It already happened in the early 1970s. I wonder what the key fob you got with it looked like.
Advertisement
by L Ron Cupboard » Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:18 am
by Temujinn » Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:19 am
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
by L Ron Cupboard » Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:45 am
Temujinn wrote:L Ron Cupboard wrote:
It already happened in the early 1970s. I wonder what the key fob you got with it looked like.
You dont know the song?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQYue6eZmlU
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:05 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:
Are you seriously that clueless?
do you know where the word jeep came from?
how about durango?
car manufacturers have been naming them after anything they think sounds even remotely positive.
often without even checking to see what the word even means.
Other jeep brands
jeep honcho
jeep gladiator
jeep cowboy
jeep patriot
jeep kaiser
jeep pioneer
jeep golden eagle
jeep wagoner
It however would have been funnier if it had been Pontiac that used that name.
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:11 pm
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Regardless of whether or not this is "culturally insensitive" (which, I suppose not thinking about what other people think kind of is), there's still no reason why we should actually give a shit how the Cherokee feel about their name being used by someone else. If they really care, they can copyright it.
by Phocidaea » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:12 pm
Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:Regardless of whether or not this is "culturally insensitive" (which, I suppose not thinking about what other people think kind of is), there's still no reason why we should actually give a shit how the Cherokee feel about their name being used by someone else. If they really care, they can copyright it.
Check your privilege.
by Frisivisia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:Regardless of whether or not this is "culturally insensitive" (which, I suppose not thinking about what other people think kind of is), there's still no reason why we should actually give a shit how the Cherokee feel about their name being used by someone else. If they really care, they can copyright it.
Check your privilege.
by Frisivisia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:14 pm
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:16 pm
by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:28 pm
Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:Regardless of whether or not this is "culturally insensitive" (which, I suppose not thinking about what other people think kind of is), there's still no reason why we should actually give a shit how the Cherokee feel about their name being used by someone else. If they really care, they can copyright it.
Check your privilege.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Angleter » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:42 pm
by Mushet » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:17 pm
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:20 pm
by Frisivisia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:24 pm
Mushet wrote:Phocidaea wrote:
... did... did... did you actually just use that phrase in a serious context, with the actual intent of getting a "privileged" person to feel bad about themselves?
Well, looks like Tumblr is the new Cicero.Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The words I would give you for having said this are unfortunately not worth yet another ban.
Oh no, god forbid somebody reminds you of the privileges you have, what's so wrong with being told to check your privilege that it deserves a hostile response?
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:25 pm
Well, here’s some: “We are really opposed to stereotypes,” said Amanda Clinton, a spokeswoman for the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma.
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:27 pm
Angleter wrote:At least it's not as bad as the poor Qashqai, who were so obscure before the co-option by the automotive industry that they're now completely and irrevocably associated with a Nissan.
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:29 pm
Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:Regardless of whether or not this is "culturally insensitive" (which, I suppose not thinking about what other people think kind of is), there's still no reason why we should actually give a shit how the Cherokee feel about their name being used by someone else. If they really care, they can copyright it.
Check your privilege.
by Greed and Death » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:45 pm
Dakini wrote:greed and death wrote:Cherokee is the English name. Tsalagi is the transliteration of the Cherokee language name "ᏣᎳᎩ".
English has this habit that when a transliteration for a proper noun would be very difficult to impossible for a reader to pronouce just looking at it of adopting a name that is only tangentially related to the original.
It's not just English that does it, but yeah. Do you object to the use of Cherokee over Tsalagi?
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:31 pm
Mushet wrote:Phocidaea wrote:
... did... did... did you actually just use that phrase in a serious context, with the actual intent of getting a "privileged" person to feel bad about themselves?
Well, looks like Tumblr is the new Cicero.Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The words I would give you for having said this are unfortunately not worth yet another ban.
Oh no, god forbid somebody reminds you of the privileges you have, what's so wrong with being told to check your privilege that it deserves a hostile response?
Geilinor wrote:How is naming a car after a tribe culturally insensitive? They may be poor, but they have cars too. Is this a "It's insensitive to name cars after people who probably can't afford them!!" rant?
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:40 pm
Algonquin Ascendancy wrote:Mushet wrote:
Oh no, god forbid somebody reminds you of the privileges you have, what's so wrong with being told to check your privilege that it deserves a hostile response?
Because then they might have to face the reality.Geilinor wrote:How is naming a car after a tribe culturally insensitive? They may be poor, but they have cars too. Is this a "It's insensitive to name cars after people who probably can't afford them!!" rant?
Use of an ethnic groups name with out the group's permission. How are you not not getting that?Geilinor wrote:There's no privilege involved. As far as I know, no country, nation, or ethnicity as copyrighted their name. American isn't copyrighted.
You're Caucasian, aren't you?
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:41 pm
Bodobol wrote:As a part Cherokee, I'm not offended at all by this.
by Geilinor » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:42 pm
by Algonquin Ascendancy » Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:47 pm
Geilinor wrote:1. The context of the use isn't offensive. They are not using the name to mock or offend the Cherokee tribe. If it was being used that way, it would be insensitivity.
2. No, I'm Asian American(Indian-American to be exact). You don't hesitate to call people racist, do you?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Experina, Lophostoma, Sveniland, Valrifall, Westeri
Advertisement