Creationism vs. Evolution

[Soldati Senza Confini]

What is the average weight of a human baby?

What the fuck do human babies have to do with something that happened millions of years ago while the human race is barely hundreds of thousands of years old?!

Just... Please tell me, are you on drugs or something?

[Dragonisia]

Dragonosia, what are you arguing for?

The non-linear flow of time from the big bang.

[Blasveck]

I don't....
Wha...

Exactly.

Hell, if we go by some theories there are some parts of the mecahnizations of this universe we can't even see yet.. multiple dimensions out of the basic 4. Yet we assume we have all the answers now.

Are we arguing about multi-dimensions now?

How does ID fit into this again?

[Anachronous Rex]

Oh my god... you have idea what you're talking about...

You watched walking with prehistoric beasts, didn't you? And now you're an expert on earth history?

The Carboniferous was not "just after plant life arrived."

As stated previously, the extinction that killed the dinosaurs killed everything over 22 pounds. Land and sea. What magical force makes your impact different.

Also: elephants.

What is the average weight of a human baby?

Probably about 7 pounds, but I've never known a baby that can live on its own. And, of course, a baby elephant weighs 250 lb.

[Dragonisia]

What is the average weight of a human baby?

What the fuck do human babies have to do with something that happened millions of years ago while the human race is barely hundreds of thousands of years old?!

Just... Please tell me, are you on drugs or something?

Someone was arguing 22 lb extinction weights during exinction events. I'm just pointing out there are human beings below that weight level.

[Seperates]

Hell, most archeology is still for the most part based on relative dating systems using similar features of objects and their layers in situ (where they were found originally). And for the most part we've found that radio-metric dating is unnessecery as it normally confirms relative dating methods (if the archaeological team was being precise with a large amount of data, smaller data pools generally were overturned just because there weren't enough objects to actually figure out the relative placement within the timeline.)

That all of those methods still rely on a unifying feature. Our perception of the progression of time as it is within our lifetime. There is the potentiality with whatever drove the origination of the universe that in the universe's expansion time flowed at different rates at different points due to the amount of energy involved.

Perhaps, but there is no logical reason to ASSUME that. The key is that yes, time is relative, Einstein proved that. However, time is only relative for objects which are moving at vastly different speeds. Assuming that the Earth was formed at approximately the same velocity, all the relative radioactive aspects of the Earth should be relative equal to each other. And if time is experienced differently, then it is likely that the entire solar system, nay, the entire Galaxy experienced the same difference in the flow of time, making the matter inconsequential, because it would affect the energy of everything equally. Basically, no matter the relative flow of time, the age of Earth is approximately 6 billion revolutions around the Sun. Perhaps it was 'faster' than our relative flow of time, but it is irrelevant to the matter at hand, because it was all experienced simultaneously.

[Quandarm]

There's this huge issue where a test is given and, no matter how poorly you understand the material, you're forced to move on. That's the issue that needs solved, but it's nearly impossible.

Have you seem the TED talks on education? We need it to be more personalized. We use a "factory line" system, built during the 1800s. It needs to change.

Can you imagine the COST of that? While it's important they complain about not having enough money in education now. I can't even imagine the screaming for something on this level.

[With Teeth]

Oh my god... you have idea what you're talking about...

You watched walking with prehistoric beasts, didn't you? And now you're an expert on earth history?

The Carboniferous was not "just after plant life arrived."

As stated previously, the extinction that killed the dinosaurs killed everything over 22 pounds. Land and sea. What magical force makes your impact different.

Also: elephants.

What is the average weight of a human baby?

Objection, your honor...relevance to an era of history when humans didn't even exist?

[Dragonisia]

That all of those methods still rely on a unifying feature. Our perception of the progression of time as it is within our lifetime. There is the potentiality with whatever drove the origination of the universe that in the universe's expansion time flowed at different rates at different points due to the amount of energy involved.

Perhaps, but there is no logical reason to ASSUME that. The key is that yes, time is relative, Einstein proved that. However, time is only relative for objects which are moving at vastly different speeds. Assuming that the Earth was formed at approximately the same velocity, all the relative radioactive aspects of the Earth should be relative equal to each other. And if time is experienced differently, then it is likely that the entire solar system, nay, the entire Galaxy experienced the same difference in the flow of time, making the matter inconsequential, because it would affect the energy of everything equally. Basically, no matter the relative flow of time, the age of Earth is approximately 6 billion revolutions around the Sun. Perhaps it was 'faster' than our relative flow of time, but it is irrelevant to the matter at hand, because it was all experienced simultaneously.

There is no reason to assume the contrary either, but all of our science is based on that assumption because we simply observed it happening now. If everything in science were pretexted with the simple were "According to our perception.." then proceeds with how it is perceived to be, it would be much more accurate.

[With Teeth]

What the fuck do human babies have to do with something that happened millions of years ago while the human race is barely hundreds of thousands of years old?!

Just... Please tell me, are you on drugs or something?

Someone was arguing 22 lb extinction weights during exinction events. I'm just pointing out there are human beings below that weight level.

Tell us, is water wet?

[Blasveck]

Guys, he's either Alex Jones, or doing some major stuff.
No one is this insane.

[Need a Name]

Dragonosia, what are you arguing for?

The non-linear flow of time from the big bang.

[Dragonisia]

Someone was arguing 22 lb extinction weights during exinction events. I'm just pointing out there are human beings below that weight level.

Tell us, is water wet?

According to our definitions of wet, it sure seems wet.

[Anachronous Rex]

You think massive mounds of limestone happen overnight?

Possibly.. if you compressed time enough relative to our own perception of it, it could happen easily.

Limestone is made of living things. It is literally compressed corpses.

Now if time can "speed up" and living things live and die faster as a result of it, in what sense has time changed at all as far as they are concerned?

[Blasveck]

Have you seem the TED talks on education? We need it to be more personalized. We use a "factory line" system, built during the 1800s. It needs to change.

Can you imagine the COST of that? While it's important they complain about not having enough money in education now. I can't even imagine the screaming for something on this level.

I know it's probably going to be costly. But we've got to find something better. Or we're costing our future.

[Anachronous Rex]

What the fuck do human babies have to do with something that happened millions of years ago while the human race is barely hundreds of thousands of years old?!

Just... Please tell me, are you on drugs or something?

Someone was arguing 22 lb extinction weights during exinction events. I'm just pointing out there are human beings below that weight level.

No human being who can take care of itself.

By that logic T-Rex should still be alive.

[With Teeth]

Tell us, is water wet?

According to our definitions of wet, it sure seems wet.

Genius.

[Dragonisia]

Possibly.. if you compressed time enough relative to our own perception of it, it could happen easily.

Limestone is made of living things. It is literally compressed corpses.

Now if time can "speed up" and living things live and die faster as a result of it, in what sense has time changed at all as far as they are concerned?

They may not perceive the deviation until something around them is unaffected by the same exact change. Our observations are also localized to within this heliosphere and the effects of our sun, gravity has an impact on time. That's why satellites have to be corrected in earth orbit. And that is part of my point. If time has altered before we were able to perceive its alterations, then our measurements could be vastly off.. in either direction.

To claim to know, when evidence of past events is unknowable, is claiming to know the unknowable, and therefore.. illogical and hardly scientific.

[Blasveck]

According to our definitions of wet, it sure seems wet.

Genius.

Call the presses! We've got the next Einstein!

[Need a Name]

According to our definitions of wet, it sure seems wet.

Genius.

Is it just me or is over thinking things?

[Blasveck]

Limestone is made of living things. It is literally compressed corpses.

Now if time can "speed up" and living things live and die faster as a result of it, in what sense has time changed at all as far as they are concerned?

They may not perceive the deviation until something around them is unaffected by the same exact change. Our observations are also localized to within this heliosphere and the effects of our sun, gravity has an impact on time. That's why satellites have to be corrected in earth orbit. And that is part of my point. If time has altered before we were able to perceive its alterations, then our measurements could be vastly off.. in either direction.

So, to summarize, you believe that a meteor caused the flood because our perceptions of time are relative?

Shoot me

[Quandarm]

I know it's probably going to be costly. But we've got to find something better. Or we're costing our future.

The issue is that our current system is so backwards and broken that I'm not sure I want the current heads of these systems running a new, more expensive version.

[Blasveck]

Genius.

Is it just me or is over thinking things?

Over thinking is an understatement

[Need a Name]

Is it just me or is over thinking things?

Over thinking is an understatement

Is there a better word?

[Anachronous Rex]

Limestone is made of living things. It is literally compressed corpses.

Now if time can "speed up" and living things live and die faster as a result of it, in what sense has time changed at all as far as they are concerned?

They may not perceive the deviation until something around them is unaffected by the same exact change. Our observations are also localized to within this heliosphere and the effects of our sun, gravity has an impact on time. That's why satellites have to be corrected in earth orbit. And that is part of my point. If time has altered before we were able to perceive its alterations, then our measurements could be vastly off.. in either direction.

To claim to know, when evidence of past events is unknowable, is claiming to know the unknowable, and therefore.. illogical.

You see, what you've done. Is pointed to something that Scientists know very well, and have accounted for, and presented it as though it were baffling to them.

And added pointless jargon.

And for the record, no human being has ever "perceived the deviation." Our instruments have.