NATION

PASSWORD

SCOTUS SSM rulings: DOMA overturned, Prop 8 gone

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:54 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Divair wrote:Says who?


Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.

Ancient Chinese civilization had it. But damn laowais foreigners had to change that.

Honestly, the collapse of the Chinese empire is due to them banning homosexual relationships.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Hornesia
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Jul 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Hornesia » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 am

Divair wrote:
Hornesia wrote:Apparently. I apologize.

So now you support same sex marriage?


Damn, that was easy.

Not really, but I never really had a problem with them having equal rights.
Hobbies:Civil war reenacting, Filmmaking doing stupid things with cars
Music: Hardcore Punk/Metalcore/Post-Hardcore/Screamo/Whatever they're calling loud music with screaming these days
Bands I'm into: Silverstein, Defeater, The Ghost Inside, Expire, Ice Nine Kills, Andrew Jackson Jihad, Amidst The Grave's Demons
Movies/TV: The Dirties, End of Watch, Sicario, Frozen, True Detective, The Fall, Happy Valley
Literature: Kurt Vonnegut, The Kite Runner, Truman Capote, Southern Gothic

Pseudo-redneck half Jew liberal from the deep south.

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 am

Norstal wrote:
Rhodesi wrote:
Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.

Ancient Chinese civilization had it. But damn laowais foreigners had to change that.

Honestly, the collapse of the Chinese empire is due to them banning homosexual relationships.

:o

User avatar
DogDoo 7
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5120
Founded: Jun 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby DogDoo 7 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 am

Choronzon wrote:Traditional marriage:

My wife who was my brothers widow.

Every year in Israel, a number of people appear before the rabbinical courts in order to get out of the levirate marriage obligation, and have their shoes spat in. True story.
Just ask this scientician--Troy McClure

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:56 am

Hornesia wrote:
Divair wrote:So now you support same sex marriage?


Damn, that was easy.

Not really, but I never really had a problem with them having equal rights.

So you support same sex marriage.


Damn, that was easy.

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:56 am

Choronzon wrote:
Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Speaking as a Missourian, please do not give us your bigoted loudmouth assholes.

We would never do that to you guys. You have enough of your own.


Srsly.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:56 am

DogDoo 7 wrote:
Norstal wrote:This is of course with the hope that the California circuit court won't overturn their decision on prop 8.

The 9th Circuit has to dismiss the case since the Proponents didn't have standing to appeal.
According to this document in the 9th circuit one does not necessarily need to have standing to INTERVENE in a case, so the District Court's ruling would stand.
Which actually results in an interesting precedent. Someone can intervene without standing, but then isn't allowed to appeal the ruling. What happens (purely hypothetical) if the Intervenors without Standing WIN a case, and the losers (with standing) appeal?

I think I get it. Maybe.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:56 am

Agritum wrote:
Norstal wrote:Ancient Chinese civilization had it. But damn laowais foreigners had to change that.

Honestly, the collapse of the Chinese empire is due to them banning homosexual relationships.

:o

That last part is sarcasm btw.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Rhodesi
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:57 am

Divair wrote:
Rhodesi wrote:
Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.

Damn, your history is really shit, isn't it? Go read up a bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#Ancient


Ancient Mesopotamia? Rather obscure... and seriously, Elagabulus is a positive argument for same-sex marriage?
NSG Senate: Classical Monarchist Party
"Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists" - Joseph De Maistre

"It is one of man's curious idiosyncrasies to create difficulties for the pleasure of resolving them" - Joseph De Maistre

"The United Nations is useless...and also harmful. It is a land that flowers demagoguery with a bunch of newborn countries, devoid of any tradition." - Antonio de Oliveira Salazar

"If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nation’s mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nation’s needs" - Jan Christiaan Smuts

"So, it's possible to be a democracy without gay-pride parades, hmm?" - Lyttenburgh - July 2013

Political Compass: Economic Right: 7.12, Social Authoritarian: 5.54

User avatar
Lithosano
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lithosano » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:57 am

Norstal wrote:
Rhodesi wrote:
Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.

Ancient Chinese civilization had it. But damn laowais foreigners had to change that.

Honestly, the collapse of the Chinese empire is due to them banning homosexual relationships.


You can add ancient Rome, Greece, reasonably modern Japan, and medieval Spain (With the blessing of the Church!)
Learn Things AND Feed the Hungry!
Pro: Social Democracy, Humanism, Equality, Roosevelt, Free science, US Dollar Coin, Renewable and Nuclear Energy
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Gay Male

User avatar
Hornesia
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Jul 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Hornesia » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:57 am

Divair wrote:
Hornesia wrote:Not really, but I never really had a problem with them having equal rights.

So you support same sex marriage.


Damn, that was easy.

I guess. I never was an anti-gay marriage extremist though and I waver easily, so I'm not that much of a feat.
Hobbies:Civil war reenacting, Filmmaking doing stupid things with cars
Music: Hardcore Punk/Metalcore/Post-Hardcore/Screamo/Whatever they're calling loud music with screaming these days
Bands I'm into: Silverstein, Defeater, The Ghost Inside, Expire, Ice Nine Kills, Andrew Jackson Jihad, Amidst The Grave's Demons
Movies/TV: The Dirties, End of Watch, Sicario, Frozen, True Detective, The Fall, Happy Valley
Literature: Kurt Vonnegut, The Kite Runner, Truman Capote, Southern Gothic

Pseudo-redneck half Jew liberal from the deep south.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:57 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Divair wrote:Damn, your history is really shit, isn't it? Go read up a bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#Ancient


Ancient Mesopotamia? Rather obscure... and seriously, Elagabulus is a positive argument for same-sex marriage?

No, you don't see anyone here arguing for same sex marriage because it was legal in the past. I'm just disproving your shitty claims.

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Hornesia wrote:Dictionaries.

From the Merriam-Dexter dictionary.


Definition 2 explicitly defines same-sex marriage as being a form of marriage.


Bigotry fail.
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
Aldheim
Envoy
 
Posts: 262
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aldheim » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Divair wrote:Says who?


Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.


I believe there were several native american tribes that performed gay marriages until the Europeans came along and forced them to stop
"Some people confuse liberty and license; they think this country owes them nothing but privileges, and that nobody ought ever to lay down the law to them about their moral responsibilities." - Harry S. Truman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Hornesia wrote:
Divair wrote:So you support same sex marriage.


Damn, that was easy.

I guess. I never was an anti-gay marriage extremist though and I waver easily, so I'm not that much of a feat.

Welcome aboard the rainbow train.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:Actually the only thing holding Illinois back from legilsating marriage equality is a cadre of loudmouth bigoted assholes from downstate that their equally bigoted asshole constituency keeps voting into office.

So really the solution isn't to try and get it around that cardre, it's to cut the worthless southern counties off and give them to other states which would be happy to welcome bigoted loudmouth assholes like Indiana or Missouri or Kentucky... after offering amnesty for people who don't want to live in those states and understand that marriage is a fundamental human right.


Speaking as a Missourian, please do not give us your bigoted loudmouth assholes.
How bout you move up this way then, lend your talent and understanding to Illinois above the Peoria/Chapagna line?

That way Missouri can finally change it's motto "Gives your banal, your bigoted, your ignorant..."
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159122
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Divair wrote:Damn, your history is really shit, isn't it? Go read up a bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#Ancient


Ancient Mesopotamia? Rather obscure... and seriously, Elagabulus is a positive argument for same-sex marriage?

You said you were waiting to be debunked. You have been. No one said anything about positive arguments for same sex marriage.

User avatar
Rhodesi
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Aldheim wrote:
Rhodesi wrote:
Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.


I believe there were several native american tribes that performed gay marriages until the Europeans came along and forced them to stop


And who says colonization was a bad thing :)
NSG Senate: Classical Monarchist Party
"Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists" - Joseph De Maistre

"It is one of man's curious idiosyncrasies to create difficulties for the pleasure of resolving them" - Joseph De Maistre

"The United Nations is useless...and also harmful. It is a land that flowers demagoguery with a bunch of newborn countries, devoid of any tradition." - Antonio de Oliveira Salazar

"If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nation’s mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nation’s needs" - Jan Christiaan Smuts

"So, it's possible to be a democracy without gay-pride parades, hmm?" - Lyttenburgh - July 2013

Political Compass: Economic Right: 7.12, Social Authoritarian: 5.54

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Divair wrote:Says who?


Says the fact that in no society, in history, up until the early 2000's (waiting to be debunked on this one), has ever married gays. This is self-evident.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions

Or do you prefer Conservapedia?
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
DogDoo 7
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5120
Founded: Jun 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby DogDoo 7 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:59 am

Norstal wrote:
DogDoo 7 wrote:The 9th Circuit has to dismiss the case since the Proponents didn't have standing to appeal.
According to this document in the 9th circuit one does not necessarily need to have standing to INTERVENE in a case, so the District Court's ruling would stand.
Which actually results in an interesting precedent. Someone can intervene without standing, but then isn't allowed to appeal the ruling. What happens (purely hypothetical) if the Intervenors without Standing WIN a case, and the losers (with standing) appeal?

I think I get it. Maybe.

I am most certainly not a lawyer though. I wish there was someone here who was so he/she could answer my hypotheticals.
Just ask this scientician--Troy McClure

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:59 am

Lithosano wrote:
Norstal wrote:Ancient Chinese civilization had it. But damn laowais foreigners had to change that.

Honestly, the collapse of the Chinese empire is due to them banning homosexual relationships.


You can add ancient Rome, Greece, reasonably modern Japan, and medieval Spain (With the blessing of the Church!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelphopoiesis and this.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:59 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Aldheim wrote:
I believe there were several native american tribes that performed gay marriages until the Europeans came along and forced them to stop


And who says colonization was a bad thing :)

Pretty much anyone who wants to be taken seriously on this forum.

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:59 am

I'm quite glad the Supreme Court has defended my right to get married today. Correct ruling, for a change, at least in my opinion.
Joy oh joy~

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8038
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:00 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Aldheim wrote:
I believe there were several native american tribes that performed gay marriages until the Europeans came along and forced them to stop


And who says colonization was a bad thing :)

Usually the people being colonized, but who gives a fuck about them, right?
My politics are real simple: I just want to be able to afford to go to the doctor.

User avatar
Aldheim
Envoy
 
Posts: 262
Founded: Jun 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aldheim » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:00 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Aldheim wrote:
I believe there were several native american tribes that performed gay marriages until the Europeans came along and forced them to stop


And who says colonization was a bad thing :)


I do
"Some people confuse liberty and license; they think this country owes them nothing but privileges, and that nobody ought ever to lay down the law to them about their moral responsibilities." - Harry S. Truman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bradfordville, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Dtn, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Heavenly Assault, Jilia, Nilokeras, Riviere Renard, Tarsonis, Vassenor, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads