NATION

PASSWORD

Does God Exist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Crysuko
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7300
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Crysuko » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:50 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well, yeah. I've kind of expected that at this point. It requires less intellectual honesty to actually read my posts and to simply pretend as though I'm just not explaining myself enough.


Or, the simpler explanation, which is that dozens of posters across months of posting have found your vapid, uninspired posts to be precisely that. Vapid, uninspired, and laden with moving goalposts.

you utter facking hypocrite! you're accusing him of being uninspired when all you do is lash out at people with bland disagreements. no arguments, just insipid attacks that stem from your chronic inability to acknowledge the other guy has said anything.
Quotes:
Xilonite wrote: cookies are heresy.

Kelinfort wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:A terrorist attack on a disabled center doesn't make a lot of sense, unless to show no one is safe.

This will take some time to figure out, i am afraid.

"No one is safe, not even your most vulnerable and insecure!"

Cesopium wrote:Welp let's hope armies of 10 million don't just roam around and Soviet their way through everything.

Yugoslav Memes wrote:
Victoriala II wrote:Ur mom has value

one week ban for flaming xd

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Much better than the kulak smoothies. Their texture was suspiciously grainy.

Official thread euthanologist
I USE Qs INSTEAD OF Qs

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:50 pm

Agymnum wrote:
The Holy Michigan Empire wrote:
Sounds a bit generic, what was the reason?


Where to begin...

1. Pro-life: Not giving women a choice as to whether to have children or not is really fucking great, isn't it?
2. Anti-stem cell research: Anti-science?
3. Anti-gay marriage: Anti-civil rights?
4. Catholic Priests found to molest children: And these men are supposed to be God's messengers?

What reason would I have to be Christian? Honestly?

Bake Sales

Free Booze

All the crackers you can stand

Sexually repressed church sluts.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:51 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Riiiight.


Which impacts our daily lives... how precisely?

So now you've shifted the goal posts from "it's not possible," to "it doesn't' affect our daily lives." Nice.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Hydronium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6007
Founded: Oct 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydronium » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:51 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Hydronium wrote:True, true. Like i said before, i'm usually studying end times prophesy. Revelation, daniel, ect. evangelism isn't my spititual gift, i just got bored and didn't want people Jesus-bashing

Why do you keep ignoring me when I point out that Jesus isn't the messiah?

But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:51 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:I am pretty fucking sure I can read them.

Then actually demonstrate that you can do so by actually replying to things that I've actually said.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:52 pm

Hydronium wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Why do you keep ignoring me when I point out that Jesus isn't the messiah?

But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

A prophecy made earlier was written down as true by someone with access to that prophecy. Wow.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:52 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Which impacts our daily lives... how precisely?

So now you've shifted the goal posts from "it's not possible," to "it doesn't' affect our daily lives." Nice.


Not really, I was wrong. I still fail to see how it's relevant however.

User avatar
Nationalist State of Knox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10293
Founded: Feb 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationalist State of Knox » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:52 pm

Hydronium wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Why do you keep ignoring me when I point out that Jesus isn't the messiah?

But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

It's all or nothing. Unless he fulfils all of the criteria, he isn't the Messiah.

lrn 2 Christ
Last edited by Gilgamesh on Mon Aru 17, 2467 BC 10:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Knox.
Biblical Authorship
God is Malevolent.
Bible Inaccuracies
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
Impeach Enlil, legalise dreaming, mortality is theft. GILGAMESH 2474 BC

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:53 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So now you've shifted the goal posts from "it's not possible," to "it doesn't' affect our daily lives." Nice.


Not really, I was wrong. I still fail to see how it's relevant however.

It's relevant BECAUSE you were wrong. Holy fucking shit I cannot believe I just had to type that.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:53 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:I am pretty fucking sure I can read them.

Then actually demonstrate that you can do so by actually replying to things that I've actually said.


If you don't want to be associated with the opposite opinion please do not make it an implicit signal about your disagreement about a reason in general and explain your reasons why you disagree, then MAYBE we will be able to discuss in a proper manner which doesn't involve one of us guessing what the other one means.

Context clues, your should probably learn how to spot them ;)
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:55 pm

The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Bake Sales

Free Booze

All the crackers you can stand

Sexually repressed church sluts.


1. I can bake my own.

2. Church wine tastes like shit (at least, at my church it did).

3. Not a big fan of bread. I'm a rice guy.

4. Asexual.

I know you were joking.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:55 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Not really, I was wrong. I still fail to see how it's relevant however.

It's relevant BECAUSE you were wrong. Holy fucking shit I cannot believe I just had to type that.


Erm.

Not really? For one, the article doesn't actually prove that we'll know how a person will act and react to something (tell me, do we have any ability to know exactly how someone will react when we tell them that their wife was just killed? No? It's in the far future, if at all). For two, it still doesn't seem to have any impact on the way in which we act towards one another, which is far more... human.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:56 pm

Nationalist State of Knox wrote:
Hydronium wrote:But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

It's all or nothing. Unless he fulfils all of the criteria, he isn't the Messiah.

lrn 2 Christ


I guess that's also dependent on his religion. The Jewish, and I'm sure you know this, do nit believe Jesus was the Messiah.

If, however, he's not religious, well, my point isn't important.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:56 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:If you don't want to be associated with the opposite opinion please do not make it an implicit signal about your acceptance of biological determinism.

Context clues, your should probably learn how to spot them ;)

The thing I argued about was not whether I accept biological determinism. It's whether I believe that you can predict someone's actions solely based on genetics alone which is what your post suggested that I believed.

Soldati senza confini wrote:
You can't make a prediction of a person's actions through their genes. That is, with 100% certainty, impossible.


You said nothing about chemicals. You said nothing about external environmental factors. You narrowed it down to PURELY genes. So please, fuck off with pretending that you ACTUALLY said something that ACTUALLY replied to something that I ACTUALLY said. You didn't. You created a straw man and are now attempting to backpedal massively by stating that you were talking about biological determinism all along when you clearly weren't.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Hydronium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6007
Founded: Oct 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydronium » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:57 pm

Nationalist State of Knox wrote:
Hydronium wrote:But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

It's all or nothing. Unless he fulfils all of the criteria, he isn't the Messiah.

lrn 2 Christ


That was just and example. Here is a list (excused the "biased" link) of a lot of the prophesies Jesus fulfilled

http://www.bibleprobe.com/365messianicprophecies.htm

And this time i looked through it.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:57 pm

Hydronium wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Why do you keep ignoring me when I point out that Jesus isn't the messiah?

But what about all the prophesies he fulfilled?

for example:
Palm 22:18-"They divide my garments among themselves and throw dice for my clothing."
John 19:23-24-"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 24 So they said, “Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.” This fulfilled the Scripture that says, “They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.” So that is what they did."

· You take Psalm 22:18 out of context. Read it the context.
· Psalms is not a prophetic book. There are literally no prophecies in psalms.
· John is New Testament. The prophecies are written in the Old Testament.
· What about all the prophecies he didn't fulfil?
He didn't build the third temple in his lifetime.
He didn't re-establish the Sanhedrin in his lifetime.
He didn't end all death. (Instead he himself died on the crucifix.)
He didn't end all war in his lifetime.
Last edited by Conscentia on Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:57 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:It's relevant BECAUSE you were wrong. Holy fucking shit I cannot believe I just had to type that.


Erm.

Not really? For one, the article doesn't actually prove that we'll know how a person will act and react to something (tell me, do we have any ability to know exactly how someone will react when we tell them that their wife was just killed? No? It's in the far future, if at all). For two, it still doesn't seem to have any impact on the way in which we act towards one another, which is far more... human.

You said:

The Steel Magnolia wrote:I'm more than my body. Who I am, as a person, is more than just my biological, physical body.

And the way in which we all interact within the world is reflected thusly: we're not biological computers, or rather, we don't act like we are, because being human is about more than logic, about more than biological programming.

I reject biological determinism.

You didn't say "we cannot predict with 100% accuracy how someone will react if we do something with our current technology."
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Crysuko
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7300
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Crysuko » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:58 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:It's relevant BECAUSE you were wrong. Holy fucking shit I cannot believe I just had to type that.


Erm.

Not really? For one, the article doesn't actually prove that we'll know how a person will act and react to something (tell me, do we have any ability to know exactly how someone will react when we tell them that their wife was just killed? No? It's in the far future, if at all). For two, it still doesn't seem to have any impact on the way in which we act towards one another, which is far more... human.

that's not the point. he was proving one of your points wrong, and seeing as how you've given the well-worn goalposts a good ol' shift you might as well commit to it. also, it could be used to predict how people might interact. inb4 he doesn't read this is blindly attempts to refute it like a blindfolded child swinging haplessly at a pinata.
Last edited by Crysuko on Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quotes:
Xilonite wrote: cookies are heresy.

Kelinfort wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:A terrorist attack on a disabled center doesn't make a lot of sense, unless to show no one is safe.

This will take some time to figure out, i am afraid.

"No one is safe, not even your most vulnerable and insecure!"

Cesopium wrote:Welp let's hope armies of 10 million don't just roam around and Soviet their way through everything.

Yugoslav Memes wrote:
Victoriala II wrote:Ur mom has value

one week ban for flaming xd

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Much better than the kulak smoothies. Their texture was suspiciously grainy.

Official thread euthanologist
I USE Qs INSTEAD OF Qs

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:58 pm

Hydronium wrote:
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:It's all or nothing. Unless he fulfils all of the criteria, he isn't the Messiah.

lrn 2 Christ


That was just and example. Here is a list (excused the "biased" link) of a lot of the prophesies Jesus fulfilled

http://www.bibleprobe.com/365messianicprophecies.htm

And this time i looked through it.

Most of those are either taken out of context or aren't even prophecies.
The list is missing all the important prophecies such as constructing the third temple.
Last edited by Conscentia on Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:59 pm

Agymnum wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Bake Sales

Free Booze

All the crackers you can stand

Sexually repressed church sluts.


1. I can bake my own.

2. Church wine tastes like shit (at least, at my church it did).

3. Not a big fan of bread. I'm a rice guy.

4. Asexual.

I know you were joking.


Shit, now I regret never going to church.

For the sluts.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:59 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Erm.

Not really? For one, the article doesn't actually prove that we'll know how a person will act and react to something (tell me, do we have any ability to know exactly how someone will react when we tell them that their wife was just killed? No? It's in the far future, if at all).

That's nice. But that isn't what you said. You said we couldn't predict a person's actions. You didn't say we couldn't KNOW with certainty EXACTLY how someone will react in the far future.

And you have the gall to seriously complain that I don't explain myself? If you ACTUALLY meant that we cannot predict with certainty what someone will do in the future, fucking say that.
The Steel Magnolia wrote:For two, it still doesn't seem to have any impact on the way in which we act towards one another, which is far more... human.

Which wasn't your claim, so who gives a fucking shit?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:59 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:If you don't want to be associated with the opposite opinion please do not make it an implicit signal about your acceptance of biological determinism.

Context clues, your should probably learn how to spot them ;)

The thing I argued about was not whether I accept biological determinism. It's whether I believe that you can predict someone's actions solely based on genetics alone which is what your post suggested that I believed.

Soldati senza confini wrote:
You can't make a prediction of a person's actions through their genes. That is, with 100% certainty, impossible.


You said nothing about chemicals. You said nothing about external environmental factors. You narrowed it down to PURELY genes. So please, fuck off with pretending that you ACTUALLY said something that ACTUALLY replied to something that I ACTUALLY said. You didn't. You created a straw man and are now attempting to backpedal massively by stating that you were talking about biological determinism all along when you clearly weren't.


Nope, you clearly do not know how to debate. If I say something about genes, I expect you to agree or disagree when you reply and your reasons why. You also said nothing about you agreeing or disagreeing with genetic determinism. If you can't clarify your position then someone here isn't actually doing their homework, and that isn't me.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Lake Gaston
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Jun 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lake Gaston » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:00 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:Define "God".


Another question: which religion? There are a lot of religions that can refer their god simply as 'god'.

User avatar
Hydronium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6007
Founded: Oct 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydronium » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:00 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Hydronium wrote:
That was just and example. Here is a list (excused the "biased" link) of a lot of the prophesies Jesus fulfilled

http://www.bibleprobe.com/365messianicprophecies.htm

And this time i looked through it.

Most of those are either taken out of context or aren't even prophecies.


Where in Ezekiel does it say that? I mean, what verse?

User avatar
Betulla
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Dec 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Betulla » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:01 pm

Lake Gaston wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Define "God".


Another question: which religion? There are a lot of religions that can refer their god simply as 'god'.

Probably the Christian God.
Yes. Yes more sigs.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Best Mexico, Bing sung, Margraviate of Moravia, Norse Inuit Union, Riviere Renard, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns, Tlaceceyaya

Advertisement

Remove ads