NATION

PASSWORD

George Zimmerman's Trial/acquittal/DOJ charges

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:58 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Choronzon wrote:Which he did.

And then Zimmerman attacked him.


Martin has Zero wounds.
I'm calling bullshit.


http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-martins-f ... 29832.html
Martin said Zimmerman was behind him and she heard Martin ask: "What are you following me for?" She then heard what sounded like Martin's phone earpiece drop into the grass and she heard him say, "Get off! Get off!" The phone then went dead, she said.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:59 am

Choronzon wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Because I don't agree with you?

People disagree with me all the time without being racist. You should learn that skill.


What have I said in the thread that was racist?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:59 am

The UK in Exile wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Martin has Zero wounds.
I'm calling bullshit.


http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-martins-f ... 29832.html
Martin said Zimmerman was behind him and she heard Martin ask: "What are you following me for?" She then heard what sounded like Martin's phone earpiece drop into the grass and she heard him say, "Get off! Get off!" The phone then went dead, she said.


Zero Wounds.
Bullshit.
People can lie, and her testimony doesn't fit the facts.
Why did the phone go dead? Seems like a movie scene and not reality.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:


Zero Wounds.
Bullshit.
People can lie, and her testimony doesn't fit the facts.


No apparent wounds. grappling tends not to leave bruises.

lets just say her testimony is consistent with the facts.
Last edited by The UK in Exile on Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 pm

Choronzon wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Unlike you, I've actually been to the South. Hell, I've lived there all my life.

I always assumed you were.

Guess why?


I wonder what would've happened if you said that to a Jew. Or a black guy.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:


Zero Wounds.
Bullshit.
People can lie, and her testimony doesn't fit the facts.
Why did the phone go dead?


You said earlier that laying a hand on one justified self-defence. Do you stand by that?

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:02 pm

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Choronzon wrote:People disagree with me all the time without being racist. You should learn that skill.


What have I said in the thread that was racist?

Its your whole attitude and outlook towards the whole thing. Your insistence on focusing on Trayvon's past while ignoring Zimmerman's history of violent crime. This burning need to attack the intelligence and physical appearance of a black witness. And your total willingness to buy every lie that slithers out of Zimmerman's mouth.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:02 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Zero Wounds.
Bullshit.
People can lie, and her testimony doesn't fit the facts.
Why did the phone go dead?


You said earlier that laying a hand on one justified self-defence. Do you stand by that?


With some caveats, broadly speaking, yes.
Merely being touched isn't sufficient. There would have to be an attempt to injure or restrain. That could include a hand on the shoulder (From behind) if it were placed firmly enough, since that position places you in a very weakened situation.
(A tactic used by muggers is to place their hand on your shoulder from behind, and pull. Hard. Doing this on an incline or hill can and often will result in the person falling backward and cracking their head or being stunned momentarily.)
We have absolutely no idea what happened here if something like that (A non-wound leaving attack) took place.
So to say "Well zimmerman clearly did X." is just fucking ridiculous.
It's people desperately trying to justify their racism and making shit up to make Zimmerman a murderer.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:05 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:04 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You said earlier that laying a hand on one justified self-defence. Do you stand by that?


With some caveats, broadly speaking, yes.
Merely being touched isn't sufficient. There would have to be an attempt to injure or restrain. That could include a hand on the shoulder (From behind) if it were placed firmly enough, since that position places you in a very weakened situation.


and also doesn't leave a mark. which is somewhat inconsistent with your position.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Conservative Idealism
Diplomat
 
Posts: 647
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative Idealism » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:04 pm

I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:04 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You said earlier that laying a hand on one justified self-defence. Do you stand by that?


With some caveats, broadly speaking, yes.
Merely being touched isn't sufficient. There would have to be an attempt to injure or restrain.


And Zimmerman grabbing the kids hoodie would fit your requirement for an attempt to restrain, not cause injury and fit with the testimony of "Get off! Get off!".

It's also quite a logical sequence of events.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:04 pm

Conservative Idealism wrote:I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.


fictional and beloved of conservatives.

seems apt.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:05 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
With some caveats, broadly speaking, yes.
Merely being touched isn't sufficient. There would have to be an attempt to injure or restrain.


And Zimmerman grabbing the kids hoodie would fit your requirement for an attempt to restrain, not cause injury and fit with the testimony of "Get off! Get off!".

It's also quite a logical sequence of events.

We have absolutely no idea what happened here if something like that (A non-wound leaving attack) took place.
So to say "Well zimmerman clearly did X." is just fucking ridiculous.
It's people desperately trying to justify their racism and making shit up to make Zimmerman a murderer.

There is no evidence beyond people just making shit up that that happened. It's for racist motivations that they do so.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Verdance
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Dec 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Verdance » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:05 pm

Choronzon wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
What have I said in the thread that was racist?

Its your whole attitude and outlook towards the whole thing. Your insistence on focusing on Trayvon's past while ignoring Zimmerman's history of violent crime. This burning need to attack the intelligence and physical appearance of a black witness. And your total willingness to buy every lie that slithers out of Zimmerman's mouth.


Link his quotes to us and explain how they're racist. Come on, now, don't be shy. You've obviously got the upper hand in this struggle between good and evil, black and white, blue and red, subway and quiznos, japan and china, NSA and Snowden.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:05 pm

Electroconvulsive Glee wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Non legal, because being cross examined sucks. Those law talking guys are very good at making everyone look like a liar.

But I do not think Zimmerman is morally in the clear I think his actions were clearly morally wrong so I am not certain you were addressing me. who here is saying that he is a hero ?

I think it is unfair to ask for a nonlegal reasons as to why legal action should not be filed.
Alan Dershowitz, has presented his opinion that the affidavit was lacking for Probable cause, I don't necessarily think he was right he is a little more pro defendant than even I am.

What about not seeking a "stand your ground" hearing? (see my amended post)

Also, you did not address any of the "add in" factors.

I am unclear as to why (alleged) legal reasons justify non-legal conclusions in favor of Mr. Zimmerman. I am even more unclear as to how legal reasons are relevant to questions to which people have repeatedly asserted the actual law (and evidence) is irrelevant. Finally, even if strategy advises against testifying, how is that itself proof that out-of-court, self-serving stories of dubious credibility?


I am perhaps confused on this question, are you asking for nonlegal justifications as to why Zimmerman pursued a certain legal strategy ?
Or are you asking for nonlegal moral defense of his actions ?

I don't know if the former is answerable, and I wont give him the later because he deserve none.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:05 pm

Conservative Idealism wrote:I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.

yeah the poor thing.

and all he did was shoot to death a teenager coming home from the store.

life is so unfair.
whatever

User avatar
Electroconvulsive Glee
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 496
Founded: Apr 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Electroconvulsive Glee » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:06 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Electroconvulsive Glee wrote:Assuming one is in a situation described your first sentence is true, you do realize that is not necessarily -- at least as matter of law -- "more than enough to justify" use of deadly force, right?

Moreover, having "no idea" how one is being injured is a far cry from reasonably believing one faces imminent death or great bodily harm. And nothing you post says one in that situation would reasonably believe it was necessary to use deadly force to defend oneself. Then there is the question of whether you provoked the attack or fight or were engaged in criminal activity.


If your head is being slammed into the concrete repeatedly, it's entirely reasonable to think it's necessary to use deadly force to stop that happening.
Had the attacks continued, it's possible that Zimmerman could have suffered brain damage or died.
Brain Damage would, I think, be enough bodily harm to justify deadly force.
It's enough of a consideration to believe that someone can be in genuine fear for their life at that moment.

Um, try actually addressing what I posted and not jumbling up independent matters into gobbledly-gook.

But . . . among other things . . .

"No idea" as to extent of injury ≠ fear for life

Possibility of harm or death "if attacks continue[]" ≠ necessary to use deadly force to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm

Genuine fear for your life ≠ reasonable belief that deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm

And these are not the only questions relevant to whether the use of deadly force was justified.
Some of the greatest satire ever, by my hero, Hammurab
  • Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations, Bk. XIII, No. LXIX: "They can all just fuck off. I'm sick of this shit and I'm going home."
  • Butthole Surfers: "I hate cough syrup, don't you?"
  • Socrates in Plato's Mentītus: "I can explain it to you, Dudious, but how can I understand it for you? Hmm?"

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:06 pm

The Verdance wrote:
Choronzon wrote:Its your whole attitude and outlook towards the whole thing. Your insistence on focusing on Trayvon's past while ignoring Zimmerman's history of violent crime. This burning need to attack the intelligence and physical appearance of a black witness. And your total willingness to buy every lie that slithers out of Zimmerman's mouth.


Link his quotes to us and explain how they're racist. Come on, now, don't be shy. You've obviously got the upper hand in this struggle between good and evil, black and white, blue and red, subway and quiznos, japan and china, NSA and Snowden.

What part of its outlook and attitude is hard for you to grasp?

Racists very rarely walk around screaming how they hate black people. The real world is usually not that simple.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:06 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
And Zimmerman grabbing the kids hoodie would fit your requirement for an attempt to restrain, not cause injury and fit with the testimony of "Get off! Get off!".

It's also quite a logical sequence of events.

We have absolutely no idea what happened here if something like that (A non-wound leaving attack) took place.
So to say "Well zimmerman clearly did X." is just fucking ridiculous.
It's people desperately trying to justify their racism and making shit up to make Zimmerman a murderer.


we do, we have the testimony of the girl on the phone, which you dismissed because martin has zero injuries, injuries you don't believe are nessecary to justify self-defence.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:06 pm

Conservative Idealism wrote:I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.

I have no tears for murderers.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:08 pm

Choronzon wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
What have I said in the thread that was racist?

Its your whole attitude and outlook towards the whole thing. Your insistence on focusing on Trayvon's past while ignoring Zimmerman's history of violent crime. This burning need to attack the intelligence and physical appearance of a black witness. And your total willingness to buy every lie that slithers out of Zimmerman's mouth.


First of all, have you seen that woman? She gives black people a bad name. She is the living embodiment of black stereotypes. She should be on South Park, not testifying on the witness stand.
Focusing on Trayvon Martin's past does not make me a racist. The fact that he was a little teenage punk who was a future Black Power recruit, not the sweet, 12 year old little boy, the media wants to show pictures of, set off alarms in my mind.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:08 pm

Conservative Idealism wrote:I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.


"The Book of George."

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:09 pm

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Choronzon wrote:Its your whole attitude and outlook towards the whole thing. Your insistence on focusing on Trayvon's past while ignoring Zimmerman's history of violent crime. This burning need to attack the intelligence and physical appearance of a black witness. And your total willingness to buy every lie that slithers out of Zimmerman's mouth.


First of all, have you seen that woman? She gives black people a bad name. She is the living embodiment of black stereotypes. She should be on South Park, not testifying on the witness stand.

Nothing racist here. Nope.
Focusing on Trayvon Martin's past does not make me a racist. The fact that he was a little teenage punk who was a future Black Power recruit,

Which you have nothing to base this off of, other than the fact that he was black.

Yeah, you're totally not a racist.

12 year old little boy, the media wants to show pictures of, set off alarms in my mind.

No, what set off alarms in your mind was that he was black.
Last edited by Choronzon on Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:09 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Conservative Idealism wrote:I've given up all hope for Florida. They stack the odds against a guy who killed in self-defense, subject him to media torture, and will make him getting out of this look illegitimate, and that's just for this trial. Considering their recent Internet ban, poor judicial system and poorer bureaucratic organization, they officially rank below California in terms of meaningfulness...and that's saying something.

If this Zimmerman guy were to write a book, it would look near-identical to the Book of Job with all of the tribulations he's endured.

I have no tears for murderers.


If Martin had killed Zimmerman, would that be murder?

User avatar
Electroconvulsive Glee
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 496
Founded: Apr 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Electroconvulsive Glee » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:10 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You said earlier that laying a hand on one justified self-defence. Do you stand by that?


With some caveats, broadly speaking, yes.
Merely being touched isn't sufficient. There would have to be an attempt to injure or restrain. That could include a hand on the shoulder (From behind) if it were placed firmly enough, since that position places you in a very weakened situation.
(A tactic used by muggers is to place their hand on your shoulder from behind, and pull. Hard. Doing this on an incline or hill can and often will result in the person falling backward and cracking their head or being stunned momentarily.)

Are these opinions (and similar statements about what constitutes "starting fight," justifies throwing a punch, or justifies deadly force) about the law? Ethics?

Regardless, on what are they based?

Ostroeuropa wrote: We have absolutely no idea what happened here if something like that (A non-wound leaving attack) took place.
So to say "Well zimmerman clearly did X." is just fucking ridiculous.
It's people desperately trying to justify their racism and making shit up to make Zimmerman a murderer.

And yet you freely opine about what happened and have said some things clearly did or did not happen.

EDIT: Fixed quote error.
Last edited by Electroconvulsive Glee on Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Some of the greatest satire ever, by my hero, Hammurab
  • Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations, Bk. XIII, No. LXIX: "They can all just fuck off. I'm sick of this shit and I'm going home."
  • Butthole Surfers: "I hate cough syrup, don't you?"
  • Socrates in Plato's Mentītus: "I can explain it to you, Dudious, but how can I understand it for you? Hmm?"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads