Advertisement

by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:07 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Ashmoria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:15 am
The Devolved State of England wrote:Now before you get the wrong idea about me, I harbour no hate or distrust for my non-white countrymen nor wish to see any segregation. I am simply asking the question.
So lets say a man feels "White pride" in the same way that a black gentleman might, is it ok that he feels that way? Is it possible to be a supporter of equal rights for the races and be a proud white? or has White supremacy and separatism demonized the concept?
I personally have never felt any pride or shame for the colour of my skin and can't understand why it matters to others. I value my nationalities much more, which is much more flexible.
Thoughts guys?
(Please keep it mature)

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:24 am
Ashmoria wrote:The Devolved State of England wrote:Now before you get the wrong idea about me, I harbour no hate or distrust for my non-white countrymen nor wish to see any segregation. I am simply asking the question.
So lets say a man feels "White pride" in the same way that a black gentleman might, is it ok that he feels that way? Is it possible to be a supporter of equal rights for the races and be a proud white? or has White supremacy and separatism demonized the concept?
I personally have never felt any pride or shame for the colour of my skin and can't understand why it matters to others. I value my nationalities much more, which is much more flexible.
Thoughts guys?
(Please keep it mature)
its problematical at best.
first you have the problem with so many "white" accomplishments being at the expense of non-white people. the settling of the Americas, for example. we might be proud of the creation of the United States but it does require that we ignore the people we pushed off their land and people we dragged here as slaves in order to create it.
then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"

by The British Stratocracy » Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:25 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
its problematical at best.
first you have the problem with so many "white" accomplishments being at the expense of non-white people. the settling of the Americas, for example. we might be proud of the creation of the United States but it does require that we ignore the people we pushed off their land and people we dragged here as slaves in order to create it.
then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"
I don't see much different about the accomplishments of any race.

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:05 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Unionist State of Scotland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:06 am

by Ashmoria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:08 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
its problematical at best.
first you have the problem with so many "white" accomplishments being at the expense of non-white people. the settling of the Americas, for example. we might be proud of the creation of the United States but it does require that we ignore the people we pushed off their land and people we dragged here as slaves in order to create it.
then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"
I don't see much different about the accomplishments of any "race." (if a race can even have accomplishments.)
If you want examples of white people who achieved shit without oppressing others of a different color, you have the industrial revolution, joint stock companies, the magna carta, electricity, (lots of inventions.), exploration of the world and first circumnavigation, record keeping, beaurocracy (china also did these last two), and free trade.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:24 am
Ashmoria wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I don't see much different about the accomplishments of any "race." (if a race can even have accomplishments.)
If you want examples of white people who achieved shit without oppressing others of a different color, you have the industrial revolution, joint stock companies, the magna carta, electricity, (lots of inventions.), exploration of the world and first circumnavigation, record keeping, beaurocracy (china also did these last two), and free trade.
yeah those didn't hurt anyone....
but sure you can. at the same time you have to ignore all the bad things "white" people did.
its like being proud to be the son of tony soprano because he was so successful in his line of work. (given that I have never watched "the sopranos")

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:26 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Surfistan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:42 am
Wikkiwallana wrote:Well, it certainly has been interesting to watch the racists crawl out of the woodwork and clamor over each other to be the most uninformed.

by Ashmoria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:50 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ashmoria wrote:yeah those didn't hurt anyone....
but sure you can. at the same time you have to ignore all the bad things "white" people did.
its like being proud to be the son of tony soprano because he was so successful in his line of work. (given that I have never watched "the sopranos")
And I think we'd both agree that that is an incredibly stupid type of thing to be proud of.

by Saiwania » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:00 am
Wikkiwallana wrote:Well, it certainly has been interesting to watch the racists crawl out of the woodwork and clamor over each other to be the most uninformed.
Please, my being racist is nothing new, it is a very long held conviction that I don't think I'll ever give up.
by Horsefish » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:03 am
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by TBA Field Marshal » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:08 am
Ashmoria wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
And I think we'd both agree that that is an incredibly stupid type of thing to be proud of.
it is.
white people don't think of themselves as a member of the white group. we think of ourselves as americans, irish-americans, whatever. we don't usually take ego-credit for everything that happened in European history and the European expansion around the world.

by Ashmoria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:14 am
TBA Field Marshal wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
it is.
white people don't think of themselves as a member of the white group. we think of ourselves as americans, irish-americans, whatever. we don't usually take ego-credit for everything that happened in European history and the European expansion around the world.
You don't talk for every white person.

by Gallup » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:20 am
With Teeth wrote:I don't have white pride. I don't have any problem with people who do.

by WhoisJohnGalt » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:59 am

by Ashihara no Nakatsukuni » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:11 am

by Saiwania » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:45 am
Ashmoria wrote:then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"

by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:48 am
Saiwania wrote:Ashmoria wrote:then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"
Of course you have to look White to be apart of White pride, it wouldn't make any sense to include people who don't look White at all.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Ashmoria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:50 am
Saiwania wrote:Ashmoria wrote:then we have the problem of fighting about who is white enough to take part in white pride. it might not be something to YOU but to the white supremacists it is everything. a person who gets classified as "black" in the US but who has plenty of white ancestors will be denied membership in the "white pride club"
Of course you have to look White to be apart of White pride, it wouldn't make any sense to include people who don't look White at all.

by Saiwania » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:54 am
Ashmoria wrote:why? many white people have non-white ancestors. many non-white people have white ancestors. if you have a white ancestor aren't you as connected to the accomplishments of white people as a white-looking person who has some non-white background?

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:56 am
Ashmoria wrote:Saiwania wrote:
Of course you have to look White to be apart of White pride, it wouldn't make any sense to include people who don't look White at all.
why? many white people have non-white ancestors. many non-white people have white ancestors.
if you have a white ancestor aren't you as connected to the accomplishments of white people as a white-looking person who has some non-white background?

by Immoren » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:57 am
Saiwania wrote:Ashmoria wrote:why? many white people have non-white ancestors. many non-white people have white ancestors. if you have a white ancestor aren't you as connected to the accomplishments of white people as a white-looking person who has some non-white background?
Maybe that would be true if the event were called mixed pride, but White pride means White skin. You don't bring White people to a Black pride event and vice versa, the words signifying the event is supposed to have meaning.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Calption, El Lazaro, Galloism, Juansonia, New haven america, Port Caverton, Saiwana, Techocracy101010, The Jamesian Republic, Tuscaria, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement