

Why would you assume I'm homosexual?

Probably just wishful thinking on his part.

You know how anti-gay bigots are... ;)
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:33 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Drackmaria wrote:Well maybe just maybe people call it a right is because it is. :eyebrow:
It is discrimination plain and simple.
You claim to have the right to deny gay couples the right to get married because of what you believe.
If I recall not so long ago in America a lot of people felt they had the right to deny black people the vote because of what they believed.
So my question is how is this any different.

Your religion should not tell other people what they can and can't do.

Oh and don't play the "oh no, atheists and secularists are going to bash me cause I hold outdated and discriminatory views, please feel sorry for me" card
Cause it carry no weight.
Its like the KKK claiming everyone bullies them because they aren't allowed to hang black people anymore.
Stop complaining and end discrimination.


If you're a guy, and if I were gay? I would totally hook up with you for that.

Well, technically they do have the right if there's enough willing to vote at once.

Y'know, democracy and all. That's how the 18th amendment passed.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Greater Beggnig
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1466
Founded: Jan 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Beggnig » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:34 am

Fasternia wrote:I don't quite understand this. I personally believe that:

- Marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- Civil marriage is a contract between two people. Are contracts a human right? Nope.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though. As long as they don't wed in churches.
- I have nothing against homosexuals, but I don't think they should get married, at least in churches.

And let me guess: Now you call me a racist bastard someone who discriminates homosexuals. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? Don't YOU discriminate ME for my religious opinion?


You haven't read your bible correctly.

One good example of how the Bible definition of Marriage is flawed is this.

“If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found, then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days." Deuteronomy 22:28–29

If your daughter was raped, would you marry her off to the rapist? No.

However, if the Bible is God's Word, and it's Laws are His commands, one cannot simply pick and choose what they uphold, and what they do not.

Another examples of a rule that is flawed:

Deuteronomy 22:11
"You shall not wear a garment of different sorts, as of woolen and linen together."
Not morally wrong, and not insensible.

And there are countless more.
If you are going to uphold some rules from a book of the Bible and then not consider a rule just a few sentences later to be important, then why would you use the Bible as a moral framework?
Last edited by Greater Beggnig on Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I'm not a dictator. It's just that I have a grumpy face."
-Augusto Pinochet

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8897
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:38 am

Greater Beggnig wrote:-snip-

But that would take like, work and stuff. I mean, have you tasted pork? Shit's delicious!
Last edited by Herador on Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
Vaguely a pessimist, certainly an absurdist, unironically an antinatalist.

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15205
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:41 am

Who are you to decide that the Remonstrant Brotherhood shouldn't wed homosexuals?
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Greater Beggnig
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1466
Founded: Jan 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Beggnig » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:41 am

Herador wrote:
Greater Beggnig wrote:-snip-

But that would take like, work and stuff; I mean, have you tasted pork? Shit's delicious!


Yes. But Christians believe that Jesus cleaned the world again, so we could eat Pork and Bacon! I must admit, if that's true, Jesus was awesome!
"I'm not a dictator. It's just that I have a grumpy face."
-Augusto Pinochet

User avatar
Ang Ling
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jun 19, 2011
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Ang Ling » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:45 am

Why do people say same-sex marriage is a human right?

Because it is. Take a look at the recent parliamentary debate on the subject in the New Zealand parliament. You might find it informative.

User avatar
Jehuddah
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1614
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jehuddah » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:45 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Fasternia wrote:I don't quite understand this. I personally believe that:

- Marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- Civil marriage is a contract between two people. Are contracts a human right? Nope.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though. As long as they don't wed in churches.
- I have nothing against homosexuals, but I don't think they should get married, at least in churches.

And let me guess: Now you call me a racist bastard who discriminates homosexuals. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion.

Marriage existed before your magic sky faerie was dreamed up.

You are wrong, marriage is a religious institution.
Last edited by John of Giscala on Wed May 2, 68 19:32 pm, edited 3546 times in total.


Political test:
91% Nationalistic
57% Fundementalist
88% Reactionary
92% Authoritarian
31% Capitalistic
99% Militaristic
63% Anthropocentric

The Nationalist Militarist Party Headquarters:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=241535&p=14484567#p14484567
Likes: Revisionist Zionism, Jewish Ethnic Nationalism, Greater Israel, Cultural conservatism, Population transfer of the Arabs, Cultural isolationism, Militarism, Strong government
Dislikes: Antisemitism, Anti Zionism, Anti-nationalism, civic nationalism, "Two states for two peoples", Bi-National solution, Liberalism, Socialism, Communism

User avatar
Jehuddah
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1614
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jehuddah » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:46 am

Drackmaria wrote:Well maybe just maybe people call it a right is because it is. :eyebrow:
It is discrimination plain and simple.
You claim to have the right to deny gay couples the right to get married because of what you believe.
If I recall not so long ago in America a lot of people felt they had the right to deny black people the vote because of what they believed.
So my question is how is this any different.

Your religion should not tell other people what they can and can't do.

Oh and don't play the "oh no, atheists and secularists are going to bash me cause I hold outdated and discriminatory views, please feel sorry for me" card
Cause it carry no weight.
Its like the KKK claiming everyone bullies them because they aren't allowed to hang black people anymore.
Stop complaining and end discrimination.

Giving gays those "rights" will only encourage them.
We need to discourage them, not to encourage them!
Last edited by John of Giscala on Wed May 2, 68 19:32 pm, edited 3546 times in total.


Political test:
91% Nationalistic
57% Fundementalist
88% Reactionary
92% Authoritarian
31% Capitalistic
99% Militaristic
63% Anthropocentric

The Nationalist Militarist Party Headquarters:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=241535&p=14484567#p14484567
Likes: Revisionist Zionism, Jewish Ethnic Nationalism, Greater Israel, Cultural conservatism, Population transfer of the Arabs, Cultural isolationism, Militarism, Strong government
Dislikes: Antisemitism, Anti Zionism, Anti-nationalism, civic nationalism, "Two states for two peoples", Bi-National solution, Liberalism, Socialism, Communism

User avatar
Gelgisith
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Dec 10, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby Gelgisith » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:47 am

Fasternia wrote:I don't quite understand this. I personally believe that:

- Marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.

And noone (except some state legislatures) is saying they should.

- Civil marriage is a contract between two people. Are contracts a human right? Nope.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though. As long as they don't wed in churches.

And noone (except some state legislatures) is saying they should.

- I have nothing against homosexuals, but I don't think they should get married, at least in churches.

And let me guess: Now you call me a racist bastard someone who discriminates homosexuals. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? Don't YOU discriminate ME for my religious opinion?


Here in Holland, we have separation of church and state, which goes so far that a church marriage has no validity if there's not also a contract signed before a civil servant. On the other hand, a civil contract is valid, even if there was no religious ceremony.

The problem arises from the American practice, where the priest also acts as a civil servant ("With the authority vested in me...") In some states a marriage license can only be obtained from a (licensed!) religious figure. This leads to many people (apparently including you) believing that marriage is strictly a religious matter. It is not. The aforementioned states are just lazy, delegating the marriage process to licensed marriage makers (again "With the authority vested in me..."), which some states demand to be religious leaders.
My Political Compass

tunizcha wrote:Religion is an oak tree. It has many, many branches, and it's full of nuts.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:47 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Yeah, but...

Hmm.

Let me talk this over with my therapist first....

One night with me will cure you of your homosexuality.
*nods*


But I'm....

Yeah, okay, let's try it.

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:48 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:One night with me will cure you of your homosexuality.
*nods*


But I'm....

Yeah, okay, let's try it.

And so, one man literally falls into a trap.

EDIT: Or woman

dammit you people need signs or something. :palm:
Last edited by The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace on Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8897
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:48 am

Jehuddah wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Marriage existed before your magic sky faerie was dreamed up.

You are wrong, marriage is a religious institution.

Well, that's that guys, time to pack it in, apparently we're all just wrong.
Vaguely a pessimist, certainly an absurdist, unironically an antinatalist.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:49 am

Fasternia wrote:I don't quite understand this. I personally believe that:

- Marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- Civil marriage is a contract between two people. Are contracts a human right? Nope.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though. As long as they don't wed in churches.
- I have nothing against homosexuals, but I don't think they should get married, at least in churches.

And let me guess: Now you call me a racist bastard someone who discriminates homosexuals. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? Don't YOU discriminate ME for my religious opinion?


By the way, my church is ABSOLUTELY okay with same sex marriages. Are you saying that we shouldn't perform them?

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8897
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:49 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Fasternia wrote:I don't quite understand this. I personally believe that:

- Marriage is a holy constitution defined in the Bible, only for a man and a woman. Thus churches should not wed same-sex couples.
- Civil marriage is a contract between two people. Are contracts a human right? Nope.
- But I don't mind if the civil marriages of same-sex couples go through, though. As long as they don't wed in churches.
- I have nothing against homosexuals, but I don't think they should get married, at least in churches.

And let me guess: Now you call me a racist bastard someone who discriminates homosexuals. I hear that quite a lot for my opinion. Well guess what? Don't YOU discriminate ME for my religious opinion?


By the way, my church is ABSOLUTELY okay with same sex marriages. Are you saying that we shouldn't perform them?

Considering the OP? Probably.
Vaguely a pessimist, certainly an absurdist, unironically an antinatalist.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:50 am

Jehuddah wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Marriage existed before your magic sky faerie was dreamed up.

You are wrong, marriage is a religious institution.

No, actually I'm not. I'm married, yet no religious individuals were involved at any point.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Neu Preussische Republik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 589
Founded: Apr 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Preussische Republik » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:50 am

It's as I tell most people when asked about these kinds of things, I've taken this stance and I've kept this stance for quite some time now.
I don't care what other people do, as long as it doesn't affect me or my life, or anything I own.
I am a registered Independent, an enthusiast of Political and Economic history and an American Citizen.
[5]
4
3
2
1
Economic Left/Right: -1.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.46
Map | Current flag

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8897
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:51 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Jehuddah wrote:You are wrong, marriage is a religious institution.

No, actually I'm not. I'm married, yet no religious individuals were involved at any point.

But you see, according to Jehudda, we're just wrong and that's that.
Vaguely a pessimist, certainly an absurdist, unironically an antinatalist.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, El Lazaro, Grinning Dragon, ImSaLiA, Ineva, Kostane, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads