SCOTUS SSM rulings: DOMA overturned, Prop 8 gone

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

"No me importa!"
"Come torta!"
"Tu mama la gorda!"

Yes, simple yet, tedious.

"Cuchillito que no corta!"

LOL, the memories!

[Vettrera]

I think marriage just got a hell of a lot better.

And I think you are o so very wrong...but then, you think I am wrong. An impasse.

How can we be at an impasse if you believe my opinion is invalid, since I'm oh so left of center?

[Valcouria]

So you chose the roaring 20s?

I don't like the Sodom the world has become, I'm moving to Gomorrah.

I laughed.

Val would be stuck between the Great War and the Great Depression too. Possibly blind or missing a limb, and soon to be queuing for soup.

And yet it would still be better than this terrible world we live in today.

[Liriena]

What do I know?

You know cat-stuff.

I think marriage just got a hell of a lot better.

And I think you are o so very wrong...but then, you think I am wrong. An impasse.

Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

[Mkuki]

Really? Why?

Well, Texas is starting to turn blue. Florida is so gerrymandered to hell that it's never going to be blue on the state government level, because even though the blue cities are growing faster than the red ones, the establishment basically remaps the districts with impunity so that they'll remain in control.

Plus being a corrupt male WASP is kind of a prerequisite to being Governor. We have a criminal in our governor's mansion right now, everyone knew it during he election, but he still won.

Interesting. I remember I saw a site that listed the states most likely to legalize same-sex marriage. I'll try and find it. I'd like your opinion on the suggestions.

WASP?

[The Rich Port]

Well I don't.

Neither does the law.

Well, it should...after all, the concept of law comes from divine or divinely-inspired sources (depending on whether or not one counts ancient Babylonian rulers as 'gods', as they referred to themselves).

Not American law, and definitely not any system of law that isn't medieval.

I think marriage just got a hell of a lot better.

And I think you are o so very wrong...but then, you think I am wrong. An impasse.

An impasse implies you have a valid point for believing your bullshit.

You don't.

[Grenartia]

I laughed.

Val would be stuck between the Great War and the Great Depression too. Possibly blind or missing a limb, and soon to be queuing for soup.

And yet it would still be better than this terrible world we live in today.

Walk a mile in a blind homeless amputee's shoes back during the Depression, and get back to me.

[New Libertarian States]

Well, Texas is starting to turn blue. Florida is so gerrymandered to hell that it's never going to be blue on the state government level, because even though the blue cities are growing faster than the red ones, the establishment basically remaps the districts with impunity so that they'll remain in control.

Plus being a corrupt male WASP is kind of a prerequisite to being Governor. We have a criminal in our governor's mansion right now, everyone knew it during he election, but he still won.

Interesting. I remember I saw a site that listed the states most likely to legalize same-sex marriage. I'll try and find it. I'd like your opinion on the suggestions.

WASP?

White
Anglo
Saxon
Protestant

[Bralia]

Arguing when we were children was so...easy...yet so tedious.



What integrity? You've pretty much admitted that you don't follow the rules of your own religion, that you believe in a government that does things that your own religion deems immoral.

The integrity of keeping my beliefs pure and untainted by left-wing influence; if there is anything I pride myself in, it is this.

Which you've done quite a good job of already. Isn't your presence here redundant now? You've repeated your beliefs many times now. The leftist hammer has struck the concrete multiple times now and neither has yielded. The back and forth seems pointless now.

[Death Metal]

Well, Texas is starting to turn blue. Florida is so gerrymandered to hell that it's never going to be blue on the state government level, because even though the blue cities are growing faster than the red ones, the establishment basically remaps the districts with impunity so that they'll remain in control.

Plus being a corrupt male WASP is kind of a prerequisite to being Governor. We have a criminal in our governor's mansion right now, everyone knew it during he election, but he still won.

Interesting. I remember I saw a site that listed the states most likely to legalize same-sex marriage. I'll try and find it. I'd like your opinion on the suggestions.

WASP?

White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. Usually used to denote the Old Money and socially backward types.

[Liriena]

"Cuchillito que no corta!"

LOL, the memories!

This is the sort of stuff that makes me want to believe in reincarnation. I'd love to be a (middle-class) kid again.

I laughed.

Val would be stuck between the Great War and the Great Depression too. Possibly blind or missing a limb, and soon to be queuing for soup.

And yet it would still be better than this terrible world we live in today.

Seriously? A war-torn world where you and millions of other young men are mutilated and hopeless is better than this...because of gay marriage?

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

What do I know?

You know cat-stuff.

And I think you are o so very wrong...but then, you think I am wrong. An impasse.

Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Yes. But as much as I would love the world to be solely about cats... it isn't.

In any case, if Val really believes the spiel he's posting, he's dead wrong. If not, well, another day in NSG.

[Valcouria]

What do I know?

You know cat-stuff.

And I think you are o so very wrong...but then, you think I am wrong. An impasse.

Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Opinions are without the need of facts. That is why they are opinions.

[Choronzon]

....law comes from God?

So...lawyers are like priests?

Well, thats a twist.

[Liriena]

Yes. But as much as I would love the world to be solely about cats... it isn't.

Give it some time...Tard will become the Supreme Overlord in a year or two.

[New Libertarian States]

You know cat-stuff.


Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Opinions are without the need of facts. That is why they are opinionsStupid and dangerous opinions

Fixed.

[Choronzon]

I nominate Neo Art for Pope.

[Vettrera]

I laughed.

Val would be stuck between the Great War and the Great Depression too. Possibly blind or missing a limb, and soon to be queuing for soup.

And yet it would still be better than this terrible world we live in today.

Why? Because we don't live in the oppressive, God-Fearing* world of the Roaring 20s.


And of course I mean the Christian God, seeing as that's the only God that there ever could be, and that only the Holy Bible is relevant in society. So what if other religions say different things on how life should be lived, Christianity is the one true religion.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Yes. But as much as I would love the world to be solely about cats... it isn't.

Give it some time...Tard will become the Supreme Overlord in a year or two.

Overlady. If only that were to improve things...

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I nominate Neo Art for Pope.

Scary.

[Valcouria]

And yet it would still be better than this terrible world we live in today.

Seriously? A war-torn world where you and millions of other young men are mutilated and hopeless is better than this...because of gay marriage?

Gay marriage...abortion...socialism/communism...there's more to it than just gay marriage. But it is a substantial factor.

[Liriena]

You know cat-stuff.


Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Opinions are without the need of facts. That is why they are opinions.

An opinion is based on arguments. If the arguments (and/or their premises and/or conclussions) are false and/or invalid, the opinion is worthless.

[Grenartia]

Well, it should...after all, the concept of law comes from divine or divinely-inspired sources (depending on whether or not one counts ancient Babylonian rulers as 'gods', as they referred to themselves).

Not American law, and definitely not any system of law that isn't medieval.

And, if Val was actually a law student, he'd know this already. I'd think that would be American Law 101.

You know cat-stuff.


Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Opinions are without the need of facts. That is why they are opinions.

No, opinions are based on facts (or perceived facts). This is how opinions can be wrong. See: flat-earthers, moon landing conspiracy theorists, etc.

[Edlichbury]

The integrity of keeping my beliefs pure and untainted by left-wing influence; if there is anything I pride myself in, it is this.

Which you've done quite a good job of already. Isn't your presence here redundant now? You've repeated your beliefs many times now. The leftist hammer has struck the concrete multiple times now and neither has yielded. The back and forth seems pointless now.

Not even a leftist hammer, considering how many right or centre-right posters were against him. It's simply the rational and empathetical hammer at this point.

[The Rich Port]

You know cat-stuff.


Nope. An impasse would imply that both of you have valid arguments supporting your respective opinions. That is not the case here. Your opinion, Valcouria, has no valid basis.

Opinions are without the need of facts. That is why they are opinions.

Opinions that are moronic and ignorant have no need of facts.

If you actually want someone to take you seriously for more than 5 seconds, you need some kind of back up.