NATION

PASSWORD

Value of virginity and slut-shaming

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:41 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Temujinn wrote:Father of Four.

Oh look, youre going to be a Social Worker.
Let me know when you grow up, and when you actually arent the possession of your parents.


I'm not fucking property of anybody.

My parents can take that to their graves.


My mother was at least intelligent enough to realize that I was not her property. Her outlook was more or less that she was my guide, and not my owner. If I have kids, if I'm even half the parent she was, I'll consider my parenthood a success.

The Flood wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:^ Slut shaming. BAD.

Why don't we quit shaming thieves and graffiti artists while we're at it, hmm? Let's just quit telling people who do immoral things that they are doing immoral things! ANARCHY!


Thing is, theft and vandalism inherently infringe on other people's rights without informed consent, and are thus immoral. Not so with casual sex. Try again.

Temujinn wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Its the attitude of people like you that caused me to assault my mom's asshole mother and stepfather, because that attitude caused them to justify making my life a fucking hell on earth for me. Because of that attitude, I considered committing fucking suicide by train just to make sure I retained at least ONE FUCKING BIT of my self-determination.

So, FUCK. YOUR. BULLSHIT.

Need a tissue?
1. Perhaps you might ought to sit down and try some more introspection.
Moving post though, very moving.
2. I bet youre really tough and have a large penis too.


1. I've done all the introspection I need.
2. Ad hominem. If you can't defend your position, and have to resort to insulting me, perhaps you should reconsider your position.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The denseness of this post is suffocating.

Good argument

Here, let me give you the argument she is failing to give out of aggravation. I assume that is your issue at this moment, Nana.

Slut, like any other word, holds no intrinsic value. Literally none. It does, however have definitions, and when coupled with other words, the context of the phrase or sentence determines what the word means. "She's a slut!" Is rather clear, in that it's evident that slut is an adjective to describe this woman. Slut is a negative adjective in this sense, as it's intent is to degrade the image of the woman it's being shouted at. It is, in this case, slut-shaming, because the entire purpose of the word is to warp outside opinions of this woman.
password scrambled

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The denseness of this post is suffocating.

Good argument


I call them like I see them.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Then... Get sexually unfrustrated.

Is there something impeding you from getting a girl/man/inbetween?

I can't talk to girls.

Try a man then, they're just as fun.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:I can't talk to girls.


Why not?

Because I'm shy.
fnord

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Simmer down. Pointing something out rudely is not the same as harassing someone or trying o push them to suicide, there needs to be a distinction.


Slut shaming is broad. The other one is harassment, also included in slut shaming. I don't understand the need for distinctions here. Whether or not it causes someone to kill themselves, it is still reprehensible. Do you understandable that?

Intent matters is the point. One is malicious one is ignorance. Those two things are not the same.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:I can't talk to girls.

Try a man then, they're just as fun.


damn ninja.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Temujinn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1545
Founded: Jan 06, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Temujinn » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:42 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:Because I'm sexually frustrated and too cheap to hire a prostitute.


Then... Get sexually unfrustrated.

Is there something impeding you from getting a girl/man/inbetween?

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Heck, kids are practically programmed to rebel in their teenage years.


Eeeeh, that's more of a symptom of actual teenage development and a stereotype of teenagers. They "rebel" if their parents don't agree with what their teenagers are doing, which is probably a given in authoritarian families.

Teenagers are in a phase of life where they look for their own identity, and they do that by searching for peer groups, which is why sometimes cliques form. Cliques are, however, also a stereotype of teenagers. Sometimes, a social group is just a social group.


This answer ignore the neurological effects on behavior, specifically brain plasticity or "white matter" which is more abundant in adolescents than in adults, adults have more grey matter.

This plasticity makes adolescents more prone to quick thinking, and less capable of judgement based decisions.

This is also often associated with the high level of sexual activity in adolescents. It doesnt imply that all adolescent decisions are bad, merely that they are wired to make snap decisions. As the brain develops this changes.

Yeah, I dont bluff.
I hate you.
Yes, I do mean you.
Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.

User avatar
Rocopurr
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12772
Founded: Aug 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rocopurr » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:43 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Why not?

Because I'm shy.

Work to overcome your shyness.
speed weed ᕕ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )ᕗ

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:43 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Galloism wrote:So she slut shamed you once.

Look, criticizing whether or not you have a boyfriend by calling you a "stupid American slut" is slut-shaming. Whether the person is a relative or a nanogenarian doesn't factor into it. If its not slut shaming for her to call you a "stupid American slut", then you wouldn't know slut shaming if it performed a lap dance in your bedroom.

Also known as #3.

So what you're saying is intent doesn't matter because se used a certain word. Yeah, no.

No, intent matters, and the intent in calling you a "stupid American slut" for having a boyfriend is pretty fucking clear. What doesn't matter is whether the person saying it is related to you or their age.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:43 pm

The Silence of Night wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:I can't talk to girls.

Try a man then, they're just as fun.

Thanks, but I just don't graze on that side of the fence, if you know what I mean.
fnord

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:43 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Why not?

Because I'm shy.


"Shy" could mean a number of things.

Are you afraid of rejection? Are you scared of talking to them? Are you afraid of public conversation in general?

Don't say all.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:43 pm

Condunum wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Good argument

Here, let me give you the argument she is failing to give out of aggravation. I assume that is your issue at this moment, Nana.

Slut, like any other word, holds no intrinsic value. Literally none. It does, however have definitions, and when coupled with other words, the context of the phrase or sentence determines what the word means. "She's a slut!" Is rather clear, in that it's evident that slut is an adjective to describe this woman. Slut is a negative adjective in this sense, as it's intent is to degrade the image of the woman it's being shouted at. It is, in this case, slut-shaming, because the entire purpose of the word is to warp outside opinions of this woman.

Yes I agree intent and context matters
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm

Arkolon wrote:>implying we're all virgins

>which we are ;_;


Don't lump me in with you.


Anyway if someone wants to tell me I'm a slut, and they have before time and again, fuck it. I'm getting laid more often than they are. And indeed, 99% of the time I'm getting laid a hell of a lot more often than the folks bitching at me.

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Why not?

Because I'm shy.


Oh for fuck's sake. talk to a fucking therapist if it's serious, grow a damn spine if it's not, maybe stop thinking about fucking every girl you meet and talk to them normally.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72161
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Galloism wrote:So she slut shamed you once.

Look, criticizing whether or not you have a boyfriend by calling you a "stupid American slut" is slut-shaming. Whether the person is a relative or a nanogenarian doesn't factor into it. If its not slut shaming for her to call you a "stupid American slut", then you wouldn't know slut shaming if it performed a lap dance in your bedroom.

Also known as #3.

So what you're saying is intent doesn't matter because se used a certain word. Yeah, no.

Her intent is clear, by your own words.

She intended to guilt or shame you into changing your behavior by calling you a "stupid American slut" mostly because she did not like your clothing choice or that you had a boyfriend, by your own words. That's pretty textbook slut shaming.

Here.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming

It's exactly the definition.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm

Condunum wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Good argument

Here, let me give you the argument she is failing to give out of aggravation. I assume that is your issue at this moment, Nana.

Slut, like any other word, holds no intrinsic value. Literally none. It does, however have definitions, and when coupled with other words, the context of the phrase or sentence determines what the word means. "She's a slut!" Is rather clear, in that it's evident that slut is an adjective to describe this woman. Slut is a negative adjective in this sense, as it's intent is to degrade the image of the woman it's being shouted at. It is, in this case, slut-shaming, because the entire purpose of the word is to warp outside opinions of this woman.


I have no idea why she's not understanding this. How many ways must it be explained? Gods.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Temujinn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1545
Founded: Jan 06, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Temujinn » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm

Grenartia wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
I'm not fucking property of anybody.

My parents can take that to their graves.


My mother was at least intelligent enough to realize that I was not her property. Her outlook was more or less that she was my guide, and not my owner. If I have kids, if I'm even half the parent she was, I'll consider my parenthood a success.

The Flood wrote:Why don't we quit shaming thieves and graffiti artists while we're at it, hmm? Let's just quit telling people who do immoral things that they are doing immoral things! ANARCHY!


Thing is, theft and vandalism inherently infringe on other people's rights without informed consent, and are thus immoral. Not so with casual sex. Try again.

Temujinn wrote:Need a tissue?
1. Perhaps you might ought to sit down and try some more introspection.
Moving post though, very moving.
2. I bet youre really tough and have a large penis too.


1. I've done all the introspection I need.
2. Ad hominem. If you can't defend your position, and have to resort to insulting me, perhaps you should reconsider your position.

I said you were tough and had a big penis...these arent insults.
You seem confused.
Last edited by Temujinn on Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I hate you.
Yes, I do mean you.
Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:44 pm

Temujinn wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Then... Get sexually unfrustrated.

Is there something impeding you from getting a girl/man/inbetween?



Eeeeh, that's more of a symptom of actual teenage development and a stereotype of teenagers. They "rebel" if their parents don't agree with what their teenagers are doing, which is probably a given in authoritarian families.

Teenagers are in a phase of life where they look for their own identity, and they do that by searching for peer groups, which is why sometimes cliques form. Cliques are, however, also a stereotype of teenagers. Sometimes, a social group is just a social group.


This answer ignore the neurological effects on behavior, specifically brain plasticity or "white matter" which is more abundant in adolescents than in adults, adults have more grey matter.

This plasticity makes adolescents more prone to quick thinking, and less capable of judgement based decisions.

This is also often associated with the high level of sexual activity in adolescents. It doesnt imply that all adolescent decisions are bad, merely that they are wired to make snap decisions. As the brain develops this changes.

Yeah, I dont bluff.


... So?

What does that have to do with the activity of looking for a social group?

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Silence of Night wrote:Try a man then, they're just as fun.

Thanks, but I just don't graze on that side of the fence, if you know what I mean.

To each their own.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:Because I'm shy.


"Shy" could mean a number of things.

Are you afraid of rejection? Are you scared of talking to them? Are you afraid of public conversation in general?

Don't say all.

Darnit. "All" was going to be my answer.

Although my "in general" conversation skills have gotten better as of late, so just the first two.
fnord

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Disserbia wrote:So what you're saying is intent doesn't matter because se used a certain word. Yeah, no.

No, intent matters, and the intent in calling you a "stupid American slut" for having a boyfriend is pretty fucking clear. What doesn't matter is whether the person saying it is related to you or their age.

Yeah it's clear, she wanted me to act respectfully at church she did not care outside of the church setting. Ergo not slut shaming, just a rude way of telling me my behavior was inappropriate in that context.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Sedikal
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9176
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sedikal » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Why not?

Because I'm shy.

It's not that hard to overcome. Just find something to talk about and then let it flow natuarly.
Nice Little Quotes
“Kindness is the golden chain by which society is bound together.”
-Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

Yet human intelligence has another force, too: the sense of urgency that gives human smarts their drive. Perhaps our intelligence is not just ended by our mortality; to a great degree, it is our mortality.
-Adam Gopnik

Fighting for peace, is like fucking for chastity
-Stephen King


Proud Member of the New Democrats in the NSG Senate
Political Compass of Sedikal
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS!

Turchynov/Yatsenyuk
Russia Out Of Crimea

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Then... Get sexually unfrustrated.

Is there something impeding you from getting a girl/man/inbetween?

I can't talk to girls.

I used to have that problem. Don't worry, just met some guys that can help you get over your fear and then hopefully you can overcome it.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Disserbia wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Slut shaming is broad. The other one is harassment, also included in slut shaming. I don't understand the need for distinctions here. Whether or not it causes someone to kill themselves, it is still reprehensible. Do you understandable that?

Intent matters is the point. One is malicious one is ignorance. Those two things are not the same.


I quit. Wallow in this, whatever, I don't care. Its been explained to your more than once and you refuse to understand.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Autismiah
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Feb 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Autismiah » Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:46 pm

I don't personally care if a woman decides to devalue herself, but I don't find the traits of promiscuity and arbitrariness as attractive. I also don't think such a display of unfaithfulness is appealing. So yes, I do value virginity. It shows control, too.
Last edited by Autismiah on Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: 3.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.51

If you're in the green, shame on you.

I'm a hybrid between a reactionary, a classical conservative and a Mussolini-fascist. I believe in regulated capitalism and social hierarchy. I am defiantly against multiculturalism and the destruction of western traditions.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Escalia, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Google [Bot], Greater Qwerty, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Rary, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads