Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:That's what you're always saying.
This is young Biden.
Obama stole his youth.
I was beautiful, dammit. I'm making this my flag now.
Advertisement

by Frisivisia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:03 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:That's what you're always saying.
This is young Biden.
Obama stole his youth.

by Planeia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:03 pm
Norstal wrote:Planeia wrote:I don't see how discrimination against straight people is necessary. If it's because of the years of discrimination gay people have been getting, then that's like saying discrimination towards a white person is okay even if he's not racist, it's okay because white people have been known to be racist throughout history. That's your logic, or what it seems to be to me.
THERE IS NO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST BLACKS. THE MAJORITY OF BLACK PEOPLE ARE NOT IN POVERTY OR IN JAILS. BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST.
MOVE ALONG CITIZEN. EVERYONE IS HAPPY AND EQUAL IN EQUALTOPIA.

by Horsefish » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:03 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Really? One of the big Gay Bars in Liverpool, Garlands, draws in a massive straight crowd.
It's a weekly event.
I keep getting told I should go...
Maybe losing myself in a sea of sexual ambivalence will do me a world of good.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:04 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Globalize yourself, Iffy.
Who needs globes? I know all the geography I need to know: America, the Dirty Mexicans of South GAY-merica, Pussy-ass european commies, German Nazi Zombie Beer-makers, The Chinese people of Asia, The Terrorist Arabs of the Middle East, Africa... is somewhere on there... and poor..., Australia has that beer stuff and the crocodile hunter and it's on the bottom of the world. Done.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Galloism » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:04 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Globalize yourself, Iffy.
Who needs globes? I know all the geography I need to know: America, the Dirty Mexicans of South GAY-merica, Pussy-ass european commies, German Nazi Zombie Beer-makers, The Chinese people of Asia, The Terrorist Arabs of the Middle East, Africa... is somewhere on there... and poor..., Australia has that beer stuff and the crocodile hunter and it's on the bottom of the world. Done.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:04 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Norstal » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:05 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Oh no, I am not assuming that straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other is a more valuable demographic. I am just thinking in terms of marginal profit per se. Of course, being a gay bar I would expect for it to be driven towards customers who are homosexual, but at the business level you also want to maximize profits, which this policy in the gay bar is not doing.
I am sincerely not looking at it in terms of demographics, I am looking at it as a financial transaction at this point. If I was the owner of said bar I would not place such a policy that is going to drive away money. Then again I think in maximum profits, he may think differently, which is okay too if he can make a profit with the current clientele he has or that he is projecting in the future.
It's only a stupid decision, at a business level, if you assume that "straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other" is a more valuable demographic to this bar than "gay people who want to have a safe space for them to socialize without being reminded of the fact that they're still an oppressed minority"
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Frisivisia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:05 pm
Galloism wrote:Frisivisia wrote:Who needs globes? I know all the geography I need to know: America, the Dirty Mexicans of South GAY-merica, Pussy-ass european commies, German Nazi Zombie Beer-makers, The Chinese people of Asia, The Terrorist Arabs of the Middle East, Africa... is somewhere on there... and poor..., Australia has that beer stuff and the crocodile hunter and it's on the bottom of the world. Done.
Crocodile hunter is dead dude. He got stabbed by an underwater pancake monster.

by Olthar » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:05 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Neo Art wrote:
Is what I do.
The problem with being on the "have" side of the socio-political reality, as opposed to the "have not" side, is that you tend to think that you're the only important demographic in the room. Not a "fault" per se, but one we need to look at.
You're one of several people in this thread that has called this policy "stupid" or "wrong" or "driving away customers" which will "hurt the business".
Because "straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other" is somehow automatically viewed as a more valuable demographic than "gay people who want to have a safe space for them to socialize without being reminded of the fact that they're still an oppressed minority"
It's only a stupid decision, at a business level, if you assume that "straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other" is a more valuable demographic to this bar than "gay people who want to have a safe space for them to socialize without being reminded of the fact that they're still an oppressed minority"
Why would you assume that? Gay people have jobs too ya know.
Oh no, I am not assuming that straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other is a more valuable demographic. I am just thinking in terms of marginal profit per se. Of course, being a gay bar I would expect for it to be driven towards customers who are homosexual, but at the business level you also want to maximize profits, which this policy in the gay bar is not doing.
I am sincerely not looking at it in terms of demographics, I am looking at it as a financial transaction at this point. If I was the owner of said bar I would not place such a policy that is going to drive away money. Then again I think in maximum profits, he may think differently, which is okay too if he can make a profit with the current clientele he has or that he is projecting in the future.

by Norstal » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:05 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Myrensis » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:06 pm
Neo Art wrote:Because, once again "discrimination = bad!" is how children think. And I'm not a child.

by Frisivisia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:07 pm

by Neo Art » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:07 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Oh no, I am not assuming that straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other is a more valuable demographic. I am just thinking in terms of marginal profit per se. Of course, being a gay bar I would expect for it to be driven towards customers who are homosexual, but at the business level you also want to maximize profits, which this policy in the gay bar is not doing.
I am sincerely not looking at it in terms of demographics, I am looking at it as a financial transaction at this point. If I was the owner of said bar I would not place such a policy that is going to drive away money. Then again I think in maximum profits, he may think differently, which is okay too if he can make a profit with the current clientele he has or that he is projecting in the future.

by Curiosityness » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:08 pm

by Planeia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:08 pm
Norstal wrote:Planeia wrote:It. does not. fucking. justify. discrimination. like this.
Ok. Then answer my last question, which you have conveniently avoided.
Where, if not for gay bars, can gay people safely mingle with other gays?
Or are you going to ignore that gays are still an oppressed minority viewed with derision?

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:09 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:09 pm

by Frisivisia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:10 pm

by Frisivisia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:10 pm

by Dumb Ideologies » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:11 pm

by ALMF » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:11 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm not opposed to themed bars provided they do not discriminate based on arbitrary criteria.
Never Mind must be made to change the policy, or closed down.
The rationale for gay bars seems sound, in as far as gays are 10% of the population who desire another (5%?) the population at maximum, and thus have only 1/10 as many potential partners as straights.
This may necessitate that homosexuals have venues that are themed toward matching them up with partners.
I see it as functionally no different from a rock club or any other kind of themed bar.
Discrimination however is unacceptable.

by Blekksprutia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:11 pm

by IshCong » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:11 pm
Norstal wrote:Planeia wrote:It. does not. fucking. justify. discrimination. like this.
Ok. Then answer my last question, which you have conveniently avoided.
Where, if not for gay bars, can gay people safely mingle with other gays?
Or are you going to ignore that gays are still an oppressed minority viewed with derision?

by Nailed to the Perch » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:11 pm
Norstal wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Oh no, I am not assuming that straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other is a more valuable demographic. I am just thinking in terms of marginal profit per se. Of course, being a gay bar I would expect for it to be driven towards customers who are homosexual, but at the business level you also want to maximize profits, which this policy in the gay bar is not doing.
I am sincerely not looking at it in terms of demographics, I am looking at it as a financial transaction at this point. If I was the owner of said bar I would not place such a policy that is going to drive away money. Then again I think in maximum profits, he may think differently, which is okay too if he can make a profit with the current clientele he has or that he is projecting in the future.
This part of NA's post is very important:It's only a stupid decision, at a business level, if you assume that "straight people who want to go to a gay bar and make out with their significant other" is a more valuable demographic to this bar than "gay people who want to have a safe space for them to socialize without being reminded of the fact that they're still an oppressed minority"
If you allow straights, you drive away gays looking for refuge. Which, you know, defeats the entire purpose of having a GAY bar.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Galloism » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bhang Bhang Duc, Continental Free States, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Hirota, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lativs, Port Caverton, Soviet Haaregrad, The Astral Mandate
Advertisement