Chernoslavia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Not necessarily. Currently, the interpretation of the second amendment is that it speaks to an individual right to keep and bear arms, but it's possible that that interpretation could change, and the right to bear arms be decided to be contingent on Militia membership. For example.
Plus, of course, it's possible to actually amend the Constitution, should public opinion ever flow that far in that direction.
Banning guns is a violation of the bill of rights. In English - It's illegal.
Which part of my post was confusing?




