NATION

PASSWORD

Best military option for a possible free Quebec?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Slarvainian
Minister
 
Posts: 2132
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Best military option for a possible free Quebec?

Postby Slarvainian » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:22 pm

I'm currently in the research stage of writing a short story of where in a alternate world, Quebec has gained independence from Canada. A few years later a new PM is elected in Canada who is greatly in favour of reunifying the country especially when the maritime provinces are considering joining with the states. While doing my research I found Department of National Defence documents from the late 90's detailing the possible scenarios of a potential Quebec armed forces. There were 4 scenarios described which I have quoted bellow and have been translated quite well by Google.

Scenario 1
A defense armed force

In this first scenario, Quebec ensure its defense and armed forces to concentrate most of its resources to the security of its territory and humanitarian UN missions. Participation in alliances would be maintained but limited to a political and diplomatic representation.

Membership in NATO and NORAD would overcome the constraints inherent in a defense policy which is not based on an armed force.

To ensure the management responsibilities related to homeland security that are not assumed by the police, this scenario proposes the creation of a National Guard 6,400 people including a land component and air and maritime auxiliary services.

In addition, in this scenario, the contribution of Quebec in international missions based on a body of white people 2,500 peacekeepers. Both entities will be fully operational with an annual budget of $ 840 million over the first five years and a workforce of 8,900 people (instead of the 17,700 people employed by the Department of National Defence on the territory of Quebec).

The National Guard under the Department of Public Safety as the body of White Helmets would be placed under the responsibility of the Department of International Affairs.

The human, material and financial resources could be reduced by half compared to the current situation.

Scenario 2:
A lightly armed force

In this scenario, a sovereign Quebec would ensure his defense with a lightly armed force. The resources devoted to this sector would be lower than those spent in Quebec by the Ministry of National Defence, which would make substantial savings.

At the end of the restructuring period, the number required would be 12,100 people, while the average annual budget is $ 1.3 billion, to $ 925 million in the fifth year (a third of what Quebecers are paying for the defense sector.

Ground and air resources currently deployed on the territory Quebecois should be redeveloped. The army of Quebec would have a land force of 4,900 people and an air service 1,100 people. This would be given a new oriented support ground forces and abandon its responsibility interception mission. Quebec does not endow to a Navy and Coast Guard to leave the task of ensuring maritime safety.

The armed forces are composed of permanet personnel and reservists could be attached to the Ministry of Public Safety, under the responsibility of a Secretary of State. This structure, lighter than the Ministry of Defence, would achieve significant savings.

Participation in military alliances would be maintained. Within NATO, Quebec would favor the political process and provide technical support to NORAD. Contribution to the UN would be supported by a body of 2,500 White Helmets under the Ministry of International Affairs. This body would be assisted by a contingent of 400 peacekeepers from the Earth's military force.

The human, material and financial resources could be reduced by at least one third compared to the current situation.

Scenario 3:
A military force restructured

In this scenario, a sovereign Quebec would ensure his defense with an armed force restructured, using and streamlining resources currently deployed on its territory in order to maintain the same number of people (17,700), while slightly reducing the financial resources required .

The average anneul budget would be $ 1.8 billion over five years, 10% less than the current expenditures of the Department of National Defence in Quebec (1993-94 amounted to $ 2 billion).

This restructuring would allow Quebec to realize cost, all missions. The armed forces continue to be made permanent and réservistes.Le military command and staff would be placed under the responsibility of the Ministry of Defence.

Resources restructured armed forces would be concentrated on land defense (6,900 people) and air (2,500 people). Coast Guard assume responsibility for ensuring the safety of the maritime area.

Participation in military alliances would be maintained. Quebec contribute to preserving capacity NORAD air intercept (F-18) adapted to the needs of a sovereign Quebec. Resources and staff of the Air Force would be increased as well.

Quebec would assist the activities of the NATO military authorities, without affecting troops, permanently, the Atlantic Alliance in peacetime.

A sovereign Quebec will actively contribute to the promotion of peace and international security, with the provision of a contingent of 2,400 UN peacekeepers and a civilian corps of 2,500 White Helmets.

Human resources required to implement this scenario would be a comparable level to the present situation.

Scenario 4:
Increased armed force

In this scenario, a sovereign Quebec would ensure his defense with increased strength, using all the resources deployed on its territory and gradually increasing the human, material and financial resources available to the Department of Defense.

At the end of the five-year period, the total number would reach 25,800 people, 8,100 more than at present. The financial resources allocated to defense would be $ 2.3 billion in the fifth year, while the annual average, every five years, would be $ 2.7 billion.

In addition to being made permanent and military reservists to have a Ministry of Defence and a unified command, the military would be based on a land force of 6,900 people, an air force of 3,800 people. Unlike other scenarios, Quebec would develop a marine equipped with ten ships.

Quebec could participate in the collective defense of North America (NORAD). In addition, it could provide military support to NATO by the deployment of a battalion group of fast reaction, but constantly maintain troops in peacetime outside its territory.

Quebec collaborate in efforts to promote peace and international security, by making available to the 3,700 UN peacekeepers and 3,000 White Helmets.

The analysis of the conditions for the implementation of this scéario indicates that the required human resources require hiring 8,100 people.

Source: http://archives.vigile.net/armee/etudes.html

In my opinion, scenario 2 would be the best option. Allowing Quebec to deal with its own domestic and national defence, and also be able to maintain membership with organizations like NATO. It also doesn't put to much financial strain on the new nation and also allows opportunity to grow its armed forces over time.

My question I'm putting forwards is if Quebec gained independence, what scenario do you view as the best option for a independent Quebec for a possible armed forces?

Note: This is not how Quebec will become free but if it did how would it's armed forces be formed.
Last edited by Slarvainian on Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
V: Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy. And ideas are bulletproof.

Sophist, Ironist, the po-mo-neo-marxist Jordan Peterson warned you about.

I really enjoy talking ideas with people so feel free to TG me.

User avatar
Denway
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Denway » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:29 pm

#1

I'm going to say a coup de etat by nationalists.

Military wise. Most likely a Quebec state would be voted in by the ballot.
Last edited by Denway on Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:36 pm

Nothing. Quebeker terrorists kill like 10 people of which a couple weren't even Canadian over a span of a couple of years. And any uprising or coup would be easily crushed
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Slarvainian
Minister
 
Posts: 2132
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Slarvainian » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:40 pm

This is not how Quebec will become free but if it did how would it's armed forces be formed.
V: Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy. And ideas are bulletproof.

Sophist, Ironist, the po-mo-neo-marxist Jordan Peterson warned you about.

I really enjoy talking ideas with people so feel free to TG me.

User avatar
Denway
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Best military option for a possible free Quebec?

Postby Denway » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:46 pm

Slarvainian wrote:This is not how Quebec will become free but if it did how would it's armed forces be formed.

Unless Canada becomes hostile to them, then #2. I don't see the Quebecois, unlike the French, taking an active role in international affairs and then having the need to build up their military.

User avatar
United Furry Alliance
Diplomat
 
Posts: 795
Founded: Mar 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby United Furry Alliance » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:47 pm

I'd say Quebec would go with either 1 or 3 depending on how pissed off Canada is and the how the world views the situation.
Past-A small island nation of warrior monks
Modern-continent sized nation Run by Scholars.
Futuristic-Star sized mobile station that travels the multiverse run by scientists.
Pros-Science and democracies,USA(mostly),Atheism,Blueberries.
Cons-Religon,Monarchy,Cherries,

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:47 pm

First one if Canada accepts their independence. Last one if not.

None if the U.S decides that "lol you r staying Canadian".
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
Please help a family in need, every penny counts.
Mainland Map | "Weebs must secure the existence of anime and a future for cute aryan waifus"| IIwiki
I Identify as a Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carrier, please refer to me as she.
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.72

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:58 pm

Well they should obviously form an alliance with the Iroquois Nation, the Metis Confederacy, the CSA, and Deseret.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:28 pm

Light arms, quick response force, an Arctic navy, and a defense treaty with Russia giving them access to Canada's North Coast.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
United Kingdom of Muffins
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1158
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby United Kingdom of Muffins » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:45 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:First one if Canada accepts their independence. Last one if not.

None if the U.S decides that "lol you r staying Canadian".

In my opinion the 4 equal options are
a. Stay part of Canada
b. Rejoin France
c. Shut up
d. Be turned into a nuclear waste dump
Pope Muffins
"Pretty girls digging prettier women" The Who, 5:15, from the album Quadrophenia
"Has God forgotten what I have done for him?" Louis XIV Of France

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:50 pm

It is not nearly so simple. First off you have to clarify what Quebec is, just because it separates doesn't mean its taking all its current territory with it. You must also look at things such as economic and political ties to the rest of Canada, as they may hinder any defense plan Quebec tried to put in place.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:55 pm

Anachronous Rex wrote:Well they should obviously form an alliance with the Iroquois Nation, the Metis Confederacy, the CSA, and Deseret.

The kingdom of hawaii will provide for their defensive needs. *nods*
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:15 pm

Pope Joan wrote:Light arms, quick response force, an Arctic navy, and a defense treaty with Russia giving them access to Canada's North Coast.

...Quebec makes up part of Canada's north coast.

If they leave, they get that part. They don't get the territories though because that's not theirs to claim so they wouldn't share a border with Russia. There would probably be some issues over Labrador since Quebec seems to stake some claim to that (the French maps of Canada always have it hashed out like it's neither part of Quebec nor part of Newfoundland).

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:17 pm

Marcurix wrote:It is not nearly so simple. First off you have to clarify what Quebec is, just because it separates doesn't mean its taking all its current territory with it. You must also look at things such as economic and political ties to the rest of Canada, as they may hinder any defense plan Quebec tried to put in place.

This too. If memory serves, it looks like Quebec separating means that the area around Quebec City goes pretty much since everyone else doesn't tend to want to separate.

User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6694
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:18 pm

How about a peaceful route instead? Like, oh I don't know, a referendum? Like the Scots are doing?
China state-affiliated media
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
My posts do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer, President Xi Jinping.
me - my politics - my twitter
Ceterum autem censeo Americam esse delendam.
౿ᓕ  ̤Ꜥ·⦣

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:20 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:How about a peaceful route instead? Like, oh I don't know, a referendum? Like the Scots are doing?

That is how Quebec would leave if it does. They haven't had a referendum in quite a while though and the separatist sentiment has died down a lot since the last one.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:12 pm

keep the armed forces united is probably a good option.
Canada only really acts in NATO and UN peacekeeping.
And if Canada or Quebec were invaded by someone, it's an easy case to make that it's a pressing national security matter for both.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:56 am

Weaponised poutine.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:17 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:Weaponised poutine.

And lumberjack commandos wielding beaver nunchunks.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:19 am

A few catapults and 400 crossbowmen will keep those damn English at bay, the nobility should also raise their own levies from the peasantry and must buy suits of armour to defend the rightfull king of Quebec.
Last edited by Surfistan on Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Saint-Thor
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1064
Founded: Aug 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint-Thor » Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:12 am

Interesting thread. An important element is missing though. What military material a new sovereign Québec would be able to keep? Remember in 1995 when they planned to move every F-18? For the federal governement, the army belongs to them even though Québec paid its part (about 20%). What would you do then? No ship, no plane, no tanks, Québec would have to buy everything again. It would inevitably means nothing more than option 1.

Some of the most extremist elements wanted to ground the F-18s and put the officers in charge under arrest, just to make sure they aren't stealing our share of the airforce. But I don't think they would do it as it would increase the tension. If Russia after 1991 could find some profitable arrangements with her former republics, I'm sure Canada could do the same (we never know though) The moderates had suggested to negociate with Ottawa using the federal debt as a way to obtain military equipement. You take our stuff, we aren't paying our share of the debt anymore.

Saruhan wrote:Nothing. Quebeker terrorists kill like 10 people of which a couple weren't even Canadian over a span of a couple of years. And any uprising or coup would be easily crushed

Hey we're terrorists now, great. First, that was in the 60s. It was 5, not 10, and no foreigner got killed. It's always a good idea to inform yourself before making statements like this on a country that you obviously don't know anything about.

Marcurix wrote:It is not nearly so simple. First off you have to clarify what Quebec is, just because it separates doesn't mean its taking all its current territory with it. You must also look at things such as economic and political ties to the rest of Canada, as they may hinder any defense plan Quebec tried to put in place.

The federal governement can not strip Québec from its land. It simply does not have that power, never did.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:13 am

Saint-Thor wrote:Interesting thread. An important element is missing though. What military material a new sovereign Québec would be able to keep? Remember in 1995 when they planned to move every F-18? For the federal governement, the army belongs to them even though Québec paid its part (about 20%). What would you do then? No ship, no plane, no tanks, Québec would have to buy everything again. It would inevitably means nothing more than option 1.

Some of the most extremist elements wanted to ground the F-18s and put the officers in charge under arrest, just to make sure they aren't stealing our share of the airforce. But I don't think they would do it as it would increase the tension. If Russia after 1991 could find some profitable arrangements with her former republics, I'm sure Canada could do the same (we never know though) The moderates had suggested to negociate with Ottawa using the federal debt as a way to obtain military equipement. You take our stuff, we aren't paying our share of the debt anymore.
The problem with that is that the Soviet Union dissolved. Quebec wants to leave Confederation, that itself remains intact. So the Canadian government has no obligation to give Quebec anything, unlike Russia. When you end the lease on an apartment building, you don't take the fire detector and closet door with you.

Hey we're terrorists now, great. First, that was in the 60s. It was 5, not 10, and no foreigner got killed. It's always a good idea to inform yourself before making statements like this on a country that you obviously don't know anything about.
Quebec ain't a country. A nation perhaps, but not a country.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:39 am

Scenario 5: Surrender. A Frenchman by any other name.
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4629
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:57 am

Quebec is a haven for terrorists and nationalists and the French-speaking population should finally be assimilated into the majority.

The only fun thing to do with Québécois people is to constantly remind them of the Plains of Abraham.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54738
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:14 am

Slarvainian wrote:My question I'm putting forwards is if Quebec gained independence, what scenario do you view as the best option for a independent Quebec for a possible armed forces?


Allying with France.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, El Lazaro, Grinning Dragon, Honghai, Necroghastia, Primitive Communism, Shrillland, Trump Almighty, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads