Gay bars: Discriminatory?

[Ifreann]

Good. Good. Now your transformation to the gay side is complete.

I haven't been to the gay FEMA reformation camp yet. I trust you have a black helicopter for transportation.

What, aren't white helicopters good enough, negropressor?

---

intolerance is shit bars.

Just got a name for my bar.

You owe me at least one night of free drinks.

---

Just got a name for my bar.

I've always wanted to name one "The Stagger Home"

Assuming I get rich eventually, my bar will be called The Brig. People will get locked in there.

[Norstal]

I believe that gay bars should be banned. Let me rephrase that before a dimwitted person mistakes it for a statement of bigotry. Establishments meant exclusively for sexual orientation should be banned, that includes straight. They make all the campaigning of LGBT rights useless. Places like that should be for having fun anyway, if you're lucky enough to get lucky, good, but if you don't, whatever. Yes establishments can keep sexual orientation directed themes and what not to attract a certain crowd, but if the unwanted crowd ends up coming, it shouldn't matter.

Hopefully that would clear things up.

Where's a safe place for gays to mingle then?

[Frisivisia]

I haven't been to the gay FEMA reformation camp yet. I trust you have a black helicopter for transportation.

What, aren't white helicopters good enough, negropressor?

---

Just got a name for my bar.

You owe me at least one night of free drinks.

---

I've always wanted to name one "The Stagger Home"

Assuming I get rich eventually, my bar will be called The Brig. People will get locked in there.

We need a White Entertainment Television, White History Month, and White Helicopter FEMA Obama Conspiracy.

[Frisivisia]

Hopefully that would clear things up.

Where's a safe place for gays to mingle then?

E! and Bravo.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Carry on.

I do feel a need to clarify one bit, so allow me to indulge. I want to address this "neo art doesn't think it's discrimination when done against straight people".

It most certainly is. Or, to be more precise, it's discrimination against conduct that disparately impacts straight people. This...rabid and unrelenting attempt to try and pin me down, screaming "SAY IT! SAY IT'S DISCRIMINATION! SAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY IIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT" that certain company has engaged in here seems to be based primarily on the same limited and fundamentally childish thinking I alluded to earlier, this myopic, uneducated, unintelligent, and fundamentally stupid idea that they've latched on to, with all the trifling intellectual might that they're capable of mustering, that "discrimination = bad!" and have thus attempted to try and "trap" me into "admitting" that it's discrimination, thus *cough* forcing me into doing a 180 on my belief system because, to these towering monuments of intellectual vapidity "discrimination = bad" and "this = discrimination" and therefore, displaying all the grand thinking of a kindergarten math class, "this = bad"

And when I come along and state, actually, I don't find it that bad, the ENTIRE effort has now swung, with singleminded (because we seem incapable of more) fury, to try and make me admit "this=discrimination" and thus force me to conclude "this = bad" just as they, demonstrating the faculties that make them suited to push shopping carts at walmart, have concluded is the natural and probable result.

And therefore, they have been stymied, utterly stuck, and completely incapable of moving on from the fact that while I freely admit this is a discriminatory act, it's one I'm just not all that bothered by.

Because, once again "discrimination = bad!" is how children think. And I'm not a child.

I have nothing against you or your way of thinking. I have no reason to believe you are incapable of seeing a wrong doing when its happening. I think you're a reasonable individual, and I don't have a mission to make accept things you obviously already understand, as evidenced.

All I wish to clarify is that my statement was regarding this case in particular. If that wasn't clear, my bad.

[Neo Art]

I do feel a need to clarify one bit, so allow me to indulge. I want to address this "neo art doesn't think it's discrimination when done against straight people".

It most certainly is. Or, to be more precise, it's discrimination against conduct that disparately impacts straight people. This...rabid and unrelenting attempt to try and pin me down, screaming "SAY IT! SAY IT'S DISCRIMINATION! SAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY IIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT" that certain company has engaged in here seems to be based primarily on the same limited and fundamentally childish thinking I alluded to earlier, this myopic, uneducated, unintelligent, and fundamentally stupid idea that they've latched on to, with all the trifling intellectual might that they're capable of mustering, that "discrimination = bad!" and have thus attempted to try and "trap" me into "admitting" that it's discrimination, thus *cough* forcing me into doing a 180 on my belief system because, to these towering monuments of intellectual vapidity "discrimination = bad" and "this = discrimination" and therefore, displaying all the grand thinking of a kindergarten math class, "this = bad"

And when I come along and state, actually, I don't find it that bad, the ENTIRE effort has now swung, with singleminded (because we seem incapable of more) fury, to try and make me admit "this=discrimination" and thus force me to conclude "this = bad" just as they, demonstrating the faculties that make them suited to push shopping carts at walmart, have concluded is the natural and probable result.

And therefore, they have been stymied, utterly stuck, and completely incapable of moving on from the fact that while I freely admit this is a discriminatory act, it's one I'm just not all that bothered by.

Because, once again "discrimination = bad!" is how children think. And I'm not a child.

BUT MY S00PER CONSISTENT LIBERTARIAN VIEWS THEIR SO CONSISTENT AND I THINK THAT EVERYONE IS COMPLETELY EQUAL REGARDLESS OF NUANCES AND SENSE BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS BLACK AND WHITE AND THERE ARE NO SHADES OF GRAY IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe, I'm going to marry you one day.

And then we'll adopt a young child, and get federal tax breaks for it. Because we can do that now.

[Neo Art]

I have nothing against you or your way of thinking. I have no reason to believe you are incapable of seeing a wrong doing when its happening. I think you're a reasonable individual, and I don't have a mission to make accept things you obviously already understand, as evidenced.

All I wish to clarify is that my statement was regarding this case in particular. If that wasn't clear, my bad.

Ah, nah, that wasn't really directed at you per se, more the flow of that particular conversation.

[Frisivisia]

BUT MY S00PER CONSISTENT LIBERTARIAN VIEWS THEIR SO CONSISTENT AND I THINK THAT EVERYONE IS COMPLETELY EQUAL REGARDLESS OF NUANCES AND SENSE BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS BLACK AND WHITE AND THERE ARE NO SHADES OF GRAY IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe, I'm going to marry you one day.

And then we'll adopt a young child, and get federal tax breaks for it. Because we can do that now.

We'll need a woman in the marriage too, so that we don't discriminate. And she needs to be Inuit.

[Neo Art]

Joe, I'm going to marry you one day.

And then we'll adopt a young child, and get federal tax breaks for it. Because we can do that now.

We'll need a woman in the marriage too, so that we don't discriminate. And she needs to be Inuit.

It's a shame Neesika got DOSed, she was our token indian for a bit.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I have nothing against you or your way of thinking. I have no reason to believe you are incapable of seeing a wrong doing when its happening. I think you're a reasonable individual, and I don't have a mission to make accept things you obviously already understand, as evidenced.

All I wish to clarify is that my statement was regarding this case in particular. If that wasn't clear, my bad.

Ah, nah, that wasn't really directed at you per se, more the flow of that particular conversation.

Just making sure.

[Frisivisia]

We'll need a woman in the marriage too, so that we don't discriminate. And she needs to be Inuit.

It's a shame Neesika got DOSed, she was our token indian for a bit.

As in India or American?

[Neo Art]

Ah, nah, that wasn't really directed at you per se, more the flow of that particular conversation.

Just making sure.

Frankly, I piggybacked off your quote because it was the only way I could see the quote that I was actually responding to. But mods don't like it when you say that sorta thing.

[Neo Art]

It's a shame Neesika got DOSed, she was our token indian for a bit.

As in India or American?

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Carry on.

I do feel a need to clarify one bit, so allow me to indulge. I want to address this "neo art doesn't think it's discrimination when done against straight people".

It most certainly is. Or, to be more precise, it's discrimination against conduct that disparately impacts straight people. This...rabid and unrelenting attempt to try and pin me down, screaming "SAY IT! SAY IT'S DISCRIMINATION! SAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY IIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT" that certain company has engaged in here seems to be based primarily on the same limited and fundamentally childish thinking I alluded to earlier, this myopic, uneducated, unintelligent, and fundamentally stupid idea that they've latched on to, with all the trifling intellectual might that they're capable of mustering, that "discrimination = bad!" and have thus attempted to try and "trap" me into "admitting" that it's discrimination, thus *cough* forcing me into doing a 180 on my belief system because, to these towering monuments of intellectual vapidity "discrimination = bad" and "this = discrimination" and therefore, displaying all the grand thinking of a kindergarten math class, "this = bad"

And when I come along and state, actually, I don't find it that bad, the ENTIRE effort has now swung, with singleminded (because we seem incapable of more) fury, to try and make me admit "this=discrimination" and thus force me to conclude "this = bad" just as they, demonstrating the faculties that make them suited to push shopping carts at walmart, have concluded is the natural and probable result.

And therefore, they have been stymied, utterly stuck, and completely incapable of moving on from the fact that while I freely admit this is a discriminatory act, it's one I'm just not all that bothered by.

Because, once again "discrimination = bad!" is how children think. And I'm not a child.

You really had to go ahead and make another one of your long posts, didn't you?

I mean yes, you are right, discrimination many times is necessary. In this case though I tend to see the policy as stupid, not so much discriminatory because all they are doing is driving away customers (and revenue much needed for the business).

[Frisivisia]

As in India or American?

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

Crazy minorities being called the same thing. Who thought that up? Definitely not a white person, I'll tell you.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Just making sure.

Frankly, I piggybacked off your quote because it was the only way I could see the quote that I was actually responding to. But mods don't like it when you say that sorta thing.

No harm done, man. I just wondered, that's all.

On topic, I've ever seen a gay bar that I frequented engage in discrimination like the one mentioned in the OP.

[Galloism]

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

Crazy minorities being called the same thing. Who thought that up? Definitely not a white person, I'll tell you.

Crazy white guy named Chris.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

As in India or American?

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

Would you like some curry?

[Olthar]

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

Would you like some curry?

Oh god. If you say his name, he appears! Nightkill is Bloody Mary!

[Ifreann]

Canadian, actually.

Nightkill is our token Indian from India.

Crazy minorities being called the same thing. Who thought that up? Definitely not a white person, I'll tell you.

It was a proto-Mexican.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Would you like some curry?

Oh god. If you say his name, he appears! Nightkill is Bloody Mary!

Beetlejuice.

[Frisivisia]

I do feel a need to clarify one bit, so allow me to indulge. I want to address this "neo art doesn't think it's discrimination when done against straight people".

It most certainly is. Or, to be more precise, it's discrimination against conduct that disparately impacts straight people. This...rabid and unrelenting attempt to try and pin me down, screaming "SAY IT! SAY IT'S DISCRIMINATION! SAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY IIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT" that certain company has engaged in here seems to be based primarily on the same limited and fundamentally childish thinking I alluded to earlier, this myopic, uneducated, unintelligent, and fundamentally stupid idea that they've latched on to, with all the trifling intellectual might that they're capable of mustering, that "discrimination = bad!" and have thus attempted to try and "trap" me into "admitting" that it's discrimination, thus *cough* forcing me into doing a 180 on my belief system because, to these towering monuments of intellectual vapidity "discrimination = bad" and "this = discrimination" and therefore, displaying all the grand thinking of a kindergarten math class, "this = bad"

And when I come along and state, actually, I don't find it that bad, the ENTIRE effort has now swung, with singleminded (because we seem incapable of more) fury, to try and make me admit "this=discrimination" and thus force me to conclude "this = bad" just as they, demonstrating the faculties that make them suited to push shopping carts at walmart, have concluded is the natural and probable result.

And therefore, they have been stymied, utterly stuck, and completely incapable of moving on from the fact that while I freely admit this is a discriminatory act, it's one I'm just not all that bothered by.

Because, once again "discrimination = bad!" is how children think. And I'm not a child.

You really had to go ahead and make another one of your long posts, didn't you?

I mean yes, you are right, discrimination many times is necessary. In this case though I tend to see the policy as stupid, not so much discriminatory because all they are doing is driving away customers (and revenue much needed for the business).

When Neo makes a longpost (one word, I just invented it), you've already lost. It's like when the kung fu guy punches the baddie a bunch of times and then he just falls apart, only with your argument.

[Blakullar]

Oh my word.

A bar bans heterosexual couples from kissing and it makes the news.

Something tells me not a lot of interesting things have been showing up in the Huffington Post recently.

[Galloism]

Would you like some curry?

Oh god. If you say his name, he appears! Nightkill is Bloody Mary!

*sets up two mirrors across the hall from each other*

[Gulf Empire]

The Gulf Empire has a ZERO tolerance level for people of homosexual orientation. If you were caught, by police or bystanders, kissing another man on the lips or having anal sex (this goes the same for lesbians as well), you would be immediatly arrested and either shot on the spot or hauled off to a death/concentration camp (the first of the two options is much more merciful than the second). Therefore, most gays keep their gayness a secret and it is illegal to get married or own gay bars. Also gay sympathizers, people who help support or like gays, are also prosecuted. The Gays are to Imperialists like the jews were to the Nazis or like Christians were to Communists.